Literature DB >> 14963745

Intracranial hypertension: what additional information can be derived from ICP waveform after head injury?

M Balestreri1, M Czosnyka, L A Steiner, E Schmidt, P Smielewski, B Matta, J D Pickard.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Although intracranial hypertension is one of the important prognostic factors after head injury, increased intracranial pressure (ICP) may also be observed in patients with favourable outcome. We have studied whether the value of ICP monitoring can be augmented by indices describing cerebrovascular pressure-reactivity and pressure-volume compensatory reserve derived from ICP and arterial blood pressure (ABP) waveforms.
METHOD: 96 patients with intracranial hypertension were studied retrospectively: 57 with fatal outcome and 39 with favourable outcome. ABP and ICP waveforms were recorded. Indices of cerebrovascular reactivity (PRx) and cerebrospinal compensatory reserve (RAP) were calculated as moving correlation coefficients between slow waves of ABP and ICP, and between slow waves of ICP pulse amplitude and mean ICP, respectively. The magnitude of 'slow waves' was derived using ICP low-pass spectral filtration.
RESULTS: The most significant difference was found in the magnitude of slow waves that was persistently higher in patients with a favourable outcome (p<0.00004). In patients who died ICP was significantly higher (p<0.0001) and cerebrovascular pressure-reactivity (described by PRx) was compromised (p<0.024). In the same patients, pressure-volume compensatory reserve showed a gradual deterioration over time with a sudden drop of RAP when ICP started to rise, suggesting an overlapping disruption of the vasomotor response.
CONCLUSION: Indices derived from ICP waveform analysis can be helpful for the interpretation of progressive intracranial hypertension in patients after brain trauma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14963745     DOI: 10.1007/s00701-003-0187-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)        ISSN: 0001-6268            Impact factor:   2.216


  36 in total

1.  Risks for impaired cerebral autoregulation during cardiopulmonary bypass and postoperative stroke.

Authors:  M Ono; B Joshi; K Brady; R B Easley; Y Zheng; C Brown; W Baumgartner; C W Hogue
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 9.166

Review 2.  Neuromonitoring in the intensive care unit. I. Intracranial pressure and cerebral blood flow monitoring.

Authors:  Anuj Bhatia; Arun Kumar Gupta
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2007-05-24       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  Cerebral blood flow autoregulation during intracranial hypertension: a simple, purely hydraulic mechanism?

Authors:  C Anile; P De Bonis; A Di Chirico; A Ficola; A Mangiola; G Petrella
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2009-01-17       Impact factor: 1.475

Review 4.  Intracranial pressure monitoring for traumatic brain injury in the modern era.

Authors:  Llewellyn C Padayachy; Anthony A Figaji; M R Bullock
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.475

Review 5.  The Utility of Cerebral Blood Flow Assessment in TBI.

Authors:  Omar S Akbik; Andrew P Carlson; Mark Krasberg; Howard Yonas
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 5.081

Review 6.  Chronic overdrainage syndrome: pathophysiological insights based on ICP analysis: a case-based review.

Authors:  Laura V Sainz; Konstantin Hockel; Martin U Schuhmann
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2017-11-11       Impact factor: 1.475

7.  Predicting the limits of cerebral autoregulation during cardiopulmonary bypass.

Authors:  Brijen Joshi; Masahiro Ono; Charles Brown; Kenneth Brady; R Blaine Easley; Gayane Yenokyan; Rebecca F Gottesman; Charles W Hogue
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2011-11-21       Impact factor: 5.108

8.  Detrended fluctuation analysis of intracranial pressure predicts outcome following traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Robert L Burr; Catherine J Kirkness; Pamela H Mitchell
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.538

9.  Robust peak recognition in intracranial pressure signals.

Authors:  Fabien Scalzo; Shadnaz Asgari; Sunghan Kim; Marvin Bergsneider; Xiao Hu
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2010-10-19       Impact factor: 2.819

10.  Regression analysis for peak designation in pulsatile pressure signals.

Authors:  Fabien Scalzo; Peng Xu; Shadnaz Asgari; Marvin Bergsneider; Xiao Hu
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2009-07-04       Impact factor: 2.602

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.