Literature DB >> 34008079

A questionnaire survey on evaluation for penetration and compliance of the Japanese Guideline on Febrile Neutropenia among hematology-oncology physicians and surgeons.

Nobu Akiyama1, Takuho Okamura2, Minoru Yoshida3, Shun-Ichi Kimura4, Shingo Yano5, Isao Yoshida6, Hiroyuki Kusaba7, Kosuke Takahashi8, Hiroyuki Fujita9, Keitaro Fukushima10, Hiromichi Iwasaki11, Kazuo Tamura12, Toshiaki Saeki13, Yasushi Takamatsu14, Sadamoto Zenda15.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The Japanese Society of Medical Oncology published a guideline (GL) on febrile neutropenia (FN) in 2017. The study's purpose is to reveal how widely GL penetrated among physicians and surgeons providing chemotherapy.
METHODS: A questionnaire survey was conducted with SurveyMonkey™ for members of the Japanese Association of Supportive Care in Cancer and relevant academic organizations. Each question had four options (always do, do in more than half of patients, do in less than half, do not at all) and a free description form. Responses were analyzed with statistical text-analytics. RESULT: A total of 800 responses were retrieved. Major respondents were experts with more than 10-year experience, physicians 54%, and surgeons 46%. Eighty-seven percent of respondents knew and used GL. Forty-eight percent assessed FN with Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) score "always" or "more than half." Eighty-one percent chose beta-lactam monotherapy as primary treatment in high-risk patients. Seventy-seven percent did oral antibacterial therapy in low-risk patients ambulatorily. Seventy-eight percent administered primary prophylactic G-CSF (ppG-CSF) in FN frequency ≥ 20% regimen. Fifty-nine percent did ppG-CSF for high-risk patients in FN frequency 10-20% regimen. Ninety-seven percent did not use ppG-CSF in FN frequency < 10% regimen. The medians of complete and complete plus partial compliance rates were 46.4% (range 7.0-92.8) and 77.8% (range 35.4-98.7). The complete compliance rates were less than 30% in seven recommendations, including the MASCC score assessment.
CONCLUSION: GL is estimated to be widely utilized, but some recommendations were not followed, presumably due to a mismatch with actual clinical practices in Japan.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chemotherapy; Febrile neutropenia; G-CSF; Guidelines; Supportive care; Surveillance

Year:  2021        PMID: 34008079     DOI: 10.1007/s00520-021-06277-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Support Care Cancer        ISSN: 0941-4355            Impact factor:   3.603


  16 in total

1.  Clinical practice guideline for the use of antimicrobial agents in neutropenic patients with cancer: 2010 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

Authors:  Alison G Freifeld; Eric J Bow; Kent A Sepkowitz; Michael J Boeckh; James I Ito; Craig A Mullen; Issam I Raad; Kenneth V Rolston; Jo-Anne H Young; John R Wingard
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2011-01-04       Impact factor: 9.079

2.  Management of febrile neutropaenia: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines.

Authors:  J Klastersky; J de Naurois; K Rolston; B Rapoport; G Maschmeyer; M Aapro; J Herrstedt
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 32.976

3.  Growth of rubella virus in the presence of serum substitutes.

Authors:  G L Gitnich; A Fabiyi; D A Fuccillo; P Crockett; J L Sever
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1968-02

4.  Outpatient Management of Fever and Neutropenia in Adults Treated for Malignancy: American Society of Clinical Oncology and Infectious Diseases Society of America Clinical Practice Guideline Update.

Authors:  Randy A Taplitz; Erin B Kennedy; Eric J Bow; Jennie Crews; Charise Gleason; Douglas K Hawley; Amelia A Langston; Loretta J Nastoupil; Michelle Rajotte; Kenneth Rolston; Lynne Strasfeld; Christopher R Flowers
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-02-20       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 5.  A Patient Risk Model of Chemotherapy-Induced Febrile Neutropenia: Lessons Learned From the ANC Study Group.

Authors:  Gary H Lyman; Marek S Poniewierski
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 11.908

6.  The Multinational Association for Supportive Care in Cancer risk index: A multinational scoring system for identifying low-risk febrile neutropenic cancer patients.

Authors:  J Klastersky; M Paesmans; E B Rubenstein; M Boyer; L Elting; R Feld; J Gallagher; J Herrstedt; B Rapoport; K Rolston; J Talcott
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Emergency Department Management of Patients With Febrile Neutropenia: Guideline Concordant or Overly Aggressive?

Authors:  Christopher W Baugh; Thomas J Wang; Jeffrey M Caterino; Olesya N Baker; Gabriel A Brooks; Audrey C Reust; Daniel J Pallin
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 3.451

8.  Deviations from guideline-based therapy for febrile neutropenia in cancer patients and their effect on outcomes.

Authors:  Jason D Wright; Alfred I Neugut; Cande V Ananth; Sharyn N Lewin; Elizabeth T Wilde; Yu-Shiang Lu; Thomas J Herzog; Dawn L Hershman
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2013-04-08       Impact factor: 21.873

9.  Guideline adherence for the management of emergency department patients with febrile neutropenia and no infection source: Is there room for improvement?

Authors:  Brianna Jansma; Priyanka Vakkalanka; David A Talan; Briana Negaard; Brett A Faine
Journal:  J Oncol Pharm Pract       Date:  2020-01-19       Impact factor: 1.809

10.  Current antimicrobial practice in febrile neutropenia across Europe and Asia: the EBMT Infectious Disease Working Party survey.

Authors:  Anke Verlinden; Malgorzata Mikulska; Nina Simone Knelange; Dina Averbuch; Jan Styczynski
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2020-02-11       Impact factor: 5.483

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.