Katherine Jane Williams Baucom1, Mandy L Pershing2, Kaitlyn M Dwenger2, Michelle Karasawa2, Jessica N Cohan2,3, Elissa M Ozanne2. 1. Department of Psychology, College of Social and Social Behavioral Science, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA. 2. Division of Health System Innovation and Research, Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA. 3. Department of Surgery, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Abstract
Background: More than 10% of US adults are living with type 2 diabetes. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention established the National Diabetes Prevention Program (National DPP) in 2010 in an effort to delay or prevent this disease among individuals at high risk. Unfortunately, enrollment and retention rates are low. This qualitative study aims to understand barriers and facilitators to enrolling and completing the National DPP among women, and to provide recommendations for improvement. Methods: Semistructured interviews were conducted with the following: (1) women who were eligible for the National DPP, but declined to enroll (n=11); (2) women who enrolled in the National DPP, but did not complete the program (n=12); and (3) clinicians who treat women eligible for the National DPP (n=12). Transcripts of the interviews were coded using content analysis. Results: The 35 interviews (23 patients and 12 clinicians) provided further insight into known barriers, such as the cost of the program, the time that it takes, and inconvenient locations. The study also identified previously undiscovered barriers, including the program not meeting participants' expectations and facilitating referrals. Furthermore, improved communication between clinicians, patients, and National DPP staff could ensure that both clinicians and National DPP staff are aware of patients' goals and their individual barriers to success. Conclusions: Enrollment and retention in the National DPP may be improved with additional communication, more training for National DPP staff to work more closely with participants, adding better incentives to participation, and making the program more accessible through flexibility in time and/or locations. Katherine Jane Williams Baucom et al., 2021; Published by Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.
Background: More than 10% of US adults are living with type 2 diabetes. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention established the National Diabetes Prevention Program (National DPP) in 2010 in an effort to delay or prevent this disease among individuals at high risk. Unfortunately, enrollment and retention rates are low. This qualitative study aims to understand barriers and facilitators to enrolling and completing the National DPP among women, and to provide recommendations for improvement. Methods: Semistructured interviews were conducted with the following: (1) women who were eligible for the National DPP, but declined to enroll (n=11); (2) women who enrolled in the National DPP, but did not complete the program (n=12); and (3) clinicians who treat women eligible for the National DPP (n=12). Transcripts of the interviews were coded using content analysis. Results: The 35 interviews (23 patients and 12 clinicians) provided further insight into known barriers, such as the cost of the program, the time that it takes, and inconvenient locations. The study also identified previously undiscovered barriers, including the program not meeting participants' expectations and facilitating referrals. Furthermore, improved communication between clinicians, patients, and National DPP staff could ensure that both clinicians and National DPP staff are aware of patients' goals and their individual barriers to success. Conclusions: Enrollment and retention in the National DPP may be improved with additional communication, more training for National DPP staff to work more closely with participants, adding better incentives to participation, and making the program more accessible through flexibility in time and/or locations. Katherine Jane Williams Baucom et al., 2021; Published by Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.
Authors: Jennifer Carroll; Paul Winters; Kevin Fiscella; Geoffrey Williams; Jean Bauch; Linda Clark; James Sutton; Nancy Bennett Journal: Diabetes Educ Date: 2015-03-10 Impact factor: 2.140
Authors: Matt C Jackson; Shifan Dai; Renée A Skeete; Michelle Owens-Gary; Michael J Cannon; Bryce D Smith; Rajai Jabrah; Svetlana E Masalovich; Robin E Soler Journal: Diabetes Educ Date: 2020-10-16 Impact factor: 2.140
Authors: Michael J Cannon; Svetlana Masalovich; Boon Peng Ng; Robin E Soler; Rajai Jabrah; Elizabeth K Ely; Bryce D Smith Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2020-07-02 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: William C Knowler; Sarah E Fowler; Richard F Hamman; Costas A Christophi; Heather J Hoffman; Anne T Brenneman; Janet O Brown-Friday; Ronald Goldberg; Elizabeth Venditti; David M Nathan Journal: Lancet Date: 2009-10-29 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Earle C Chambers; Colin D Rehm; Jordan Correra; Lydia Elena Garcia; Melinda E Marquez; Judith Wylie-Rosett; Amanda Parsons Journal: Prev Chronic Dis Date: 2017-03-30 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: Katherine J W Baucom; Tali Bauman; Manuel Gutierrez Chavez; Yanina Nemirovsky; Monique C Aguirre; Carmen Ramos; Anu Asnaani; Cassidy A Gutner; Natalie D Ritchie; Megha Shah Journal: Transl Behav Med Date: 2022-08-17 Impact factor: 3.626
Authors: Lisa A Auster-Gussman; Kimberly G Lockwood; Sarah A Graham; Natalie Stein; OraLee H Branch Journal: Popul Health Manag Date: 2022-02-24 Impact factor: 2.290