Literature DB >> 34014851

The other side of screening: predictors of treatment and follow-up for anal precancers in a large health system.

Richard Silvera1, Tyler Martinson2, Michael M Gaisa1, Yuxin Liu3, Ashish A Deshmukh4, Keith Sigel5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Anal cancer disproportionately affects people with HIV (PWH). High-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) are cancer precursors and treating them might prevent anal cancer. Data on adherence to HSIL treatment and surveillance is limited but needed to identify deficiencies of screening strategies.
METHODS: We collected data on high-resolution anoscopy (HRA) attendance and outcomes from 2009 to 2019 in a large urban anal cancer-screening program. Patients with an initial HSIL diagnosis were followed for return for HSIL electrocautery ablation within 6 months of index HSIL diagnosis, and follow-up HRA within 18 months of index HSIL diagnosis. We also evaluated predictors of these outcomes in univariable and multivariable analyses.
RESULTS: One thousand one hundred and seventy-nine unique patients with an anal HSIL diagnosis were identified and 684 (58%) returned for electrocautery ablation. Of those treated, only 174 (25%) and only 9% of untreated HSIL patients (47 of 495) underwent surveillance HRA within 18 months of index HSIL diagnosis. In multivariable analyses, black patients and PWH regardless of virologic control were less likely to undergo HSIL ablation within 6 months of HSIL diagnosis whereas patients with commercial insurance were more likely to be treated within 6 months of diagnosis. Among treated HSIL patients, PWH with viremia had a lower likelihood of engaging in post-treatment surveillance within 18 months of HSIL diagnosis. DISCUSSION: Even in large specialized anal cancer screening programs adherence to HSIL treatment and surveillance is low. Psychosocial and economic determinants of health may impact retention in care. Addressing both personal and structural barriers to patient engagement may improve the effectiveness of anal cancer screening.
Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34014851      PMCID: PMC8808754          DOI: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000002948

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AIDS        ISSN: 0269-9370            Impact factor:   4.177


  29 in total

Review 1.  Screening to prevent anal cancer: Current thinking and future directions.

Authors:  Joel M Palefsky
Journal:  Cancer Cytopathol       Date:  2015-08-03       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 2.  The increasing incidence of anal cancer: can it be explained by trends in risk groups?

Authors:  R P van der Zee; O Richel; H J C de Vries; J M Prins
Journal:  Neth J Med       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 1.422

Review 3.  Use of geocoding and surname analysis to estimate race and ethnicity.

Authors:  Kevin Fiscella; Allen M Fremont
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Anal Cancer Screening: Barriers and Facilitators Among Ethnically Diverse Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, and Other Men Who Have Sex With Men.

Authors:  Peter A Newman; Kathleen J Roberts; Emmanuel Masongsong; D J Wiley
Journal:  J Gay Lesbian Soc Serv       Date:  2008-10-01

5.  Long-term follow-up of infrared coagulator ablation of anal high-grade dysplasia in men who have sex with men.

Authors:  Robert N Goldstone; Andrew B Goldstone; James Russ; Stephen E Goldstone
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 4.585

6.  Recent Trends in Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Anus Incidence and Mortality in the United States, 2001-2015.

Authors:  Ashish A Deshmukh; Ryan Suk; Meredith S Shiels; Kalyani Sonawane; Alan G Nyitray; Yuxin Liu; Michael M Gaisa; Joel M Palefsky; Keith Sigel
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  Electrocautery ablation of anal high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions: Effectiveness and key factors associated with outcomes.

Authors:  Michael M Gaisa; Yuxin Liu; Ashish A Deshmukh; Kimberly L Stone; Keith M Sigel
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Brief Report: Recurrence of Anal High-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions Among Women Living With HIV.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Stier; Wafaa Abbasi; Amma F Agyemang; Eduardo Amílkar Valle Álvarez; Elizabeth Y Chiao; Ashish A Deshmukh
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 3.731

9.  Factors associated with anal cancer screening follow-up by high-resolution anoscopy.

Authors:  Kaan Z Apaydin; Andy Nguyen; Christina P C Borba; Derri L Shtasel; Sharon Ulery; Kenneth H Mayer; Alex S Keuroghlian
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2018-06-22       Impact factor: 3.519

10.  A meta-analysis of anal cancer incidence by risk group: Toward a unified anal cancer risk scale.

Authors:  Gary M Clifford; Damien Georges; Meredith S Shiels; Eric A Engels; Andreia Albuquerque; Isobel Mary Poynten; Alexandra de Pokomandy; Alexandra M Easson; Elizabeth A Stier
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 7.396

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.