Literature DB >> 34040279

Semi-Supervised Multi-Organ Segmentation through Quality Assurance Supervision.

Ho Hin Lee1, Yucheng Tang1, Olivia Tang1, Yuchen Xu1, Yunqiang Chen2, Dashan Gao2, Shizhong Han2, Riqiang Gao1, Michael R Savona2, Richard G Abramson3, Yuankai Huo1, Bennett A Landman1,4.   

Abstract

Human in-the-loop quality assurance (QA) is typically performed after medical image segmentation to ensure that the systems are performing as intended, as well as identifying and excluding outliers. By performing QA on large-scale, previously unlabeled testing data, categorical QA scores (e.g. "successful" versus "unsuccessful") can be generated. Unfortunately, the precious use of resources for human in-the-loop QA scores are not typically reused in medical image machine learning, especially to train a deep neural network for image segmentation. Herein, we perform a pilot study to investigate if the QA labels can be used as supplementary supervision to augment the training process in a semi-supervised fashion. In this paper, we propose a semi-supervised multi-organ segmentation deep neural network consisting of a traditional segmentation model generator and a QA involved discriminator. An existing 3-D abdominal segmentation network is employed, while the pre-trained ResNet-18 network is used as discriminator. A large-scale dataset of 2027 volumes are used to train the generator, whose 2-D montage images and segmentation mask with QA scores are used to train the discriminator. To generate the QA scores, the 2-D montage images were reviewed manually and coded 0 (success), 1 (errors consistent with published performance), and 2 (gross failure). Then, the ResNet-18 network was trained with 1623 montage images in equal distribution of all three code labels and achieved an accuracy 94% for classification predictions with 404 montage images withheld for the test cohort. To assess the performance of using the QA supervision, the discriminator was used as a loss function in a multi-organ segmentation pipeline. The inclusion of QA-loss function boosted performance on the unlabeled test dataset from 714 patients to 951 patients over the baseline model. Additionally, the number of failures decreased from 606 (29.90%) to 402 (19.83%). The contributions of the proposed method are three-fold: We show that (1) the QA scores can be used as a loss function to perform semi-supervised learning for unlabeled data, (2) the well trained discriminator is learnt by QA score rather than traditional "true/false", and (3) the performance of multi-organ segmentation on unlabeled datasets can be fine-tuned with more robust and higher accuracy than the original baseline method. The use of QA-inspired loss functions represents a promising area of future research and may permit tighter integration of supervised and semi-supervised learning.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Abdomen Segmentation; Image Quality; Multi-Organ Segmentation; Semi-Supervised Learning

Year:  2020        PMID: 34040279      PMCID: PMC8148095          DOI: 10.1117/12.2549033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng        ISSN: 0277-786X


  7 in total

1.  Improving Splenomegaly Segmentation by Learning from Heterogeneous Multi-Source Labels.

Authors:  Yucheng Tang; Yuankai Huo; Yunxi Xiong; Hyeonsoo Moon; Albert Assad; Tamara K Moyo; Michael R Savona; Richard Abramson; Bennett A Landman
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2019-03-15

2.  Abdominal multi-organ segmentation with organ-attention networks and statistical fusion.

Authors:  Yan Wang; Yuyin Zhou; Wei Shen; Seyoun Park; Elliot K Fishman; Alan L Yuille
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2019-04-18       Impact factor: 8.545

3.  Retinal image quality assessment using deep learning.

Authors:  Gabriel Tozatto Zago; Rodrigo Varejão Andreão; Bernadette Dorizzi; Evandro Ottoni Teatini Salles
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  2018-10-11       Impact factor: 4.589

4.  Learning normalized inputs for iterative estimation in medical image segmentation.

Authors:  Michal Drozdzal; Gabriel Chartrand; Eugene Vorontsov; Mahsa Shakeri; Lisa Di Jorio; An Tang; Adriana Romero; Yoshua Bengio; Chris Pal; Samuel Kadoury
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2017-11-14       Impact factor: 8.545

5.  Splenomegaly Segmentation on Multi-Modal MRI Using Deep Convolutional Networks.

Authors:  Yuankai Huo; Zhoubing Xu; Shunxing Bao; Camilo Bermudez; Hyeonsoo Moon; Prasanna Parvathaneni; Tamara K Moyo; Michael R Savona; Albert Assad; Richard G Abramson; Bennett A Landman
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2018-11-13       Impact factor: 10.048

6.  Interactive Medical Image Segmentation Using Deep Learning With Image-Specific Fine Tuning.

Authors:  Guotai Wang; Wenqi Li; Maria A Zuluaga; Rosalind Pratt; Premal A Patel; Michael Aertsen; Tom Doel; Anna L David; Jan Deprest; Sebastien Ourselin; Tom Vercauteren
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 10.048

7.  NiftyNet: a deep-learning platform for medical imaging.

Authors:  Eli Gibson; Wenqi Li; Carole Sudre; Lucas Fidon; Dzhoshkun I Shakir; Guotai Wang; Zach Eaton-Rosen; Robert Gray; Tom Doel; Yipeng Hu; Tom Whyntie; Parashkev Nachev; Marc Modat; Dean C Barratt; Sébastien Ourselin; M Jorge Cardoso; Tom Vercauteren
Journal:  Comput Methods Programs Biomed       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 5.428

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.