| Literature DB >> 34013877 |
Felicita Medalla, Weidong Gu, Cindy R Friedman, Michael Judd, Jason Folster, Patricia M Griffin, Robert M Hoekstra.
Abstract
Salmonella is a major cause of foodborne illness in the United States, and antimicrobial-resistant strains pose a serious threat to public health. We used Bayesian hierarchical models of culture-confirmed infections during 2004-2016 from 2 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention surveillance systems to estimate changes in the national incidence of resistant nontyphoidal Salmonella infections. Extrapolating to the United States population and accounting for unreported infections, we estimated a 40% increase in the annual incidence of infections with clinically important resistance (resistance to ampicillin or ceftriaxone or nonsusceptibility to ciprofloxacin) during 2015-2016 (≈222,000 infections) compared with 2004-2008 (≈159,000 infections). Changes in the incidence of resistance varied by serotype. Serotypes I 4,[5],12:i:- and Enteritidis were responsible for two thirds of the increased incidence of clinically important resistance during 2015-2016. Ciprofloxacin-nonsusceptible infections accounted for more than half of the increase. These estimates can help in setting targets and priorities for prevention.Entities:
Keywords: Salmonella; United States; ampicillin; antibiotic resistance; antimicrobial resistance; bacteria; ceftriaxone; ciprofloxacin; drug resistance; enteric infections; foodborne diseases; incidence; nontyphoidal; resistance trends
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34013877 PMCID: PMC8153855 DOI: 10.3201/eid2706.204486
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Emerg Infect Dis ISSN: 1080-6040 Impact factor: 6.883
Figure 1Estimated annual incidence of culture-confirmed nontyphoidal Salmonella infections with any clinically important resistance, by serotype and region, United States, 2004–2016. Estimated changes in resistance incidence (mean and 95% credible intervals of the posterior differences per 100,000 persons per year) were derived using Bayesian hierarchical models. Crude resistance incidence rates were derived by multiplying infection incidence and resistance proportion for state-year. Any clinically important resistance was defined as resistant to ceftriaxone, resistant to ampicillin, or ciprofloxacin nonsusceptible. The “other” category comprised serotypes other than Enteritidis, Typhimurium, Newport, I 4,[],12:i:-, and Heidelberg. US Census regions were used to define 4 geographic regions. NTS, all nontyphoidal Salmonella serotypes.
Number and percentage of antimicrobial-resistant nontyphoidal Salmonella isolates, by serotype and resistance category, United States, 2004–2016*
| Resistance category | No. (%) isolates | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Enteritidis, n = 5,206 | Typhimurium, n = 4,404 | Newport, n = 3,140 | I 4,[5],12:i:-, n = 1,158 | Heidelberg, n = 974 | Other fully serotyped, n = 12,878 | Not fully serotyped, n = 505 | Total nontyphoidal | |
| Any clinically important resistance† | 548 (10.5) | 1,197 (27.2) | 284 (9.0) | 389 (33.6) | 240 (24.6) | 843 (6.5) | 45 (8.9) | 3,546 (12.5) |
| Multidrug resistance‡ | 114 (2.2) | 1,178 (26.7) | 271 (8.6) | 382 (33.0) | 204 (20.9) | 727 (5.6) | 36 (7.1) | 2,912 (10.3) |
| Amp-only§ | 152 (2.9) | 897 (20.4) | 30 (1.0) | 319 (27.5) | 120 (12.3) | 311 (2.4) | 28 (5.5) | 1,857 (6.6) |
| Cef/Amp§¶ | 15 (0.3) | 212 (4.8) | 237 (7.5) | 39 (3.4) | 116 (11.9) | 212 (1.6) | 4 (0.8) | 835 (3.0) |
| Cipro§# | 381 (7.3) | 88 (2.0) | 17 (0.5) | 31 (2.7) | 4 (0.4) | 320 (2.5) | 13 (2.6) | 854 (3.0) |
*Amp-only, resistant to ampicillin (MIC >32 µg/mL) but susceptible to ceftriaxone and ciprofloxacin; Cef/Amp, resistant to ceftriaxone (MIC >4 µg/mL) and ampicillin; Cipro, nonsusceptible to ciprofloxacin (MIC >0.12 µg/mL) but susceptible to ceftriaxone; NTS, nontyphoidal Salmonella, which includes isolates serotyped as Enteritidis, Typhimurium, Newport, I 4,[],12:i:-, and Heidelberg, isolates serotyped as other than those 5, and those not fully serotyped. †Includes any of the 3 clinically important resistance patterns (i.e., resistant to ceftriaxone, resistant to ampicillin, or nonsusceptible to ciprofloxacin). Isolates might have resistance to other agents tested. ‡Resistant to >3 classes of antimicrobial agents. §Amp-only, Cef/Amp, and Cipro are mutually exclusive categories of clinically important resistance. ¶Of the 835 isolates with Cef/Amp resistance, 78 (0.3% of all nontyphoidal Salmonella isolates) were nonsusceptible to ciprofloxacin. Of the 78 isolates, 71 (91%) had ciprofloxacin MICs within the intermediate range (i.e., 0.12–0.5) (Appendix Figure 6). These 78 isolates were not included in the Cipro category. #Of the 854 isolates, 785 (92%) had ciprofloxacin MICs within the intermediate range (Appendix Figure 6).
Estimated incidence and changes in the incidence of antimicrobial-resistant culture-confirmed nontyphoidal Salmonella infections, by resistance category, United States, 2015–2016 versus 2004–2008 and 2010–2014*
| Resistance category | Mean (95% CrI) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Change in resistance incidence, per 100,000 persons per year‡ | ||||||
| Resistance incidence, per 100,000 persons per year† | 2015–2016 vs. 2004–2008 | 2015–2016 vs. 2010–2014 | ||||
| 2015–2016 | 2004–2008 | 2010–2014 | ||||
| Any clinically important resistance§ | 2.38 (1.93–2.86) | 1.70 (1.44–1.98) | 1.78 (1.46–2.15) |
| 0.60 (−0.002 to 1.20) | |
| Multidrug resistance¶ | 1.83 (1.45–2.25) | 1.51 (1.27–1.79) | 1.42 (1.16–1.70) | 0.32 (−0.17 to 0.82) | 0.41 (−0.07 to 0.92) | |
| Amp-only§ | 1.19 (0.85–1.56) | 1.00 (0.78–1.25) | 0.96 (0.73–1.21) | 0.19 (−0.25 to 0.63) | 0.23 (−0.21 to 0.67) | |
| Cef/Amp§ | 0.49 (0.37–0.65) | 0.43 (0.31–0.58) | 0.42 (0.30–0.56) | 0.06 (−0.13 to 0.26) | 0.08 (−0.11 to 0.26) | |
| Cipro§ | 0.70 (0.55–0.88) | 0.29 (0.19–0.41) | 0.41 (0.26–0.64) |
|
| |
*Amp-only, resistant to ampicillin (MIC >32 µg/mL) but susceptible to ceftriaxone and ciprofloxacin; BHM, Bayesian hierarchical model; Cef/Amp, resistant to ceftriaxone (MIC >4 µg/mL) and ampicillin; Cipro, nonsusceptible to ciprofloxacin (MIC >0.12 µg/mL) but susceptible to ceftriaxone; CrI, credible interval. †Mean estimates of resistance incidence and 95% CrIs were derived using BHMs. Serotypes other than Enteritidis, Typhimurium, Newport, I 4,[],12:i:-, and Heidelberg were combined into the “other” category. For all nontyphoidal Salmonella, estimates were derived by summing those for the 6 serotype categories. State-year data were too sparse to use in the BHMs to estimate mean resistance incidence for Cef/Amp among Enteritidis and Cipro among Newport and Heidelberg (4, 5, and 6 Enteritidis isolates, 7, 2, and 8 Newport isolates, and 0, 1, and 3 Heidelberg isolates in 2015–2016, 2004–2008, and 2010–2014, respectively). ‡Resistance incidence in 2015–2016 was compared with that from 2 reference periods, 2004–2008 and 2010–2015 (e.g., increase if 2015–2016 > reference). Mean changes are reported as significant (bold font) if the 95% CrIs (rounded to 2 decimals) do not include 0. §An overall category of clinically important resistance includes any of 3 resistance patterns (i.e., resistant to ceftriaxone, resistant to ampicillin, or nonsusceptible to ciprofloxacin). Amp-only, Cef/Amp, and Cipro are mutually exclusive categories of clinically important resistance. Isolates with any clinically important resistance might have resistance to other agents tested. Model estimates for overall clinically important resistance were derived separately and might differ from the sum of estimates for the 3 mutually exclusive categories. ¶Resistant to >3 classes of antimicrobial agents.
Figure 2Estimated changes in the incidence of resistant culture-confirmed nontyphoidal Salmonella infections, by serotype, resistance category, and geographic region, United States, 2015–2016 versus 2004–2008. Estimated changes in resistance incidence (mean and 95% credible intervals of the posterior differences per 100,000 persons/year) were derived using Bayesian hierarchical models Amp-only, Cef/Amp, and Cipro are mutually exclusive categories of clinically important resistance: Amp-only, resistant to ampicillin but susceptible to ceftriaxone and ciprofloxacin; Cef/Amp, resistant to ceftriaxone and ampicillin; Cipro, nonsusceptible to ciprofloxacin but susceptible to ceftriaxone. Isolates in each category might have resistance to other agents. Multidrug resistance was defined as resistance to >3 classes of antimicrobial agents. The “other” category comprised serotypes other than Enteritidis, Typhimurium, Newport, I 4,[],12:i:-, and Heidelberg. US Census regions were used to define 4 geographic regions (A, all regions; M, Midwest; N, Northeast; S, South; W, West). MDR, multidrug resistant. NTS, all nontyphoidal Salmonella serotypes.
Figure 3Estimated changes in the incidence of resistant culture-confirmed nontyphoidal Salmonella infections, by serotype, resistance category, and geographic region, United States, 2015–2016 versus 2010–2014. Estimated changes in resistance incidence (mean and 95% credible intervals of the posterior differences per 100,000 persons/year) were derived using Bayesian hierarchical models. Amp-only, Cef/Amp, and Cipro are mutually exclusive categories of clinically important resistance: Amp-only, resistant to ampicillin but susceptible to ceftriaxone and ciprofloxacin; Cef/Amp, resistant to ceftriaxone and ampicillin; Cipro, nonsusceptible to ciprofloxacin but susceptible to ceftriaxone. Isolates in each category might have resistance to other agents. Multidrug resistance (MDR) was defined as resistance to >3 classes of antimicrobial agents. The “other” category comprised serotypes other than Enteritidis, Typhimurium, Newport, I 4,[],12:i:-, and Heidelberg. US Census regions were used to define 4 geographic regions (A, all regions; M, Midwest; N, Northeast; S, South; W, West). MDR, multidrug resistant; NTS, all nontyphoidal Salmonella serotypes.
Point estimates of the total number and changes in the total number of resistant nontyphoidal Salmonella infections extrapolated to the US population, by resistance category, United States, 2015–2016 versus 2004–2008 and 2010–2014*†
| Resistance category | Change in no. infections/year‡ | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. infections/year† | 2015–2016 vs. 2004–2008 | 2015–2016 vs. 2010–2014 | ||||
| 2015–2016 | 2004–2008 | 2010–2014 | ||||
| Any clinically important resistance§ | 222,000 | 159,000 | 166,000 |
| 56,000 | |
| Multidrug resistance¶ | 171,000 | 141,000 | 133,000 | 30,000 | 38,000 | |
| Amp-only§ | 111,000 | 93,000 | 90,000 | 18,000 | 21,000 | |
| Cef/Amp§ | 46,000 | 40,000 | 39,000 | 6,000 | 7,000 | |
| Cipro§ | 65,000 | 27,000 | 38,000 |
|
| |
*Amp-only, resistant to ampicillin (MIC >32 µg/mL) but susceptible to ceftriaxone and ciprofloxacin; BHM, Bayesian hierarchical model; Cef/Amp, resistant to ceftriaxone (MIC >4 µg/mL) and ampicillin; Cipro, nonsusceptible to ciprofloxacin (MIC >0.12 µg/mL) but susceptible to ceftriaxone; CrI, credible interval. †Point estimates extrapolated to the entire US population were calculated by multiplying mean estimates for culture-confirmed infections (derived using BHM) by the multiplier of 29 and the average total U.S. population for 2015–2016 (322 million). The multiplier of 29 is the mean estimate of the total number of infections for every culture-confirmed nontyphoidal Salmonella infection. The 95% CrIs were not derived. Extrapolated point estimates were rounded to the nearest thousand. ‡Model-derived mean estimates of changes in resistance incidence (Table 2) used to calculate extrapolated estimates are reported as significant if the 95% CrIs do not include 0; the extrapolated estimates corresponding to these BHM-derived estimates are shown in bold font. Although the 95% CrIs of extrapolated estimates were not derived, they can be assumed to include 0 if the 95% CrIs of BHM-derived estimates include 0. §An overall category of clinically important resistance includes any of 3 resistance patterns (i.e., resistant to ceftriaxone, resistant to ampicillin, or nonsusceptible to ciprofloxacin). Amp-only, Cef/Amp, and Cipro are mutually exclusive categories of clinically important resistance. Isolates with any clinically important resistance might have resistance to other agents tested. Model estimates for overall clinically important resistance were derived separately and might differ from the sum of BHM estimates for the 3 mutually exclusive categories; thus, extrapolated estimates for the overall category might differ from the sum of mutually exclusive categories. ¶Resistant to >3 classes of antimicrobial agents.