Literature DB >> 34038542

A Dietary Supplement Frequency Questionnaire Correctly Ranks Nutrient Intakes in US Older Adults When Compared to a Comprehensive Dietary Supplement Inventory.

Alana D Steffen1, Lynne R Wilkens2, Kim M Yonemori2, Cheryl L Albright3, Suzanne P Murphy2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Dietary supplements are commonly taken by adults in the United States and can contribute substantially to daily nutrient intakes. Short supplement-use questionnaires are often used in dietary surveys, but their accuracy has not been well studied.
OBJECTIVES: The primary objective was to evaluate the accuracy of a short, self-administered supplement frequency questionnaire (SFQ) relative to a comprehensive 1-y inventory of supplement use. A secondary objective was to compare SFQ responses for participants in the intensive measurement study to those from a control group to investigate a possible research participation effect.
METHODS: The Supplement Reporting study enrolled 1029 older adults in 2005-2006, with a mean age of 67.8 y, who participated in the Multiethnic Cohort and reported regular use of dietary supplements. Of these, 375 were interviewed quarterly to collect detailed information on types and amounts of dietary supplements used, while 654 served as the control group. All participants completed 2 SFQs, 1 y apart.
RESULTS: Agreement between the 2 instruments in use at least weekly ranged from 88% to 97% for 15 of 16 supplement types, with a lower agreement of 74% for vitamin D. The correlations of nutrient intakes from supplements between the 2 instruments were high, ranging from 0.48 to 0.75, except for iron (r = 0.29). However, mean nutrient intakes as reported on the SFQ were higher than intakes from the inventory for most nutrients, sometimes twice as high. Nutrient intakes based on the SFQ were similar for the inventory and control groups, at both baseline and the end of the study.
CONCLUSIONS: A self-administered short SFQ can be used in large surveys to identify participants who use 16 categories of dietary supplements at least once a week and can correctly rank participant intakes of nutrients. However, the SFQ does not accurately estimate absolute levels of nutrient intakes from supplements.
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society for Nutrition.

Entities:  

Keywords:  dietary supplements; measurement; methodology; nutrient intakes; supplement inventory

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34038542      PMCID: PMC8349128          DOI: 10.1093/jn/nxab140

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nutr        ISSN: 0022-3166            Impact factor:   4.687


  15 in total

1.  Allowing for variations in multivitamin supplement composition improves nutrient intake estimates for epidemiologic studies.

Authors:  Song-Yi Park; Suzanne P Murphy; Lynne R Wilkens; Jennifer F Yamamoto; Laurence N Kolonel
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 4.798

Review 2.  Multivitamin-multimineral supplements' effect on total nutrient intake.

Authors:  Suzanne P Murphy; Kami K White; Song-Yi Park; Sangita Sharma
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 7.045

Review 3.  Best Practices for Dietary Supplement Assessment and Estimation of Total Usual Nutrient Intakes in Population-Level Research and Monitoring.

Authors:  Regan L Bailey; Kevin W Dodd; Jaime J Gahche; Johanna T Dwyer; Alexandra E Cowan; Shinyoung Jun; Heather A Eicher-Miller; Patricia M Guenther; Anindya Bhadra; Paul R Thomas; Nancy Potischman; Raymond J Carroll; Janet A Tooze
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 4.798

4.  Dietary Supplement Use Among Adults: United States, 2017-2018.

Authors:  Suruchi Mishra; Bryan Stierman; Jaime J Gahche; Nancy Potischman
Journal:  NCHS Data Brief       Date:  2021-02

5.  SPSS and SAS programs for comparing Pearson correlations and OLS regression coefficients.

Authors:  Bruce Weaver; Karl L Wuensch
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2013-09

Review 6.  Federal Monitoring of Dietary Supplement Use in the Resident, Civilian, Noninstitutionalized US Population, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.

Authors:  Jaime J Gahche; Regan L Bailey; Nancy Potischman; Abby G Ershow; Kirsten A Herrick; Namanjeet Ahluwalia; Johanna T Dwyer
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2018-08-03       Impact factor: 4.798

7.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Development of a supplement composition database for the SURE Study.

Authors:  Kim M Yonemori; Yukiko Morimoto; Lynne R Wilkens; Suzanne P Murphy
Journal:  J Food Compost Anal       Date:  2009-12-01       Impact factor: 4.556

9.  Trends in Dietary Supplement Use Among US Adults From 1999-2012.

Authors:  Elizabeth D Kantor; Colin D Rehm; Mengmeng Du; Emily White; Edward L Giovannucci
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2016-10-11       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Comparison of two instruments for quantifying intake of vitamin and mineral supplements: a brief questionnaire versus three 24-hour recalls.

Authors:  Suzanne P Murphy; Lynne R Wilkens; Jean H Hankin; Janet A Foote; Kristine R Monroe; Brian E Henderson; Laurence N Kolonel
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2002-10-01       Impact factor: 4.897

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.