Literature DB >> 34020974

Addressing the psychological impact of COVID-19 on healthcare workers: learning from a systematic review of early interventions for frontline responders.

Jasmine Jean Hooper1, Lisa Saulsman2, Tammy Hall3, Flavie Waters2,3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Protecting healthcare workers from psychological harm is an urgent clinical issue within the current COVID-19 pandemic. Research on early psychological programmes that aim to prevent or reduce mental health symptoms and that have been tested in frontline responders may assist service providers with choosing a suitable intervention for rapid dissemination in healthcare settings. DESIGN AND OUTCOME MEASURES: First, Embase, Web of Science, PsycINFO and Google Scholar were searched through a systematic literature review of early psychological interventions administered to frontline responders in the last 15 years. Interventions were included if they were designed to prevent or reduce psychological impact and had outcome measures of psychological distress (eg, general psychopathology, post-traumatic stress disorder and stress) and/or positive mental health domains (eg, resilience, self-efficacy and life satisfaction). Second, the suitability of these programmes for the healthcare workforce was evaluated according to the criteria of effectiveness, content applicability and feasibility.
RESULTS: Of 320 articles retrieved, 12 relevant studies were included that described six early psychological interventions. Although the evidence base is limited, psychological first aid, eye movement desensitisation and reprocessing, and trauma risk management showed effectiveness across at least two studies each with frontline workers. Resilience and coping for the healthcare community; anticipate, plan, and deter; and resilience at work programmes found promising results in single studies. Concerning other suitability criteria, all programmes appear applicable to healthcare settings and have acceptable feasibility for rapid implementation.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite the limited evidence, several interventions were identified as potentially suitable and useful for improving psychological functioning of healthcare workers across a variety of disaster situations. Service providers should continue to implement and evaluate early psychological interventions in frontline workers in order to refine best practices for managing the psychological impact of future disasters. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19; health policy; mental health

Year:  2021        PMID: 34020974     DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044134

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ Open        ISSN: 2044-6055            Impact factor:   2.692


  10 in total

1.  Assessment of Acceptability and Initial Effectiveness of a Unified Protocol Prevention Program to Train Emotional Regulation Skills in Female Nursing Professionals during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Vanesa Ferreres-Galán; María Vicenta Navarro-Haro; Óscar Peris-Baquero; Silvia Guillén-Marín; Jordi de Luna-Hermoso; Jorge Osma
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-05-07       Impact factor: 4.614

2.  Longitudinal Change of Psychological Distress among Healthcare Professionals with and without Psychological First Aid Training Experience during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Hiroki Asaoka; Yuichi Koido; Yuzuru Kawashima; Miki Ikeda; Yuki Miyamoto; Daisuke Nishi
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-11-26       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 3.  Stress, PTSD, and COVID-19: the Utility of Disaster Mental Health Interventions During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Patricia Watson
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Psychiatry       Date:  2022-02-21

4.  Psychological stress self-help interventions for healthcare workers in the context of COVID-19 in China: A randomized controlled trial protocol.

Authors:  Rui Luo; Pengyue Guo; Menglin Shang; Yuqi Cai; Jinying Huang; Yiling He; Phoenix K H Mo; Anise M S Wu; Roman Dong Xu; Jinghua Li; Joseph T F Lau; Jing Gu
Journal:  Internet Interv       Date:  2022-04-20

5.  Psychological first aid for workers in care and nursing homes: systematic review.

Authors:  Mariyana Schoultz; Claire McGrogan; Michelle Beattie; Leah Macaden; Clare Carolan; Rob Polson; Geoffrey Dickens
Journal:  BMC Nurs       Date:  2022-04-26

6.  Psychotherapy and Follow-Up in Health Care Workers After the COVID-19 Epidemic: A Single Center's Experience.

Authors:  Hao Chen; Qing Ma; Bo Du; Yan Huang; Shi-Guang Zhu; Sheng-Li Li; De-Qin Geng; Xing-Shun Xu
Journal:  Psychol Res Behav Manag       Date:  2022-08-18

7.  E-Health Psychological Intervention for COVID-19 Healthcare Workers: Protocol for its Implementation and Evaluation.

Authors:  Alejandro Dominguez-Rodriguez; Reyna Jazmín Martínez-Arriaga; Paulina Erika Herdoiza-Arroyo; Eduardo Bautista-Valerio; Anabel de la Rosa-Gómez; Rosa Olimpia Castellanos Vargas; Laura Lacomba-Trejo; Joaquín Mateu-Mollá; Miriam de Jesús Lupercio Ramírez; Jairo Alejandro Figueroa González; Flor Rocío Ramírez Martínez
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-10-05       Impact factor: 4.614

Review 8.  [Is this the parallel pandemic? : Measures to improve working conditions and stress levels among health care personnel].

Authors:  Matthias Weigl; Julia Schreyer
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2021-08-12       Impact factor: 0.743

9.  Experiences of Safety-Net Practice Clinicians Participating in the National Health Service Corps During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Donald E Pathman; Jeffrey Sonis; Jerry N Harrison; Robert G Sewell; Jackie Fannell; Marc Overbeck; Thomas R Konrad
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2021-10-25       Impact factor: 2.792

10.  Help Seeking of Highly Specialized Mental Health Treatment before and during the COVID-19 Pandemic among Health Professionals.

Authors:  María Dolores Braquehais; Esperanza L Gómez-Duran; Gemma Nieva; Sergi Valero; Josep Antoni Ramos-Quiroga; Eugeni Bruguera
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-03-19       Impact factor: 3.390

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.