Literature DB >> 34038873

Benefits of deep learning classification of continuous noninvasive brain-computer interface control.

James R Stieger1,2, Stephen A Engel1,2, Daniel Suma1, Bin He1.   

Abstract

Objective. Noninvasive brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) assist paralyzed patients by providing access to the world without requiring surgical intervention. Prior work has suggested that EEG motor imagery based BCI can benefit from increased decoding accuracy through the application of deep learning methods, such as convolutional neural networks (CNNs).Approach. Here, we examine whether these improvements can generalize to practical scenarios such as continuous control tasks (as opposed to prior work reporting one classification per trial), whether valuable information remains latent outside of the motor cortex (as no prior work has compared full scalp coverage to motor only electrode montages), and the existing challenges to the practical implementation of deep-learning based continuous BCI control.Main results. We report that: (1) deep learning methods significantly increase offline performance compared to standard methods on an independent, large, and longitudinal online motor imagery BCI dataset with up to 4-classes and continuous 2D feedback; (2) our results suggest that a variety of neural biomarkers for BCI, including those outside the motor cortex, can be detected and used to improve performance through deep learning methods, and (3) tuning neural network output will be an important step in optimizing online BCI control, as we found the CNN models trained with full scalp EEG also significantly reduce the average trial length in a simulated online cursor control environment.Significance. This work demonstrates the benefits of CNNs classification during BCI control while providing evidence that electrode montage selection and the mapping of CNN output to device control will be important design choices in CNN based BCIs.
© 2021 IOP Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BCI; EEG; brain–computer interface; convolutional neural network; deep learning; motor imagery; sensorimotor rhythm

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34038873      PMCID: PMC9305984          DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/ac0584

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neural Eng        ISSN: 1741-2552            Impact factor:   5.043


  64 in total

1.  How many people are able to operate an EEG-based brain-computer interface (BCI)?

Authors:  C Guger; G Edlinger; W Harkam; I Niedermayer; G Pfurtscheller
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.802

2.  EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis.

Authors:  Arnaud Delorme; Scott Makeig
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2004-03-15       Impact factor: 2.390

3.  Neurophysiological predictor of SMR-based BCI performance.

Authors:  Benjamin Blankertz; Claudia Sannelli; Sebastian Halder; Eva M Hammer; Andrea Kübler; Klaus-Robert Müller; Gabriel Curio; Thorsten Dickhaus
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-03-17       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Spherical splines and average referencing in scalp electroencephalography.

Authors:  Thomas C Ferree
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.020

Review 5.  Closed-loop brain training: the science of neurofeedback.

Authors:  Ranganatha Sitaram; Tomas Ros; Luke Stoeckel; Sven Haller; Frank Scharnowski; Jarrod Lewis-Peacock; Nikolaus Weiskopf; Maria Laura Blefari; Mohit Rana; Ethan Oblak; Niels Birbaumer; James Sulzer
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2016-12-22       Impact factor: 34.870

6.  LSTM-Based EEG Classification in Motor Imagery Tasks.

Authors:  Ping Wang; Aimin Jiang; Xiaofeng Liu; Jing Shang; Li Zhang
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2018-10-18       Impact factor: 3.802

7.  MOABB: trustworthy algorithm benchmarking for BCIs.

Authors:  Vinay Jayaram; Alexandre Barachant
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 5.379

8.  A large electroencephalographic motor imagery dataset for electroencephalographic brain computer interfaces.

Authors:  Murat Kaya; Mustafa Kemal Binli; Erkan Ozbay; Hilmi Yanar; Yuriy Mishchenko
Journal:  Sci Data       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 6.444

9.  High theta and low alpha powers may be indicative of BCI-illiteracy in motor imagery.

Authors:  Minkyu Ahn; Hohyun Cho; Sangtae Ahn; Sung Chan Jun
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-22       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Noninvasive Electroencephalogram Based Control of a Robotic Arm for Reach and Grasp Tasks.

Authors:  Jianjun Meng; Shuying Zhang; Angeliki Bekyo; Jaron Olsoe; Bryan Baxter; Bin He
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-12-14       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  5 in total

1.  Classification of motor imagery EEG using deep learning increases performance in inefficient BCI users.

Authors:  Navneet Tibrewal; Nikki Leeuwis; Maryam Alimardani
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 3.752

Review 2.  2020 International brain-computer interface competition: A review.

Authors:  Ji-Hoon Jeong; Jeong-Hyun Cho; Young-Eun Lee; Seo-Hyun Lee; Gi-Hwan Shin; Young-Seok Kweon; José Del R Millán; Klaus-Robert Müller; Seong-Whan Lee
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 3.473

3.  On the Deep Learning Models for EEG-Based Brain-Computer Interface Using Motor Imagery.

Authors:  Hao Zhu; Dylan Forenzo; Bin He
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2022-08-19       Impact factor: 4.528

4.  Closed-loop motor imagery EEG simulation for brain-computer interfaces.

Authors:  Hyonyoung Shin; Daniel Suma; Bin He
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-08-17       Impact factor: 3.473

5.  A novel EEG decoding method for a facial-expression-based BCI system using the combined convolutional neural network and genetic algorithm.

Authors:  Rui Li; Di Liu; Zhijun Li; Jinli Liu; Jincao Zhou; Weiping Liu; Bo Liu; Weiping Fu; Ahmad Bala Alhassan
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-09-13       Impact factor: 5.152

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.