Literature DB >> 34017220

Formaldehyde Vapor Characteristics in Varied Decontamination Environments.

Young W Choi1, Michelle M Sunderman1, Martha W McCauley1, William R Richter1, Zachary J Willenberg1, Joseph Wood2, Shannon Serre2, Leroy Mickelsen2, Stuart Willison3, Rich Rupert4, Jorge G Muñiz Ortiz5, Sara Casey6, M Worth Calfee2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: This effort investigated formaldehyde vapor characteristics under various environmental conditions by the analyses of air samples collected over a time-course. This knowledge will help responders achieve desired formaldehyde exposure parameters for decontamination of affected spaces after a biological contamination incident.
METHODS: Prescribed masses of paraformaldehyde and formalin were sublimated or evaporated, respectively, to generate formaldehyde vapor. Adsorbent cartridges were used to collect air samples from the test chamber at predetermined times. A validated method was used to extract the cartridges and analyze for formaldehyde via liquid chromatography. In addition, material demand for the formaldehyde was evaluated by inclusion of arrays of Plexiglas panels in the test chamber to determine the impact of varied surface areas within the test chamber. Temperature was controlled with a circulating water bath connected to a radiator and fan inside the chamber. Relative humidity was controlled with humidity fixed-point salt solutions and water vapor generated from evaporated water.
RESULTS: Low temperature trials (approximately 10°C) resulted in decreased formaldehyde air concentrations throughout the 48-hour time-course when compared with formaldehyde concentrations in the ambient temperature trials (approximately 22°C). The addition of clear Plexiglas panels to increase the surface area of the test chamber interior resulted in appreciable decreases of formaldehyde air concentration when compared to an empty test chamber.
CONCLUSION: This work has shown that environmental variables and surface-to-volume ratios in the decontaminated space may affect the availability of formaldehyde in the air and, therefore, may affect decontamination effectiveness.

Entities:  

Keywords:  air sampling; environmental; formaldehyde; formalin; material demand; paraformaldehyde

Year:  2021        PMID: 34017220      PMCID: PMC8129920          DOI: 10.1089/apb.21.926968

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Biosaf        ISSN: 1535-6760


  11 in total

1.  A comparative study of methods to validate formaldehyde decontamination of biological safety cabinets.

Authors:  K Munro; J Lanser; R Flower
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Formaldehyde sorption and desorption characteristics of gypsum wallboard.

Authors:  T G Matthews; A R Hawthorne; C V Thompson
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 9.028

3.  Solubility of gaseous formaldehyde in liquid water and generation of trace standard gaseous formaldehyde.

Authors:  S Dong; P K Dasgupta
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 9.028

4.  Wavelength-Resolved Photon Fluxes of Indoor Light Sources: Implications for HOx Production.

Authors:  Shawn F Kowal; Seth R Allen; Tara F Kahan
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2017-08-29       Impact factor: 9.028

5.  Paraformaldehyde for surface sterilization and detoxification.

Authors:  L A Taylor; M S Barbeito; G G Gremillion
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1969-04

6.  Effect of relative humidity on formaldehyde decontamination.

Authors:  D R Spiner; R K Hoffmann
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1971-12

7.  Adsorption of formaldehyde by various surfaces during gaseous decontamination.

Authors:  J R Braswell; D R Spiner; R K Hoffman
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1970-11

8.  Formaldehyde gas inactivation of Bacillus anthracis, Bacillus subtilis, and Geobacillus stearothermophilus spores on indoor surface materials.

Authors:  J V Rogers; Y W Choi; W R Richter; D C Rudnicki; D W Joseph; C L K Sabourin; M L Taylor; J C S Chang
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 3.772

9.  Controlled formaldehyde fumigation system.

Authors:  N R Ackland; M R Hinton; K R Denmeade
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1980-03       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 10.  Inactivation of Bacillus anthracis spores.

Authors:  Ellen A Spotts Whitney; Mark E Beatty; Thomas H Taylor; Robbin Weyant; Jeremy Sobel; Matthew J Arduino; David A Ashford
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 6.883

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.