Literature DB >> 16195880

Sex-specific foraging behaviour in a seabird with reversed sexual dimorphism: the red-footed booby.

Henri Weimerskirch1, Matthieu Le Corre, Yan Ropert-Coudert, Akiko Kato, Francis Marsac.   

Abstract

Most hypotheses attempting to explain the evolution of reversed sexual dimorphism (RSD) assume that size-related differences in foraging ability are of prime importance, but the studies on sex-specific differences in foraging behaviour remain scarce. We compare the foraging behaviour of males and females in a seabird species with a RSD by using several miniaturised activity and telemetry loggers. In red-footed boobies males are 5% smaller and 15% lighter than females, but have a longer tail than females. Both sexes spend similar time on the nest while incubating or brooding. When foraging at sea, males and females spend similar time foraging in oceanic waters, forage in similar areas, spend similar proportion of their foraging trip in flight, and feed on similar prey-flying fishes and flying squids-of similar size. However, compared to males, females range farther during incubation (85 km vs. 50 km), and furthermore feed mostly at the extremity of their foraging trip, whereas males actively forage throughout the trip. Males are much more active than females, landing and diving more often. During the study period, males lost mass, whereas females showed no significant changes. These results indicate that males and females of the red-footed boobies differ in several aspects in their foraging behaviour. Although some differences found in the study may be the direct result of the larger size of females, that is, the slightly higher speeds and deeper depths attained by females, others indicate clearly different foraging strategies between the sexes. The smaller size and longer tail of males confer them a higher agility, and could allow them to occupy a foraging niche different from that of females. The higher foraging effort of males related to its different foraging strategy is probably at the origin of the rapid mass loss of males during the breeding period. These results suggest that foraging differences are probably the reason for the differential breeding investment observed in boobies, and are likely to be involved in the evolution and maintenance of RSD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16195880     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-005-0226-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  8 in total

1.  A GPS logger and software for analysis of homing in pigeons and small mammals.

Authors:  I Steiner; C Bürgi; S Werffeli; G Dell'Omo; P Valenti; G Tröster; D P Wolfer; H P Lipp
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2000-12

2.  Fast and fuel efficient? Optimal use of wind by flying albatrosses.

Authors:  H Weimerskirch; T Guionnet; J Martin; S A Shaffer; D P Costa
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2000-09-22       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  GPS tracking of foraging albatrosses.

Authors:  Henri Weimerskirch; Francesco Bonadonna; Frédéric Bailleul; Géraldine Mabille; Giacomo Dell'Omo; Hans-Peter Lipp
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-02-15       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Flight performance: Frigatebirds ride high on thermals.

Authors:  Henri Weimerskirch; Olivier Chastel; Christophe Barbraud; Olivier Tostain
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-01-23       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  The three-dimensional flight of red-footed boobies: adaptations to foraging in a tropical environment?

Authors:  H Weimerskirch; M Le Corre; Y Ropert-Coudert; A Kato; F Marsac
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2005-01-07       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Reproductive endocrinology of tropical seabirds: sex-specific patterns in LH, steroids, and prolactin secretion in relation to parental care.

Authors:  H Lormée; P Jouventin; A Lacroix; J Lallemand; O Chastel
Journal:  Gen Comp Endocrinol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 2.822

7.  Stroke and glide of wing-propelled divers: deep diving seabirds adjust surge frequency to buoyancy change with depth.

Authors:  Yutaka Watanuki; Yasuaki Niizuma; Geir Wing Gabrielsen; Katsufumi Sato; Yasuhiko Naito
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-03-07       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Sex-specific foraging behaviour in a monomorphic seabird.

Authors:  S Lewis; S Benvenuti; L Dall'Antonia; R Griffiths; L Money; T N Sherratt; S Wanless; K C Hamer
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-08-22       Impact factor: 5.349

  8 in total
  14 in total

1.  Relationship between reversed sexual dimorphism, breeding investment and foraging ecology in a pelagic seabird, the masked booby.

Authors:  Henri Weimerskirch; Matthieu Le Corre; Hélène Gadenne; David Pinaud; Akiko Kato; Yan Ropert-Coudert; Charles-André Bost
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2009-06-21       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Consistency pays: sex differences and fitness consequences of behavioural specialization in a wide-ranging seabird.

Authors:  Samantha C Patrick; Henri Weimerskirch
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 3.703

3.  Low relative error in consumer-grade GPS units make them ideal for measuring small-scale animal movement patterns.

Authors:  Greg A Breed; Paul M Severns
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 2.984

4.  The Use of Acceleration to Code for Animal Behaviours; A Case Study in Free-Ranging Eurasian Beavers Castor fiber.

Authors:  Patricia M Graf; Rory P Wilson; Lama Qasem; Klaus Hackländer; Frank Rosell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Shadowed by scale: subtle behavioral niche partitioning in two sympatric, tropical breeding albatross species.

Authors:  Melinda G Conners; Elliott L Hazen; Daniel P Costa; Scott A Shaffer
Journal:  Mov Ecol       Date:  2015-09-21       Impact factor: 3.600

6.  Habitat-specific foraging strategies in Australasian gannets.

Authors:  Melanie R Wells; Lauren P Angel; John P Y Arnould
Journal:  Biol Open       Date:  2016-07-15       Impact factor: 2.422

7.  Habitat foraging niche of a High Arctic zooplanktivorous seabird in a changing environment.

Authors:  Dariusz Jakubas; Katarzyna Wojczulanis-Jakubas; Lech M Iliszko; Hallvard Strøm; Lech Stempniewicz
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-11-24       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Year-round at-sea distribution and trophic resources partitioning between two sympatric Sulids in the tropical Atlantic.

Authors:  Nathalie Almeida; Jaime A Ramos; Isabel Rodrigues; Ivo Dos Santos; Jorge M Pereira; Diana M Matos; Pedro M Araújo; Pedro Geraldes; Tommy Melo; Vitor H Paiva
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-06-21       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Sexual Size Dimorphism and Body Condition in the Australasian Gannet.

Authors:  Lauren P Angel; Melanie R Wells; Marlenne A Rodríguez-Malagón; Emma Tew; John R Speakman; John P Y Arnould
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-04       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Estimating Regions of Oceanographic Importance for Seabirds Using A-Spatial Data.

Authors:  Grant Richard Woodrow Humphries
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 3.752

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.