| Literature DB >> 34016141 |
Chenchen Si1,2, Nan Wang1, Mingjie Wang2, Yue Liu1, Zhihong Niu3, Zhide Ding4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Increasing evidence supports a relationship between obesity and either infertility or subfertility in women. Most previous omics studies were focused on determining if the serum and follicular fluid expression profiles of subjects afflicted with both obesity-related infertility and polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) are different than those in normal healthy controls. As granulosa cells (GCs) are essential for oocyte development and fertility, we determined here if the protein expression profiles in the GCs from obese subjects are different than those in their normal-weight counterpart.Entities:
Keywords: Electron transport chain; Free fatty acids; Granulosa cells; Mitochondria; Obesity; Proteomic analysis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34016141 PMCID: PMC8135161 DOI: 10.1186/s12958-021-00760-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Reprod Biol Endocrinol ISSN: 1477-7827 Impact factor: 5.211
Clinical parameters and ovarian stimulation in control and obese groups
| 31.00±1.86 | 31.79±1.37 | 0.227 | |
| 20.75(20.38-21.02) | 30.70(29.25-32.33) | <0.001 | |
| 8.36±1.16 | 8.52±0.77 | 0.687 | |
| 3.87±1.21 | 4.25±1.14 | 0.423 | |
| 40.50±9.06 | 34.93±8.40 | 0.117 | |
| 0.68±0.25 | 0.74±0.22 | 0.549 | |
| 0.37±0.05 | 0.40±0.07 | 0.207 | |
| 2806.25±368.52 | 2850.00±314.09 | 0.747 | |
| 10.00(9.00-10.25) | 10.00(9.00-10.75) | 0.874 | |
| 4096.00±1022.08 | 3987.29±1065.23 | 0.794 | |
| 3.09±1.11 | 2.81±0.95 | 0.486 | |
| 1.08±0.26 | 1.02±0.23 | 0.591 | |
Lipids Levels of serum and follicular fluid in control and obese groups
| Control group( | Obesity group ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| TC (mmol/L) | 4.12±0.75 | 4.22±0.95 | 0.779 |
| TG (mmol/L) | 1.03±0.34 | 1.28±0.41 | 0.098 |
| LDL (mmol/L) | 2.48±0.48 | 2.41±0.49 | 0.715 |
| HDL (mmol/L) | 1.30±0.10 | 1.29±0.12 | 0.899 |
| FFA (mmol/L) | 0.37±0.12 | 0.47±0.12 | 0.042 |
| TC (mmol/L) | 0.72±0.22 | 0.78±0.19 | 0.487 |
| TG (mmol/L) | 0.24(0.23-0.26) | 0.29(0.26-0.32) | 0.01 |
| FFA (mmol/L) | 0.32(0.31-0.34) | 0.44(0.42-0.46) | <0.001 |
Fig. 1Quantitative analysis of proteomics data between control group and obese subjects. a Scatter plot showing the principle component analysis clustering of subjects. Each dot represents a subject and is colored according to subject groups indicated in the bottom-right corner of the plot. b Scatter plot showing the t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding clustering of subjects. c Volcano plot of differentially expressed proteins (DEPs). The x-axis corresponds to the log2-transformed fold change of DEPs identified when comparing obese group (OB) versus control group (CTR). The y-axis corresponds to -log10-transformed P values. Upregulated and downregulated DEPs are colored in red and blue, respectively. The top 10 upregulated and downregulated DEPs are labeled. d Heatmap showing the hierarchical clustering of samples and DEPs. Samples of the OB and CTR groups are colored in red and blue, respectively
List of differentially expressed proteins identified in GCs obtained from obese women and control group
| E9PN81 | RNASEH2C | Ribonuclease H2 subunit C | 4.09 | <0.0001 |
| P51460 | INSL3 | Insulin-like 3 | 1.85 | 0.02 |
| Q9BX59 | TAPBPL | Tapasin-related protein | 0.59 | 0.03 |
| P19075 | TSPAN8 | Tetraspanin-8 | 1.67 | 0.01 |
| Q3ZCM7 | TUBB8 | Tubulin beta-8 chain | 1.66 | 0.02 |
| A8MU27 | SUMO3 | Small ubiquitin-related modifier 3 | 1.64 | 0.04 |
| A0A024R3N2 | NFRKB | Nuclear factor related to kappaB binding protein, isoform CRA_a | 1.6 | 0.01 |
| Q96GX5 | MASTL | Serine/threonine-protein kinase greatwall | 1.6 | 0.07 |
| Q71SY5 | MED25 | Mediator of RNA polymerase II transcription subunit 25 | 1.55 | 0.03 |
| Q15746 | MYLK | Myosin light chain kinase, smooth muscle | 1.54 | 0.03 |
Fig. 2GO and KEGG enrichment of differentially expressed proteins (DEPs). Top 15 significantly enriched GO terms for (a) biological process, b cellular component, c molecular function, and (d) KEGG pathway analysis. Dot size represents DEP counts in corresponding GO term/pathway, and the dot color represents the -log10-transformed statistical P value. X axis corresponds to the gene ratio value. Gene Ontology (GO); the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG)
Fig. 3Protein-protein interactions (PPI) network of differentially expressed proteins (DEPs). a PPI network of all DEPs. DEPs are illustrated as dots, and edges between DEPs indicate potential interactions. Dot color corresponds to the log2-transformed fold change (obese group versus control group), while dot size and dot label size correspond to the clustering coefficient. Edge width corresponds to the combined interaction score predicted by the STRING database. b, c, d represent the three core modules identified by Cytoscape