| Literature DB >> 34039383 |
Lauren M Green1, Thomas Wallis1, Martin U Schuhmann2, Matthias Jaeger3,4,5,6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) and late-onset idiopathic aqueductal stenosis (LIAS) are two forms of chronic adult hydrocephalus of different aetiology. We analysed overnight intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring to elucidate ICP waveform changes characteristic for iNPH and LIAS to better understand pathophysiological processes of both diseases.Entities:
Keywords: Aqueductal stenosis; Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus; Intracranial compliance; Intracranial pressure; Intracranial pulsations; Neuromonitoring
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34039383 PMCID: PMC8157654 DOI: 10.1186/s12987-021-00259-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Fluids Barriers CNS ISSN: 2045-8118
Fig. 1Selection process for the study population. Adult patient were identified from the ICP monitoring database at both institutions
Fig. 2Sagittal T2 MRI image through the third ventricle, cerebral aqueduct and fourth ventricle showing typical findings for LIAS. Note the convex shape of the tuber cinereum and lamina terminalis, dilated third ventricle, stenosis of the distal aqueduct and normal sized fourth ventricle
Demographic and radiological details of iNPH and LIAS groups
| Variable | iNPH | LIAS | p value |
|---|---|---|---|
| No. of patients | 98 | 14 | |
| Age (years) | 76.6 ± 5.6 | 53.8 ± 14.4 | < 0.001 |
| Female/male | 33/65 | 8/6 | 0.09 |
| Evans-index | 0.39 ± 0.04 | 0.41 ± 0.05 | 0.03 |
| Duration of artefact free ICP data obtained during 10 h of overnight monitoring (min) | 593 ± 16 | 583 ± 39 | 0.67 |
Given values are the mean ± standard deviations or absolute numbers. p values from Mann–Whitney-U test and chi-square test
Fig. 3Typical 10 h overnight recording of ICP, AMP, RAP, RESP and SLOW
ICP derived parameters between iNPH and LIAS
| Variable | iNPH | LIAS | p value |
|---|---|---|---|
| No. of patients | 98 | 14 | |
| ICP (mmHg) | 5.4 ± 4.2 | 9.3 ± 3.0 | 0.001 |
| AMP (mmHg) | 2.36 ± 0.91 | 1.81 ± 0.59 | 0.012 |
| MWA (mmHg) | 6.0 ± 2.0 | 4.9 ± 1.2 | 0.049 |
| RAP (AU) | 0.67 ± 0.17 | 0.66 ± 0.11 | 0.59 |
| HR (1/min) | 69 ± 10 | 69 ± 11 | 0.88 |
| RESP (mmHg) | 0.52 ± 0.20 | 0.66 ± 0.59 | 0.69 |
| RR (1/min) | 14 ± 3 | 14 ± 2 | 0.64 |
| SLOW (mmHg) | 1.63 ± 0.49 | 1.78 ± 0.72 | 0.59 |
| RT (s) | 0.25 ± 0.04 | 0.21 ± 0.06 | 0.014 |
| RTc (mmHg/s) | 25.2 ± 9.9 | 27.5 ± 12.1 | 0.61 |
Given values are the mean ± standard deviations. p values from Mann–Whitney-U test
Fig. 4Values of ICP for iNPH and LIAS. Horizontal bars are the mean ± standard deviation. The difference between the groups was statistically significant (p = 0.001)
Fig. 5Values of AMP (left) and MWA (right) for iNPH and LIAS. Horizontal bars are the mean ± standard deviation. The difference between the groups was statistically significant (p = 0.012 for AMP, p = 0.049 for MWA)
Fig. 6Values for RT (left) and RTc (right) for iNPH and LIAS. Horizontal bars are the mean ± standard deviation. The difference between the groups was statistically significant for RT (p = 0.014), but not for RTc (p = 0.61)