Literature DB >> 34032160

Effects of Low-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Language Recovery in Poststroke Survivors With Aphasia: An Updated Meta-analysis.

Zhongqiu Hong1, Haiqing Zheng1, Jing Luo1, Mingyu Yin1, Yinan Ai1, Baomei Deng1, Wuwei Feng2, Xiquan Hu1.   

Abstract

The effects of low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (LF-rTMS) on treating poststroke aphasia (PSA) remain inconclusive. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of LF-rTMS on language function poststroke and determine potential factors that may affect treatment effects. Electronic databases, including MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library were searched to identify relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) concerning the effects of LF-rTMS on language performance poststroke. We adopted fixed- and random-effects models to estimate intervention effects, which were represented by the Hedges' g and 95% CIs. Subgroup analyses regarding several factors potentially influencing the effects of LF-rTMS on language recovery were also conducted. A total of 14 RCTs involving 374 participants were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled analysis showed the positive and significant effects of LF-rTMS on language function, both short-term (Hedges' g = 0.65; P < .05) and long-term (Hedges' g = 0.46; P < .05). Subgroup analyses demonstrated that LF-rTMS for 20 minutes per day over 10 days yielded the largest effect size (Hedges' g = 1.02; P < .05) and that LF-rTMS significantly improved language performance in the chronic stage after stroke (Hedges' g = 0.55; P < .05). Patients with different native languages might have diverse responses to LF-rTMS treatment efficacy. Additionally, there were significant improvements in language subtests, including naming, repetition, comprehension, and writing. Overall, this updated meta-analysis demonstrated that LF-rTMS has significant positive effects on PSA, with moderate treatment effects. It provides additional evidence to support LF-rTMS as a promising complementary therapy to promote language recovery in PSA.

Entities:  

Keywords:  aphasia; meta-analysis; stroke; systematic review; transcranial magnetic stimulation

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34032160     DOI: 10.1177/15459683211011230

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair        ISSN: 1545-9683            Impact factor:   3.919


  4 in total

1.  Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Improves Neurological Function and Promotes the Anti-inflammatory Polarization of Microglia in Ischemic Rats.

Authors:  Jing Luo; Yuan Feng; Mingyue Li; Mingyu Yin; Feng Qin; Xiquan Hu
Journal:  Front Cell Neurosci       Date:  2022-04-12       Impact factor: 5.505

2.  Low-Frequency vs. Theta Burst Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for the Treatment of Chronic Non-fluent Aphasia in Stroke: A Proof-of-Concept Study.

Authors:  Ting-Yu Chou; Jia-Chi Wang; Mu-Yun Lin; Po-Yi Tsai
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2022-01-14       Impact factor: 5.750

Review 3.  Reversing the Ruin: Rehabilitation, Recovery, and Restoration After Stroke.

Authors:  Melissa D Stockbridge; Lisa D Bunker; Argye E Hillis
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2022-10-01       Impact factor: 6.030

4.  Effectiveness and safety of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on memory disorder in stroke: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Haihua Xie; Dan Xiong; Pan Zhu; Hao Li; Hong Zhang; Jie Tan; Ning Zhao
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2022-10-07       Impact factor: 1.817

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.