Literature DB >> 34014348

Temporal dynamics of gut microbiota in caged laying hens: a field observation from hatching to end of lay.

Nitish Joat1, Thi Thu Hao Van2, Dragana Stanley3, Robert J Moore2, Kapil Chousalkar4.   

Abstract

Gut health has major implications for the general health of food-producing animals such as the layer birds used in the egg industry. In order to modulate gut microbiota for the benefit of gut health, an understanding of the dynamics and details of the development of gut microbiota is critical. The present study investigated the phylogenetic composition of the gut microbiota of a commercial layer flock raised in cages from hatch to the end of the production cycle. This study also aimed to understand the establishment and development of gut microbiota in layer chickens. Results showed that the faecal microbiota was dominated by phyla Firmicutes and Proteobacteria in the rearing phase, but Bacteroidetes in mid lay and late lay phase. The gut microbiota composition changed significantly during the transfer of the flock from the rearing to the production shed. The richness and diversity of gut microbiota increased after week 6 of the flocks age and stabilized in the mid and late lay phase. The overall dynamics of gut microbiota development was similar to that reported in earlier studies, but the phylogenetic composition at the phylum and family level was different. The production stage of the birds is one of the important factors in the development of gut microbiota. This study has contributed to a better understanding of baseline gut microbiota development over the complete life cycles in layer chickens and will help to develop strategies to improve the gut health. KEY POINTS: • Faecal microbiota of caged hens was dominated by phyla Firmicutes and Proteobacteria in the rearing phase. • The gut microbiota composition changed significantly during the transfer of the flock from the rearing to the production shed. • The richness and diversity of gut microbiota increased after week 6 of the flocks age and stabilized in the mid and late lay phase.

Entities:  

Keywords:  16S rRNA gene sequencing; Firmicutes; Gut health; Gut microbiota; Layers; Laying hens; Proteobacteria; Pullets

Year:  2021        PMID: 34014348     DOI: 10.1007/s00253-021-11333-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol        ISSN: 0175-7598            Impact factor:   4.813


  6 in total

1.  Intestinal microbiota associated with differential feed conversion efficiency in chickens.

Authors:  Dragana Stanley; Stuart E Denman; Robert J Hughes; Mark S Geier; Tamsyn M Crowley; Honglei Chen; Volker R Haring; Robert J Moore
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 4.813

2.  The effect of gender on the bacterial community in the gastrointestinal tract of broilers.

Authors:  B S Lumpkins; A B Batal; M Lee
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Influence of Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis infection on the composition of chicken cecal microbiota.

Authors:  Petra Videnska; Frantisek Sisak; Hana Havlickova; Marcela Faldynova; Ivan Rychlik
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2013-07-15       Impact factor: 2.741

4.  Intestinal microbiota profiles associated with low and high residual feed intake in chickens across two geographical locations.

Authors:  Sina-Catherine Siegerstetter; Stephan Schmitz-Esser; Elizabeth Magowan; Stefanie Urimare Wetzels; Qendrim Zebeli; Peadar G Lawlor; Niamh E O'Connell; Barbara U Metzler-Zebeli
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-15       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Gut metagenomic analysis reveals prominent roles of Lactobacillus and cecal microbiota in chicken feed efficiency.

Authors:  Wei Yan; Congjiao Sun; Jingwei Yuan; Ning Yang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-03-28       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 6.  Emerging Roles of Hydrogen Sulfide in Inflammatory and Neoplastic Colonic Diseases.

Authors:  Fang-Fang Guo; Ta-Chung Yu; Jie Hong; Jing-Yuan Fang
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2016-05-03       Impact factor: 4.566

  6 in total
  6 in total

1.  Effects of early-life cecal microbiota transplantation from divergently selected inbred chicken lines on growth, gut serotonin, and immune parameters in recipient chickens.

Authors:  Yuechi Fu; Jiaying Hu; Marisa A Erasmus; Timothy A Johnson; Heng-Wei Cheng
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 4.014

2.  Cecal Microbiota of Free-Range Hens Varied With Different Rearing Enrichments and Ranging Patterns.

Authors:  Md Saiful Bari; Sarbast K Kheravii; Yadav S Bajagai; Shu-Biao Wu; Chake Keerqin; Dana L M Campbell
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-02-11       Impact factor: 5.640

3.  Growth Performance, Bone Development and Phosphorus Metabolism in Chicks Fed Diets Supplemented with Phytase Are Associated with Alterations in Gut Microbiota.

Authors:  Lan Li; Xiaoyi Zhang; Jiatu Zhang; Meiling Liu; Lihong Zhao; Cheng Ji; Jianyun Zhang; Shimeng Huang; Qiugang Ma
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-06       Impact factor: 2.752

4.  Multi-Omics Reveals Different Strategies in the Immune and Metabolic Systems of High-Yielding Strains of Laying Hens.

Authors:  Muhammad Arsalan Iqbal; Henry Reyer; Michael Oster; Frieder Hadlich; Nares Trakooljul; Alvaro Perdomo-Sabogal; Sonja Schmucker; Volker Stefanski; Christoph Roth; Amélia Camarinha Silva; Korinna Huber; Vera Sommerfeld; Markus Rodehutscord; Klaus Wimmers; Siriluck Ponsuksili
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 4.772

5.  Effects of Dietary Bopu Powder Supplementation on Serum Antioxidant Capacity, Egg Quality, and Intestinal Microbiota of Laying Hens.

Authors:  Hua Liu; Qian Lin; Xiubin Liu; Peng Huang; Zihui Yang; Manhu Cao; Mengting Liu; Xinyao Li; Jianguo Zeng; Jianhua He
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 4.755

6.  The active core microbiota of two high-yielding laying hen breeds fed with different levels of calcium and phosphorus.

Authors:  Christoph Roth; Tanja Sims; Markus Rodehutscord; Jana Seifert; Amélia Camarinha-Silva
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-09-23       Impact factor: 4.755

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.