Literature DB >> 34019088

Examination of Medical College Admission Test Scores and US Medical Licensing Examination Step 1 and Step 2 Clinical Knowledge Scores Among Students With Disabilities.

Joel Purkiss1, Melissa Plegue2, Christina J Grabowski3, Michael H Kim4, Sharad Jain5, Mark C Henderson5,6,7, Lisa M Meeks2,7.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34019088      PMCID: PMC8140368          DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.10914

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Netw Open        ISSN: 2574-3805


× No keyword cloud information.

Introduction

An increasing number of medical students are disclosing disabilities,[1] yet little is known about the association between Medical College Admission Test (MCAT) and US Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) performance in this population. Previous studies were focused on a single site[3] and were performed prior to changes in disability law and increases in disability disclosure.[2,3] Historical literature suggests that students with disabilities (SWD) have lower USMLE pass rates[2] and lower Step 1 and Step 2 Clinical Knowledge (CK) scores.[3] Despite recent attention to differential MCAT performance among students with lower socioeconomic status backgrounds and those identifying as races/ethnicities underrepresented in medicine,[4] disability has been conspicuously absent from these discussions. If the MCAT is to remain a useful tool for assessing the likelihood of success in medical school, data on performance outcomes in diverse cohorts of students are needed.[5] We examined the association of MCAT scores, disability status and category, and performance on Step 1 and Step 2 CK scores in a multisite, multiyear cohort of SWD who matriculated following amendments to the Americans with Disabilities Act.[6]

Methods

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 163 graduating SWD from 11 US medical schools in 2018 and 2019 matched with 2 nondisabled control (NDC) participants by self-reported gender at application and MCAT score, yielding a final sample of 488 students. The University of Michigan Medical School institutional review board approved this study. The requirement for informed consent was waived because data were deidentified. The study followed the American Association for Public Opinion Research (AAPOR) reporting guideline. SWD were dichotomized into 2 groups following previous literature.[3] The cognitive group included students with psychological, learning, and attention deficit disorders; the noncognitive group included all others. Primary outcome measures included scores on USMLE Step 1 and Step 2 CK. To assess the association between MCAT and USMLE scores, we ran linear mixed models using MCAT, disability group, and the interaction between MCAT and disability group as covariates. Random effects for school and matched pairs were included to account for clustering. Secondary analyses separated SWD into those with cognitive vs noncognitive disabilities and compared each with NDC group participants using a 3-group approach. The NDC group was the reference group for all comparisons. Model assumptions included normality of error terms and random effects; both were assessed and determined to be reasonably met. A significance level of P < .05 was used in determining significant associations, and all tests were 2-sided. Statistical analyses were conducted in Stata IC version 15.1 (StataCorp).

Results

The sample consisted of 488 participants, with 284 (58.2%) female participants and a mean (SD) MCAT score of 31.6 (3.5). Among 163 SWD, 111 (68.1%) reported cognitive disabilities, 47 (28.8%) reported noncognitive disabilities, and disabilities for 5 (3.1%) were unknown. Our models showed that MCAT scores were positively associated with USMLE Step 1 and Step 2 CK scores for all students (Table). After adjusting for MCAT score, SWD status was associated with lower mean USMLE scores (B = −11.2; 95% CI, −14.0 to −8.4). Neither model had a significant disability by MCAT interaction, suggesting that changes in MCAT scores were associated with similar changes in USMLE scores regardless of disability status (Figure). Students with noncognitive disabilities had significantly lower Step 1 scores than students in the NDC group (B = −5.8; 95% CI, −10.6 to −1.1) but did not differ significantly from students in the NDC group on Step 2 CK scores (B = −3.4; 95% CI, −7.7 to 0.9). Students with cognitive disabilities had significantly lower mean scores than both students in the NDC group and those with noncognitive disabilities on both Step 1 (cognitive disability vs NDC: B = −13.3; 95% CI, −16.6 to −10.0; cognitive vs noncognitive disability: B = −7.3; 95% CI, −12.7 to −1.9) and Step 2 CK (cognitive disability vs NDC: B = −10.7; 95% CI, −13.7 to −7.7; cognitive vs noncognitive disability: B = −7.3; 95% CI, −12.2 to −2.4).
Table.

Association of MCAT Score With US Medical Licensing Examination Step 1 and Step 2 CK Scores for Medical Students With and Without Disabilities

CovariateModel 1a, Step 1 scoreaModel 2a, Step 2 CK Scorea
B (95% CI)P valueB (95% CI)P value
MCAT Score2.27 (1.81 to 2.74)<.0011.54 (1.15 to 1.93)<.001
Group
Nondisabled control group0 [Reference]NA0 [Reference]NA
Students with disabilities−11.20 (−14.04 to −8.36)<.001−8.47 (−11.11 to −5.83)<.001
Model 1b: Step 1 scorebModel 2b: Step 2 CK scoreb
MCAT Scorec2.20 (1.72 to 2.68)<.0011.46 (1.06 to 1.86)<.001
Group
Nondisabled control group0 [Reference]NA0 [Reference]NA
Students with cognitive disabilitiesd−13.28 (−16.55 to −10.01)<.001−10.71 (−13.74 to −7.68)<.001
Students with noncognitive disabilitiese−5.84 (−10.58 to −1.11).02−3.41 (−7.74 to .93).12

Abbreviations: CK, Clinical Knowledge; MCAT, Medical College Admission Test; NA, not applicable.

Models 1a and 2a include group as control group vs students with disability group.

Models 1b and 2b include group as a 3-level factor, ie, control group vs cognitive primary disability group vs noncognitive primary disability group.

Scores were from the previous version of the MCAT exam.

Cognitive disabilities included psychological, learning, and attention deficit disorders.

Noncognitive disabilities included mobility/physical disabilities, chronic health conditions, deaf and hard of hearing, and low vision.

Figure.

Medical College Admission Test (MCAT) Scores by US Medical Licensing Examination Step 1 and Step 2 Clinical Knowledge (CK) Scores, for Students With and Without Disabilities

Lines indicate unadjusted regression fit lines between MCAT and US Medical Licensing Examination scores for students with disabilities (SWD) and the control group.

Abbreviations: CK, Clinical Knowledge; MCAT, Medical College Admission Test; NA, not applicable. Models 1a and 2a include group as control group vs students with disability group. Models 1b and 2b include group as a 3-level factor, ie, control group vs cognitive primary disability group vs noncognitive primary disability group. Scores were from the previous version of the MCAT exam. Cognitive disabilities included psychological, learning, and attention deficit disorders. Noncognitive disabilities included mobility/physical disabilities, chronic health conditions, deaf and hard of hearing, and low vision.

Medical College Admission Test (MCAT) Scores by US Medical Licensing Examination Step 1 and Step 2 Clinical Knowledge (CK) Scores, for Students With and Without Disabilities

Lines indicate unadjusted regression fit lines between MCAT and US Medical Licensing Examination scores for students with disabilities (SWD) and the control group.

Discussion

SWD are a growing and important medical school population. Our findings confirm previous studies[2] showing that MCAT is strongly associated with USMLE examination scores for both SWD and students without disabilities. This study has several limitations. Dichotomized categorical groups may not fully represent the association of disability with performance. Furthermore, no data on MCAT testing accommodations were available. As the number of SWD grows, understanding the association between MCAT and USMLE scores may better inform admissions committees with concerns regarding the academic performance of applicants with disabilities.
  6 in total

1.  Implications of the 2008 amendments to the Americans with Disabilities Act for medical education.

Authors:  W Thomas Smith; William L Allen
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 6.893

2.  Clinical performance of medical students with protected disabilities.

Authors:  Arianne Teherani; Maxine A Papadakis
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Investigating Group Differences in Examinees' Preparation for and Performance on the New MCAT Exam.

Authors:  Jorge A Girotti; Julie A Chanatry; Daniel M Clinchot; Stephanie C McClure; Aubrie Swan Sein; Ian W Walker; Cynthia A Searcy
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 6.893

4.  The Validity of Scores From the New MCAT Exam in Predicting Student Performance: Results From a Multisite Study.

Authors:  Kevin Busche; Martha L Elks; Joshua T Hanson; Loretta Jackson-Williams; R Stephen Manuel; Wanda L Parsons; David Wofsy; Kun Yuan
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 6.893

5.  Association of MCAT scores obtained with standard vs extra administration time with medical school admission, medical student performance, and time to graduation.

Authors:  Cynthia A Searcy; Keith W Dowd; Michael G Hughes; Sean Baldwin; Trey Pigg
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2015-06-09       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Change in Prevalence of Disabilities and Accommodation Practices Among US Medical Schools, 2016 vs 2019.

Authors:  Lisa M Meeks; Ben Case; Kurt Herzer; Melissa Plegue; Bonnielin K Swenor
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2019-11-26       Impact factor: 56.272

  6 in total
  2 in total

1.  The Performance and Trajectory of Medical Students With Disabilities: Results From a Multisite, Multicohort Study.

Authors:  Lisa M Meeks; Melissa Plegue; Bonnielin K Swenor; Christopher J Moreland; Sharad Jain; Christina J Grabowski; Marjorie Westervelt; Ben Case; William H Eidtson; Rahul Patwari; Nancy R Angoff; Jack LeConche; Bliss M Temple; Peter Poullos; Mijiza Sanchez-Guzman; Caitlyn Coates; Christine Low; Mark C Henderson; Joel Purkiss; Michael H Kim
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 7.840

2.  Impact of USMLE Step-1 accommodation denial on US medical schools: A national survey.

Authors:  Kristina H Petersen; Neera R Jain; Ben Case; Sharad Jain; Lisa M Meeks
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-04-14       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.