Literature DB >> 20485021

Quantitative morphometric outcomes following the Melbourne method of total vault remodeling for scaphocephaly.

Robert Toma1, Andrew L Greensmith, John G Meara, Annette C Da Costa, Lloyd A Ellis, Susanne K Willams, Anthony D Holmes.   

Abstract

The Melbourne method of total vault remodeling was developed at The Royal Children's Hospital (Melbourne) to address all phenotypic aspects of scaphocephaly. To quantitatively evaluate this technique, a retrospective analysis was performed on 33 consecutive patients who underwent the Melbourne procedure between October 2004 and June 2007. To monitor outcomes, three-dimensional digital surface photography was used, obtaining 4 anthropometric measurements (cranial length, cranial width, head circumference, auricular head height) preoperatively and postoperatively. To assess the effect on continuing cranial vault development, cranial volume was calculated with computed tomography. Anthropometric measurements were obtained in 27 patients (81.8%), with a mean postoperative follow-up of 8.9 months. Cranial index (width/length) demonstrated an 11.1% improvement. The mean head circumference in the scaphocephaly group preoperatively remained larger than the normative population postoperatively, although the magnitude of difference was decreased, whereas the mean auricular head height demonstrated a 10.5% increase postoperatively, remaining higher than the normative population. Cranial volume was calculated in 30 patients (91%), with a mean postoperative follow-up of 7.9 months. This demonstrated that the mean intracranial volume was significantly higher in the scaphocephaly group preoperatively, and this difference was maintained postoperatively. These results support our belief that the Melbourne procedure is a technique that may be used to correct all phenotypic aspects of scaphocephaly, with no apparent evidence for a detrimental effect on cranial growth.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20485021     DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e3181d841d9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Craniofac Surg        ISSN: 1049-2275            Impact factor:   1.046


  7 in total

1.  Intracranial volume (ICV) in isolated sagittal craniosynostosis: a retrospective case-matched-control study.

Authors:  James Holland; Desideiro Rodrigues; Shyam Mohan; Nicholas White
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2019-01-07       Impact factor: 1.475

2.  Morphological and surgical results in sagittal synostosis: early craniectomy versus later cranioplasty.

Authors:  Matthieu Vinchon; Pierre Guerreschi; Melodie-Anne Karnoub; Alexis Wolber
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2021-04-22       Impact factor: 1.475

3.  Results of early surgery for sagittal suture synostosis: long-term follow-up and the occurrence of raised intracranial pressure.

Authors:  Marie-Lise C van Veelen; Oscar H J Eelkman Rooda; Tim de Jong; Ruben Dammers; Leon N A van Adrichem; Irene M J Mathijssen
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2013-01-20       Impact factor: 1.475

4.  Evaluating Surgical Decision-making in Nonsyndromic Sagittal Craniosynostosis Using a Digital 3D Model.

Authors:  Christopher D Hughes; Olivia Langa; Laura Nuzzi; Steven J Staffa; Mark Proctor; John G Meara; Ingrid M Ganske
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2021-05-21

5.  Head circumference - a useful single parameter for skull volume development in cranial growth analysis?

Authors:  Markus Martini; Anne Klausing; Guido Lüchters; Nils Heim; Martina Messing-Jünger
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 2.151

6.  Modification of the Melbourne Method for Total Calvarial Vault Remodeling.

Authors:  Christopher D Hughes; Kathryn V Isaac; Paul F Hwang; Ingrid Ganske; Mark R Proctor; John G Meara
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2018-07-09

Review 7.  Methods to quantify soft tissue-based cranial growth and treatment outcomes in children: a systematic review.

Authors:  Sander Brons; Machteld E van Beusichem; Ewald M Bronkhorst; Jos M Draaisma; Stefaan J Bergé; Jan G Schols; Anne Marie Kuijpers-Jagtman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-27       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.