Literature DB >> 34023380

Postpartum contraception method type and risk of a short interpregnancy interval in a state Medicaid population.

Katie Gifford1, Mary Joan McDuffie2, Hira Rashid3, Erin K Knight2, Rebecca McColl2, Michel Boudreaux4, Michael S Rendall5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the likelihood of a short interpregnancy interval (IPI) resulting in a birth among women covered by Medicaid, as a function of postpartum contraceptive method type. STUDY
DESIGN: We used Medicaid claims and eligibility data to identify women (aged 15-44) who had a Medicaid-financed birth in Delaware in the years 2012-2014 (n = 10,328). Claims were analyzed to determine postpartum contraceptive type within 60 days of the index birth, and linked birth certificates were used to determine the incidence and timing of a subsequent birth through 2018 (regardless of payer). We used logistic regression to analyze the likelihood of having a short IPI following the index birth as a function of postpartum contraceptive type, controlling for preterm births, parity, having a postpartum checkup, and maternal characteristics including age, race, education, and marital status.
RESULTS: Compared to patients receiving postpartum long-acting reversible contraceptive methods (LARC), patients with no contraceptive claims had nearly 5 times higher odds (odds ratio [OR] = 4.98, confidence interval [CI] = 3.05-8.13) and those with claims for moderately effective methods (injectable, pill, patch, or ring) had 3.5 times higher odds (OR = 3.51, CI = 2.13-5.77) of a subsequent birth following a short IPI.
CONCLUSIONS: In a state population of Medicaid-enrolled women, women with claims for postpartum LARC had substantially lower risk of a short IPI resulting in a birth. IMPLICATIONS: Women who received LARC within 60 days postpartum are less likely to experience a short interpregnancy interval resulting in a birth. The evidence suggests that recent state policy changes that make postpartum LARC more accessible to those that desire it will be an effective strategy in helping patients obtain desired birth intervals.
Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Interpregnancy interval; LARC; Medicaid; Subsequent birth

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34023380      PMCID: PMC8992691          DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2021.05.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contraception        ISSN: 0010-7824            Impact factor:   3.051


  28 in total

Review 1.  Eliminating health disparities in unintended pregnancy with long-acting reversible contraception (LARC).

Authors:  Caitlin Parks; Jeffrey F Peipert
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  Declines in Unintended Pregnancy in the United States, 2008-2011.

Authors:  Lawrence B Finer; Mia R Zolna
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2016-03-03       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Short interpregnancy intervals in the United States.

Authors:  Alison Gemmill; Laura Duberstein Lindberg
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 7.661

4.  Interpregnancy Interval and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes: An Analysis of Successive Pregnancies.

Authors:  Gillian E Hanley; Jennifer A Hutcheon; Brooke A Kinniburgh; Lily Lee
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  Within-Family Analysis of Interpregnancy Interval and Adverse Birth Outcomes.

Authors:  Quetzal A Class; Martin E Rickert; Anna S Oberg; Ayesha C Sujan; Catarina Almqvist; Henrik Larsson; Paul Lichtenstein; Brian M D'Onofrio
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 7.661

6.  Variation in postpartum contraceptive method use: results from the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS).

Authors:  Kari White; Joseph E Potter; Kristine Hopkins; Daniel Grossman
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2013-10-22       Impact factor: 3.375

7.  The Effect of Interpregnancy Interval on the Recurrence Rate of Spontaneous Preterm Birth: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Bouchra Koullali; Esme I Kamphuis; Michel H P Hof; Sarah A Robertson; Eva Pajkrt; Christianne J M de Groot; Ben W J Mol; Anita C J Ravelli
Journal:  Am J Perinatol       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 1.862

8.  Perceptions of coercion, discrimination and other negative experiences in postpartum contraceptive counseling for low-income minority women.

Authors:  Lynn M Yee; Melissa A Simon
Journal:  J Health Care Poor Underserved       Date:  2011-11

9.  Birth Intervals and Health in Adulthood: A Comparison of Siblings Using Swedish Register Data.

Authors:  Kieron J Barclay; Martin Kolk
Journal:  Demography       Date:  2018-06

10.  Contraceptive method use in the United States: trends and characteristics between 2008, 2012 and 2014.

Authors:  Megan L Kavanaugh; Jenna Jerman
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2017-10-13       Impact factor: 3.375

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.