Vy H Nguyen1, Michael H Le1, Ramsey C Cheung2, Mindie H Nguyen3. 1. Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Stanford University Medical Center, Palo Alto, California. 2. Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Palo Alto Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Palo Alto, California. 3. Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Stanford University Medical Center, Palo Alto, California. Electronic address: mindiehn@stanford.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) establishes new criteria for diagnosing fatty liver disease independent of alcohol intake and concomitant viral hepatitis infection. However, the long-term outcomes of patients with MAFLD are sparse. We aimed to describe the characteristics and long-term survival of persons meeting criteria for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) only (non-MAFLD NAFLD), for both NAFLD and MAFLD (NAFLD-MAFLD), and for MAFLD only (non-NAFLD MAFLD). METHODS: Using data from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III) 1988-1994, 2997 participants with fatty liver identified via ultrasound were categorized into 3 distinct groups: non-MAFLD NAFLD, NAFLD-MAFLD, and non-NAFLD MAFLD. RESULTS: Participants in the NAFLD-MAFLD and non-NAFLD MAFLD groups were older, had more metabolic traits and higher mean liver enzymes. Nearly 8% of participants in the non-NAFLD MAFLD group had advanced fibrosis (Fibrosis-4 index >2.67), while only 1.3% and 1.9% in the NAFLD-MAFLD and non-MAFLD NAFLD groups did, respectively (P < .0001). Non-NAFLD MAFLD participants had the highest cumulative incidence of all-cause mortality (26.2%) followed by those with NAFLD-MAFLD then non-MAFLD NAFLD participants (21.1% and 10.6%, respectively; P < .0001). Similar findings were observed for cardiovascular disease-related and other-cause (noncardiovascular disease, noncancer) mortality. Non-NAFLD MAFLD was independently associated with all-cause mortality compared with non-MAFLD NAFLD (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-4.6; P = .01). CONCLUSIONS: MAFLD criteria identified a significant group of people with more comorbidities and worse prognosis compared with those with NAFLD only. These criteria should be considered in the general population to identify high-risk groups for early interventions.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) establishes new criteria for diagnosing fatty liver disease independent of alcohol intake and concomitant viral hepatitis infection. However, the long-term outcomes of patients with MAFLD are sparse. We aimed to describe the characteristics and long-term survival of persons meeting criteria for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) only (non-MAFLD NAFLD), for both NAFLD and MAFLD (NAFLD-MAFLD), and for MAFLD only (non-NAFLD MAFLD). METHODS: Using data from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III) 1988-1994, 2997 participants with fatty liver identified via ultrasound were categorized into 3 distinct groups: non-MAFLD NAFLD, NAFLD-MAFLD, and non-NAFLD MAFLD. RESULTS:Participants in the NAFLD-MAFLD and non-NAFLD MAFLD groups were older, had more metabolic traits and higher mean liver enzymes. Nearly 8% of participants in the non-NAFLD MAFLD group had advanced fibrosis (Fibrosis-4 index >2.67), while only 1.3% and 1.9% in the NAFLD-MAFLD and non-MAFLD NAFLD groups did, respectively (P < .0001). Non-NAFLD MAFLD participants had the highest cumulative incidence of all-cause mortality (26.2%) followed by those with NAFLD-MAFLD then non-MAFLD NAFLD participants (21.1% and 10.6%, respectively; P < .0001). Similar findings were observed for cardiovascular disease-related and other-cause (noncardiovascular disease, noncancer) mortality. Non-NAFLD MAFLD was independently associated with all-cause mortality compared with non-MAFLD NAFLD (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-4.6; P = .01). CONCLUSIONS: MAFLD criteria identified a significant group of people with more comorbidities and worse prognosis compared with those with NAFLD only. These criteria should be considered in the general population to identify high-risk groups for early interventions.
Authors: Jérémy Dana; Aïna Venkatasamy; Antonio Saviano; Joachim Lupberger; Yujin Hoshida; Valérie Vilgrain; Pierre Nahon; Caroline Reinhold; Benoit Gallix; Thomas F Baumert Journal: Hepatol Int Date: 2022-02-09 Impact factor: 9.029
Authors: Xinyu Wang; Si Cheng; Jun Lv; Canqing Yu; Yu Guo; Pei Pei; Ling Yang; Iona Y Millwood; Robin Walters; Yiping Chen; Huaidong Du; Haiping Duan; Simon Gilbert; Daniel Avery; Junshi Chen; Yuanjie Pang; Zhengming Chen; Liming Li Journal: Front Cardiovasc Med Date: 2022-08-11