Literature DB >> 34012663

The use of neoadjuvant lobar radioembolization prior to major hepatic resection for malignancy results in a low rate of post hepatectomy liver failure.

Altan Ahmed1,2, John A Stauffer3, Jordan D LeGout1, Justin Burns4, Kristopher Croome4, Ricardo Paz-Fumagalli1, Gregory Frey1, Beau Toskich1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant yttrium-90 transarterial radioembolization (TARE) is increasingly being used as a strategy to facilitate resection of otherwise unresectable tumors due to its ability to generate both tumor response and remnant liver hypertrophy. Perioperative outcomes after the use of neoadjuvant lobar TARE remain underinvestigated.
METHODS: A single center retrospective review of patients who underwent lobar TARE prior to major hepatectomy for primary or metastatic liver cancer between 2007 and 2018 was conducted. Baseline demographics, radioembolization parameters, pre- and post-radioembolization volumetrics, intra-operative surgical data, adverse events, and post-operative outcomes were analyzed.
RESULTS: Twenty-six patients underwent major hepatectomy after neoadjuvant lobar TARE. The mean age was 58.3 years (17-88 years). 62% of patients (n=16) had primary liver malignancies while the remainder had metastatic disease. Liver resection included right hepatectomy or trisegmentectomy, left or extended left hepatectomy, and sectorectomy/segmentectomy in 77% (n=20), 8% (n=2), and 15% (n=4) of patients, respectively. The mean length of stay was 8.3 days (range, 3-33 days) and there were no grade IV morbidities or 90-day mortalities. The incidence of post hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) was 3.8% (n=1). The median time to progression after resection was 4.5 months (range, 3.3-10 months). Twenty-three percent (n=6) of patients had no recurrence. The median survival was 28.9 months (range, 16.9-46.8 months) from major hepatectomy and 37.6 months (range, 25.2-53.1 months) from TARE.
CONCLUSIONS: Major hepatectomy after neoadjuvant lobar radioembolization is safe with a low incidence of PHLF. 2021 Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Radioembolization; major hepatectomy; post hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF); radiation lobectomy

Year:  2021        PMID: 34012663      PMCID: PMC8107583          DOI: 10.21037/jgo-20-507

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol        ISSN: 2078-6891


  70 in total

1.  Immaturity of Bile Canalicular-Ductule Networks in the Future Liver Remnant While Associating Liver Partition and Portal Vein Occlusion for Staged Hepatectomy (ALPPS).

Authors:  Kenichi Matsuo; Yukihiko Hiroshima; Kazuto Yamazaki; Kohei Kasahara; Yutaro Kikuchi; Daisuke Kawaguchi; Takashi Murakami; Yasuo Ishida; Kuniya Tanaka
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  Hepatobiliary scintigraphy to evaluate liver function in associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy: Liver volume overestimates liver function.

Authors:  Pim B Olthof; Federico Tomassini; Pablo E Huespe; Stephanie Truant; François-René Pruvot; Roberto I Troisi; Carlos Castro; Erik Schadde; Rimma Axelsson; Ernesto Sparrelid; Roelof J Bennink; Rene Adam; Thomas M van Gulik; Eduardo de Santibanes
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 3.982

3.  RAS mutation status predicts survival and patterns of recurrence in patients undergoing hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases.

Authors:  Jean-Nicolas Vauthey; Giuseppe Zimmitti; Scott E Kopetz; Junichi Shindoh; Su S Chen; Andreas Andreou; Steven A Curley; Thomas A Aloia; Dipen M Maru
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 4.  Modified Radiation Lobectomy: An Evolving Paradigm to Convert Patients to Liver Resection Candidacy.

Authors:  Ahmed Gabr; Ahsun Riaz; Samdeep Mouli; Kush Desai; Bartley Thornburg; Riad Salem; Robert J Lewandowski
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2019-10-31       Impact factor: 1.513

5.  The value of gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MR imaging for predicting posthepatectomy liver failure after major hepatic resection: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Seung Hyun Cho; Ung Rae Kang; Joo Dong Kim; Young Seok Han; Dong Lak Choi
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2011-09-09       Impact factor: 3.528

Review 6.  Cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Nataliya Razumilava; Gregory J Gores
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 7.  Trends in local therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma and survival outcomes in the US population.

Authors:  Roderich E Schwarz; David D Smith
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2008-04-23       Impact factor: 2.565

8.  Predictors of early postoperative outcomes in 375 consecutive hepatectomies: a single-institution experience.

Authors:  Mohammad Ali Abbass; Jeffery M Slezak; L Andrew DiFronzo
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 0.688

Review 9.  World review of laparoscopic liver resection-2,804 patients.

Authors:  Kevin Tri Nguyen; T Clark Gamblin; David A Geller
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Developing and validating a pre-operative risk score to predict post-hepatectomy liver failure.

Authors:  Bobby V M Dasari; James Hodson; Keith J Roberts; Robert P Sutcliffe; Ravi Marudanayagam; Darius F Mirza; John Isaac; Paolo Muiesan
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 3.647

View more
  1 in total

1.  Clinical, dosimetric, and reporting considerations for Y-90 glass microspheres in hepatocellular carcinoma: updated 2022 recommendations from an international multidisciplinary working group.

Authors:  Riad Salem; Siddharth A Padia; Marnix Lam; Carlo Chiesa; Paul Haste; Bruno Sangro; Beau Toskich; Kirk Fowers; Joseph M Herman; S Cheenu Kappadath; Thomas Leung; Daniel Y Sze; Edward Kim; Etienne Garin
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2022-09-17       Impact factor: 10.057

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.