| Literature DB >> 34019710 |
Anna Meijer1, Petra J W Pouwels2, Joanne Smith3, Chris Visscher3, Roel J Bosker4, Esther Hartman3, Jaap Oosterlaan1,5, Marsh Königs5.
Abstract
Recent evidence indicates that both cardiovascular fitness and gross motor skill performance are related to enhanced neurocognitive functioning in children by influencing brain structure and functioning. This study investigates the role of white matter microstructure in the relationship of both cardiovascular fitness and gross motor skills with neurocognitive functioning in healthy children. In total 92 children (mean age 9.1 years, range 8.0-10.7) were included in this study. Cardiovascular fitness and gross motor skill performance were assessed using performance-based tests. Neurocognitive functioning was assessed using computerized tests (working memory, inhibition, interference control, information processing, and attention). Diffusion tensor imaging was used in combination with tract-based spatial statistics to assess white matter microstructure as defined by fractional anisotropy (FA), axial and radial diffusivity (AD, RD). The results revealed positive associations of both cardiovascular fitness and gross motor skills with neurocognitive functioning. Information processing and motor response inhibition were associated with FA in a cluster located in the corpus callosum. Within this cluster, higher cardiovascular fitness and better gross motor skills were both associated with greater FA, greater AD, and lower RD. No mediating role was found for FA in the relationship of both cardiovascular fitness and gross motor skills with neurocognitive functioning. The results indicate that cardiovascular fitness and gross motor skills are related to neurocognitive functioning as well as white matter microstructure in children. However, this study provides no evidence for a mediating role of white matter microstructure in these relationships.Entities:
Keywords: DTI; cross-sectional design; neurocognitive functioning; preadolescents; white matter microstructure
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34019710 PMCID: PMC8453576 DOI: 10.1002/jnr.24851
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Neurosci Res ISSN: 0360-4012 Impact factor: 4.164
Baseline characteristics
| Total sample ( | |
|---|---|
| Number of girls, | 46 (50%) |
| Age in years, | 9.12 (0.62) |
| BMI in kg/m2, | 16.81 (2.24) |
| Normal weight, | 77 (84%) |
| Overweight, | 13 (14%) |
| Obesity, | 2 (2%) |
| Grade three, | 47 (51%) |
| IQ, | 101.29 (15.33) |
| SES, | 4.60 (1.04) |
| Cardiovascular fitness (VO2max, ml kg−1 min−1), | 48.89 (4.37) |
| Gross motor skills, | 0.00 (1.00) |
Abbreviations: BMI, body‐mass index; M, mean; SD, standard deviation; SES, socioeconomic status.
According to the reference values by Cole and Lobstein (2012).
The average level of parental education ranged from 0 (no education) to 7 (post‐doctoral education).
Component scores derived from four motor skills subtests including: Jumping Sideways, Moving Sideways, Backwards Balancing, and Ball Skills.
Description and operationalization of neurocognitive functioning measures
| Task | Measures | Description | Dependent variable | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ANT | Computerized task in which target stimuli consisting of an arrow pointing left or right are presented on a computer screen. Children are instructed to respond as quickly as possible to the direction of a target stimulus by pressing the corresponding button. The ex‐Gaussian model was used to extract the influence of extreme slow responses (tau) on information processing speed (Fan et al., | Information processing | The speed of responding to target appearance | Mean reaction time (ms) on neutral trials |
| Tau | Lapses of attention | The average of the exponential component of the fitted ex‐Gaussian curve, reflecting the influence of extremely slow responses (lapses of attention) on information processing | ||
| Alerting attention | The speed of achieving an alert state | The difference in mean reaction time (ms) between central cue trials and no cue trials | ||
| The accuracy of achieving an alert state | The difference in percentage of correct responses on central cue trials and no cue trials | |||
| Spatial attention | The speed of spatially orienting to information | The difference in mean reaction time (ms) between spatial cue trials and central cue trials | ||
| The accuracy of spatially orienting to information | The difference in the percentage of correct responses on spatial cue trials and central cue trials | |||
| Interference control | The speed of suppressing irrelevant information | The difference in mean reaction time (ms) between incongruent trials and congruent trials | ||
| The accuracy of suppressing irrelevant information | The difference in the percentage of correct responses on incongruent trials and congruent trials | |||
| DS | Children are required to repeat a sequence of numbers presented auditorily in the order of presentation (forward condition) or reversed order (backward condition (WISC‐III; Wechsler, | Verbal short‐term memory | The ability to hold verbal information in short‐term memory | The product of the number of correct responses and the highest span reached in the forward condition (Kessels et al., |
| Verbal working memory | The ability to manipulate verbal information in working memory | The product of the number of correct responses and the highest span reached in the backward condition (Kessels et al., | ||
| GT | A sequence of yellow dots is presented on a four by four digital grid. Children are required to repeat the sequence in the order of presentation (forward) or reversed order (backward) by clicking on the relevant locations in the grid (Nutley et al., | Visuospatial short‐term memory | The ability to hold visuospatial information in short‐term memory | The product of the number of correct responses and the highest span reached in the forward condition (Kessels et al., |
| Visuospatial working memory | The ability to manipulate visuospatial information in working memory | The product of the number of correct responses and the highest span reached in the backward condition (Kessels et al., | ||
| SST | A computerized task involved Go trials and Stop trials. Go trials consist of an airplane either pointing to the right or left side. Stop trials are identical to Go trials but with a stop signal superimposed on the airplane. Children are instructed to respond as quickly as possible to Go trials by pressing the corresponding button, and to inhibit the motor response when the stop signal is presented (Logan, | Motor inhibition efficiency | The latency of an inhibitory process | The mean reaction time (ms) calculated for correct responses on go trials subtracted by the average stop signal delay time (ms) |
Abbreviations: ANT, attention network test; DS, digit span; GT, grid task; SST, stop signal task.
Results of linear regression analysis relating cardiovascular fitness to neurocognitive functioning components
| Neurocognitive functioning component | Covariates | 95% CI |
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Information Processing and Control | Grade | 0.061 (0.022) | 0.017–0.105 | 0.007 | 0.173 |
| Interference Control | – | 0.027 (0.024) | −0.021–0.075 | 0.266 | 0.014 |
| Attention Accuracy | BMI | −0.024 (0.023) | −0.069–0.021 | 0.297 | 0.066 |
| Visuospatial Working Memory | – | 0.046 (0.026) | −0.006–0.098 | 0.083 | 0.033 |
| Verbal Working Memory | SES | 0.018 (0.023) | −0.027–0.064 | 0.422 | 0.072 |
| Attention Efficiency | – | 0.031 (0.022) | −0.014–0.075 | 0.172 | 0.021 |
Abbreviation: SES, socioeconomic status.
Covariates significantly related to the neurocognitive functioning component.
Results of linear regression analysis relating gross motor skills to neurocognitive functioning components
| Neurocognitive functioning component | Covariates | 95% CI |
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Information Processing and Control | – | 0.437 (0.095) | 0.248–0.626 | <0.001 | 0.188 |
| Interference Control | – | 0.084 (0.105) | −0.124–0.292 | 0.425 | 0.007 |
| Attention Accuracy | BMI | −0.084 (0.095) | −0.272–0.105 | 0.380 | 0.063 |
| Visuospatial Working Memory | – | 0.236 (0.112) | 0.013–0.459 | 0.038 | 0.046 |
| Verbal Working Memory | SES | 0.095 (0.097) | −0.098–0.289 | 0.330 | 0.074 |
| Attention Efficiency | – | 0.081 (0.098) | −0.113–0.275 | 0.407 | 0.008 |
Abbreviation: SES, socioeconomic status.
Covariates significantly related to the neurocognitive functioning component.
FIGURE 1Significant voxel‐wise associations for Information Processing and Control (left) and the significant association between the mean fractional anisotropy (FA) and Information Processing and Control (z‐score) (right). Significant associations (blue) are displayed on the mean FA skeleton (green; threshold: 0.3) using threshold‐free cluster enhancement correction in TBSS (p < 0.05). The results are overlaid on a MNI152 1 mm T1 brain and for visualization purposes, significant associations between FA and Information Processing and Control were thickened
FIGURE 2Significant voxel‐wise associations for cardiovascular fitness (a) and gross motor skills (b; both left) and the significant associations between fractional anisotropy (FA) (z‐score) and (a) cardiovascular fitness (z‐score) and (b) gross motor skills (z‐score; both right). Significant voxel‐wise associations are displayed (red) within the ROI of white matter tracts with relevance for Information Processing and Control (blue), displayed on the mean FA skeleton (green; threshold: 0.3) using threshold‐free cluster enhancement correction in TBSS (p < 0.05). The results are overlaid on a MNI152 1 mm T1 brain and for visualization purposes, significant associations between cardiovascular fitness or gross motor skills and Information Processing and Control were thickened
Results of linear regression analysis relating DTI parameters to cardiovascular fitness and gross motor skills
| Cardiovascular fitness | Mean ( |
| 95% CI |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FA | 0.576 (0.065) | 0.004 (0.001) | 0.002–0.006 | <0.001 | 0.667 |
| AD | 153.1 (8.5) | 0.362 (0.131) | 0.102–0.622 | 0.007 | 0.604 |
| RD | 54.1 (6.8) | −0.395 (0.117) | −0.627–−0.163 | 0.001 | 0.504 |
Corrected for Scanning Site and Grade.
Corrected for Scanning Site.
10−5 mm2/s.
FIGURE 3Mediation model Note. Mediation model testing the mediating role of white matter microstructure (FA) in the relation between cardiovascular fitness or gross motor skills and Information Processing and Control. 1FA in the cluster of white matter tracts associated with the neurocognitive component Information Processing and Control and cardiovascular fitness; 2FA in the cluster of white matter tracts associated with the neurocognitive component Information Processing and Control and motor skills. c’ represents the direct effect and c the total effect of Cardiovascular fitness/Gross motor skills on Information Processing and Control.