| Literature DB >> 34015158 |
Mónica Lopes-Marques1,2,3, Ana Rita Pacheco1,2, Maria João Peixoto4,5, Ana Rita Cardoso1,2,3, Catarina Serrano1,2,3, António Amorim1,2,3, Maria João Prata1,2,3, David N Cooper6, Luísa Azevedo1,2,3.
Abstract
Understanding the role of common polymorphisms in modulating the clinical phenotype when they co-occur with a disease-causing lesion is of critical importance in medical genetics. We explored the impact of apparently neutral common polymorphisms, using the gene encoding the urea cycle enzyme, ornithine transcarbamylase (OTC), as a model system. Distinct combinations of genetic backgrounds embracing two missense polymorphisms were created in cis with the pathogenic p.Arg40His replacement. In vitro enzymatic assays revealed that the polymorphic variants were able to modulate OTC activity both in the presence or absence of the pathogenic lesion. First, we found that the combination of the minor alleles of polymorphisms p.Lys46Arg and p.Gln270Arg significantly enhanced enzymatic activity in the wild-type protein. Second, enzymatic assays revealed that the minor allele of the p.Gln270Arg polymorphism was capable of ameliorating OTC activity when combined in cis with the pathogenic p.Arg40His replacement. Structural analysis predicted that the minor allele of the p.Gln270Arg polymorphism would serve to stabilize the OTC wild-type protein, thereby corroborating the results of the experimental assays. Our findings demonstrate the potential importance of cis-interactions between common polymorphic variants and pathogenic missense mutations and illustrate how standing genetic variation can modulate protein function.Entities:
Keywords: zzm321990OTC gene; enzymatic activity; genetic modifiers; pathogenic replacements; polymorphic variants; structural modeling
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34015158 PMCID: PMC8362079 DOI: 10.1002/humu.24221
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Hum Mutat ISSN: 1059-7794 Impact factor: 4.878
Figure 1Genetic backgrounds and primer sets. (a) Schematic representation of the OTC genetic backgrounds analyzed in this study. Wild‐type backgrounds are termed WT1‐WT4, and the corresponding backgrounds containing the p.Arg40His mutation are termed M1‐M4 accordingly. Red indicates pathogenic amino acid replacement, blue indicates non‐pathogenic amino acid replacement. (b) Primer sets and strategies used to obtain each background sequence. OTC, ornithine transcarbamylase
Haplotype analysis of rs180321 and rs1800328 in various human populations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| H1 | A | A | 0.851 | 0.614 | 0.840 | 0.997 | 0.721 | 0.962 | WT1 |
| H2 | G | A | 0.135 | 0.383 | 0.137 | 0.00131 | 0.225 | 0.0237 | WT2 |
| H3 | A | G | 0.00334 | ‐ | 0.00573 | ‐ | 0.0104 | 0.00696 | WT3 |
| H4 | G | G | 0.009 | ‐ | 0.0172 | 0.00131 | 0.0431 | 0.00557 | WT4 |
Figure 2OTC enzymatic activity assays. (a) From left to right, OTC activity in cell lysates transfected with plasmids encoding wild‐type (WT) OTC, OTC harboring the p.Lys46Arg polymorphism, OTC carrying the p.Gln270Arg polymorphic variant, and OTC carrying both the p.Lys46Arg and p.Gln270Arg polymorphic variants. (b) From left to right, OTC activity in cell lysates transfected with plasmids encoding OTC harboring the p.Arg40His pathogenic mutation, OTC harboring the p.Arg40His mutation and the p.Lys46Arg polymorphic variant, OTC harboring the p.Arg40His mutation and the p.Gln270Arg polymorphic variant, OTC carrying the p.Arg40His mutation and both the p.Lys46Arg p.Gln270Arg polymorphisms. *p < .05, **p < .01, ***p < .0005. All tested conditions are significantly different from negative controls (a); see also Tables S1, S2, and S3 for detailed values. Mock: citrulline values (due to residual OTC activity) for cells transfected with an empty plasmid, Cells: citrulline values of non‐transfected cells. OTC, ornithine transcarbamylase
Figure 3Structural analysis of OTC homology models. (a) Location of the three amino acid residues of interest (Arg40, Lys46, and Gln270) within the OTC monomer showing approximate distances between the target residues. (b) Detailed view of the hydrogen bond network alterations in Site 1 on various genetic backgrounds; each genetic background is indicated on the left. OTC, ornithine transcarbamylase
Figure 4Structural analysis of Site 2 in OTC homology models. OTC, ornithine transcarbamylase
Structural stability analysis of models harboring the variants p.Arg40His, p.Lys46Arg, and p.Gln270Arg in comparison to wild‐type (ΔΔG = 0)
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| mCSM | −1.457 | −0.678 |
|
| DUET | −1.551 | −0.303 |
|
| SDM | −0.13 |
|
|
Note: Values correspond to changes in Gibbs free energy (ΔΔG Kcal/mol). Negative values of ΔΔG indicate a protein destabilizing replacement, whereas positive values of ΔΔG indicate a stabilizing replacement.