Dan Xue1, Tracy Tabib2, Christina Morse2, Yi Yang3, Robyn T Domsic2, Dinesh Khanna4, Robert Lafyatis2. 1. University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, and Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China. 2. University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 3. Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China. 4. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: In this study, we sought a comprehensive understanding of myeloid cell types driving fibrosis in diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis (dcSSc) skin. METHODS: We analyzed the transcriptomes of 2,465 myeloid cells from skin biopsy specimens from 12 dcSSc patients and 10 healthy control subjects using single-cell RNA sequencing. Monocyte-derived dendritic cells (mo-DCs) were assessed using immunohistochemical staining and immunofluorescence analyses targeting ficolin-1 (FCN-1). RESULTS: A t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding analysis of single-cell transcriptome data revealed 12 myeloid cell clusters, 9 of which paralleled previously described healthy control macrophage/DC clusters, and 3 of which were dcSSc-specific myeloid cell clusters. One SSc-associated macrophage cluster, highly expressing Fcγ receptor IIIA, was suggested on pseudotime analysis to be derived from normal CCR1+ and MARCO+ macrophages. A second SSc-associated myeloid population highly expressed monocyte markers FCN-1, epiregulin, S100A8, and S100A9, but was closely related to type 2 conventional DCs on pseudotime analysis and identified as mo-DCs. Mo-DCs were associated with more severe skin disease. Proliferating macrophages and plasmacytoid DCs were detected almost exclusively in dcSSc skin, the latter clustering with B cells and apparently derived from lymphoid progenitors. CONCLUSION: Transcriptional signatures in these and other myeloid populations indicate innate immune system activation, possibly through Toll-like receptors and highly up-regulated chemokines. However, the appearance and activation of myeloid cells varies between patients, indicating potential differences in the underlying pathogenesis and/or temporal disease activity in dcSSc.
OBJECTIVE: In this study, we sought a comprehensive understanding of myeloid cell types driving fibrosis in diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis (dcSSc) skin. METHODS: We analyzed the transcriptomes of 2,465 myeloid cells from skin biopsy specimens from 12 dcSSc patients and 10 healthy control subjects using single-cell RNA sequencing. Monocyte-derived dendritic cells (mo-DCs) were assessed using immunohistochemical staining and immunofluorescence analyses targeting ficolin-1 (FCN-1). RESULTS: A t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding analysis of single-cell transcriptome data revealed 12 myeloid cell clusters, 9 of which paralleled previously described healthy control macrophage/DC clusters, and 3 of which were dcSSc-specific myeloid cell clusters. One SSc-associated macrophage cluster, highly expressing Fcγ receptor IIIA, was suggested on pseudotime analysis to be derived from normal CCR1+ and MARCO+ macrophages. A second SSc-associated myeloid population highly expressed monocyte markers FCN-1, epiregulin, S100A8, and S100A9, but was closely related to type 2 conventional DCs on pseudotime analysis and identified as mo-DCs. Mo-DCs were associated with more severe skin disease. Proliferating macrophages and plasmacytoid DCs were detected almost exclusively in dcSSc skin, the latter clustering with B cells and apparently derived from lymphoid progenitors. CONCLUSION: Transcriptional signatures in these and other myeloid populations indicate innate immune system activation, possibly through Toll-like receptors and highly up-regulated chemokines. However, the appearance and activation of myeloid cells varies between patients, indicating potential differences in the underlying pathogenesis and/or temporal disease activity in dcSSc.
Authors: Dinesh Khanna; Christopher P Denton; Angelika Jahreis; Jacob M van Laar; Tracy M Frech; Marina E Anderson; Murray Baron; Lorinda Chung; Gerhard Fierlbeck; Santhanam Lakshminarayanan; Yannick Allanore; Janet E Pope; Gabriela Riemekasten; Virginia Steen; Ulf Müller-Ladner; Robert Lafyatis; Giuseppina Stifano; Helen Spotswood; Haiyin Chen-Harris; Sebastian Dziadek; Alyssa Morimoto; Thierry Sornasse; Jeffrey Siegel; Daniel E Furst Journal: Lancet Date: 2016-05-05 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Allison L Mathes; Romy B Christmann; Giuseppina Stifano; Alsya J Affandi; Timothy R D J Radstake; G Alessandra Farina; Cristina Padilla; Sarah McLaughlin; Robert Lafyatis Journal: Ann Rheum Dis Date: 2013-07-19 Impact factor: 19.103
Authors: Alexandra-Chloé Villani; Rahul Satija; Gary Reynolds; Siranush Sarkizova; Karthik Shekhar; James Fletcher; Morgane Griesbeck; Andrew Butler; Shiwei Zheng; Suzan Lazo; Laura Jardine; David Dixon; Emily Stephenson; Emil Nilsson; Ida Grundberg; David McDonald; Andrew Filby; Weibo Li; Philip L De Jager; Orit Rozenblatt-Rosen; Andrew A Lane; Muzlifah Haniffa; Aviv Regev; Nir Hacohen Journal: Science Date: 2017-04-21 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Brian Skaug; Marka A Lyons; William R Swindell; Gloria A Salazar; Minghua Wu; Tuan M Tran; Julio Charles; Connor P Vershel; Maureen D Mayes; Shervin Assassi Journal: Ann Rheum Dis Date: 2021-12-22 Impact factor: 19.103