Literature DB >> 34033071

Comprehensive analysis of laparoscopic, robotic, and open hepatectomy outcomes using the nationwide readmissions database.

Hassan Aziz1, Johnny C Wang1, Yuri Genyk1, Mohd Raashid Sheikh2.   

Abstract

Although open resections have been the most prevalent method of hepatectomies in the United States, laparoscopic and robotic methods of liver resection have since gained significant traction. Given the augmenting role of minimally invasive techniques in liver resection, a study that explores and analyzes the surgical outcomes of the approaches mentioned above to liver resection on a national basis is warranted. A retrospective analysis was performed in this study using the 2016-2018 Nationwide Readmissions Database (NRD). Patients who underwent liver resections via one of the following methods were selected and grouped: open, laparoscopic, or robotic. Our primary outcome variable of interest was the 45-day readmission rate. 11,186 patients were included in the analysis. The 45-day readmission rate was 13.5%, 12.9%, and 8.7% in the open, laparoscopic, and robotic groups, respectively (p < 0.001). A significantly lower complication rate (7.3%) was seen in the robotic group than its counterparts (11.4% in open vs. 9.1% in the laparoscopic group). Patients undergoing hepatectomies may benefit from the robotic approach given that it is associated with a shorter hospital length of stay and lower readmission rates.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hepatectomy outcomes; Open liver resection; Readmission; Robotic liver resection

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34033071     DOI: 10.1007/s11701-021-01257-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Robot Surg        ISSN: 1863-2483


  8 in total

1.  Laparoscopic versus open hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma: short- and long-term outcomes comparison.

Authors:  Lanyun Luo; Haibo Zou; Yutong Yao; Xiaolun Huang
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-10-15

2.  Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of Clinical and Financial Outcomes After Robotic and Laparoscopic Colorectal Resection.

Authors:  Ahmed M Al-Mazrou; Onur Baser; Ravi P Kiran
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Hospital readmissions after liver surgery for metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Dietmar Tamandl; Jean M Butte; Peter J Allen; Michael I D'Angelica; Ronald P DeMatteo; Jeffrey S Groeger; William R Jarnagin; Yuman Fong
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 3.982

4.  Authors' Reply: Laparoscopic Versus Open Liver Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Case Controlled Study with Propensity Score Matching.

Authors:  Yusuke Uemoto; Kojiro Taura
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2021-09-30       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Response to Letter to the Editor-Expanding the Expanded Denver Criteria.

Authors:  Mary A McCullough; Ashley L Cairns; Rachel D Appelbaum; Daniel E Couture; Andrew M Nunn; Preston R Miller; Robert S Martin; Samuel P Carmichael
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2021-09-20       Impact factor: 1.002

6.  Hospitalization Costs and Outcomes of Open, Laparoscopic, and Robotic Liver Resections.

Authors:  Hassan Aziz; Kamil Hanna; Nassim Lashkari; Noor-Us-Sabah Ahmad; Yuri Genyk; Mohd Raashid Sheikh
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2021-04-16       Impact factor: 1.002

7.  Financial Impact of the Robotic Approach in Liver Surgery: A Comparative Study of Clinical Outcomes and Costs Between the Robotic and Open Technique in a Single Institution.

Authors:  Despoina Daskalaki; Raquel Gonzalez-Heredia; Marc Brown; Francesco M Bianco; Ivo Tzvetanov; Myriam Davis; Jihun Kim; Enrico Benedetti; Pier C Giulianotti
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A       Date:  2017-02-10       Impact factor: 1.878

8.  Hepatectomy for Breast Cancer Metastasis and Sarcoma are more likely to have Adverse Outcomes than Hepatectomy for Primary Hepatocellular Cancer or for Colorectal Metastasis.

Authors:  Hassan Aziz; Kamil Hanna; Muhammad Wasif Saif; Muhammad Ameen Rauf; Yuri Genyk; Mohd Raashid Sheikh
Journal:  Cancer Med J       Date:  2020-07-23
  8 in total
  3 in total

Review 1.  Advanced Robotic Surgery: Liver, Pancreas, and Esophagus - The State of the Art?

Authors:  Pasquale Scognamiglio; Björn-Ole Stüben; Asmus Heumann; Jun Li; Jakob R Izbicki; Daniel Perez; Matthias Reeh
Journal:  Visc Med       Date:  2021-11-12

2.  International multicentre propensity score-matched analysis comparing robotic versus laparoscopic right posterior sectionectomy.

Authors:  Adrian K H Chiow; David Fuks; Gi-Hong Choi; Nicholas Syn; Iswanto Sucandy; Marco V Marino; Mikel Prieto; Charing C Chong; Jae Hoon Lee; Mikhail Efanov; T Peter Kingham; Sung Hoon Choi; Robert P Sutcliffe; Roberto I Troisi; Johann Pratschke; Tan-To Cheung; Xiaoying Wang; Rong Liu; Mathieu D'Hondt; Chung-Yip Chan; Chung Ngai Tang; Ho-Seong Han; Brian K P Goh
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 3.  What Is the Current Role and What Are the Prospects of the Robotic Approach in Liver Surgery?

Authors:  Emre Bozkurt; Jasper P Sijberden; Mohammed Abu Hilal
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-31       Impact factor: 6.575

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.