Literature DB >> 35087901

Advanced Robotic Surgery: Liver, Pancreas, and Esophagus - The State of the Art?

Pasquale Scognamiglio1, Björn-Ole Stüben1, Asmus Heumann1, Jun Li1, Jakob R Izbicki1, Daniel Perez1, Matthias Reeh1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The trend in performing robotic-assisted operations in visceral surgery has been increasing in the last decade, also reaching the challenging field of hepatic, pancreatic, and esophageal surgery. Nevertheless, solid data about advantages and disadvantages of the robotic approach are still missing. The aim of this review is to analyze the benefit and impact of robotic surgery in the field of hepatic, pancreatic, and esophageal surgery, focusing on the comparison with the conventional laparoscopic or open approach.
SUMMARY: The well-known advantages of laparoscopic surgery in comparison to the open approach are also valid for robotic surgery, with the addition of a 3D-view camera, wristed instrumentation, and an ergonomic console. On the other hand, the use of a robotic system leads to longer operating time and higher costs. Randomized controlled trials comparing the robotic approach with the laparoscopic one are still missing. KEY MESSAGE: Recent meta-analyses show promising results of the usage of robotic systems in advanced surgical procedures, like hepatic, pancreatic, and esophageal resections. Further randomized studies are needed to validate the postulated benefit.
Copyright © 2021 by S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Esophagus; Liver; Minimally invasive surgery; Pancreas; Robotic surgery

Year:  2021        PMID: 35087901      PMCID: PMC8739999          DOI: 10.1159/000519753

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Visc Med        ISSN: 2297-4725


  56 in total

1.  The robotic, 2-stage, 3-field esophagolymphadenectomy.

Authors:  Kemp H Kernstine; Daniel T DeArmond; Mohsen Karimi; Timothy L Van Natta; Javier H Campos; Javier C Campos; Mary R Yoder; Jeffrey E Everett
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 5.209

2.  Does robot-assisted minimally invasive oesophagectomy have superiority over thoraco-laparoscopic minimally invasive oesophagectomy in lymph node dissection?

Authors:  Xiao-Kun Li; Yang Xu; Hai Zhou; Zhuang-Zhuang Cong; Wen-Jie Wu; Yong Qiang; Yi Shen
Journal:  Dis Esophagus       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 3.429

3.  Robot-assisted minimally invasive thoracolaparoscopic esophagectomy versus open esophagectomy: long-term follow-up of a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Eline M de Groot; Sylvia van der Horst; B Feike Kingma; Lucas Goense; Pieter C van der Sluis; Jelle P Ruurda; Richard van Hillegersberg
Journal:  Dis Esophagus       Date:  2020-11-26       Impact factor: 3.429

4.  From Illusion to Reality: A Brief History of Robotic Surgery.

Authors:  Marco Vito Marino; Galyna Shabat; Gaspare Gulotta; Andrzej Lech Komorowski
Journal:  Surg Innov       Date:  2018-04-27       Impact factor: 2.058

5.  Minimally Invasive Versus Open Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Population-Based Analysis.

Authors:  Babatunde A Yerokun; Zhifei Sun; Chi-Fu Jeffrey Yang; Brian C Gulack; Paul J Speicher; Mohamed A Adam; Thomas A D'Amico; Mark W Onaitis; David H Harpole; Mark F Berry; Matthew G Hartwig
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2016-05-04       Impact factor: 4.330

6.  Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: oncological outcomes.

Authors:  Ibrahim Nassour; Michael A Choti; Matthew R Porembka; Adam C Yopp; Sam C Wang; Patricio M Polanco
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-12-26       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 7.  Laparoscopic versus robotic major hepatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ioannis A Ziogas; Dimitrios Giannis; Stepan M Esagian; Konstantinos P Economopoulos; Samer Tohme; David A Geller
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-09-28       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Robotic versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: multicentre analysis.

Authors:  S Lof; N van der Heijde; M Abuawwad; B Al-Sarireh; U Boggi; G Butturini; G Capretti; A Coratti; R Casadei; M D'Hondt; A Esposito; G Ferrari; G Fusai; A Giardino; B Groot Koerkamp; T Hackert; S Kamarajah; E F Kauffmann; T Keck; R Marudanayagam; F Nickel; A Manzoni; P Pessaux; A Pietrabissa; E Rosso; R Salvia; Z Soonawalla; S White; A Zerbi; M G Besselink; M Abu Hilal
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2021-03-12       Impact factor: 6.939

9.  Outcomes After Minimally-invasive Versus Open Pancreatoduodenectomy: A Pan-European Propensity Score Matched Study.

Authors:  Sjors Klompmaker; Jony van Hilst; Ulrich F Wellner; Olivier R Busch; Andrea Coratti; Mathieu D'Hondt; Safi Dokmak; Sebastiaan Festen; Mustafa Kerem; Igor Khatkov; Daan J Lips; Carlo Lombardo; Misha Luyer; Alberto Manzoni; Izaäk Q Molenaar; Edoardo Rosso; Olivier Saint-Marc; Franky Vansteenkiste; Uwe A Wittel; Bert Bonsing; Bas Groot Koerkamp; Mohammed Abu Hilal; David Fuks; Ignasi Poves; Tobias Keck; Ugo Boggi; Marc G Besselink
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Protocol for a randomised controlled trial to compare postoperative complications between minimally invasive and open DIStal PAnCreaTectomy (DISPACT-2 trial).

Authors:  Pascal Probst; Fabian Schuh; Colette Dörr-Harim; Anja Sander; Thomas Bruckner; Christina Klose; Inga Rossion; Felix Nickel; Beat Peter Müller-Stich; Arianeb Mehrabi; Thilo Hackert; Markus W Büchler; Markus K Diener
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-02-22       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.