Literature DB >> 34034645

Super.FELT: supervised feature extraction learning using triplet loss for drug response prediction with multi-omics data.

Sejin Park1, Jihee Soh1, Hyunju Lee2,3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Predicting the drug response of a patient is important for precision oncology. In recent studies, multi-omics data have been used to improve the prediction accuracy of drug response. Although multi-omics data are good resources for drug response prediction, the large dimension of data tends to hinder performance improvement. In this study, we aimed to develop a new method, which can effectively reduce the large dimension of data, based on the supervised deep learning model for predicting drug response.
RESULTS: We proposed a novel method called Supervised Feature Extraction Learning using Triplet loss (Super.FELT) for drug response prediction. Super.FELT consists of three stages, namely, feature selection, feature encoding using a supervised method, and binary classification of drug response (sensitive or resistant). We used multi-omics data including mutation, copy number aberration, and gene expression, and these were obtained from cell lines [Genomics of Drug Sensitivity in Cancer (GDSC), Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia (CCLE), and Cancer Therapeutics Response Portal (CTRP)], patient-derived tumor xenografts (PDX), and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). GDSC was used for training and cross-validation tests, and CCLE, CTRP, PDX, and TCGA were used for external validation. We performed ablation studies for the three stages and verified that the use of multi-omics data guarantees better performance of drug response prediction. Our results verified that Super.FELT outperformed the other methods at external validation on PDX and TCGA and was good at cross-validation on GDSC and external validation on CCLE and CTRP. In addition, through our experiments, we confirmed that using multi-omics data is useful for external non-cell line data.
CONCLUSION: By separating the three stages, Super.FELT achieved better performance than the other methods. Through our results, we found that it is important to train encoders and a classifier independently, especially for external test on PDX and TCGA. Moreover, although gene expression is the most powerful data on cell line data, multi-omics promises better performance for external validation on non-cell line data than gene expression data. Source codes of Super.FELT are available at  https://github.com/DMCB-GIST/Super.FELT .

Entities:  

Keywords:  Drug response prediction; Multi-omics data; Pharmacogenomics; Precision oncology; Triplet loss; encoder using supervised methods

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34034645     DOI: 10.1186/s12859-021-04146-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics        ISSN: 1471-2105            Impact factor:   3.169


  20 in total

1.  Precision Oncology beyond Targeted Therapy: Combining Omics Data with Machine Learning Matches the Majority of Cancer Cells to Effective Therapeutics.

Authors:  Michael Q Ding; Lujia Chen; Gregory F Cooper; Jonathan D Young; Xinghua Lu
Journal:  Mol Cancer Res       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 5.852

2.  Pharmacogenomic landscape of patient-derived tumor cells informs precision oncology therapy.

Authors:  Jin-Ku Lee; Zhaoqi Liu; Jason K Sa; Sang Shin; Jiguang Wang; Mykola Bordyuh; Hee Jin Cho; Oliver Elliott; Timothy Chu; Seung Won Choi; Daniel I S Rosenbloom; In-Hee Lee; Yong Jae Shin; Hyun Ju Kang; Donggeon Kim; Sun Young Kim; Moon-Hee Sim; Jusun Kim; Taehyang Lee; Yun Jee Seo; Hyemi Shin; Mijeong Lee; Sung Heon Kim; Yong-Jun Kwon; Jeong-Woo Oh; Minsuk Song; Misuk Kim; Doo-Sik Kong; Jung Won Choi; Ho Jun Seol; Jung-Il Lee; Seung Tae Kim; Joon Oh Park; Kyoung-Mee Kim; Sang-Yong Song; Jeong-Won Lee; Hee-Cheol Kim; Jeong Eon Lee; Min Gew Choi; Sung Wook Seo; Young Mog Shim; Jae Ill Zo; Byong Chang Jeong; Yeup Yoon; Gyu Ha Ryu; Nayoung K D Kim; Joon Seol Bae; Woong-Yang Park; Jeongwu Lee; Roel G W Verhaak; Antonio Iavarone; Jeeyun Lee; Raul Rabadan; Do-Hyun Nam
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2018-09-27       Impact factor: 38.330

3.  The Cancer Genome Atlas Pan-Cancer analysis project.

Authors:  John N Weinstein; Eric A Collisson; Gordon B Mills; Kenna R Mills Shaw; Brad A Ozenberger; Kyle Ellrott; Ilya Shmulevich; Chris Sander; Joshua M Stuart
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 38.330

4.  A community effort to assess and improve drug sensitivity prediction algorithms.

Authors:  James C Costello; Laura M Heiser; Elisabeth Georgii; Mehmet Gönen; Michael P Menden; Nicholas J Wang; Mukesh Bansal; Muhammad Ammad-ud-din; Petteri Hintsanen; Suleiman A Khan; John-Patrick Mpindi; Olli Kallioniemi; Antti Honkela; Tero Aittokallio; Krister Wennerberg; James J Collins; Dan Gallahan; Dinah Singer; Julio Saez-Rodriguez; Samuel Kaski; Joe W Gray; Gustavo Stolovitzky
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2014-06-01       Impact factor: 54.908

5.  The Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia enables predictive modelling of anticancer drug sensitivity.

Authors:  Jordi Barretina; Giordano Caponigro; Nicolas Stransky; Kavitha Venkatesan; Adam A Margolin; Sungjoon Kim; Christopher J Wilson; Joseph Lehár; Gregory V Kryukov; Dmitriy Sonkin; Anupama Reddy; Manway Liu; Lauren Murray; Michael F Berger; John E Monahan; Paula Morais; Jodi Meltzer; Adam Korejwa; Judit Jané-Valbuena; Felipa A Mapa; Joseph Thibault; Eva Bric-Furlong; Pichai Raman; Aaron Shipway; Ingo H Engels; Jill Cheng; Guoying K Yu; Jianjun Yu; Peter Aspesi; Melanie de Silva; Kalpana Jagtap; Michael D Jones; Li Wang; Charles Hatton; Emanuele Palescandolo; Supriya Gupta; Scott Mahan; Carrie Sougnez; Robert C Onofrio; Ted Liefeld; Laura MacConaill; Wendy Winckler; Michael Reich; Nanxin Li; Jill P Mesirov; Stacey B Gabriel; Gad Getz; Kristin Ardlie; Vivien Chan; Vic E Myer; Barbara L Weber; Jeff Porter; Markus Warmuth; Peter Finan; Jennifer L Harris; Matthew Meyerson; Todd R Golub; Michael P Morrissey; William R Sellers; Robert Schlegel; Levi A Garraway
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Anticancer drug sensitivity prediction in cell lines from baseline gene expression through recursive feature selection.

Authors:  Zuoli Dong; Naiqian Zhang; Chun Li; Haiyun Wang; Yun Fang; Jun Wang; Xiaoqi Zheng
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2015-06-30       Impact factor: 4.430

7.  Discovering novel pharmacogenomic biomarkers by imputing drug response in cancer patients from large genomics studies.

Authors:  Paul Geeleher; Zhenyu Zhang; Fan Wang; Robert F Gruener; Aritro Nath; Gladys Morrison; Steven Bhutra; Robert L Grossman; R Stephanie Huang
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2017-08-28       Impact factor: 9.043

8.  Autoencoder Based Feature Selection Method for Classification of Anticancer Drug Response.

Authors:  Xiaolu Xu; Hong Gu; Yang Wang; Jia Wang; Pan Qin
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2019-03-27       Impact factor: 4.599

Review 9.  More Is Better: Recent Progress in Multi-Omics Data Integration Methods.

Authors:  Sijia Huang; Kumardeep Chaudhary; Lana X Garmire
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2017-06-16       Impact factor: 4.599

10.  Predicting drug response of tumors from integrated genomic profiles by deep neural networks.

Authors:  Yu-Chiao Chiu; Hung-I Harry Chen; Tinghe Zhang; Songyao Zhang; Aparna Gorthi; Li-Ju Wang; Yufei Huang; Yidong Chen
Journal:  BMC Med Genomics       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 3.063

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.