| Literature DB >> 34038529 |
Phuong H Nguyen1, Shivani Kachwaha1, Lan M Tran2, Rasmi Avula1, Melissa F Young3, Sebanti Ghosh2, Praveen K Sharma2, Jessica Escobar-Alegria2, Thomas Forissier2, Sumeet Patil4, Edward A Frongillo5, Purnima Menon1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Maternal nutrition interventions are inadequately integrated into antenatal care (ANC). Alive & Thrive aimed to strengthen delivery of micronutrient supplements and intensify interpersonal counseling and community mobilization through government ANC services.Entities:
Keywords: India; breastfeeding; diet quality; interpersonal counseling; maternal nutrition; micronutrient intake
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34038529 PMCID: PMC8349122 DOI: 10.1093/jn/nxab131
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Nutr ISSN: 0022-3166 Impact factor: 4.798
Description of differences between I-ANC and S-ANC intervention areas in Uttar Pradesh, India[1]
| Interventions | I-ANC areas | S-ANC areas |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity building | ||
| Training of FLWs and supervisors | - As part of the National Nutrition Mission program, FLWs in both areas received training on maternal and child nutrition through the incremental learning approach mechanism | |
| - Convergent actions were encouraged and performance incentives were included | ||
| - FLWs receive a full-day technical training on MN content (diet diversity, IFA and calcium supplementation, weight gain, and breastfeeding) and counseling approach with pregnant women with follow-up training/orientation during monthly meetings | - Routine training and supervision activities without additional performance support | |
| - Supervisors receive 2 full-day trainings on MN content and on supporting FLWs to deliver MN services as well as use of data | ||
| - FLWs received hands-on mentoring during home visits to help beneficiaries translate the skills learnt into practice | ||
| - FLWs and supervisors receive SBCC materials on MN and job aid to retain training content | - Standard materials | |
| MN services | ||
| Overall MN services | - Under the national mission, in both I-ANC and S-ANC areas, existing programs on safe pregnancy and access to ANC ( | |
| Counseling on dietary diversity and quantity | - Intensified interpersonal counseling/coaching/demonstrations during home visits for pregnant women and family members using local foods by ASHAs and AWWs | - Routine standard counseling |
| - Reminder messages at VHNDs/ANC contacts at subcenters by ANMs and by facility-based service providers | ||
| - Peer group problem-solving discussions at AWC group meetings | ||
| IFA and calciumsupplementationand counseling | - Intensified distribution of 180 IFA and 360 calcium tablets during pregnancy | - Routine IFA and calcium distribution to pregnant women |
| - Intensified interpersonal counseling at home visits for pregnant women and family members with emphasis on benefits, dosage, and adherence/compliance, by ASHAs and AWWs | - Routine standard counseling | |
| - Counseling/reminder messages on dosage and adherence/compliance, by ANMs at VHNDs and subcenters and by facility-based service providers | ||
| Weight measurementin pregnancy | - Functional weighing scale at AWC and VHNDs | - Standard materials |
| - Intensified interpersonal counseling during home visit on importance of adequate weight gain by ASHAs and AWWs | - Routine standard counseling | |
| - Weight gain chart at home for women and family members | ||
| - Weight monitoring and reminder messages at VHNDs and subcenters by ANMs and other facility-based providers | ||
| Counseling on breastfeeding | - Focus on counseling by ANMs during VHNDs and at subcenters and by other facility-based providers during ANC (second- and third-trimester visits) on early initiation of breastfeeding | - Routine counseling on early breastfeeding |
| Number of ANC and home visits during pregnancy | - Optimizing the existing mandated contact by improving quality through intensified counseling (minimum 30 min per counseling session) and demonstration | - Routine training/performance improvement support for quality home visits/contacts by FLWs |
| - 4 minimum quality contacts with ANMs for ANC services at VHNDs or subcenters (1 each during the first and second trimesters and 2 during the third trimester) | ||
| - 4 minimum quality contacts by ASHAs (1 each during the first and second trimesters and 2 during the third trimester) and 3 minimum contacts by AWWs (1 during the second trimester and 2 during the third trimester) for home visits to ensure pregnant women seek antenatal care at VHNDs and coaching/counseling/checking compliance/recommended practices | ||
| Community mobilization | ||
| Community events and outreach | - In both I-ANC and S-ANC areas, community awareness-raising activities were conducted periodically because community mobilization was a key pillar of the National Nutrition Mission | |
| - Community mobilization involved key influencers in families (husbands, mothers/mothers-in-law), local community leaders, and Village Health, Sanitation, and Nutrition Committee members, aiming to improve awareness and shift norms and perceptions related to MN | - Routine community activities | |
| - Husbands’ forums (1/village during the intervention period) | ||
| - Community sensitization sessions with Village Health, Sanitation, and Nutrition Committee members and local community leaders (monthly meeting) | ||
| - Sensitization of local doctors in the public health system | ||
| Supportive supervision | ||
| Observation of MN counseling and services | - Government supervisors and A&T staff conduct supervision visits to FLWs at different service-delivery contact points (home visits, VHNDs, community-based events, etc.) | - Standard supervision without additional performance improvement support |
| - Supervisors were encouraged to adopt a supportive supervision checklist, provide coaching, use a problem-solving method, and provide feedback to FLWs for performance improvement as part of their regular supervision visits | ||
| - Supportive supervision activities were reviewed during monthly meetings based on information from the checklists | ||
| Supply chain strengthening | ||
| Supplies of IFA and calcium supplements | - Under the national Anemia-Free India program, activities to strengthen the IFA supply chain were undertaken in both I-ANC and S-ANC areas | |
| - Distribution of 180 IFA and 360 calcium tablets was intensified in I-ANC areas | - Routine activities related to the supply chain | |
| - A&T staff provided technical support to facilitate accurate forecasting and procurement of adequate quantities of IFA and calcium at state and district levels | ||
| - Block staff and ANMs also received technical support to improve demand estimation and rational distribution based on requirements for IFA and calcium supplements | ||
| Use of data | ||
| Strategic use of data for program improvement | - A&T staff supports ANMs to check data quality and make necessary revisions during reporting for the Mother and Child Tracking system | - Routine monitoring of activities or use of data |
| - A&T staff collects program monitoring data on MN activities including home visits, VHNDs, husbands’ forums, and review meetings to monitor coverage and quality | ||
| - A&T supports government staff to develop and use MN block cards using the Health Management Information System to monitor health and nutrition indicators each month | ||
| - Data discussed in review meetings to identify gaps and areas for improvement | ||
1ANC, antenatal care; ANM, Auxiliary Nurse Midwife; ASHA, Accredited Social Health Activist; AWC: Anganwadi Center; AWW, Anganwadi worker; A&T, Alive & Thrive; FLW, frontline worker; I-ANC, nutrition-intensified antenatal care; IFA, iron and folic acid; MN, maternal nutrition; S-ANC, standard antenatal care; SBCC, social and behavior change communication; VHND, Village Health and Nutrition Day.
FIGURE 1Trial profile from repeated cross-sectional surveys. A&T, Alive & Thrive; I-ANC, nutrition-intensified antenatal care; S-ANC, standard antenatal care.
Selected baseline characteristics of pregnant and recently delivered women in I-ANC and S-ANC intervention areas in Uttar Pradesh, India[1]
| Pregnant women | Recently delivered women | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| I-ANC area ( | S-ANC area ( | I-ANC area ( | S-ANC area ( | |
| Maternal characteristics | ||||
| Gestational age, mo | 6.4 ± 1.4 | 6.5 ± 1.4 | — | — |
| Second trimester, % | 39.0 | 33.8 | — | — |
| Third trimester, % | 61.0 | 66.2 | — | — |
| Age of respondent mother, y | 25.2 ± 4.1 | 24.9 ± 4.1 | 25.8 ± 4.2 | 25.8 ± 4.4 |
| Education level, % | ||||
| Never attended school, % | 23.7 | 27.8 | 28.2 | 31.1 |
| Primary school (grade 1–5), % | 15.9 | 14.7 | 13.9 | 14.8 |
| Middle school (grade 6–9), % | 21.9 | 19.2 | 22.6 | 21.3 |
| High school (grade 10–12), % | 27.0 | 22.8 | 23.5 | 24.8 |
| Graduate and above, % | 11.4 | 15.6 | 11.8 | 7.9 |
| Occupation as housewife, % | 91.9 | 91.6 | 89.4 | 87.8 |
| Religion as Hindu, % | 92.2 | 91.9 | 94.2 | 92.3 |
| Caste category, % | ||||
| Scheduled caste/tribe, % | 41.1 | 42.2 | 39.3 | 42.7 |
| Other backward class, % | 43.5 | 39.5 | 44.4 | 43.9 |
| General/others, % | 15.3 | 18.3 | 16.4 | 13.4 |
| BMI, kg/m2 | — | — | 21.0 ± 3.1 | 20.8 ± 2.9 |
| Underweight (<18.5), % | — | — | 21.5 | 20.3 |
| Normal (18.5–24.9), % | — | — | 68.4 | 72.4 |
| Overweight/obese (≥25), % | — | — | 10.2 | 7.3 |
| Household characteristics | ||||
| Household size, | 5.1 ± 2.1 | 5.2 ± 2.0 | 6.4 ± 2.4 | 6.4 ± 2.4 |
| Children <5 y, | 0.8 ± 0.7 | 0.7 ± 0.7 | 1.7 ± 0.7 | 1.7 ± 0.7 |
| Household food secure, % | 83.1 | 83.5 | 74.7 | 71.2 |
| Household socioeconomic index | −0.02 ± 0.9 | 0.02 ± 0.9 | 0.05 ± 1.0 | −0.05 ± 0.9 |
| Tertile 1, % | 33.3 | 33.5 | 31.4 | 35.2 |
| Tertile 2, % | 35.4 | 31.1 | 33.5 | 33.2 |
| Tertile 3, % | 31.2 | 35.3 | 35.1 | 31.6 |
Values are means ± SDs or percentages. I-ANC, nutrition-intensified antenatal care; S-ANC, standard antenatal care.
Coverage and use of ANC services and nutrition interventions among recently delivered women by survey round in I-ANC and S-ANC intervention areas in Uttar Pradesh, India[1]
| Baseline | Endline | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I-ANC area ( | S-ANC area ( | I-ANC area[ | S-ANC area ( | DIDs,[ | |
| Received ANC services | |||||
| Received any ANC, % | 91.0 | 89.7 | 89.8 | 88.4 | −0.1 ± 2.1 |
| Received ANC from first trimester, % | 41.0 | 38.1 | 41.1 | 44.0 | −5.9 ± 3.5 |
| Received ANC ≥4 times, % | 29.4 | 24.3 | 23.5 | 22.7 | −4.8 ± 3.4 |
| Home visits | |||||
| Visited at home by AWW, % | 27.0 | 32.0 | 61.6** | 51.4 | 14.4 ± 4.3** |
| Received ≥3 visits at home by AWW, % | 15.2 | 15.5 | 36.2* | 27.8 | 8.4 ± 3.5* |
| Visited at home by ASHA, % | 80.1 | 83.5 | 90.6 | 86.7 | 6.8 ± 2.6* |
| Received ≥4 visits at home by ASHA, % | 40.7 | 40.9 | 56.5* | 49.4 | 6.6 ± 3.7 |
| Received ≥7 visits at home by AWW or ASHA, % | 18.7 | 18.0 | 38.9* | 31.7 | 6.2 ± 3.4 |
| VHNDs | |||||
| Participated in VHNDs, % | — | — | 59.2** | 48.3 | — |
| Times attended VHNDs in the last 3 mo, | — | — | 1.4 ± 1.5** | 1.1 ± 1.3 | — |
| Received any individual counseling, % | — | — | 52.2* | 42.9 | — |
| Participated in any group counseling, % | — | — | 44.2** | 33.0 | — |
| Received counseling on maternal nutrition and breastfeeding practices | |||||
| Eating variety of foods (5 groups), % | 51.2 | 51.7 | 64.0*** | 54.6 | 9.9 ± 4.1* |
| Increasing quantities of foods, % | 32.0 | 37.3 | 69.3*** | 51.0 | 23.2 ± 3.5*** |
| Weight gain, % | 17.9 | 19.8 | 50.3** | 40.2 | 11.7 ± 3.7*** |
| Taking IFA, % | 70.8 | 73.7 | 89.4*** | 80.9 | 11.0 ± 3.7*** |
| Taking calcium, % | 19.7 | 20.9 | 68.0*** | 54.6 | 14.0 ± 3.7*** |
| Breastfeeding, % | 36.1 | 43.4 | 63.1** | 53.9 | 15.5 ± 4.1*** |
Values are means ± SDs or percentages. ANC, antenatal care; ASHA, Accredited Social Health Activist; AWW, Anganwadi worker; DID, difference-in-difference effect estimate; I-ANC, nutrition-intensified antenatal care; IFA, iron and folic acid; pp, percentage points; S-ANC, standard antenatal care; VHND, Village Health and Nutrition Day.
Differences in groups at baseline and endline: *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001.
DIDs between baseline and endline: *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001.
FIGURE 2Receipt and consumption of IFA supplements in recently delivered women, by survey round in I-ANC and S-ANC intervention areas in Uttar Pradesh, India. (A) Percentage of women that received IFA supplements, (B) number of IFA supplements received, (C) percentage of women that consumed IFA supplements, (D) number of IFA supplements consumed. *Significant difference: P < 0.05. Percentage that consumed ≥100 IFA tablets: 8.0% compared with 7.0% at baseline and 26.0% compared with 23.2% at endline for I-ANC and S-ANC, respectively. DID, difference-in-difference effect estimate; I-ANC, nutrition-intensified antenatal care; IFA, iron–folic acid; pp, percentage points; S-ANC, standard antenatal care.
FIGURE 3Receipt and consumption of calcium supplements in recently delivered women, by survey round in I-ANC and S-ANC intervention areas in Uttar Pradesh, India. (A) Percentage of women that received calcium supplements, (B) number of calcium supplements received, (C) percentage of women that consumed calcium supplements, (D) number of calcium supplements consumed. **,***Significant difference: **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001. Percentage that consumed ≥100 calcium tablets: 3.4% compared with 1.8% at baseline and 13.5% compared with 10.4% at endline for I-ANC and S-ANC, respectively. DID, difference-in-difference effect estimate; I-ANC, nutrition-intensified antenatal care; pp, percentage points; S-ANC, standard antenatal care.
Diet diversity and probability of adequate intake of micronutrients among pregnant women by survey round in I-ANC and S-ANC intervention areas in Uttar Pradesh, India[1]
| Baseline | Endline | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I-ANC area2 ( | S-ANC area ( | I-ANC area ( | S-ANC area ( | DIDs, pp ± SE | |
| Core indicators | |||||
| Food groups consumed, | 4.2 ± 1.1 | 4.1 ± 1.1 | 4.4 ± 1.2 | 4.3 ± 1.1 | 0.003 ± 0.1 |
| Consumed ≥5 food groups, % | 36.2 | 34.9 | 45.2 | 42.4 | 1.8 ± 5.5 |
| Mean probability of adequacy of micronutrients, % | 17.6 | 19.3 | 21.0 | 21.5 | 0.8 ± 1.7 |
| Optional indicators | |||||
| Type of food groups consumed, % | |||||
| All starchy staple foods | 100 | 100 | 99.7 | 100 | −0.3 ± 0.3 |
| Pulses | 59.7 | 56.1 | 59.3 | 58.5 | −2.1 ± 5.1 |
| Nuts and seeds | 18.1 | 17.9 | 18.6 | 21.8 | −4.0 ± 4.7 |
| Dairy | 80.6 | 81.1 | 82.9 | 86.2 | −3.0 ± 3.7 |
| Flesh foods | 3.5 | 5.1 | 6.3 | 5.0 | 3.5 ± 2.7 |
| Eggs | 2.9 | 1.9 | 3.9 | 2.9 | −0.01 ± 1.7 |
| Dark green leafy vegetables | 38.4 | 37.2 | 38.9 | 32.1 | 5.5 ± 5.7 |
| Other vitamin A–rich fruits and vegetables | 2.5 | 2.9 | 3.9 | 4.7 | −0.3 ± 2.0 |
| Other vegetables | 77.1 | 78.8 | 86.2 | 86.2 | 2.1 ± 4.5 |
| Other fruits | 32.7 | 29.2 | 38.0 | 35.6 | −1.1 ± 5.5 |
| Probability of adequate intake, % | |||||
| Calcium | 24.4 | 26.4 | 31.9 | 32.0 | 1.2 ± 2.6 |
| Iron | 3.0 | 3.7 | 3.1 | 4.9 | −1.4 ± 1.6 |
| Zinc | 49.3 | 52.4 | 54.5 | 52.8 | 4.1 ± 4.3 |
| Vitamin C | 11.3 | 16.9 | 18.3 | 21.7 | 2.1 ± 4.2 |
| Thiamin | 53.0 | 56.0 | 57.8 | 57.1 | 2.7 ± 4.4 |
| Riboflavin | 14.4 | 15.7 | 16.6 | 17.6 | −0.3 ± 3.5 |
| Niacin | 34.9 | 38.0 | 39.2 | 40.6 | 1.2 ± 4.4 |
| Vitamin B-6 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 2.2 | 1.7 | 0.5 ± 1.0 |
| Folate | 1.2 | 0.5 | 1.9 | 1.6 | −0.4 ± 1.1 |
| Vitamin B-12 | 1.1 | 1.4 | 5.1 | 5.9 | −0.7 ± 1.7 |
| Vitamin A | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.2 | −0.1 ± 0.1 |
Values are means ± SDs or percentages. No comparisons were statistically significant. DID, difference-in-difference effect estimate; I-ANC, nutrition-intensified antenatal care; pp, percentage points; S-ANC, standard antenatal care.
FIGURE 4Weight monitoring during pregnancy and gestational weight gain, by survey round in I-ANC and S-ANC intervention areas in Uttar Pradesh, India. (A) Weight monitoring, (B) gestational weight gain. *Significant difference: P < 0.05. DID, difference-in-difference effect estimate; I-ANC, nutrition-intensified antenatal care; pp, percentage points; S-ANC, standard antenatal care.
FIGURE 5Breastfeeding practices, by survey round in I-ANC and S-ANC intervention areas in Uttar Pradesh, India. (A) Early initiation of breastfeeding, (B) exclusive breastfeeding. *Significant difference: P < 0.05. DID, difference-in-difference effect estimate; I-ANC, nutrition-intensified antenatal care; pp, percentage points; S-ANC, standard antenatal care.