Literature DB >> 34043144

A semi-automatic seed point-based method for separation of individual vertebrae in 3D surface meshes: a proof of principle study.

Peter A J Pijpker1, Tim S Oosterhuis2, Max J H Witjes3, Chris Faber4, Peter M A van Ooijen5, Jiří Kosinka6, Jos M A Kuijlen7, Rob J M Groen7, Joep Kraeima3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this paper is to present and validate a new semi-automated 3D surface mesh segmentation approach that optimizes the laborious individual human vertebrae separation in the spinal virtual surgical planning workflow and make a direct accuracy and segmentation time comparison with current standard segmentation method.
METHODS: The proposed semi-automatic method uses the 3D bone surface derived from CT image data for seed point-based 3D mesh partitioning. The accuracy of the proposed method was evaluated on a representative patient dataset. In addition, the influence of the number of used seed points was studied. The investigators analyzed whether there was a reduction in segmentation time when compared to manual segmentation. Surface-to-surface accuracy measurements were applied to assess the concordance with the manual segmentation.
RESULTS: The results demonstrated a statically significant reduction in segmentation time, while maintaining a high accuracy compared to the manual segmentation. A considerably smaller error was found when increasing the number of seed points. Anatomical regions that include articulating areas tend to show the highest errors, while the posterior laminar surface yielded an almost negligible error.
CONCLUSION: A novel seed point initiated surface based segmentation method for the laborious individual human vertebrae separation was presented. This proof-of-principle study demonstrated the accuracy of the proposed method on a clinical CT image dataset and its feasibility for spinal virtual surgical planning applications.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D surface segmentation; Computed tomography; Seed point segmentation; Segmentation; Spine; Vertebra; Virtual surgical planning (VSP)

Year:  2021        PMID: 34043144     DOI: 10.1007/s11548-021-02407-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg        ISSN: 1861-6410            Impact factor:   2.924


  13 in total

Review 1.  The principles of bony spinal fusion.

Authors:  H H Kaufman; E Jones
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 4.654

2.  Posterior stabilization of subaxial cervical spine trauma: indications and techniques.

Authors:  Frank Kandziora; Robert Pflugmacher; Matti Scholz; Klaus Schnake; Michael Putzier; Cyrus Khodadadyan-Klostermann; Norbert P Haas
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 2.586

3.  Automatic segmentation of the mandible from computed tomography scans for 3D virtual surgical planning using the convolutional neural network.

Authors:  Bingjiang Qiu; Jiapan Guo; Joep Kraeima; Haye H Glas; Ronald J H Borra; Max J H Witjes; Peter M A van Ooijen
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2019-09-05       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Preliminary application of a multi-level 3D printing drill guide template for pedicle screw placement in severe and rigid scoliosis.

Authors:  Kun Liu; Qiang Zhang; Xin Li; Changsong Zhao; Xuemin Quan; Rugang Zhao; Zongfeng Chen; Yansheng Li
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-12-27       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 5.  Measuring and Establishing the Accuracy and Reproducibility of 3D Printed Medical Models.

Authors:  Elizabeth George; Peter Liacouras; Frank J Rybicki; Dimitrios Mitsouras
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2017-08-11       Impact factor: 5.333

6.  Iterative fully convolutional neural networks for automatic vertebra segmentation and identification.

Authors:  Nikolas Lessmann; Bram van Ginneken; Pim A de Jong; Ivana Išgum
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2019-02-12       Impact factor: 8.545

7.  Pedicle screw insertion with patient-specific 3D-printed guides based on low-dose CT scan is more accurate than free-hand technique in spine deformity patients: a prospective, randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Riccardo Cecchinato; Pedro Berjano; Alberto Zerbi; Marco Damilano; Andrea Redaelli; Claudio Lamartina
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-04-20       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Comparison and evaluation of methods for liver segmentation from CT datasets.

Authors:  Tobias Heimann; Bram van Ginneken; Martin A Styner; Yulia Arzhaeva; Volker Aurich; Christian Bauer; Andreas Beck; Christoph Becker; Reinhard Beichel; György Bekes; Fernando Bello; Gerd Binnig; Horst Bischof; Alexander Bornik; Peter M M Cashman; Ying Chi; Andrés Cordova; Benoit M Dawant; Márta Fidrich; Jacob D Furst; Daisuke Furukawa; Lars Grenacher; Joachim Hornegger; Dagmar Kainmüller; Richard I Kitney; Hidefumi Kobatake; Hans Lamecker; Thomas Lange; Jeongjin Lee; Brian Lennon; Rui Li; Senhu Li; Hans-Peter Meinzer; Gábor Nemeth; Daniela S Raicu; Anne-Mareike Rau; Eva M van Rikxoort; Mikaël Rousson; László Rusko; Kinda A Saddi; Günter Schmidt; Dieter Seghers; Akinobu Shimizu; Pieter Slagmolen; Erich Sorantin; Grzegorz Soza; Ruchaneewan Susomboon; Jonathan M Waite; Andreas Wimmer; Ivo Wolf
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2009-02-10       Impact factor: 10.048

9.  CT image segmentation of bone for medical additive manufacturing using a convolutional neural network.

Authors:  Jordi Minnema; Maureen van Eijnatten; Wouter Kouw; Faruk Diblen; Adriënne Mendrik; Jan Wolff
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 4.589

10.  The impact of manual threshold selection in medical additive manufacturing.

Authors:  Maureen van Eijnatten; Juha Koivisto; Kalle Karhu; Tymour Forouzanfar; Jan Wolff
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2016-10-07       Impact factor: 2.924

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.