Rodney Ehrlich1, Paula Akugizibwe2, Nandi Siegfried3,4, David Rees5,6. 1. School of Public Health and Family Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa. rodney.ehrlich@uct.ac.za. 2. School of Public Health and Family Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa. 3. Independent Clinical Epidemiologist, Cape Town, South Africa. 4. Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa. 5. National Institute for Occupational Health, Johannesburg, South Africa. 6. School of Public Health, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: While the association between occupational inhalation of silica dust and pulmonary tuberculosis has been known for over a century, there has never been a published systematic review, particularly of experience in the current era of less severe silicosis and treatable tuberculosis. We undertook a systematic review of the evidence for the association between (1) silicosis and pulmonary tuberculosis, and (2) silica exposure and pulmonary tuberculosis controlling for silicosis, and their respective exposure-response gradients. METHODS: We searched PUBMED and EMBASE, and selected studies according to a priori inclusion criteria. We extracted, summarised and pooled the results of published case-control and cohort studies of silica exposure and/or silicosis and incident active tuberculosis. Study quality was assessed on the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Where meta-analysis was possible, effect estimates were pooled using inverse-variance weighted random-effects models. Otherwise narrative and graphic synthesis was undertaken. Confidence regarding overall effect estimates was assessed using the GRADE schema. RESULTS: Nine studies met the inclusion criteria. Meta-analysis of eight studies of silicosis and tuberculosis yielded a pooled relative risk of 4.01 (95% confidence interval (CI) 2.88, 5.58). Exposure-response gradients were strong with a low silicosis severity threshold for increased risk. Our GRADE assessment was high confidence in a strong association. Meta-analysis of five studies of silica exposure controlling for or excluding silicosis yielded a pooled relative risk of 1.92 (95% CI 1.36, 2.73). Exposure-response gradients were observable in individual studies but not finely stratified enough to infer an exposure threshold. Our GRADE assessment was low confidence in the estimated effect owing to inconsistency and use of proxies for silica exposure. CONCLUSIONS: The evidence is robust for a strongly elevated risk of tuberculosis with radiological silicosis, with a low disease severity threshold. The effect estimate is more uncertain for silica exposure without radiological silicosis. Research is needed, particularly cohort studies measuring silica exposure in different settings, to characterise the effect more accurately as well as the silica exposure threshold that could be used to prevent excess tuberculosis risk.
BACKGROUND: While the association between occupational inhalation of silica dust and pulmonary tuberculosis has been known for over a century, there has never been a published systematic review, particularly of experience in the current era of less severe silicosis and treatable tuberculosis. We undertook a systematic review of the evidence for the association between (1) silicosis and pulmonary tuberculosis, and (2) silica exposure and pulmonary tuberculosis controlling for silicosis, and their respective exposure-response gradients. METHODS: We searched PUBMED and EMBASE, and selected studies according to a priori inclusion criteria. We extracted, summarised and pooled the results of published case-control and cohort studies of silica exposure and/or silicosis and incident active tuberculosis. Study quality was assessed on the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Where meta-analysis was possible, effect estimates were pooled using inverse-variance weighted random-effects models. Otherwise narrative and graphic synthesis was undertaken. Confidence regarding overall effect estimates was assessed using the GRADE schema. RESULTS: Nine studies met the inclusion criteria. Meta-analysis of eight studies of silicosis and tuberculosis yielded a pooled relative risk of 4.01 (95% confidence interval (CI) 2.88, 5.58). Exposure-response gradients were strong with a low silicosis severity threshold for increased risk. Our GRADE assessment was high confidence in a strong association. Meta-analysis of five studies of silica exposure controlling for or excluding silicosis yielded a pooled relative risk of 1.92 (95% CI 1.36, 2.73). Exposure-response gradients were observable in individual studies but not finely stratified enough to infer an exposure threshold. Our GRADE assessment was low confidence in the estimated effect owing to inconsistency and use of proxies for silica exposure. CONCLUSIONS: The evidence is robust for a strongly elevated risk of tuberculosis with radiological silicosis, with a low disease severity threshold. The effect estimate is more uncertain for silica exposure without radiological silicosis. Research is needed, particularly cohort studies measuring silica exposure in different settings, to characterise the effect more accurately as well as the silica exposure threshold that could be used to prevent excess tuberculosis risk.
Authors: K Dheda; S Charalambous; A S Karat; A von Delft; U G Lalloo; R van Zyl Smit; R Perumal; B W Allwood; A Esmail; M L Wong; A G Duse; G Richards; C Feldman; M Mer; K Nyamande; U Lalla; C F N Koegelenberg; F Venter; H Dawood; S Adams; N A B Ntusi; H-M van der Westhuizen; M-Y S Moosa; N A Martinson; H Moultrie; J Nel; H Hausler; W Preiser; L Lasersohn; H J Zar; G J Churchyard Journal: Afr J Thorac Crit Care Med Date: 2021-10-22
Authors: Ryan F Hoy; Mohamed F Jeebhay; Catherine Cavalin; Weihong Chen; Robert A Cohen; Elizabeth Fireman; Leonard H T Go; Antonio León-Jiménez; Alfredo Menéndez-Navarro; Marcos Ribeiro; Paul-André Rosental Journal: Respirology Date: 2022-03-18 Impact factor: 6.175
Authors: Jan Michael Jesse Lomanta; Mary Antonette Atienza; Juan Raphael M Gonzales; Eric Jason Bautista Amante; Sheen C Urquiza; Hanna Lucero-Orillaza; Joel Marquez Santiaguel Journal: Am J Case Rep Date: 2022-08-10
Authors: Rodney Ehrlich; Stephen Barker; Jim Te Water Naude; David Rees; Barry Kistnasamy; Julian Naidoo; Annalee Yassi Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-09-29 Impact factor: 4.614
Authors: Jerry M Spiegel; Rodney Ehrlich; Annalee Yassi; Francisco Riera; James Wilkinson; Karen Lockhart; Stephen Barker; Barry Kistnasamy Journal: Ann Glob Health Date: 2021-07-01 Impact factor: 2.462
Authors: Haidee Williams; Rodney Ehrlich; Stephen Barker; Sophia Kisting-Cairncross; Muzimkhulu Zungu; Annalee Yassi Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-03-17 Impact factor: 3.390