Literature DB >> 34039419

Interspecific and intraspecific foraging differentiation of neighbouring tropical seabirds.

R E Austin1, F De Pascalis2,3, S C Votier4, J Haakonsson5, J P Y Arnould6, G Ebanks-Petrie5, J Newton7, J Harvey5,8, J A Green2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Social interactions, reproductive demands and intrinsic constraints all influence foraging decisions in animals. Understanding the relative importance of these factors in shaping the way that coexisting species within communities use and partition resources is central to knowledge of ecological and evolutionary processes. However, in marine environments, our understanding of the mechanisms that lead to and allow coexistence is limited, particularly in the tropics.
METHODS: Using simultaneous data from a suite of animal-borne data loggers (GPS, depth recorders, immersion and video), dietary samples and stable isotopes, we investigated interspecific and intraspecific differences in foraging of two closely-related seabird species (the red-footed booby and brown booby) from neighbouring colonies on the Cayman Islands in the Caribbean.
RESULTS: The two species employed notably different foraging strategies, with marked spatial segregation, but limited evidence of interspecific dietary partitioning. The larger-bodied brown booby foraged within neritic waters, with the smaller-bodied red-footed booby travelling further offshore. Almost no sex differences were detected in foraging behaviour of red-footed boobies, while male and female brown boobies differed in their habitat use, foraging characteristics and dietary contributions. We suggest that these behavioural differences may relate to size dimorphism and competition: In the small brown booby population (n < 200 individuals), larger females showed a higher propensity to remain in coastal waters where they experienced kleptoparasitic attacks from magnificent frigatebirds, while smaller males that were never kleptoparasitised travelled further offshore, presumably into habitats with lower kleptoparasitic pressure. In weakly dimorphic red-footed boobies, these differences are less pronounced. Instead, density-dependent pressures on their large population (n > 2000 individuals) and avoidance of kleptoparasitism may be more prevalent in driving movements for both sexes.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results reveal how, in an environment where opportunities for prey diversification are limited, neighbouring seabird species segregate at-sea, while exhibiting differing degrees of sexual differentiation. While the mechanisms underlying observed patterns remain unclear, our data are consistent with the idea that multiple factors involving both conspecifics and heterospecifics, as well as reproductive pressures, may combine to influence foraging differences in these neighbouring tropical species.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Brown booby; Competition; Foraging ecology; Red-footed booby; Resource partitioning

Year:  2021        PMID: 34039419     DOI: 10.1186/s40462-021-00251-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mov Ecol        ISSN: 2051-3933            Impact factor:   3.600


  20 in total

1.  The ecology of individuals: incidence and implications of individual specialization.

Authors:  Daniel I Bolnick; Richard Svanbäck; James A Fordyce; Louie H Yang; Jeremy M Davis; C Darrin Hulsey; Matthew L Forister
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2002-12-11       Impact factor: 3.926

2.  The three-dimensional flight of red-footed boobies: adaptations to foraging in a tropical environment?

Authors:  H Weimerskirch; M Le Corre; Y Ropert-Coudert; A Kato; F Marsac
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2005-01-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Sex-specific foraging behaviour in a seabird with reversed sexual dimorphism: the red-footed booby.

Authors:  Henri Weimerskirch; Matthieu Le Corre; Yan Ropert-Coudert; Akiko Kato; Francis Marsac
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2005-09-30       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Interpolation of animal tracking data in a fluid environment.

Authors:  Yann Tremblay; Scott A Shaffer; Shannon L Fowler; Carey E Kuhn; Birgitte I McDonald; Michael J Weise; Charle-André Bost; Henri Weimerskirch; Daniel E Crocker; Michael E Goebel; Daniel P Costa
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.312

5.  Resource partitioning in ecological communities.

Authors:  T W Schoener
Journal:  Science       Date:  1974-07-05       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Space partitioning without territoriality in gannets.

Authors:  Ewan D Wakefield; Thomas W Bodey; Stuart Bearhop; Jez Blackburn; Kendrew Colhoun; Rachel Davies; Ross G Dwyer; Jonathan A Green; David Grémillet; Andrew L Jackson; Mark J Jessopp; Adam Kane; Rowena H W Langston; Amélie Lescroël; Stuart Murray; Mélanie Le Nuz; Samantha C Patrick; Clara Péron; Louise M Soanes; Sarah Wanless; Stephen C Votier; Keith C Hamer
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  High inter- and intraspecific niche overlap among three sympatrically breeding, closely related seabird species: Generalist foraging as an adaptation to a highly variable environment?

Authors:  Nina Dehnhard; Helen Achurch; Judy Clarke; Loïc N Michel; Colin Southwell; Michael D Sumner; Marcel Eens; Louise Emmerson
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2019-09-06       Impact factor: 5.091

Review 8.  Ecological causes for the evolution of sexual dimorphism: a review of the evidence.

Authors:  R Shine
Journal:  Q Rev Biol       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 4.875

9.  Effects of age and reproductive status on individual foraging site fidelity in a long-lived marine predator.

Authors:  Stephen C Votier; Annette L Fayet; Stuart Bearhop; Thomas W Bodey; Bethany L Clark; James Grecian; Tim Guilford; Keith C Hamer; Jana W E Jeglinski; Greg Morgan; Ewan Wakefield; Samantha C Patrick
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-07-26       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Ecological segregation in space, time and trophic niche of sympatric planktivorous petrels.

Authors:  Joan Navarro; Stephen C Votier; Jacopo Aguzzi; Juan J Chiesa; Manuela G Forero; Richard A Phillips
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-30       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.