Literature DB >> 34023187

Effect of Overpressure on Acoustic Emissions and Treated Tissue Histology in ex Vivo Bulk Ultrasound Ablation.

Chandra Priya Karunakaran1, Mark T Burgess1, Marepalli B Rao2, Christy K Holland3, T Douglas Mast4.   

Abstract

Bulk ultrasound ablation is a thermal therapy approach in which tissue is heated by unfocused or weakly focused sonication (average intensities on the order of 100 W/cm2) to achieve coagulative necrosis within a few minutes exposure time. Assessing the role of bubble activity, including acoustic cavitation and tissue vaporization, in bulk ultrasound ablation may help in making bulk ultrasound ablation safer and more effective for clinical applications. Here, two series of ex vivo ablation trials were conducted to investigate the role of bubble activity and tissue vaporization in bulk ultrasound ablation. Fresh bovine liver tissue was ablated with unfocused, continuous-wave ultrasound using ultrasound image-ablate arrays sonicating at 31 W/cm2 (0.9 MPa amplitude) for either 20 min at a frequency of 3.1 MHz or 10 min at 4.8 MHz. Tissue specimens were maintained at a static overpressure of either 0.52 or 1.2 MPa to suppress bubble activity and tissue vaporization or at atmospheric pressure for control groups. A passive cavitation detector was used to record subharmonic (1.55 or 2.4 MHz), broadband (1.2-1.5 MHz) and low-frequency (5-20 kHz) acoustic emissions. Treated tissue was stained with 2% triphenyl tetrazolium chloride to evaluate thermal lesion dimensions. Subharmonic emissions were significantly reduced in overpressure groups compared with control groups. Correlations observed between acoustic emissions and lesion dimensions were significant and positive for the 3.1-MHz series, but significant and negative for the 4.8-MHz series. The results indicate that for bulk ultrasound ablation, where both acoustic cavitation and tissue vaporization are possible, bubble activity can enhance ablation in the absence of tissue vaporization, but can reduce thermal lesion dimensions in the presence of vaporization.
Copyright © 2021 World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acoustic cavitation; Bubble activity; Bulk ultrasound ablation; Overpressure; Passive detection; Tissue vaporization; Triphenyl tetrazolium chloride vital staining

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34023187      PMCID: PMC8243850          DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2021.04.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol        ISSN: 0301-5629            Impact factor:   3.694


  60 in total

1.  Passive cavitation imaging with ultrasound arrays.

Authors:  Vasant A Salgaonkar; Saurabh Datta; Christy K Holland; T Douglas Mast
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Observation of a cavitation cloud in tissue using correlation between ultrafast ultrasound images.

Authors:  Fabrice Prieur; Ali Zorgani; Stefan Catheline; Rémi Souchon; Jean-Louis Mestas; Maxime Lafond; Cyril Lafon
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 2.725

3.  Dependence of inertial cavitation induced by high intensity focused ultrasound on transducer F-number and nonlinear waveform distortion.

Authors:  Tatiana Khokhlova; Pavel Rosnitskiy; Christopher Hunter; Adam Maxwell; Wayne Kreider; Gail Ter Haar; Marcia Costa; Oleg Sapozhnikov; Vera Khokhlova
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  High-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) ablation by the frequency chirps: Enhanced thermal field and cavitation at the focus.

Authors:  Mingjun Wang; Yisheng Lei; Yufeng Zhou
Journal:  Ultrasonics       Date:  2018-08-21       Impact factor: 2.890

5.  Passive cavitation detection during pulsed HIFU exposures of ex vivo tissues and in vivo mouse pancreatic tumors.

Authors:  Tong Li; Hong Chen; Tatiana Khokhlova; Yak-Nam Wang; Wayne Kreider; Xuemei He; Joo Ha Hwang
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 2.998

Review 6.  Cancers Metastatic to the Liver.

Authors:  Nikdokht Rashidian; Adnan Alseidi; Russell C Kirks
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  2020-04-03       Impact factor: 2.741

7.  Evidence for ultrasonically induced cavitation in vivo.

Authors:  G R ter Haar; S Daniels
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1981-11       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  MRI-guided gas bubble enhanced ultrasound heating in in vivo rabbit thigh.

Authors:  S D Sokka; R King; K Hynynen
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2003-01-21       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  Survival analysis of high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation in patients with small hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Tan To Cheung; Sheung Tat Fan; Ferdinand S K Chu; Caroline R Jenkins; Kenneth S H Chok; Simon H Y Tsang; Wing Chiu Dai; Albert C Y Chan; See Ching Chan; Thomas C C Yau; Ronnie T P Poon; Chung Mau Lo
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2012-12-04       Impact factor: 3.647

10.  Endoscopic treatment of cholangiocarcinoma and carcinoma of the duodenal papilla by intraductal high-intensity US: Results of a pilot study.

Authors:  Frédéric Prat; Cyril Lafon; David Melo De Lima; Yves Theilliere; Jacques Fritsch; Gilles Pelletier; Catherine Buffet; Dominique Cathignol
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 9.427

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.