Literature DB >> 34032997

SARS-CoV-2: big seroprevalence data from Pakistan-is herd immunity at hand?

Mohsina Haq1, Asif Rehman2, Junaid Ahmad3, Usman Zafar4, Sufyan Ahmed5, Mumtaz Ali Khan6, Asif Naveed7, Hala Rajab1, Fawad Muhammad1, Wasifa Naushad1, Muhammad Aman1, Hafeez Ur Rehman1, Sajjad Ahmad1, Saeed Anwar1, Najib Ul Haq1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Seroprevalence surveys from different countries have reported SARS CoV-2 antibodies below 20% even in the most adversely affected areas and herd immunity cannot be predicted till more than half of the population gets the disease. The purpose of this survey was to estimate the magnitude of community-based spread of the infection, associated immunity, and the future prospects and proximity to a 'herd community'.
METHODS: The study was undertaken as a cluster randomized, cross-sectional countrywide survey. This largest community-based seroprevalence data of SARS-CoV-2 were collected between 15th and 31st July, 2020 from seven randomly selected cities belonging to the three most populous provinces of Pakistan. The FDA approved kit of ROCHE was used for detection of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies.
RESULTS: Serum samples of 15,390 participants were tested for SARS CoV-2 antibodies with an overall seroprevalence of 42.4%. The seroprevalence ranged from 31.1% to 48.1% in different cities with the highest in Punjab province (44.5%). In univariable analysis, the odds of seropositivity was higher in men compared to women (OR: 1.10, 95% CI: 1.01-1.19, P < 0.05). In multivariable analysis, the risk of being seropositive was lower (OR 0.72, 95% CI: 0.60-0.87, P < 0.01) in younger group (≤ 20 years) than in those aged above 60 years.
CONCLUSION: The study concluded that despite a reasonable seroprevalence, the country is yet to reach the base minimum of estimations for herd immunity. The durability of immunity though debated at the moment, has shown an evidenced informed shift towards longer side.
© 2021. Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Antibody; CoV-2; Herd; Immunity; Sars; Seroprevalence

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34032997      PMCID: PMC8145183          DOI: 10.1007/s15010-021-01629-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Infection        ISSN: 0300-8126            Impact factor:   7.455


Introduction

Novel Coronavirus related disease (COVID-19) started from China in December 2019, while Pakistan declared its two positive cases on 26th Feb 2020 [1]. Word Health Organization declared SARS-CoV-2 a global pandemic on March 11, 2020 and since then the cases are on the rise world-wide, resulting in unprecedented effects on human life [2]. The WHO COVID-19 statistics of confirmed cases were 81,533,368 till December 31, 2020 including 1,799,911 deaths world-wide [3]. Like many other countries Pakistan witnessed its highest number of new cases and mortalities during the month of June 2020 followed by a steep fall [4, 5]. The measures taken by the government of Pakistan and the resultant decline in cases has been much praised by the world [6, 7] but the reasons cannot be fully explained (due to lack of supporting evidence/data) [5]. There has been a resurge of COVID-19 with start of winter and the number of confirmed cases rose by 110,530 including 2060 deaths from end of October to mid-December 2020 [8]. The widespread infection has affected all provinces of Pakistan with 230,718 cases in Sindh, 62,377 in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, 147,292 cases in Punjab and 39,624 cases in capital territory Islamabad [8]. Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) is the gold standard to confirm SARS-CoV-2 infection. However, it may miss several pre-symptomatic and asymptomatic infections during latency and does not provide information about immunity against the disease which could help illustrate the state of herd immunity in community [9, 10]. Studies have reported cases of reinfection with SARS CoV-2 [11-13] but some other studies have concluded that a positive PCR retest could be due to several other reason like infection by mutated SARS Cov-2 and technical error with specimen collection [14, 15]. Seroprevalence surveys also provide estimates of the population still vulnerable to the infection [16]. A true community-based seroprevalence survey is still lacking in Pakistan while most of the studies conducted are hospital based and with a varying level of infection (11–40%), given the fact that several of them were based on recall [17-19]. Herd immunity is still not foreseeable in many countries of the world as seroprevalence population surveys reveal antibodies as low as 10–15% [20] and herd immunity cannot be predicted till more than half of the population gets the disease [21]. Herd immunity against a contagious disease like COVID-19 could be achieved when 70–90% of the population becomes immune due to mass scale vaccination or exposure to infection [22]. The second surge of COVID-19 has already been established in many countries including Pakistan [23, 24]. This makes it very important to understand the immune response in different populations as it has important public health and policy implications [25, 26]. However, it is still unclear whether herd immunity through vaccine or previous infection may be achievable. This community-based seroprevalence study was conducted in the three major provinces of Pakistan having more than 90% of country population. The purpose was to have a better estimation of the spread of infection at the community level, the associated immunity pattern to COVID-19 and the prospects of proximity to a herd immunity in future.

Methodology

This study was undertaken as a cluster randomized, cross-sectional countrywide survey. Seven out of ninety-nine cities were randomly selected as a study clusters. In each cluster, participants were recruited via mobile camping from randomly selected Union Councils (an administrative unit within district with a population size of 25,000–35,000). The clusters included Peshawar, Karachi, Lahore, Multan, Mansehra, Rawalpindi, Multan and Hyderabad from three major provinces (Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Sindh and Punjab). The study was conducted from 15th to 31st July 2020 following an approval from Institutional Review Board (IRB) of Prime Foundation, Pakistan (IRB approval no. Prime/IRB/2020-248). After taking an informed consent, 5 mL of peripheral venous blood was collected in lithium heparin container. Basic demographic data of the consenting subjected was recorded on a structured tool.

Storing, processing and diagnostic labeling of the phlebotomy samples

The samples were transported to laboratories in specialized containers ensuring temperature control. Serum was separated, centrifuged at 2500 rpm, stored in labeled cups and 20 μL used for analysis. The samples were analyzed using Elecsys® (Roche, Basel, Switzerland) Anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoassay. The assay uses a recombinant protein representing the nucleocapsid (N) antigen for the determination of antibodies against SARS-CoV-2. It is an immunoassay for the in vitro qualitative detection of antibodies that includes IgG to SARS-CoV-2 in human serum and plasma [27]. The FDA approved kit of ROCHE used for the detection of immunoglobulins against SARS-CoV-2 has high specificity (100%) and sensitivity of more than 98.8%, according to the manufacturer [28]. However, the Public Health England estimates its specificity to be 100% but sensitivity of 87% [29]. The cut off for significant antibodies level was taken as 1 AU/mL as per manufacturers instruction.

Statistical analysis

The data was entered and analyzed in SPSS version 24.0. The means, median, standard deviations were calculated for the continuous variables, while frequencies, counts and percentages were calculated for the categorical variables. Confidence interval for the proportions were calculated using Binomial Exact methods. Chi-square test was used to compare between categorical variables like sex, age group and location. The logistic regression analysis was run to predict the odds of seropositivity among different age groups. The threshold for statistical significance was established at a P value ≤ 0.05.

Results

A total number of 15,390 serum samples (one sample per individual) were tested for SARS CoV-2 antibodies from three major provinces of Pakistan in seven different locations, as specified in the methods above. Table 1 shows the seroprevalence estimates by sex, age groups and different locations. Majority of the participants belonged to Punjab province (n = 8872, 57.6%) followed by Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (n = 4797, 31.2%) and Sindh Province (n = 1721, 11.2%).
Table 1

Demographic characteristics and seroprevalence

Number of participantsnSeropositiven (%)Seronegativen (%)Seroprevalence (95% CI) binomial exactP value
Overall15,3906518 (42.4%)8872 (57.6%)42.4.% (41.5–43.14)a
Sex
Male12,2805259 (42.8%)7021 (57·2%)42.8% (41.9–43·7)a < 0.05b
Female31101259 (40.5%)1851 (59.9%)40.5% (38.7–42·2)a
Age groups
 ≤ 201549568 (36.7%)981 (63.3%)36.7% (34.2–39.1)a < 0.01b
21–4093483957 (42.3%)5391 (57.7%)42.3% (41.3–43.3)a
41–6038411702 (44.3%)2139 (55.7%)44.3% (42.7–45.9)a
Above 60652291 (44.6%)361 (55.4%)44.6% (40.7–48.5)a
Province
Khyber Pakhtunkhwa47972025 (42.2%)2772 (57.8%)42.2% (41.2–44.0)a < 0.01b
Sindh1721548 (31.8%)1173 (68.2%)31.8% (29.6–34.1)a
Punjab88723954 (44.5%)4927 (55.5%)44.5% (43.5–45.6)a

aUnweighted seroprevalence of SARS CoV-2 with 95% CI calculated using Binomial Exact method

bChi square test with significance level of < 0.05

Demographic characteristics and seroprevalence aUnweighted seroprevalence of SARS CoV-2 with 95% CI calculated using Binomial Exact method bChi square test with significance level of < 0.05 Of the total, 12,280 (79.8%) were male participants and 3110 (20.2%) were female with a mean age of 35.21 years (SD ± 13.29). The age group of 21–40 years comprised the majority number of people (n = 9348, 60.7%) while the age group of above 60 years comprising the lowest number of participants (n = 652, 4.2%). During the study period, of the total sample (n = 15,390), 6518 tested found positive for SARS COV-2 antibodies with an overall seroprevalence of 42.4% (Binomial Exact 95% CI: 41.5–43.14). In different age groups, older age group of above 60 years had the highest seropositivity (44.6%, 95% CI: 40.7–48.5) while the lowest seropositivity were estimated in younger age group of ≤ 20 (36.7%, 95% CI: 34.2–39.1) (Table 1). The seroprevalence was highest in Punjab province (44.5%) (Binomial Exact 95% CI: 43.5–45.6) followed by Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (42.2%) (Binomial Exact 95% CI: 41.2–44.0) and Sindh province (31.8%) (Binomial Exact 95% CI: 29.6–34.1) with statistical significant association (P < 0.01) when chi-square test was applied. The city-wise seroprevalence was also calculated that ranged from 31.1% (Binomial Exact 95% CI: 28.8–33.3) in Mansehra city to 48.1% (Binomial Exact 95% CI: 46.3–49.8) in Peshawar city (Fig. 1). For the remaining five locations, the seroprevalence estimates fell within this range (31.1–48.1%).
Fig. 1

Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 in different cities of Pakistan

Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 in different cities of Pakistan In univariable analysis, the odds of seropositivity was higher in men compared to women (OR: 1.10, 95% CI: 1.01–1.19, P < 0.05) but was not statistically significant in multivariable analysis (P > 0.05) (Table 2). The odds of seropositivity in multivariable analysis were low in younger age (≤ 20 years) with an OR: 0·72, 95% CI: 0.60–0.87 when compared with the age group of above 60 years and had a highly statistically significant P value of < 0.01. Similarly, the age groups of 20–40 and 41–60 years also had a lower risk of being seropositive (OR: 0.91, 95% CI: 0.77–1.07) and (OR: 0.98, 95% CI: 0.83–1.16) respectively to the age group of above 60 years and was found to be numerically higher (P = 0.25, P = 0.88) (Table 2).
Table 2

Univariable and multivariable analysis of sex and age group with seropositivity

Relative variableUnivariable analysisMultivariable analysis
OR95% CIP valueOR95% CIP value
Sex
Female (Ref)
 Male1.101.01–1.190.01*1.070.99–1.160.07
Age group
Above 60 years (Ref)
  ≤ 20 years0.720.60–0.860.001*0.720.60–0.870.001*
 21–40 years0.910.78–1.070.240.910.77–1.070.25
 41–60 years0.990.84–1.170.870.980.83–1.160.88

Adjusted odd ratio with 95% Confidence Interval and their P value

*Refers to P value with statistically significant association

Univariable and multivariable analysis of sex and age group with seropositivity Adjusted odd ratio with 95% Confidence Interval and their P value *Refers to P value with statistically significant association

Discussion

During the current pandemic, serological testing appears to be a useful strategy to determine the human-to-human transmission of COVID-19. The utilization of serological tests in the asymptomatic population or those showing mild symptoms is crucial, as they rarely opt for PCR testing [30] masking the population's actual rate of infection. Different studies conducted in different parts of the world have indicated that many people who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 showed no symptoms [31-33]. This study conducted serological tests for COVID-19 of the population from three provinces of Pakistan. The seropositivity increased with increase in age in our study. An up-to-date review by Lai and colleagues reported this to be the case in some other studies also but was not a universal finding, however in all the studies [34]. Furthermore, neither they nor Anand et al. in a big data review in USA found any significant difference for seropositivity among the males and females [34, 35]. Our study on multivariable analysis also did not find any significant difference for seropositivity among the sexes. However, the study found out an overall seroprevalence of 42.4%. Knowing that when majority of a population is immune to an infectious disease, it provides an indirect protection, i.e., herd immunity to those who are not immune to the disease. Given that effective vaccination for COVID-19 has host of affordability and supply-chain issues especially for developing countries coupled with the fact that the influenza viruses are believed to be rapidly mutating, the natural course of infection remains the major possibility for acquiring herd immunity [36]. Questions have been raised about the time duration of the immunity against COVID-19. A recent study published in Science Journal reported that immunological memory to SARS-CoV-2 can last longer than six months and revealed further that spike-IgG was relatively stable over six-plus months, and spike-specific memory B cells were more abundant at six months than at one month [37]. The news regarding the emergence of a variant of concern (VOC) in UK of Brazilian origin might pose a challenging scenario in terms of tracking and controlling the spread of the VOCs and understanding their effects on the pandemic especially in the low to middle income countries (LMICs). This as well as the short-lived immunity associated with flu like pandemics doesn’t preclude reinfection and problems in achieving a herd immunity [38].

Conclusion

The overall seroprevalence of SARS CoV-2 antibodies in Pakistan was reasonably high in this study (as of June 2020) but still short of the base minimum for herd immunity. The seroprevalence varied in the different cities of Pakistan and by age and gender, also. The immunity though dependent on a number of the agent, host, and environment factors, may not be very short-lived (3 months or so as was believed earlier), and with passing time, evidence is mounting that points towards longevity of the immunity much beyond that.

Limitation

A limitation to keep in mind might be the selection bias that may have occurred due to voluntary participation from randomly selected UCs. Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material. Supplementary file1 (SAV 263 KB)
  23 in total

1.  Serological Assays for SARS-CoV-2 Infectious Disease: Benefits, Limitations and Perspectives.

Authors:  Maria Infantino; Arianna Damiani; Francesca Li Gobbi; Valentina Grossi; Barbara Lari; Donatella Macchia; Patrizia Casprini; Francesca Veneziani; Danilo Villalta; Nicola Bizzaro; Piero Cappelletti; Martina Fabris; Luca Quartuccio; Maurizio Benucci; Mariangela Manfredi
Journal:  Isr Med Assoc J       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 0.892

Review 2.  A systematic review of asymptomatic infections with COVID-19.

Authors:  Zhiru Gao; Yinghui Xu; Chao Sun; Xu Wang; Ye Guo; Shi Qiu; Kewei Ma
Journal:  J Microbiol Immunol Infect       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 4.399

3.  COVID-19 herd immunity: where are we?

Authors:  Arnaud Fontanet; Simon Cauchemez
Journal:  Nat Rev Immunol       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 53.106

4.  Immunological memory to SARS-CoV-2 assessed for up to 8 months after infection.

Authors:  Jennifer M Dan; Jose Mateus; Yu Kato; Kathryn M Hastie; Esther Dawen Yu; Caterina E Faliti; Alba Grifoni; Sydney I Ramirez; Sonya Haupt; April Frazier; Catherine Nakao; Vamseedhar Rayaprolu; Stephen A Rawlings; Bjoern Peters; Florian Krammer; Viviana Simon; Erica Ollmann Saphire; Davey M Smith; Daniela Weiskopf; Alessandro Sette; Shane Crotty
Journal:  Science       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Reinfection risk of novel coronavirus (COVID-19): A systematic ‎review of current evidence.

Authors:  SeyedAhmad SeyedAlinaghi; Shahram Oliaei; Shaghayegh Kianzad; Amir Masoud Afsahi; Mehrzad MohsseniPour; Alireza Barzegary; Pegah Mirzapour; Farzane Behnezhad; Tayebeh Noori; Esmaeil Mehraeen; Omid Dadras; Fabricio Voltarelli; Jean-Marc Sabatier
Journal:  World J Virol       Date:  2020-12-15

6.  Comparison of seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infections with cumulative and imputed COVID-19 cases: Systematic review.

Authors:  Oyungerel Byambasuren; Claudia C Dobler; Katy Bell; Diana Patricia Rojas; Justin Clark; Mary-Louise McLaws; Paul Glasziou
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-04-02       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Recurrence of COVID-19 after recovery: a case report from Italy.

Authors:  Daniela Loconsole; Francesca Passerini; Vincenzo Ostilio Palmieri; Francesca Centrone; Anna Sallustio; Stefania Pugliese; Lucia Donatella Grimaldi; Piero Portincasa; Maria Chironna
Journal:  Infection       Date:  2020-05-16       Impact factor: 3.553

8.  Universal Screening for SARS-CoV-2 in Women Admitted for Delivery.

Authors:  Desmond Sutton; Karin Fuchs; Mary D'Alton; Dena Goffman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2020-04-13       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Substantial undocumented infection facilitates the rapid dissemination of novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2).

Authors:  Ruiyun Li; Sen Pei; Bin Chen; Yimeng Song; Tao Zhang; Wan Yang; Jeffrey Shaman
Journal:  Science       Date:  2020-03-16       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  5 in total

1.  Seroprevalence of Sars-Cov-2 antibodies among eligible blood donors of Peshawar, Pakistan.

Authors:  Muhammad Nisar Khan; Haleema Khan; Muhammad Shahzad; Muhammad Ibrahim; Muhammad Arif; Zeeshan Kibria; Usman Waheed; Noore Saba; Inayat Shah; Yasar Mehmood Yousafzai
Journal:  Am J Blood Res       Date:  2022-06-20

2.  Seroprevalence and characteristics of Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) in workers with non-specific disease symptoms.

Authors:  Wajiha Javed; Syed Hussain Baqar Abidi; Jaffer Bin Baqar
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2022-05-20       Impact factor: 3.667

3.  Assessing the burden of COVID-19 in developing countries: systematic review, meta-analysis and public policy implications.

Authors:  Andrew T Levin; Nana Owusu-Boaitey; Sierra Pugh; Bailey K Fosdick; Anthony B Zwi; Anup Malani; Satej Soman; Lonni Besançon; Ilya Kashnitsky; Sachin Ganesh; Aloysius McLaughlin; Gayeong Song; Rine Uhm; Daniel Herrera-Esposito; Gustavo de Los Campos; Ana Carolina Pecanha Peçanha Antonio; Enyew Birru Tadese; Gideon Meyerowitz-Katz
Journal:  BMJ Glob Health       Date:  2022-05

4.  How do we…form and coordinate a national serosurvey of SARS-CoV-2 within the blood collection industry?

Authors:  Rebecca V Fink; Lois Fisher; Hasan Sulaeman; Honey Dave; Matthew E Levy; Lily McCann; Clara Di Germanio; Edward P Notari; Valerie Green; Sherri Cyrus; Phillip Williamson; Paula Saa; James M Haynes; Jamel Groves; Sunitha Mathew; Zhanna Kaidarova; Roberta Bruhn; Eduard Grebe; Jean Opsomer; Jefferson M Jones; Maureen J Miller; Michael P Busch; Mars Stone
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 3.337

5.  IgG antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 in asymptomatic blood donors at two time points in Karachi.

Authors:  Muhammad Hasan; Bushra Moiz; Shama Qaiser; Kiran Iqbal Masood; Zara Ghous; Areeba Hussain; Natasha Ali; J Pedro Simas; Marc Veldhoen; Paula Alves; Syed Hani Abidi; Kulsoom Ghias; Erum Khan; Zahra Hasan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-08-24       Impact factor: 3.752

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.