| Literature DB >> 34033258 |
Stuart D W Smith1,2, Anna B Smith1, Mark P Richardson1,3,4, Deb K Pal1,2,3,4.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Recent neuroimaging studies have revealed differences in cortical and white matter brain structure in children with self-limiting rolandic epilepsy (RE). Despite this, reproducibility of the findings has been difficult, and there is no consensus about where and when structural differences are most apparent. We performed a systematic review of quantitative neuroimaging studies in children with RE to explore these questions.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34033258 PMCID: PMC8166787 DOI: 10.1002/epi4.12468
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Epilepsia Open ISSN: 2470-9239
Quality ratings of gray and white matter MRI studies
| Quality rating | Included for analysis | Sample (m:f) | Age, years ± sd | Handedness R/L/Amb/ | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RE | Control | RE | Control | RE | Control | |||
| Gray matter studies | ||||||||
| Kohrogi and Mitsudome (1993) | * | No | 27 (11:16) | 17 (10:7) | 9.9 ± 2.7 | 10.4 ± 2.7 | n.r. | n.r. |
| Kanemura et al (2011) | No | 7 (6:1) | 11 (8:3) | 7 | 7.8 | 2/ n.r. | n.r. | |
| Lin et al (2012) | ***** | Yes | 13 (8:5) | 54 (24:30) | 10.2 ± 1.4 | 13.2 ± 3.0 | n.r. | n.r. |
| Overvliet et al (2013) | **** | Yes | 24 (15:9) | 24 (14:10) | 11.3 ± 1.9 | 10.6 ± 1.8 | 20/3/1 | 22/2/0 |
| Pardoe et al (Group A) | ****** | Yes | 16 (11:5) | 20 (12:8) | 9.3 ± 1.6 | 9.7 ± 1.6 | 16/0/0 | 18/2/0 |
| Pardoe et al (Group B) | **** | Yes | 9 (3:6) | 35 (17:18) | 15.8 ± 2.3 | 16.9 ± 4.6 | 8/1/0 | n.r. |
| Pardoe et al (Group C) | **** | Yes | 10 (3:7) | 20 (8:12) | 22.7 ± 2.7 | 23.7 ± 3.4 | 9/1/0 | n.r. |
| Garcia‐Ramos et al (2015) | ****** | Yes | 13 (7:6) | 24 (11:13) | 10.3 ± 1.9 | 11.3 ± 2.0 | n.r. | n.r. |
| Kim et al (2015) | **** | Yes | 20 (14:6) | 20 (14:6) | 7.5 ± 1.5 | 7.4 ± 1.5 | 14/2/0 | 14/2/2/2 |
| Luo et al (2015) | **** | Yes | 21 (13:8) | 20 (10:10) | 9.1 ± 1.5 | 9.3 ± 2.0 | 21/0/0 | 20/0/0 |
| Shakeri et al (2017) | ** | No | 41 (28:13) | 38 (25:13) | 10.34 ± 1.73 | 11.18 ± 1.75 | n.r | n.r. |
| Fujiwara et al (2018) | **** | Yes | 23 (13/10) | 32 (15/17) | 8.61 ± 2.01 | 8.31 ± 2.26 | 21/2/0 | 32/0/0 |
| Karalok et al 2019 | ** | No | 33 (23/10) | 48 (27:21) | 8.72 ± 2.44 | 9.58 ± 2.56 | 31/2/0 | 46/2/0 |
| White matter studies | ||||||||
| Besseling et al (2013) | **** | Yes | 23 (14:9) | 23 (12:11) | 11.4 ± 2 | 10.4 ± 1.6 | 19/3/1 | 12/2/0 |
| Ciumas et al (2014) | ***** | Yes | 25 (18:7) | 25 (14:11) | 9.6 ± 1.9 | 10 ± 3 | 20/3/2/ | 19/5/1 |
| Kim et al (2014) | ***** | Yes | 19 (11:8) | 25 (14;11) | 10.7 ± 2.4 | 10.4 ±.2.7 | n.r. | n.r. |
| Xiao et al (2014) | *** | Yes | 28 (14:14) | 18 (11:7) | 9.4 ± 2.3 | 10.1 ± 1.9 | 28/0/0 | 18/0/0 |
| Wu et al (2015) | ** | No | 32 (15:17) | 25 (15/10) | 9.8 ± 1.5 | 10.0 ± 1.5 | 31/1/0 | 23/2/0 |
| Cao e al (2017) | ** | No | 38 (22:16) | 20 (13/7) | 9.43 ± 1.7 | 9.67 ± 2.55 | n.r. | n.r. |
| Ostrowski et al | **** | Yes | 20 (16:4) | 14 (7:7) | 11.5 ± 1.9 | 9.8 ± 2.1 | 2/18/0 | 11/2/1 |
Papers with three or more stars were included for analysis.
FIGURE 1PRISMA flowchart of the systematic review process
Table of putamina effect sizes and overall average for each study that reported on putamen/putamina volumes
| Study | Left Putamen | Right Putamen | Combined Putamen | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RE (mm3) | Control (mm3) | Effect size ( | RE (mm3) | Control (mm3) | Effect size ( | RE | Control | Effect size ( | |
| Lin et al 2012 | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | 11 133 ± 1022 | 10 441 ± 684 | 0.97 |
| Garcia‐Ramos et al 2015 | 6687 ± 142 | 6246 ± 106 | 0.86 | 6499 ± 146 | 6121 ± 109 | 0.71 | n/a | n/a | n/a |
| Kim et al 2015 | 6194.9 ± 547.8 | 5609.4 ± 687.7 | 0.97 | 6156.8 ± 509.5 | 5545.8 ± 608.6 | 1.13 | n/a | n/a | n/a |
| Luo et al 2015 |
59 voxel cluster t statistic : 3.61 | 1.14 |
202 voxel cluster t statistic : 4.02 | 1.27 | n/a | n/a | n/a | ||
| Average | 6388 8 ± 390.7 | 5956.6 ± 369.5 | 0.99 | 6291.6 ± 368.8 | 5859.5 ± 335 | 1.04 | 11 133 ± 1022 | 10 441 ± 684 | 0.97 |
Gray matter studies stratified by group mean age and mean duration of epilepsy
| Study | Mean age (years ± SD) | Mean epilepsy duration (months) | Measure | Frontal lobe | Temporal lobe | Parietal lobe | Occipital lobe | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| L | R | L | R | L | R | L | R | ||||
| Kim et al (2015) | 7.5 ± 1.5 | Cortical thickness | |||||||||
| 6 ± 0.5 | Cortical volume | ||||||||||
| Fujiwara et al (2018) | 8.61 ± 2.01 | Cortical thickness | |||||||||
| 2 | Cortical thickness | ||||||||||
| Luo et al (2015) | 9.1 ± 1.5 | Cortical volume | |||||||||
| 13.4 ± 12.9 | Cortical volume | ||||||||||
| Pardoe et al (2013) (A) | 9.3 ± 1.6 | Cortical volume | |||||||||
| <5 | Cortical volume | ||||||||||
| Pardoe et al (2013) (B) | 15.8 ± 2.3 | Cortical thickness | |||||||||
| 15.8 ± 2.3 | Cortical volume | ||||||||||
| Pardoe et al (2013) (C) | 22.7 ± 2.7 | Cortical volume | |||||||||
| Overvliet et al (2013) | 11.3 ± 1.9 | Cortical thickness | |||||||||
| 28.8 ± 0.2 | Cortical thickness | ||||||||||
| Garcia‐Ramos et al (2015) | 10.3 ± 1.9 | Cortical thickness | |||||||||
| 6.5 ± 3.4 | Cortical thickness | ||||||||||
| 12.3 | Cortical thickness | ||||||||||
Differences include increased (hatched) or decreased (dotted) thickness and volume. Included are brain regions and the laterality of the effect.
Baseline and longitudinal results from same participants.
Findings of TBSS in white matter studies stratified by age and epilepsy duration
| Study | Mean age (years) | Mean epilepsy duration (months) | Measure | Cingulum | Corpus Callosum | Corticospinal tract | External capsule | Fornix | Inferior network | Internal capsule and thalamic radiations | Midbrain | Perisylvian networks | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| L | R | L | R | L | R | L | R | L | R | L | R | L | R | L | R | L | R | ||||
| Xiao et al (2014) (Group A) | 8.87 ± 2.23 | 1.26 ± 0.5 | MD | ||||||||||||||||||
| FA | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Xiao et al (2014) (Group B) | 10.03 ± 2.45 | 1.16 ± 0.1 | MD | ||||||||||||||||||
| FA | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Kim et al (2014). | 10.7 ± 2.4 | 3.3 ± 1.5 | MD | ||||||||||||||||||
| FA | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Besseling et al (2013) | 11.4 ± 2 | 3.9 ± 2.1 | MD | ||||||||||||||||||
| FA | |||||||||||||||||||||
Measurements of FA and/or MD are presented with the distribution of the affected white matter structures. Hatched squares—significant difference. Dotted squares—no significant difference. Top row JHU white matter tract regions some have been grouped together for ease of understanding.
Abbreviations: L, left; R, right.
FIGURE 2The developmental trajectories of average cortical thickness (in mm) and overall cortical volume (in cm3) in healthy children. The cortical volume trajectories are shown in blue for males and in red for females. Extracted from