Literature DB >> 24968968

The relationship between the extent of extraprostatic extension and survival following radical prostatectomy.

Byong Chang Jeong1, Heather J Chalfin2, Seung Bae Lee3, Zhaoyong Feng2, Jonathan I Epstein4, Bruce J Trock2, Alan W Partin2, Elizabeth Humphreys2, Patrick C Walsh2, Misop Han5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Subclassification of the extent of extraprostatic extension (EPE) in radical prostatectomy (RP) specimens may enhance prognostication for prostate cancer (PCa) patients. Yet optimal criteria for staging, validation within a large cohort, and long-term follow-up are lacking.
OBJECTIVE: To compare biochemical recurrence-free survival (BRFS), PCa-specific survival (PCSS), and overall survival (OS) for focal EPE (pT3aF) and nonfocal EPE (pT3aNF) in a large tertiary-referral center with the Epstein criteria for EPE extent. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Between 1982 and 2012, 20 434 men underwent RP, and 15 565 men (76.2%) had available pathologic and survival data. A total of 4216 men with isolated EPE were subclassified into pT3aF (1869 men, 44%) and pT3aNF (2347 men, 56%). OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Predictors of BRFS, PCSS, and OS were identified with multivariate Cox proportional hazard models. Covariates included age, preoperative prostate-specific antigen, body mass index, surgery year, Gleason score, and surgical margin status. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: With a median follow-up of 9.0 yr (range: 1-27), 314 men died of PCa, with 1300 deaths from any cause. In a multivariate model, pT3aNF compared with pT3aF was an independent predictor of BRFS (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.39; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.18-1.62; p<0.001), but not of PCSS (HR: 1.38; 95% CI, 0.89-2.11; p=0.146) or OS (HR: 1.13; 95% CI, 0.94-1.36; p=0.197). Ten-year BRFS, PCSS, and OS for pT3aF and pT3aNF were 76% versus 59%, 98% versus 96%, and 95% versus 90%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: In a large RP cohort, subclassification of EPE extent with the Epstein criteria improves correlation with BRFS. PCSS and OS in men with isolated EPE (pT3a) are excellent and are not significantly different between pT3aF and pT3aNF. The EPE extent should be subclassified to identify a subgroup of men with a higher risk of recurrence (pT3aNF) and to consider them for additional therapy. PATIENT
SUMMARY: Subclassification of extraprostatic extension (EPE) with the Epstein criteria improves correlation with biochemical recurrence-free survival. Prostate cancer-specific survival and overall survival in men with isolated EPE (pT3a) are excellent and are not significantly different between pT3aF and pT3aNF.
Copyright © 2014 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Extraprostatic extension; Prostate cancer; Recurrence; Survival

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24968968     DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.06.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  15 in total

1.  Comparison of two commonly used methods in measurement of cancer volume in prostate biopsy.

Authors:  Viharkumar Patel; Samuel Hubbard; Wei Huang
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2020-04-01

2.  Differential expression of E-cadherin and P-cadherin in pT3 prostate cancer: correlation with clinical and pathological features.

Authors:  Catarina Ferreira; João Lobo; Luís Antunes; Paula Lopes; Carmen Jerónimo; Rui Henrique
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2018-07-13       Impact factor: 4.064

3.  Impact of the extent of extraprostatic extension defined by Epstein's method in patients with negative surgical margins and negative lymph node invasion.

Authors:  T Maubon; N Branger; C Bastide; G Lonjon; K-A Harvey-Bryan; P Validire; S Giusiano; D Rossi; X Cathelineau; F Rozet
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 5.554

4.  Artificial intelligence is a promising prospect for the detection of prostate cancer extracapsular extension with mpMRI: a two-center comparative study.

Authors:  Ying Hou; Yi-Hong Zhang; Jie Bao; Mei-Ling Bao; Guang Yang; Hai-Bin Shi; Yang Song; Yu-Dong Zhang
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 9.236

5.  Digital versus light microscopy assessment of extraprostatic extension in radical prostatectomy samples.

Authors:  Metka Volavšek; Vanessa Henriques; Ana Blanca; Rodolfo Montironi; Liang Cheng; Maria R Raspollini; Alessia Cimadamore; Nuno Vau; Francesco Pierconti; Antonio Lopez-Beltran
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2019-10-07       Impact factor: 4.064

6.  Assessing Extraprostatic Extension with Multiparametric MRI of the Prostate: Mehralivand Extraprostatic Extension Grade or Extraprostatic Extension Likert Scale?

Authors:  Lars A R Reisæter; Ole J Halvorsen; Christian Beisland; Alfred Honoré; Karsten Gravdal; Are Losnegård; Jan Monssen; Lars A Akslen; Martin Biermann
Journal:  Radiol Imaging Cancer       Date:  2020-01-17

7.  Machine learning-based radiomics for multiple primary prostate cancer biological characteristics prediction with 18F-PSMA-1007 PET: comparison among different volume segmentation thresholds.

Authors:  Kun Tang; Yunjun Yang; Fei Yao; Shuying Bian; Dongqin Zhu; Yaping Yuan; Kehua Pan; Zhifang Pan; Xianghao Feng
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2022-08-26       Impact factor: 6.313

8.  Clinical Usefulness of Total Length of Gleason Pattern 4 on Biopsy in Men with Grade Group 2 Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Lucas W Dean; Melissa Assel; Daniel D Sjoberg; Andrew J Vickers; Hikmat A Al-Ahmadie; Ying-Bei Chen; Anuradha Gopalan; S Joseph Sirintrapun; Satish K Tickoo; James A Eastham; Peter T Scardino; Victor E Reuter; Behfar Ehdaie; Samson W Fine
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Clinical Findings and Treatment Outcomes in Patients with Extraprostatic Extension Identified on Prostate Biopsy.

Authors:  Katherine Fleshner; Melissa Assel; Nicole Benfante; Justin Lee; Andrew Vickers; Samson Fine; Sigrid Carlsson; James Eastham
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2016-04-02       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 10.  Biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy: what does it mean?

Authors:  Rafael Tourinho-Barbosa; Victor Srougi; Igor Nunes-Silva; Mohammed Baghdadi; Gregory Rembeyo; Sophie S Eiffel; Eric Barret; Francois Rozet; Marc Galiano; Xavier Cathelineau; Rafael Sanchez-Salas
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2018 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.541

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.