Azalea Guerra-García1, Tania Gioia2, Eric von Wettberg3, Giuseppina Logozzo2, Roberto Papa4, Elena Bitocchi4, Kirstin E Bett1. 1. Department of Plant Sciences, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada. 2. School of Agriculture, Forestry, Food and Environmental Sciences, University of Basilicata, Potenza, Italy. 3. Department of Plant and Soil Sciences and Gund Institute for the Environment, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont. 4. Dipartimento di Scienze Agrarie, Alimentari ed Ambientali, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy.
Abstract
The genetic and phenotypic characterization of crops allows us to elucidate their evolutionary and domestication history, the genetic basis of important traits, and the use of variation present in landraces and wild relatives to enhance resilience. In this context, we aim to provide an overview of the main genetic resources developed for lentil and their main outcomes, and to suggest protocols for continued work on this important crop. Lens culinaris is the third-most-important cool-season grain and its use is increasing as a quick-cooking, nutritious, plant-based source of protein. L. culinaris was domesticated in the Fertile Crescent, and six additional wild taxa (L. orientalis, L. tomentosus, L. odemensis, L. lamottei, L. ervoides, and L. nigricans) are recognized. Numerous genetic diversity studies have shown that wild relatives present high levels of genetic variation and provide a reservoir of alleles that can be used for breeding programs. Furthermore, the integration of genetics/genomics and breeding techniques has resulted in identification of quantitative trait loci and genes related to attributes of interest. Genetic maps, massive genotyping, marker-assisted selection, and genomic selection are some of the genetic resources generated and applied in lentil. In addition, despite its size (∼4 Gbp) and complexity, the L. culinaris genome has been assembled, allowing a deeper understanding of its architecture. Still, major knowledge gaps exist in lentil, and a deeper understanding and characterization of germplasm resources, including wild relatives, is critical to lentil breeding and improvement.
The genetic and phenotypic characterization of crops allows us to elucidate their evolutionary and domestication history, the genetic basis of important traits, and the use of variation present in landraces and wild relatives to enhance resilience. In this context, we aim to provide an overview of the main genetic resources developed for lentil and their main outcomes, and to suggest protocols for continued work on this important crop. Lens culinaris is the third-most-important cool-season grain and its use is increasing as a quick-cooking, nutritious, plant-based source of protein. L. culinaris was domesticated in the Fertile Crescent, and six additional wild taxa (L. orientalis, L. tomentosus, L. odemensis, L. lamottei, L. ervoides, and L. nigricans) are recognized. Numerous genetic diversity studies have shown that wild relatives present high levels of genetic variation and provide a reservoir of alleles that can be used for breeding programs. Furthermore, the integration of genetics/genomics and breeding techniques has resulted in identification of quantitative trait loci and genes related to attributes of interest. Genetic maps, massive genotyping, marker-assisted selection, and genomic selection are some of the genetic resources generated and applied in lentil. In addition, despite its size (∼4 Gbp) and complexity, the L. culinaris genome has been assembled, allowing a deeper understanding of its architecture. Still, major knowledge gaps exist in lentil, and a deeper understanding and characterization of germplasm resources, including wild relatives, is critical to lentil breeding and improvement.
Authors: Elisa Bellucci; Orlando Mario Aguilar; Saleh Alseekh; Kirstin Bett; Creola Brezeanu; Douglas Cook; Lucía De la Rosa; Massimo Delledonne; Denise F Dostatny; Juan J Ferreira; Valérie Geffroy; Sofia Ghitarrini; Magdalena Kroc; Shiv Kumar Agrawal; Giuseppina Logozzo; Mario Marino; Tristan Mary-Huard; Phil McClean; Vladimir Meglič; Tamara Messer; Frédéric Muel; Laura Nanni; Kerstin Neumann; Filippo Servalli; Silvia Străjeru; Rajeev K Varshney; Marta W Vasconcelos; Massimo Zaccardelli; Aleksei Zavarzin; Elena Bitocchi; Emanuele Frontoni; Alisdair R Fernie; Tania Gioia; Andreas Graner; Luis Guasch; Lena Prochnow; Markus Oppermann; Karolina Susek; Maud Tenaillon; Roberto Papa Journal: Plant J Date: 2021-09-23 Impact factor: 7.091
Authors: Kuldeep Tripathi; Jyoti Kumari; Padmavati G Gore; Dwijesh C Mishra; Amit Kumar Singh; Gyan P Mishra; C Gayacharan; H K Dikshit; Neeta Singh; D P Semwal; Reena Mehra; Rakesh Bhardwaj; Ruchi Bansal; J C Rana; Ashok Kumar; Veena Gupta; Kuldeep Singh; Ashutosh Sarker Journal: Front Plant Sci Date: 2022-01-27 Impact factor: 5.753