Oliver Stoetzer1, Dorit Di Gioia2, Rolf Dieter Issels2, Sultan Abdel-Rahman2, Ulrich Mansmann3, Lars Hartwin Lindner2, Oleg Gluz4, Rachel Würstlein4,5, Michael Braun6, Moritz Hamann6, Franz Edler von Koch7, Nadia Harbeck4,5, Christoph Salat1. 1. Medical Center for Hematology and Oncology MVZ, Munich, Germany. 2. Department of Medicine III, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany. 3. Institute of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany. 4. West German Study Group, Mönchengladbach, Germany. 5. Breast Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, and Comprehensive Cancer Center (CCC Munich LMU), University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany. 6. Germany Red Cross Breast Center, Munich, Germany. 7. Clinic for Obstetrics and Gynecology Dritter Orden, Munich, Germany.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Patients with triple-negative primary breast cancer (TNBC) who have residual invasive carcinoma after neoadjuvant chemotherapy have poor prognosis. Proven adjuvant approaches to reduce the risk of recurrence and improve outcome in patients with non-pathological complete response (non-pCR) are limited. METHODS: From our institutional registry, a consecutive case series of patients with operable, unilateral, primary invasive noninflammatory early TNBC of stage I-IIIB and pathologically verified residual cancer cells (no pathological complete response) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy underwent adjuvant treatment with gemcitabine plus cisplatin combined with regional hyperthermia. For quality assurance, we analyzed feasibility, efficacy, and toxicity of all treated patients. Outcome was evaluated for the entire group of patients as well as for the subgroups of patients with or without lymph node involvement at baseline (cN0/ cN+). RESULTS: From August 2012 to January 2019, we offered this treatment to 53 patients at our center as part of routine care. The median follow-up was 38 months. The majority of patients (64.2%) had cT2 tumors at baseline. Twenty-four patients (45%) were clinically node positive as evaluated by sonography. Thirty-nine patients (74%) had grade 3, and 14 patients (26%) had grade 2 tumors. Forty-one patients (76%) showed a regression grade 1 according to Sinn. Patients received a median of six treatment cycles of gemcitabine and cisplatin (range 1-6) combined with 12 applications of regional hyperthermia (median 12, range 2-12). Disease-free survival (DFS) at 3 years was 57.5%. In patients with no lymph node involvement at baseline (cN0), DFS at 3 years was significantly higher than in initially node-positive (cN+) patients (80 vs. 31%; p = 0.001). Overall survival (OS) at 3 years was 81.6%. In patients with no lymph node involvement at baseline (cN0), OS at 3 years was significantly higher than in node-positive (cN+) patients (93 vs. 70.4%; p = 0.02). Overall, grade 3/4 toxicities were leukopenia (38%), thrombocytopenia (4%), and anemia (4%). CONCLUSION: After standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy containing anthracycline plus cyclophosphamide followed by taxanes, addition of adjuvant gemcitabine plus cisplatin in combination with regional hyperthermia was safe and effective in TNBC patients with non-pCR.
BACKGROUND: Patients with triple-negative primary breast cancer (TNBC) who have residual invasive carcinoma after neoadjuvant chemotherapy have poor prognosis. Proven adjuvant approaches to reduce the risk of recurrence and improve outcome in patients with non-pathological complete response (non-pCR) are limited. METHODS: From our institutional registry, a consecutive case series of patients with operable, unilateral, primary invasive noninflammatory early TNBC of stage I-IIIB and pathologically verified residual cancer cells (no pathological complete response) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy underwent adjuvant treatment with gemcitabine plus cisplatin combined with regional hyperthermia. For quality assurance, we analyzed feasibility, efficacy, and toxicity of all treated patients. Outcome was evaluated for the entire group of patients as well as for the subgroups of patients with or without lymph node involvement at baseline (cN0/ cN+). RESULTS: From August 2012 to January 2019, we offered this treatment to 53 patients at our center as part of routine care. The median follow-up was 38 months. The majority of patients (64.2%) had cT2 tumors at baseline. Twenty-four patients (45%) were clinically node positive as evaluated by sonography. Thirty-nine patients (74%) had grade 3, and 14 patients (26%) had grade 2 tumors. Forty-one patients (76%) showed a regression grade 1 according to Sinn. Patients received a median of six treatment cycles of gemcitabine and cisplatin (range 1-6) combined with 12 applications of regional hyperthermia (median 12, range 2-12). Disease-free survival (DFS) at 3 years was 57.5%. In patients with no lymph node involvement at baseline (cN0), DFS at 3 years was significantly higher than in initially node-positive (cN+) patients (80 vs. 31%; p = 0.001). Overall survival (OS) at 3 years was 81.6%. In patients with no lymph node involvement at baseline (cN0), OS at 3 years was significantly higher than in node-positive (cN+) patients (93 vs. 70.4%; p = 0.02). Overall, grade 3/4 toxicities were leukopenia (38%), thrombocytopenia (4%), and anemia (4%). CONCLUSION: After standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy containing anthracycline plus cyclophosphamide followed by taxanes, addition of adjuvant gemcitabine plus cisplatin in combination with regional hyperthermia was safe and effective in TNBC patients with non-pCR.
Authors: Oleg Gluz; Ulrike Nitz; Cornelia Liedtke; Matthias Christgen; Eva-Maria Grischke; Helmut Forstbauer; Michael Braun; Mathias Warm; John Hackmann; Christoph Uleer; Bahriye Aktas; Claudia Schumacher; Nikola Bangemann; Christoph Lindner; Sherko Kuemmel; Michael Clemens; Jochem Potenberg; Peter Staib; Andreas Kohls; Raquel von Schumann; Ronald Kates; Ronald Kates; Johannes Schumacher; Rachel Wuerstlein; Hans Heinrich Kreipe; Nadia Harbeck Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2018-06-01 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Fergus J Couch; Steven N Hart; Priyanka Sharma; Amanda Ewart Toland; Xianshu Wang; Penelope Miron; Janet E Olson; Andrew K Godwin; V Shane Pankratz; Curtis Olswold; Seth Slettedahl; Emily Hallberg; Lucia Guidugli; Jaime I Davila; Matthias W Beckmann; Wolfgang Janni; Brigitte Rack; Arif B Ekici; Dennis J Slamon; Irene Konstantopoulou; Florentia Fostira; Athanassios Vratimos; George Fountzilas; Liisa M Pelttari; William J Tapper; Lorraine Durcan; Simon S Cross; Robert Pilarski; Charles L Shapiro; Jennifer Klemp; Song Yao; Judy Garber; Angela Cox; Hiltrud Brauch; Christine Ambrosone; Heli Nevanlinna; Drakoulis Yannoukakos; Susan L Slager; Celine M Vachon; Diana M Eccles; Peter A Fasching Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2014-12-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Przemek M Krawczyk; Berina Eppink; Jeroen Essers; Jan Stap; Hans Rodermond; Hanny Odijk; Alex Zelensky; Chris van Bree; Lukas J Stalpers; Marrije R Buist; Thomas Soullié; Joost Rens; Hence J M Verhagen; Mark J O'Connor; Nicolaas A P Franken; Timo L M Ten Hagen; Roland Kanaar; Jacob A Aten Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2011-05-09 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Patricia Cortazar; Lijun Zhang; Michael Untch; Keyur Mehta; Joseph P Costantino; Norman Wolmark; Hervé Bonnefoi; David Cameron; Luca Gianni; Pinuccia Valagussa; Sandra M Swain; Tatiana Prowell; Sibylle Loibl; D Lawrence Wickerham; Jan Bogaerts; Jose Baselga; Charles Perou; Gideon Blumenthal; Jens Blohmer; Eleftherios P Mamounas; Jonas Bergh; Vladimir Semiglazov; Robert Justice; Holger Eidtmann; Soonmyung Paik; Martine Piccart; Rajeshwari Sridhara; Peter A Fasching; Leen Slaets; Shenghui Tang; Bernd Gerber; Charles E Geyer; Richard Pazdur; Nina Ditsch; Priya Rastogi; Wolfgang Eiermann; Gunter von Minckwitz Journal: Lancet Date: 2014-02-14 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: William M Sikov; Donald A Berry; Charles M Perou; Baljit Singh; Constance T Cirrincione; Sara M Tolaney; Charles S Kuzma; Timothy J Pluard; George Somlo; Elisa R Port; Mehra Golshan; Jennifer R Bellon; Deborah Collyar; Olwen M Hahn; Lisa A Carey; Clifford A Hudis; Eric P Winer Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2014-08-04 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: H P Sinn; H Schmid; H Junkermann; J Huober; G Leppien; M Kaufmann; G Bastert; H F Otto Journal: Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd Date: 1994-10 Impact factor: 2.915
Authors: Eric Hahnen; Bianca Lederer; Jan Hauke; Sibylle Loibl; Sandra Kröber; Andreas Schneeweiss; Carsten Denkert; Peter A Fasching; Jens U Blohmer; Christian Jackisch; Stefan Paepke; Bernd Gerber; Sherko Kümmel; Christian Schem; Guido Neidhardt; Jens Huober; Kerstin Rhiem; Serban Costa; Janine Altmüller; Claus Hanusch; Holger Thiele; Volkmar Müller; Peter Nürnberg; Thomas Karn; Valentina Nekljudova; Michael Untch; Gunter von Minckwitz; Rita K Schmutzler Journal: JAMA Oncol Date: 2017-10-01 Impact factor: 31.777