Literature DB >> 34018021

Scattering and clustering the proximal screw construct in unilateral locking plate osteosynthesis of distal femoral fractures.

Jae Hoon Jang1, Seung Joon Rhee2, Se Bin Jun1, Yoon Young Choi3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The importance of fixation construct in locking compression plate (LCP) is not well enlightened until recently. The aim of this study was to investigate radiological and clinical outcomes of scattering and clustering of the proximal screw fixation construct in unilateral LCP treatment of the distal femoral fractures.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients who were treated for distal femoral fractures using unilateral LCP between January 2014 and December 2019 in our institute were included in this retrospective study. They were divided into groups 1 (35 cases, scattered proximal screw fixation) and 2 (35 cases, clustered proximal screw fixation). Mean follow-up period was 23.6 months for group 1 and 21.3 months for group 2. Medical history, patient demographics, injury characteristics, and surgical characteristics were reviewed and analyzed. Radiological findings including time to callus formation, bridging callus formation, union, and symmetry of the union were assessed and compared between the groups. Clinical outcomes included total blood loss during the operation, postoperative range of motion, and number of revision surgery.
RESULTS: The time for callus formation (5.8 weeks in group 1 vs. 4.1 weeks in group 2, p = 0.009) and bridging callus formation (12.5 weeks in group 1 vs. 10.7 weeks in group 2, p = 0.009) was significantly earlier in group 2. Despite similar union rates between groups, the mean time for radiological union was longer in group 2 (10.7 vs 7.4 months, p = 0.001). Though statistically insignificant, more asymmetric union was observed in group 2 (17 vs 11 cases).
CONCLUSIONS: Despite a delay in initial callus and bridging callus formation, scattering the proximal screws was better in achieving earlier and more balanced radiographic union than the clustered fixation. We recommend to avoid bridging more than five holes in the whole plate fixation construct to lessen the asymmetric callus formation and to prevent eventual plate breakage.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Construct stiffness; Distal femur; Fracture; Osteosynthesis; Plate; Screw density

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34018021     DOI: 10.1007/s00402-021-03912-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg        ISSN: 0936-8051            Impact factor:   2.928


  12 in total

1.  Implant material and design alter construct stiffness in distal femur locking plate fixation: a pilot study.

Authors:  Ulf Schmidt; Rainer Penzkofer; Samuel Bachmaier; Peter Augat
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 2.  Minimally invasive internal fixation of distal femur fractures.

Authors:  G Piétu; M Ehlinger
Journal:  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res       Date:  2016-11-17       Impact factor: 2.256

Review 3.  Management of distal femur fractures with modern plates and nails: state of the art.

Authors:  Michael J Beltran; Joshua L Gary; Cory A Collinge
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 2.512

4.  Determination of Radiographic Healing: An Assessment of Consistency Using RUST and Modified RUST in Metadiaphyseal Fractures.

Authors:  Jody Litrenta; Paul Tornetta; Samir Mehta; Clifford Jones; Robert V OʼToole; Mohit Bhandari; Stephen Kottmeier; Robert Ostrum; Kenneth Egol; William Ricci; Emil Schemitsch; Daniel Horwitz
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 2.512

5.  Implant Material, Type of Fixation at the Shaft, and Position of Plate Modify Biomechanics of Distal Femur Plate Osteosynthesis.

Authors:  Utku Kandemir; Peter Augat; Stefanie Konowalczyk; Felix Wipf; Geert von Oldenburg; Ulf Schmidt
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 2.512

6.  Mechanical Construct Characteristics Predisposing to Non-union After Locked Lateral Plating of Distal Femur Fractures.

Authors:  Edward K Rodriguez; David Zurakowski; Lindsay Herder; Amber Hall; Kempland C Walley; Mike J Weaver; Paul T Appleton; Mark Vrahas
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 2.512

7.  Working length and proximal screw constructs in plate osteosynthesis of distal femur fractures.

Authors:  William H Harvin; Lasun O Oladeji; Gregory J Della Rocca; Yvonne M Murtha; David A Volgas; James P Stannard; Brett D Crist
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 2.586

8.  Biomechanical testing of the LCP--how can stability in locked internal fixators be controlled?

Authors:  Karl Stoffel; Ulrich Dieter; Gwidon Stachowiak; André Gächter; Markus S Kuster
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.586

9.  Comparison of 4 Methods for Dynamization of Locking Plates: Differences in the Amount and Type of Fracture Motion.

Authors:  Julia Henschel; Stanley Tsai; Daniel C Fitzpatrick; J Lawrence Marsh; Steven M Madey; Michael Bottlang
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 2.512

10.  Finite Element- and Design of Experiment-Derived Optimization of Screw Configurations and a Locking Plate for Internal Fixation System.

Authors:  Wei Sheng; Aimin Ji; Runxin Fang; Gang He; Changsheng Chen
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2019-08-21       Impact factor: 2.238

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.