| Literature DB >> 30334643 |
Yu-Bin Liu1,2,3, Song-Jian Li1, Li Zhao2,3, Bo Yu1, Da-Hang Zhao3.
Abstract
Background and purpose - There are still controversies as to the age for beginning treatment with the Ponseti method. We evaluated the clinical outcome with different age at onset of Ponseti management for clubfoot. Patients and methods - 90 included children were divided into 3 groups in terms of age at start of treatment. The difference in treatment-related and prognosis-related variables including presentation age, initial Pirani and Dimeglio score, casts required, relapse rates, final Dimeglio score, and international clubfoot study group score (ICFSG) was analyzed. Results - Age between 28 days and 3 months at start of treatment method was associated with fewer casts required, lower relapse rate, and lower final ICFSG score (p < 0.05). Early treatment before 28 days of age required more casts and had a higher relapse rate (p < 0.05). The highest ICFSG scores were found in the ages between 3 and 6 months (p < 0.05). After propensity score matching, age between 28 days and 3 months was demonstrated to have a lower finial ICFSG score. Linear regression models showed that presentation age was positively correlated with final ICFSG score, and was identified as the only independent prognostic risk factor. Interpretation - There was lower rate of relapse and better clinical outcome when treatment was initiated at age between 28 days and 3 months. With the Ponseti method, clubfeet may not need urgent treatment.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30334643 PMCID: PMC6300741 DOI: 10.1080/17453674.2018.1526534
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Acta Orthop ISSN: 1745-3674 Impact factor: 3.717
Figure 1.Flowchart of patients with idiopathic clubfoot.
Figure 2.Foot-abduction brace was applied in our clinics. The brace consists of a bar with the shoes attached at 60–70° of abduction on the affected side and 30–40° on the normal side.
Figure 3.Relapse was identified at 4 years of age for poor brace compliance. Right clubfoot: Dimeglio score =8. (A) Forefoot adductus, (B) No obvious varus deformity, (C) Lateral edge curve, (D) Equinus deformity, (E) Standing anteroposterior views: reduced talocalcaneal angle, (F) Standing lateral views: reduced talocalcaneal angle and flat-top talus.
Figure 4.The same patient after repeated Ponseti treatment: ICFSG =4. (A–C) Morphology evaluation =1, (D) Muscle function =0, (E) Radiologic evaluation =3, (F) Gait analysis: dynamic function =0.
Demographic data with reference to age when clubfoot management was initiated
| Group I | Group II | Group III | |
|---|---|---|---|
| No. of cases (feet) | 30 (43) | 36 (56) | 24 (32) |
| Age at presentation range | 13 days | 47 days | 4.5 months |
| (2–27) | (29–90) | (3–6) | |
| Sex | |||
| Male | 25 | 29 | 18 |
| Female | 5 | 7 | 6 |
| Side | |||
| Bilateral | 13 | 20 | 8 |
| Unilateral | 17 | 16 | 16 |
| Initial Pirani score | 4.8 (0.9) | 4.3 (1.1) | 4.3 (0.7) |
| Initial Dimeglio score | 14 (3.5) | 13 (3.1) | 13 (2.7) |
| No. of casts before PAT | 4.5 (1.6) | 3.7 (1.2) | 4.2 (1.4) |
| PAT rate | |||
| Yes | 28 (40) | 29 (46) | 22 (28) |
| No | 2 (3) | 7 (10) | 2 (4) |
| Initial correction rate | |||
| Yes | 22 (33) | 33 (51) | 20 (26) |
| No | 8 (10) | 3 (5) | 4 (6) |
| Brace compliance | |||
| Yes | 25 (35) | 30 (46) | 1 8 (26) |
| No | 5 (8) | 6 (10) | 6 (6) |
| Relapse rate | |||
| Yes | 7 (14) | 4 (6) | 2 (2) |
| No | 23 (29) | 32 (50) | 22 (30) |
| Dorsal flexion (°) | 13.7 (9.2) | 15.2 (8.3) | 14.8 (7.9) |
| Mean follow-up (years) | 4.9 (1.2) | 4.7 (0.7) | 4.9 (0.7) |
| Final Dimeglio score | 4.3 (1.3) | 4.1 (0.8) | 4.1 (0.6) |
| ICFSG score | 24 (34) | 21 (35) | 14 (18) |
| Total score | 4.6 (1.4) | 3.9 (2.2) | 6.3 (1.1) a,b |
Group I (≤ 28 days), Group II (> 28 days to ≤3 months), Group III (> 3 months to ≤6 months);
p < 0.05 compared with Group II.
p < 0.05 compared with Group I.
values are mean (SD)
values are cases (feet)
Linear regression of ICFSG score with clinical characteristics (n = 59)
| Variables | Univariable linear regression β (95% CI) | Multivariable linear regression p-value | β (95% CI) | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Presentation age (days) | 0.017 (0.007 to 0.027) | 0.002 | 0.019 (0.009–0.029) | < 0.001 |
| Sex | 0.18 (–1.3 to 1.7) | 0.8 | – | – |
| Side | –0.14 (–1.2 to 0.9) | 0.8 | – | – |
| Initial Pirani score | –0.51 (–1.0 to –0.02) | 0.04 | –0.11 | 0.4 |
| Initial Dimeglio score | –0.16 (–0.3 to –0.01) | 0.04 | –0.22 | 0.08 |
| No. of casts | 0.18 (–0.2 to 0.6) | 0.3 | – | – |
| PAT | –1.23 (–2.8 to 0.3) | 0.1 | – | – |
| Compliance | 0.47 (–0.9 to 1.8) | 0.5 | – | – |
| Relapse | –0.04 (–1.5 to 1.5) | 1.0 | – | – |
ICFSG: International Clubfoot Study Group score.
Demographic data after propensity score matching
| Group I | Group II | Group III | |
|---|---|---|---|
| No. of cases (feet) | 15 (25) | 15 (24) | 10 (16) |
| Age at presentation | 13 days | 45 days | 4.6 months |
| range | (3–27) | (31–87) | (3–6) |
| Sex | |||
| Male | 12 | 13 | 8 |
| Female | 3 | 2 | 2 |
| Side | |||
| Bilateral | 10 | 9 | 6 |
| Unilateral | 5 | 6 | 4 |
| Initial Pirani score c | 4.6 (0.9) | 4.5 (1.2) | 4.1 (0.7) |
| Initial Dimeglio score c | 14 (3.9) | 13 (3.9) | 14 (1.2) |
| No. of casts before PAT c | 4.3 (1.8) | 3.5 (0.9) | 4.4 (1.0) |
| PAT rate d | |||
| Yes | 13 (22) | 13 (22) | 10 (16) |
| No | 2 (3) | 2 (2) | 0 (0) |
| Brace compliance d | |||
| Yes | 13 (21) | 13 (21) | 6 (12) |
| No | 2 (4) | 2 (3) | 4 (4) |
| Relapse rate d | |||
| Yes | 5 (10) | 2 (3) | 2 (2) |
| No | 10 (15) | 13 (21) | 8 (14) |
| Propensity score c | 0.5 (0.2) | 0.5 (0.2) | 0.6 (0.2) |
| ICFSG score c | 4.9 (1.6) | 3.9 (2.2) | 6.8 (1.1) a,b |
For footnotes see Table 1.