Literature DB >> 34021792

Performance of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement calculator for early postoperative outcomes following bile duct repair hepaticojejunostomy.

Gustavo Martínez-Mier1,2,3, Pedro I Moreno-Ley4,5, Daniel Mendez-Rico6, Fortino Gonzalez-Gonzalez7, Andrea Nachón-Acosta6.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: A Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy (HJ) is the preferred method for repairing bile duct injuries (BDIs). The American College of Surgeons (ACS) established the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) online risk calculator to predict risks for morbidity and mortality. The objective of the study is to assess the use of the ACS NSQIP calculator for patients undergoing HJ for BDI repairs outside the NSQIP cohort.
METHODS: An IRB-approved retrospective study of Bismuth-Strasberg type E BDI HJ (2008-2020) was performed. Clinical data was introduced in the NSQIP calculator, and morbidity and mortality were determined. Perioperative risk factors were obtained. Comparisons of postoperative complications and NSQIP-predicted complication rate were carried out.
RESULTS: Eighty-two patients were included (age: 42.2 ± 15.7 years; 81% female; BMI 27.1 ± 4.4 kg/m2). The most common injury was E4 (36.3%). A total of 40.2% patients had a 30-day complication. Mortality was 2.4%. Preoperative sepsis and high body mass index (p = 0.01) were significantly related to complications (p = 0.01) (univariate analysis). Older age (p = 0.01) and higher ASA class (p = 0.02) were significantly related to mortality (univariate analysis). None was statistically significant in multivariate analysis. Comparison between morbidity and mortality and the calculated NSQIP was not statistically significant. Postoperative mortality had a statistically significant trend (C-value = 0.72, p = 0.055).
CONCLUSION: Preoperative sepsis, high body mass index, age, and ASA classification were associated with worse outcomes in HJ BDI repair. The ACS NSQIP calculator did not have a good performance in a population outside the NSQIP data. Further larger studies will need to corroborate these results.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bile duct injury; Hepaticojejunostomy; NSQIP; Outcomes; Risk prediction

Year:  2021        PMID: 34021792     DOI: 10.1007/s00423-021-02133-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg        ISSN: 1435-2443            Impact factor:   3.445


  3 in total

Review 1.  An analysis of the problem of biliary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  S M Strasberg; M Hertl; N J Soper
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 6.113

2.  Bile duct injury during laparoscopic and conventional cholecystectomy.

Authors:  D J Gouma; P M Go
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 6.113

3.  [Factores de riesgo asociados a las complicaciones y a la falla terapéutica en las reconstrucciones de lesiones de vía biliar secundarias a colecistectomía].

Authors:  Gustavo Martínez-Mier; Héctor J Luna-Ortiz; Nicolás Hernández-Herrera; Stefan Zilli-Hernandez; Francisco A Lajud-Barquin
Journal:  Cir Cir       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 0.361

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.