Literature DB >> 34038531

BRIO: a web server for RNA sequence and structure motif scan.

Andrea Guarracino1, Gerardo Pepe1, Francesco Ballesio1, Marta Adinolfi1, Marco Pietrosanto1, Elisa Sangiovanni1, Ilio Vitale2,3, Gabriele Ausiello1, Manuela Helmer-Citterich1.   

Abstract

The interaction between RNA and RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) has a key role in the regulation of gene expression, in RNA stability, and in many other biological processes. RBPs accomplish these functions by binding target RNA molecules through specific sequence and structure motifs. The identification of these binding motifs is therefore fundamental to improve our knowledge of the cellular processes and how they are regulated. Here, we present BRIO (BEAM RNA Interaction mOtifs), a new web server designed for the identification of sequence and structure RNA-binding motifs in one or more RNA molecules of interest. BRIO enables the user to scan over 2508 sequence motifs and 2296 secondary structure motifs identified in Homo sapiens and Mus musculus, in three different types of experiments (PAR-CLIP, eCLIP, HITS). The motifs are associated with the binding of 186 RBPs and 69 protein domains. The web server is freely available at http://brio.bio.uniroma2.it.
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Nucleic Acids Research.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34038531      PMCID: PMC8262756          DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkab400

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res        ISSN: 0305-1048            Impact factor:   16.971


INTRODUCTION

Molecular interactions are crucial for most biological processes in the cell. The landscape of all possible molecular interactions depends on the actors involved in the interplay. These actors include RNA-binding proteins (RBPs), which play a central role in RNA metabolism, regulating the transcripts throughout their life cycle, and in particular modulating mRNA localization, splicing, stability, and translation (1). Moreover, RBPs are also involved in the regulation of non-coding RNAs. The human proteome includes over 2000 RBPs (2), each one having specific functions and target RNAs. This occurs through the interaction of particular RNA binding domains (RBDs) with specific RNA-binding motifs (3). Of note, some RBPs recognize their target molecules via nucleotide patterns, while others favour specific RNA structural motifs (4). The understanding of RBP function and the identification of the binding motifs are required to get insights into the regulatory mechanisms in which these proteins are involved. Recent advances in high-throughput methods to assess targets of RBPs in vitro and in vivo (5,6) have led to the development of several resources to identify RBPs and their binding motifs. Some tools find sequence motifs from inputs of target RNAs, while others focus on RNA secondary structure (7). Here, we describe BRIO (BEAM RNA Interaction mOtifs), a new web server allowing users to easily search for sequence and structure RNA-binding motifs in one or more RNA molecules of interest. The dataset contains 2508 sequence and 2296 structure motifs associated with the binding of 186 unique proteins and 69 unique protein domains. The motifs were previously identified in Homo sapiens and Mus musculus, in three different types of experiments (PAR-CLIP, eCLIP, HITS) analyzed in Adinolfi et al. (8). The structure motifs are encoded using BEAR (Brand nEw Alphabet for RNA), a powerful context-aware structural string encoding we previously developed and applied in our research on RNA structural characterization and conservation (9,10). This encoding not only stores information about the ’paired’ or ’unpaired’ status of a nucleotide, but also takes into account the type and length of the secondary structure element (SSE) to which the nucleotide belongs. This means that the BEAR encoding describes RNA secondary structure in a more comprehensive way, but with low algorithmic complexity given the simple string representation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Workflow

The overall workflow of BRIO is illustrated in Figure 1. After the pre-processing step (i.e. the calculation of the secondary structure, when not provided by the user), each input RNA molecule is scanned for the identification of sequence and structure motifs. The user can decide to scan subsets of motifs present in our database, selecting the species and the type of experiments in which the motifs were identified.
Figure 1.

The Workflow used by BRIO to search for motifs in the input RNA sequences. The input RNA molecules are folded, encoded using the BEAR alphabet (9), and scanned for sequence and structure motifs. Filters on species and type of experiment can also be applied. A background file can be used as a comparison with the input sequences. The presence of enriched motifs is determined using Fisher's exact test.

The Workflow used by BRIO to search for motifs in the input RNA sequences. The input RNA molecules are folded, encoded using the BEAR alphabet (9), and scanned for sequence and structure motifs. Filters on species and type of experiment can also be applied. A background file can be used as a comparison with the input sequences. The presence of enriched motifs is determined using Fisher's exact test. Here, we provide a description of the datasets, the algorithm, its input and the results provided by the web server.

Datasets

BRIO scans the input RNA molecules using sequence and structure motifs (Table 1). The motifs were previously identified in 186 RBPs and 69 protein domains analyzing 228 PAR-CLIP, eCLIP, HITS-CLIP experiments in H. sapiens and M. musculus (8,11).
Table 1.

Number of sequence and structure motifs identified in Homo sapiens and Mus musculus

Motif type Homo sapiens Mus musculus Total
Sequence21121842296
Structure23191892508
The CLIP experiments are both from human (hg19; 74 experiments performed in 13 different cell lines, principally HEK293 cells) and mouse (mm9; 30 experiments performed in 7 different cell lines, mostly brain and embryonic stem cell), while eCLIP data comes from studies performed in human chronic myelogenous leukemia (K562) and hepatocellular carcinoma (HepG2) cells. The dataset contains 186 RBPs for both human and mouse, and a total of 69 unique protein domains, 12 of which are shared between the two species (51 protein domains unique for human and 6 protein domains unique for mouse). The secondary structure motifs are represented using the BEAR encoding. The whole dataset of sequence and structure motifs is available for download at the BRIO website.

Input

Users can either input only the RNA primary sequence(s) of interest, or the sequence(s) and the corresponding secondary structure(s) in dot-bracket notation, all in FASTA or multiFASTA format. Alternatively, the input can be uploaded as a text file. The user can choose the preferred type of structural representation, e.g. Minimum Free Energy (MFE) or centroid. Sequences submitted without the secondary structure are automatically folded using RNAfold (in this case, the MFE structure is computed by default) (12). Finally, the dot-bracket notation is translated into a BEAR string. The input RNA molecules are required to be at least three nucleotides long, and shorter than 3000. To search for structure motifs, sequences in input are requested to be at least 50 nucleotides long. At most 100 sequences can be submitted at a time. Users can choose to compare their RNA molecules to the whole dataset of motifs, or to only H. sapiens or M. musculus motifs. It is also possible to select a subset of the experiments analyzed (PAR-CLIP, eCLIP or HITS), considering that the eCLIP datasets were obtained from experiments performed only in H. sapiens.

Procedure

To identify the motifs, BRIO relies on substitution matrices: the Matrix of BEAR encoded RNA (MBRs) for secondary structure elements (9) and a classic substitution matrix for nucleotides (with score 3 for nucleotide matching and −2 otherwise). For each motif, the algorithm scans the corresponding Position Frequency Matrix in any single input RNA using a sliding-window ungapped alignment. Next, the score of the best match is compared to the score threshold associated with the motif (for more information, see (8)). Finally, the one-sided Fisher's Test is applied to determine if a motif is enriched in the input RNA molecules with respect to a set of background RNAs. This test evaluates whether the motif is identified with a significantly greater proportion in the RNA over the background. The background set of RNA molecules can be specified by the user. By default, all 85640 sequences from Rfam 14.3 are considered (13).

Output

BRIO returns a collection of protein binding motifs identified in the input RNA molecules. The results are shown as tables, in two different views: ‘Enriched Motifs’ and ‘Sequences’ (Figure 2). The ‘Enriched Motifs’ tab shows the motifs identified in the input molecules as a whole, while the ‘Sequences’ tab shows the results for the different input RNA molecules. The content of each table can be sorted in ascending or descending order with respect to each column.
Figure 2.

The output is composed of two views: (A) the ‘Enriched Motifs’ table, showing the enriched motifs found in the input RNA molecules, and (B) the ‘Sequence’ table, showing the results for each input sequence provided. The column description is displayed in both tables when the pointer hovers over the column name (not shown in the figure).

The output is composed of two views: (A) the ‘Enriched Motifs’ table, showing the enriched motifs found in the input RNA molecules, and (B) the ‘Sequence’ table, showing the results for each input sequence provided. The column description is displayed in both tables when the pointer hovers over the column name (not shown in the figure). In the ‘Enriched Motifs’ table (Figure 2A), by default, the motifs identified in the input RNA molecules are sorted according to the one-sided Fisher's Test P-value. For each motif, the table reports: the logo of the motif in the qBEAR alphabet for structure motifs or in IUPAC nucleic acid notation for sequence motifs; the type of the motif: sequence or structure; the type of mapping regions from the GENCODE annotation (8,14) of the RNAs datasets where the motif was originally found. The annotation includes UTR, CDS, and transcript for those RBPs known to act in the nucleus on unspliced RNAs; the coverage, which represents the number of input RNA molecules in which the motif is identified divided by the total number of query molecules; the one-sided Fisher's Test P-value; the type of experiment; the protein associated with the RNA sequence or secondary structure motif in the CLIP experiment reported in Adinolfi et al. (8); the protein domain associated with the RNA secondary structure motif (note that this information is not always available); the cell line used in the eCLIP experiments; the link to the experiment page (for eCLIP data), or to the corresponding article (for PAR-CLIP and HITS data); the organism in which the experiment was performed (H. sapiens or M. musculus). The last column reports the link for the download of the information on the motif described in each row. In the ‘Sequences’ table (Figure 2B), by default, the entries are sorted according to the start position of the motif in the sequence. For each entry, the table reports: the start and the end position of the motif in the selected sequence; the representation of the motif in BEAR alphabet for structure motifs or in IUPAC nucleic acid notation for sequence motifs; the type of the motif: sequence or structure; the protein associated with the RNA sequence or secondary structure motif in the experiments analyzed by Adinolfi et al. (8); the type of the experiment (PAR-CLIP, eCLIP, HITS).

RESULTS

We describe, here, two examples of the use of BRIO web server to search for putative binding proteins. As input RNA molecules, we selected RNA sequences belonging to Rfam families whose interactors are already described in the literature, and checked the server capability to identify known motifs. These input datasets are also available in the BRIO web server. In the first example, we analyzed sequences of the Herpesvirus saimiri U RNAs (HSUR) family (RF01802). HSURs are viral small RNAs that seem to be involved in the regulation of the stability of host mRNAs. They have been shown to associate, in vivo, with two proteins: heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein D (HNRNPD) and ELAV like RNA binding protein 1 (ELAVL1, best known as HuR) (15). In particular, HuR is known to contribute to the stability of mRNAs and to recognize short sequence motifs of low statistical significance. The HSUR family consists of four sequences, two of which share 100% sequence identity. In our analysis, three different HSUR sequences were given as input to BRIO and launched against the PAR-CLIP dataset of binding motifs. The web server identified several sequence motifs with high coverage (= 1) and low P-values (in the [10-6-10-5] range). After sorting the solutions according to ascending P-values, we found in the top positions sequence motifs binding the PAZ Piwi domain of AGO, and the HuR and ELAVL1MNASE RNA binding domains. With a significant score, we also detected PUM2, a post-transcriptional repressor interacting with the 3′ UTRs of its target mRNAs. Of note, the structure motifs identified in this run did not show full coverage or a very low P-value, although the HuR, AGO and ELAVL1MNASE protein binding motifs were listed with P-values in the [0.024–0.028] range and found in two out of the three input sequences. The identification of structure motifs is generally dependent on the number of input sequences (the more, the better). The best hits can be identified also by inspecting the ‘Sequences’ table in which the motifs identified in the single sequences are shown. In particular, this view allows the user to see the motifs identified according to the position in the sequence, but also sorted by protein name. Using this last view, it is easy to see if single proteins or domains are repeated, and if the motifs identified are sequence and/or structure motifs. In the second example, we used BRIO to search for protein binding motifs in ten U2 spliceosomal RNA sequences (the first listed in the RF00004 Rfam family) launched against the eCLIP dataset of binding motifs. In the ‘Enriched Motifs’ Table, a structural motif associated with the SF3B1 protein showed a very low P-value. SF3B1 is known to interact with U2 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein (snRNP), which is composed of U2 snRNAs and their associated polypeptide. Of note, several additional sequence and structure motifs are listed in the BRIO output table, some of which are cytoplasmic and therefore the interaction is not possible, while others can be used as suggestions for or to confirm an experimental test.

DISCUSSION

The BRIO web server allows researchers to identify sequence and structure protein binding motifs in a set of one or more RNA molecules. The BRIO dataset encompasses 2296 sequence and 2508 structure motifs associated with 186 RNA binding proteins and 69 protein domains from several CLIP experiments. BRIO takes advantage of the BEAR encoding to represent structural motifs. This string encoding allows us to include the structural context of each nucleotide in the secondary structure representation, without increasing algorithm complexity. To the best of our knowledge, no other existing web server offers the possibility to search for sequence and structure motifs associated with RNA binding proteins. Indeed, few other web servers are available to identify motifs in RNA sequences but, to our knowledge, only the RegRNA 2.0 server (16) allows the user to search also in a database of sequence and structural motifs (such as splicing sites, polyadenylation sites, motifs in 5′ and 3′ UTR, etc) that are not specifically associated with RNA binding proteins. Together with its friendly interface, BRIO can support scientists in their investigations on groups of RNA molecules of interest, their putative RBPs, and the roles these proteins play in RNA regulation. Number of sequence and structure motifs identified in Homo sapiens and Mus musculus

DATA AVAILABILITY

The web server is freely available at http://brio.bio.uniroma2.it. The source code and all the data are available at https://github.com/helmercitterich-lab/BRIO.
  16 in total

1.  Relative Information Gain: Shannon entropy-based measure of the relative structural conservation in RNA alignments.

Authors:  Marco Pietrosanto; Marta Adinolfi; Andrea Guarracino; Fabrizio Ferrè; Gabriele Ausiello; Ilio Vitale; Manuela Helmer-Citterich
Journal:  NAR Genom Bioinform       Date:  2021-02-15

Review 2.  How RNA-Binding Proteins Interact with RNA: Molecules and Mechanisms.

Authors:  Meredith Corley; Margaret C Burns; Gene W Yeo
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2020-04-02       Impact factor: 17.970

3.  The Herpesvirus saimiri small nuclear RNAs recruit AU-rich element-binding proteins but do not alter host AU-rich element-containing mRNA levels in virally transformed T cells.

Authors:  Heidi L Cook; Hannah E Mischo; Joan A Steitz
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 4.272

4.  GENCODE: the reference human genome annotation for The ENCODE Project.

Authors:  Jennifer Harrow; Adam Frankish; Jose M Gonzalez; Electra Tapanari; Mark Diekhans; Felix Kokocinski; Bronwen L Aken; Daniel Barrell; Amonida Zadissa; Stephen Searle; If Barnes; Alexandra Bignell; Veronika Boychenko; Toby Hunt; Mike Kay; Gaurab Mukherjee; Jeena Rajan; Gloria Despacio-Reyes; Gary Saunders; Charles Steward; Rachel Harte; Michael Lin; Cédric Howald; Andrea Tanzer; Thomas Derrien; Jacqueline Chrast; Nathalie Walters; Suganthi Balasubramanian; Baikang Pei; Michael Tress; Jose Manuel Rodriguez; Iakes Ezkurdia; Jeltje van Baren; Michael Brent; David Haussler; Manolis Kellis; Alfonso Valencia; Alexandre Reymond; Mark Gerstein; Roderic Guigó; Tim J Hubbard
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 9.043

5.  Rfam: Wikipedia, clans and the "decimal" release.

Authors:  Paul P Gardner; Jennifer Daub; John Tate; Benjamin L Moore; Isabelle H Osuch; Sam Griffiths-Jones; Robert D Finn; Eric P Nawrocki; Diana L Kolbe; Sean R Eddy; Alex Bateman
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2010-11-09       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  ViennaRNA Package 2.0.

Authors:  Ronny Lorenz; Stephan H Bernhart; Christian Höner Zu Siederdissen; Hakim Tafer; Christoph Flamm; Peter F Stadler; Ivo L Hofacker
Journal:  Algorithms Mol Biol       Date:  2011-11-24       Impact factor: 1.405

7.  DoRiNA 2.0--upgrading the doRiNA database of RNA interactions in post-transcriptional regulation.

Authors:  Kai Blin; Christoph Dieterich; Ricardo Wurmus; Nikolaus Rajewsky; Markus Landthaler; Altuna Akalin
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2014-11-21       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 8.  High-throughput characterization of protein-RNA interactions.

Authors:  Kate B Cook; Timothy R Hughes; Quaid D Morris
Journal:  Brief Funct Genomics       Date:  2014-12-13       Impact factor: 4.241

Review 9.  Revealing protein-lncRNA interaction.

Authors:  Fabrizio Ferrè; Alessio Colantoni; Manuela Helmer-Citterich
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2015-06-02       Impact factor: 11.622

10.  An enhanced computational platform for investigating the roles of regulatory RNA and for identifying functional RNA motifs.

Authors:  Tzu-Hao Chang; Hsi-Yuan Huang; Justin Bo-Kai Hsu; Shun-Long Weng; Jorng-Tzong Horng; Hsien-Da Huang
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2013-01-21       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  2 in total

1.  RPS: a comprehensive database of RNAs involved in liquid-liquid phase separation.

Authors:  Mengni Liu; Huiqin Li; Xiaotong Luo; Jieyi Cai; Tianjian Chen; Yubin Xie; Jian Ren; Zhixiang Zuo
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2022-01-07       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Unheeded SARS-CoV-2 proteins? A deep look into negative-sense RNA.

Authors:  Martin Bartas; Adriana Volná; Christopher A Beaudoin; Ebbe Toftgaard Poulsen; Jiří Červeň; Václav Brázda; Vladimír Špunda; Tom L Blundell; Petr Pečinka
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2022-05-13       Impact factor: 13.994

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.