Literature DB >> 6742480

Postoperative pain control with methadone: influence of supplementary methadone doses and blood concentration--response relationships.

G K Gourlay, R J Willis, P R Wilson.   

Abstract

The aim of the study was to establish whether there exists a relationship between blood methadone concentration and analgesic response and the intrasubject and intersubject variability in this relationship. Sixteen general surgical (upper abdominal) and orthopedic (spinal fusion) patients were administered methadone (20 mg, iv) as part of the general anesthetic and supplementary methadone doses (usually 5 mg, iv) in the recovery ward until postoperative pain was controlled effectively. The criteria established for the administration of supplementary methadone doses were the co-existence of 1) spontaneous reporting of significant pain by the patient; 2) an unstimulated respiratory rate of greater than 10 breaths/min, and 3) no significant depression of the level of consciousness. A median of two supplementary iv methadone doses (range 1-3) were administered to the patient by a titration method in the recovery ward to obtain effective pain control. This was achieved by a median dose of 10 mg (range 5-20 mg) in addition to the 20 mg intraoperative dose. Serial blood samples were collected for the estimation of blood methadone concentration following all doses. The methadone concentration in the blood sample collected immediately prior to a supplementary dose was termed the minimum effective concentration (MEC [methadone]). The mean (+/- SD) coefficient of variation in MEC (methadone) for the 16 patients was 21 +/- 10% (range: 7-38%), while the mean MEC for methadone was 57.9 +/- 15.2 ng/ml (range: 34.5-80.3 ng/ml) in these patients.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6742480

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesthesiology        ISSN: 0003-3022            Impact factor:   7.892


  18 in total

1.  [Not Available].

Authors:  J Jage
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 1.107

2.  Intraoperative Methadone in Same-Day Ambulatory Surgery: A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Dose-Finding Pilot Study.

Authors:  Helga Komen; L Michael Brunt; Elena Deych; Jane Blood; Evan D Kharasch
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 5.108

Review 3.  Interindividual variability of the clinical pharmacokinetics of methadone: implications for the treatment of opioid dependence.

Authors:  Chin B Eap; Thierry Buclin; Pierre Baumann
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 6.447

4.  Within- and between- subject variability in methadone pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in methadone maintenance subjects.

Authors:  Julia Hanna; David J R Foster; Amy Salter; Andrew A Somogyi; Jason M White; Felix Bochner
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 4.335

5.  Perioperative pharmacokinetics of methadone in adolescents.

Authors:  Anshuman Sharma; Danielle Tallchief; Jane Blood; Thomas Kim; Amy London; Evan D Kharasch
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 7.892

Review 6.  Methadone for Pain Management: A Pharmacotherapeutic Review.

Authors:  Denise Kreutzwiser; Qutaiba A Tawfic
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 5.749

Review 7.  Methadone: applications in pediatric anesthesiology and critical care medicine.

Authors:  Joseph D Tobias
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 2.078

Review 8.  Clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of opioid analgesics in infants and children.

Authors:  K T Olkkola; K Hamunen; E L Maunuksela
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 6.447

9.  Rapid determination of methadone in plasma, cerebrospinal fluid, and urine by gas chromatography and its application to routine drug monitoring.

Authors:  N Schmidt; R Sittl; K Brune; G Geisslinger
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 4.200

10.  Analysis of methadone disposition in the pregnant rat by means of a physiological flow model.

Authors:  J L Gabrielsson; P Johansson; U Bondesson; L K Paalzow
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1985-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.