Literature DB >> 34020716

Moving apart together: co-movement of a symbiont community and their ant host, and its importance for community assembly.

T Parmentier1,2, R Claus3, F De Laender4, D Bonte3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Species interactions may affect spatial dynamics when the movement of one species is determined by the presence of another one. The most direct species-dependence of dispersal is vectored, usually cross-kingdom, movement of immobile parasites, diseases or seeds by mobile animals. Joint movements of species should, however, not be vectored by definition, as even mobile species are predicted to move together when they are tightly connected in symbiont communities.
METHODS: We studied concerted movements in a diverse and heterogeneous community of arthropods (myrmecophiles) associated with red wood ants. We questioned whether joint-movement strategies eventually determine and speed-up community succession.
RESULTS: We recorded an astonishingly high number of obligate myrmecophiles outside red wood ant nests. They preferentially co-moved with the host ants as the highest densities were found in locations with the highest density of foraging red wood ants, such as along the network of ant trails. These observations suggest that myrmecophiles resort to the host to move away from the nest, and this to a much higher extent than hitherto anticipated. Interestingly, functional groups of symbionts displayed different dispersal kernels, with predatory myrmecophiles moving more frequently and further from the nest than detritivorous myrmecophiles. We discovered that myrmecophile diversity was lower in newly founded nests than in mature red wood ant nests. Most myrmecophiles, however, were able to colonize new nests fast suggesting that the heterogeneity in mobility does not affect community assembly.
CONCLUSIONS: We show that co-movement is not restricted to tight parasitic, or cross-kingdom interactions. Movement in social insect symbiont communities may be heterogeneous and functional group-dependent, but clearly affected by host movement. Ultimately, this co-movement leads to directional movement and allows a fast colonisation of new patches, but not in a predictable way. This study highlights the importance of spatial dynamics of local and regional networks in symbiont metacommunities, of which those of symbionts of social insects are prime examples.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ant guest; Co-dispersal; Community coexistence; Host-parasite; Inquiline; Metacommunity; Spatial structure; Succession

Year:  2021        PMID: 34020716     DOI: 10.1186/s40462-021-00259-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mov Ecol        ISSN: 2051-3933            Impact factor:   3.600


  19 in total

1.  Mutualistic fungi control crop diversity in fungus-growing ants.

Authors:  Michael Poulsen; Jacobus J Boomsma
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-02-04       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 2.  Interspecific information transfer influences animal community structure.

Authors:  Eben Goodale; Guy Beauchamp; Robert D Magrath; James C Nieh; Graeme D Ruxton
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 17.712

Review 3.  Costs of dispersal.

Authors:  Dries Bonte; Hans Van Dyck; James M Bullock; Aurélie Coulon; Maria Delgado; Melanie Gibbs; Valerie Lehouck; Erik Matthysen; Karin Mustin; Marjo Saastamoinen; Nicolas Schtickzelle; Virginie M Stevens; Sofie Vandewoestijne; Michel Baguette; Kamil Barton; Tim G Benton; Audrey Chaput-Bardy; Jean Clobert; Calvin Dytham; Thomas Hovestadt; Christoph M Meier; Steve C F Palmer; Camille Turlure; Justin M J Travis
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2011-09-19

4.  Bottom-up and top-down control of dispersal across major organismal groups.

Authors:  Emanuel A Fronhofer; Delphine Legrand; Florian Altermatt; Armelle Ansart; Simon Blanchet; Dries Bonte; Alexis Chaine; Maxime Dahirel; Frederik De Laender; Jonathan De Raedt; Lucie di Gesu; Staffan Jacob; Oliver Kaltz; Estelle Laurent; Chelsea J Little; Luc Madec; Florent Manzi; Stefano Masier; Felix Pellerin; Frank Pennekamp; Nicolas Schtickzelle; Lieven Therry; Alexandre Vong; Laurane Winandy; Julien Cote
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-11-05       Impact factor: 15.460

5.  Density and genetic relatedness increase dispersal distance in a subsocial organism.

Authors:  E V Bitume; D Bonte; O Ronce; F Bach; E Flaven; I Olivieri; C M Nieberding
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2013-01-07       Impact factor: 9.492

Review 6.  Migratory Birds as Global Dispersal Vectors.

Authors:  Duarte S Viana; Luis Santamaría; Jordi Figuerola
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2016-08-06       Impact factor: 17.712

7.  Intuitive and broadly applicable definitions of niche and fitness differences.

Authors:  Jurg W Spaak; Frederik De Laender
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2020-04-27       Impact factor: 9.492

8.  The presence of an avian co-forager reduces vigilance in a cooperative mammal.

Authors:  Lynda L Sharpe; Abigail S Joustra; Michael I Cherry
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2010-02-03       Impact factor: 3.703

9.  Joint dispersal does not imply maintenance of partnerships in lichen symbioses.

Authors:  Sabine Wornik; Martin Grube
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.552

10.  Whole-genome data reveal the complex history of a diverse ecological community.

Authors:  Lynsey Bunnefeld; Jack Hearn; Graham N Stone; Konrad Lohse
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-06-26       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  1 in total

1.  Dissecting the costs of a facultative symbiosis in an isopod living with ants.

Authors:  Jens Zarka; Frederik C De Wint; Luc De Bruyn; Dries Bonte; Thomas Parmentier
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2022-05-21       Impact factor: 3.225

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.