R E Austin1, F De Pascalis2,3, S C Votier4, J Haakonsson5, J P Y Arnould6, G Ebanks-Petrie5, J Newton7, J Harvey5,8, J A Green2. 1. School of Environmental Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 3GP, UK. rhiannoneaustin@gmail.com. 2. School of Environmental Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 3GP, UK. 3. Present Address: Department of Environmental Science and Policy, University of Milan, Milan, Italy. 4. The Lyell Centre, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, EH14 4AP, UK. 5. Department of Environment, Cayman Islands Government, George Town, Grand Cayman, KY1-1002, Cayman Islands. 6. School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Deakin University, Burwood, VIC, 3125, Australia. 7. NERC National Environmental Isotope Facility, Scottish Universities Environmental Research Centre, Scottish Enterprise Technology Park, East Kilbride, G75 0QF, UK. 8. Present Address: Guy Harvey Ocean Foundation, George Town, Grand Cayman, KY1-1005, Cayman Islands.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Social interactions, reproductive demands and intrinsic constraints all influence foraging decisions in animals. Understanding the relative importance of these factors in shaping the way that coexisting species within communities use and partition resources is central to knowledge of ecological and evolutionary processes. However, in marine environments, our understanding of the mechanisms that lead to and allow coexistence is limited, particularly in the tropics. METHODS: Using simultaneous data from a suite of animal-borne data loggers (GPS, depth recorders, immersion and video), dietary samples and stable isotopes, we investigated interspecific and intraspecific differences in foraging of two closely-related seabird species (the red-footed booby and brown booby) from neighbouring colonies on the Cayman Islands in the Caribbean. RESULTS: The two species employed notably different foraging strategies, with marked spatial segregation, but limited evidence of interspecific dietary partitioning. The larger-bodied brown booby foraged within neritic waters, with the smaller-bodied red-footed booby travelling further offshore. Almost no sex differences were detected in foraging behaviour of red-footed boobies, while male and female brown boobies differed in their habitat use, foraging characteristics and dietary contributions. We suggest that these behavioural differences may relate to size dimorphism and competition: In the small brown booby population (n < 200 individuals), larger females showed a higher propensity to remain in coastal waters where they experienced kleptoparasitic attacks from magnificent frigatebirds, while smaller males that were never kleptoparasitised travelled further offshore, presumably into habitats with lower kleptoparasitic pressure. In weakly dimorphic red-footed boobies, these differences are less pronounced. Instead, density-dependent pressures on their large population (n > 2000 individuals) and avoidance of kleptoparasitism may be more prevalent in driving movements for both sexes. CONCLUSIONS: Our results reveal how, in an environment where opportunities for prey diversification are limited, neighbouring seabird species segregate at-sea, while exhibiting differing degrees of sexual differentiation. While the mechanisms underlying observed patterns remain unclear, our data are consistent with the idea that multiple factors involving both conspecifics and heterospecifics, as well as reproductive pressures, may combine to influence foraging differences in these neighbouring tropical species.
BACKGROUND: Social interactions, reproductive demands and intrinsic constraints all influence foraging decisions in animals. Understanding the relative importance of these factors in shaping the way that coexisting species within communities use and partition resources is central to knowledge of ecological and evolutionary processes. However, in marine environments, our understanding of the mechanisms that lead to and allow coexistence is limited, particularly in the tropics. METHODS: Using simultaneous data from a suite of animal-borne data loggers (GPS, depth recorders, immersion and video), dietary samples and stable isotopes, we investigated interspecific and intraspecific differences in foraging of two closely-related seabird species (the red-footed booby and brown booby) from neighbouring colonies on the Cayman Islands in the Caribbean. RESULTS: The two species employed notably different foraging strategies, with marked spatial segregation, but limited evidence of interspecific dietary partitioning. The larger-bodied brown booby foraged within neritic waters, with the smaller-bodied red-footed booby travelling further offshore. Almost no sex differences were detected in foraging behaviour of red-footed boobies, while male and female brown boobies differed in their habitat use, foraging characteristics and dietary contributions. We suggest that these behavioural differences may relate to size dimorphism and competition: In the small brown booby population (n < 200 individuals), larger females showed a higher propensity to remain in coastal waters where they experienced kleptoparasitic attacks from magnificent frigatebirds, while smaller males that were never kleptoparasitised travelled further offshore, presumably into habitats with lower kleptoparasitic pressure. In weakly dimorphic red-footed boobies, these differences are less pronounced. Instead, density-dependent pressures on their large population (n > 2000 individuals) and avoidance of kleptoparasitism may be more prevalent in driving movements for both sexes. CONCLUSIONS: Our results reveal how, in an environment where opportunities for prey diversification are limited, neighbouring seabird species segregate at-sea, while exhibiting differing degrees of sexual differentiation. While the mechanisms underlying observed patterns remain unclear, our data are consistent with the idea that multiple factors involving both conspecifics and heterospecifics, as well as reproductive pressures, may combine to influence foraging differences in these neighbouring tropical species.
Entities:
Keywords:
Brown booby; Competition; Foraging ecology; Red-footed booby; Resource partitioning
Authors: Daniel I Bolnick; Richard Svanbäck; James A Fordyce; Louie H Yang; Jeremy M Davis; C Darrin Hulsey; Matthew L Forister Journal: Am Nat Date: 2002-12-11 Impact factor: 3.926
Authors: Henri Weimerskirch; Matthieu Le Corre; Yan Ropert-Coudert; Akiko Kato; Francis Marsac Journal: Oecologia Date: 2005-09-30 Impact factor: 3.225
Authors: Yann Tremblay; Scott A Shaffer; Shannon L Fowler; Carey E Kuhn; Birgitte I McDonald; Michael J Weise; Charle-André Bost; Henri Weimerskirch; Daniel E Crocker; Michael E Goebel; Daniel P Costa Journal: J Exp Biol Date: 2006-01 Impact factor: 3.312
Authors: Ewan D Wakefield; Thomas W Bodey; Stuart Bearhop; Jez Blackburn; Kendrew Colhoun; Rachel Davies; Ross G Dwyer; Jonathan A Green; David Grémillet; Andrew L Jackson; Mark J Jessopp; Adam Kane; Rowena H W Langston; Amélie Lescroël; Stuart Murray; Mélanie Le Nuz; Samantha C Patrick; Clara Péron; Louise M Soanes; Sarah Wanless; Stephen C Votier; Keith C Hamer Journal: Science Date: 2013-06-06 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Nina Dehnhard; Helen Achurch; Judy Clarke; Loïc N Michel; Colin Southwell; Michael D Sumner; Marcel Eens; Louise Emmerson Journal: J Anim Ecol Date: 2019-09-06 Impact factor: 5.091
Authors: Stephen C Votier; Annette L Fayet; Stuart Bearhop; Thomas W Bodey; Bethany L Clark; James Grecian; Tim Guilford; Keith C Hamer; Jana W E Jeglinski; Greg Morgan; Ewan Wakefield; Samantha C Patrick Journal: Proc Biol Sci Date: 2017-07-26 Impact factor: 5.349
Authors: Joan Navarro; Stephen C Votier; Jacopo Aguzzi; Juan J Chiesa; Manuela G Forero; Richard A Phillips Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-04-30 Impact factor: 3.240