Literature DB >> 17466312

A kinematic and anthropometric study of the upper cervical spine and the occipital condyles.

Valeta Carol Chancey1, Danielle Ottaviano, Barry S Myers, Roger W Nightingale.   

Abstract

The center of rotation (COR) of the upper cervical spine (UCS) is an important biomechanical landmark that is used to determine upper neck moment, particularly when evaluating injury risk in the automotive environment. However, neither the location of the UCS CORs nor the occipital condyles (OCs), which are frequently the referenced landmark for UCS CORs, have been measured with respect to known cranial landmarks. This study determines the CORs using pure bending (+/-3.5 N m), 3D digitization, and image analysis. Landmarks digitized included the OCs, external auditory meatus (EAM), infraorbital foramen, zygion, nasion, and the foramen magnum. The centroid of each occipital condylar surface (area 301+/-29.8 mm(2); length 25.4+/-3.2 mm) was located 18.4 mm posterior, 54.4 mm medial, and 31.0 mm inferior of the EAM. The UCS CORs were distinct: On average, OC-C1 CORs (22.5 mm posterior and 22.6 mm inferior to the left EAM) were superior and more posterior of OCs; C1-C2 CORs (7.4 mm posterior and 46.7 mm inferior to the left EAM) were inferior and more anterior of OC; and OC-C2 CORs (17.0 mm posterior and 33.1 mm inferior to the left EAM) were aligned with OC. There was a statistically significant difference between the percentage of UCS rotation in C1-C2 and OC-C1; 45% of the flexion and 71% of the extension occurred in OC-C1. Details of an anatomical variant with two pairs of distinct condylar surfaces are also presented.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17466312     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2006.09.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  3 in total

1.  Quantification of anatomical variation at the atlanto-occipital articulation: morphometric resolution of commingled human remains within the repatriation documentation process.

Authors:  J Christopher Dudar; Eric R Castillo
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2016-12-15       Impact factor: 2.610

2.  Effects of occipital-atlas stabilization in the upper cervical spine kinematics: an in vitro study.

Authors:  César Hidalgo-García; Ana I Lorente; Carlos López-de-Celis; Orosia Lucha-López; Miguel Malo-Urriés; Jacobo Rodríguez-Sanz; Mario Maza-Frechín; José Miguel Tricás-Moreno; John Krauss; Albert Pérez-Bellmunt
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Validation protocol for assessing the upper cervical spine kinematics and helical axis: An in vivo preliminary analysis for axial rotation, modeling, and motion representation.

Authors:  Pierre-Michel Dugailly; Stéphane Sobczak; Alphonse Lubansu; Marcel Rooze; Sergevan Sint Jan; Véronique Feipel
Journal:  J Craniovertebr Junction Spine       Date:  2013-01
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.