Literature DB >> 34035331

Effects of occipital-atlas stabilization in the upper cervical spine kinematics: an in vitro study.

César Hidalgo-García1, Ana I Lorente2, Carlos López-de-Celis3, Orosia Lucha-López4, Miguel Malo-Urriés4, Jacobo Rodríguez-Sanz3, Mario Maza-Frechín2, José Miguel Tricás-Moreno4, John Krauss5, Albert Pérez-Bellmunt3.   

Abstract

This study compares upper cervical spine range of motion (ROM) in the three cardinal planes before and after occiput-atlas (C0-C1) stabilization. After the dissection of the superficial structures to the alar ligament and the fixation of C2, ten cryopreserved upper cervical columns were manually mobilized in the three cardinal planes of movement without and with a screw stabilization of C0-C1. Upper cervical ROM and mobilization force were measured using the Vicon motion capture system and a load cell respectively. The ROM without C0-C1 stabilization was 19.8° ± 5.2° in flexion and 14.3° ± 7.7° in extension. With stabilization, the ROM was 11.5° ± 4.3° and 6.6° ± 3.5°, respectively. The ROM without C0-C1 stabilization was 4.7° ± 2.3° in right lateral flexion and 5.6° ± 3.2° in left lateral flexion. With stabilization, the ROM was 2.3° ± 1.4° and 2.3° ± 1.2°, respectively. The ROM without C0-C1 stabilization was 33.9° ± 6.7° in right rotation and 28.0° ± 6.9° in left rotation. With stabilization, the ROM was 28.5° ± 7.0° and 23.7° ± 8.5° respectively. Stabilization of C0-C1 reduced the upper cervical ROM by 46.9% in the sagittal plane, 55.3% in the frontal plane, and 15.6% in the transverse plane. Also, the resistance to movement during upper cervical mobilization increased following C0-C1 stabilization.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34035331     DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-90052-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  28 in total

1.  A geometrical model of vertical translation and alar ligament tension in atlanto-axial rotation.

Authors:  B M Boszczyk; A P Littlewood; R Putz
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-03-02       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Normal kinematics of the upper cervical spine during the Flexion-Rotation Test - In vivo measurements using magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Hiroshi Takasaki; Toby Hall; Sadanori Oshiro; Shouta Kaneko; Yoshikazu Ikemoto; Gwendolen Jull
Journal:  Man Ther       Date:  2010-11-04

3.  A model of the alar ligaments of the upper cervical spine in axial rotation.

Authors:  J J Crisco; M M Panjabi; J Dvorak
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  Effect of alar ligament transection in side-bending stress test: A cadaveric study.

Authors:  César Hidalgo-García; Ana I Lorente; Jacobo Rodríguez-Sanz; José Miguel Tricás-Moreno; Mathias Simon; Mario Maza-Frechín; Carlos Lopez-de-Celis; John Krauss; Albert Pérez-Bellmunt
Journal:  Musculoskelet Sci Pract       Date:  2020-01-14       Impact factor: 2.520

5.  Three-dimensional intervertebral kinematics in the healthy young adult cervical spine during dynamic functional loading.

Authors:  William J Anderst; William F Donaldson; Joon Y Lee; James D Kang
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2015-03-14       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  Dynamic in vivo 3D atlantoaxial spine kinematics during upright rotation.

Authors:  William Anderst; Bryan Rynearson; Tyler West; William Donaldson; Joon Lee
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  Construct validity of clinical tests for alar ligament integrity: an evaluation using magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Peter G Osmotherly; Darren A Rivett; Lindsay J Rowe
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2012-01-19

8.  In vivo three-dimensional kinematics of the cervical spine during maximal axial rotation.

Authors:  Walid Salem; Cyrille Lenders; Jacques Mathieu; Nicole Hermanus; Paul Klein
Journal:  Man Ther       Date:  2013-01-29

9.  A kinematic and anthropometric study of the upper cervical spine and the occipital condyles.

Authors:  Valeta Carol Chancey; Danielle Ottaviano; Barry S Myers; Roger W Nightingale
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2007-04-26       Impact factor: 2.712

10.  Is there a difference in range of motion, neck pain, and outcomes in patients with ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament versus those with cervical spondylosis, treated with plated laminoplasty?

Authors:  Takahito Fujimori; Hai Le; John E Ziewacz; Dean Chou; Praveen V Mummaneni
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 4.047

View more
  1 in total

1.  Is Cervical Stabilization Exercise Immediately Effective in Patients with Chronic Neck Pain and Upper Cervical Spine Dysfunction? Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Jacobo Rodríguez-Sanz; Miguel Malo-Urriés; María Orosia Lucha-López; Jaime Corral-de-Toro; Vanessa González-Rueda; Carlos López-de-Celis; Albert Pérez-Bellmunt; César Hidalgo-García
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-11
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.