Literature DB >> 34003225

Association of Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting vs Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Memory Decline in Older Adults Undergoing Coronary Revascularization.

Elizabeth L Whitlock1, L Grisell Diaz-Ramirez2, Alexander K Smith2,3, W John Boscardin2,4, Kenneth E Covinsky2, Michael S Avidan5, M Maria Glymour4.   

Abstract

Importance: It is uncertain whether coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is associated with cognitive decline in older adults compared with a nonsurgical method of coronary revascularization (percutaneous coronary intervention [PCI]). Objective: To compare the change in the rate of memory decline after CABG vs PCI. Design, Setting, and Participants: Retrospective cohort study of community-dwelling participants in the Health and Retirement Study, who underwent CABG or PCI between 1998 and 2015 at age 65 years or older. Data were modeled for up to 5 years preceding and 10 years following revascularization or until death, drop out, or the 2016-2017 interview wave. The date of final follow-up was November 2017. Exposures: CABG (including on and off pump) or PCI, ascertained from Medicare fee-for-service billing records. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was a summary measure of cognitive test scores and proxy cognition reports that were performed biennially in the Health and Retirement Study, referred to as memory score, normalized as a z score (ie, mean of 0, SD of 1 in a reference population of adults aged ≥72 years). Memory score was analyzed using multivariable linear mixed-effects models, with a prespecified subgroup analysis of on-pump and off-pump CABG. The minimum clinically important difference was a change of 1 SD of the population-level rate of memory decline (0.048 memory units/y).
Results: Of 1680 participants (mean age at procedure, 75 years; 41% female), 665 underwent CABG (168 off pump) and 1015 underwent PCI. In the PCI group, the mean rate of memory decline was 0.064 memory units/y (95% CI, 0.052 to 0.078) before the procedure and 0.060 memory units/y (95% CI, 0.048 to 0.071) after the procedure (within-group change, 0.004 memory units/y [95% CI, -0.010 to 0.018]). In the CABG group, the mean rate of memory decline was 0.049 memory units/y (95% CI, 0.033 to 0.065) before the procedure and 0.059 memory units/y (95% CI, 0.047 to 0.072) after the procedure (within-group change, -0.011 memory units/y [95% CI, -0.029 to 0.008]). The between-group difference-in-differences estimate for memory decline for PCI vs CABG was 0.015 memory units/y (95% CI, -0.008 to 0.038; P = .21). There was statistically significant increase in the rate of memory decline after off-pump CABG compared with after PCI (difference-in-differences: mean increase in the rate of decline of 0.046 memory units/y [95% CI, 0.008 to 0.084] after off-pump CABG), but not after on-pump CABG compared with PCI (difference-in-differences: mean slowing of decline of 0.003 memory units/y [95% CI, -0.024 to 0.031] after on-pump CABG). Conclusions and Relevance: Among older adults undergoing coronary revascularization with CABG or PCI, the type of revascularization procedure was not significantly associated with differences in the change of rate of memory decline.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34003225      PMCID: PMC8132142          DOI: 10.1001/jama.2021.5150

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  33 in total

1.  Longitudinal assessment of neurocognitive function after coronary-artery bypass surgery.

Authors:  M F Newman; J L Kirchner; B Phillips-Bute; V Gaver; H Grocott; R H Jones; D B Mark; J G Reves; J A Blumenthal
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2001-02-08       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Changes in memory before and after stroke differ by age and sex, but not by race.

Authors:  Qianyi Wang; Iván Mejía-Guevara; Pamela M Rist; Stefan Walter; Benjamin D Capistrant; M Maria Glymour
Journal:  Cerebrovasc Dis       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 2.762

3.  Comparing models of frailty: the Health and Retirement Study.

Authors:  Christine T Cigolle; Mary Beth Ofstedal; Zhiyi Tian; Caroline S Blaum
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2009-04-21       Impact factor: 5.562

4.  Do management strategies for coronary artery disease influence 6-year cognitive outcomes?

Authors:  Ola A Selnes; Maura A Grega; Maryanne M Bailey; Luu D Pham; Scott L Zeger; William A Baumgartner; Guy M McKhann
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 4.330

5.  Five-Year Outcomes after On-Pump and Off-Pump Coronary-Artery Bypass.

Authors:  A Laurie Shroyer; Brack Hattler; Todd H Wagner; Joseph F Collins; Janet H Baltz; Jacquelyn A Quin; G Hossein Almassi; Elizabeth Kozora; Faisal Bakaeen; Joseph C Cleveland; Muath Bishawi; Frederick L Grover
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2017-08-17       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Differences in Management of Coronary Artery Disease in Patients With Medicare Advantage vs Traditional Fee-for-Service Medicare Among Cardiology Practices.

Authors:  Jose F Figueroa; Daniel M Blumenthal; Yevgeniy Feyman; Austin B Frakt; Alexander Turchin; Gheorghe Doros; Qi Gao; Yang Song; Karen E Joynt Maddox
Journal:  JAMA Cardiol       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 14.676

7.  Cognitive and cardiac outcomes 5 years after off-pump vs on-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery.

Authors:  Diederik van Dijk; Monique Spoor; Ron Hijman; Hendrik M Nathoe; Cornelius Borst; Erik W L Jansen; Diederick E Grobbee; Peter P T de Jaegere; Cor J Kalkman
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2007-02-21       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Postoperative cognitive dysfunction is independent of type of surgery and anesthetic.

Authors:  Lisbeth Evered; David A Scott; Brendan Silbert; Paul Maruff
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2011-04-07       Impact factor: 5.108

Review 9.  Recommendations for the nomenclature of cognitive change associated with anaesthesia and surgery-2018.

Authors:  L Evered; B Silbert; D S Knopman; D A Scott; S T DeKosky; L S Rasmussen; E S Oh; G Crosby; M Berger; R G Eckenhoff
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 9.166

10.  Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery and Dementia Risk in the Cardiovascular Health Study.

Authors:  Elżbieta Kuźma; Jac Airdrie; Thomas J Littlejohns; Ilianna Lourida; Jo Thompson-Coon; Iain A Lang; Monica Scrobotovici; Evan L Thacker; Annette Fitzpatrick; Lewis H Kuller; Oscar L Lopez; William T Longstreth; Obioha C Ukoumunne; David J Llewellyn
Journal:  Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord       Date:  2017 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.703

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Year in Review 2021: Noteworthy Literature in Cardiothoracic Anesthesia.

Authors:  Aaron Smoroda; David Douin; Joseph Morabito; Matthew Lyman; Meghan Prin; Bryan Ahlgren; Andrew Young; Elijah Christensen; Benjamin A Abrams; Nathaen Weitzel; Nathan Clendenen
Journal:  Semin Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth       Date:  2022-05-17

2.  An age-old dilemma: Defining the optimal revascularization approach in older adults.

Authors:  Jonathan M Hanna; Michael G Nanna
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2022-05-21       Impact factor: 7.538

3.  General Anesthesia and Postoperative Neurocognitive Outcomes.

Authors:  Michael S Avidan; Elizabeth L Whitlock; George A Mashour
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 157.335

4.  Coronary Revascularization and Cognitive Decline: The Patient or the Procedure?

Authors:  Rebecca F Gottesman; Michelle C Johansen
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 5.  Mitigation of perioperative neurocognitive disorders: A holistic approach.

Authors:  Seyed A Safavynia; Peter A Goldstein; Lisbeth A Evered
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2022-07-27       Impact factor: 5.702

6.  Functional MRI Changes in Patients after Thyroidectomy under General Anesthesia.

Authors:  Xilun Yang; Bing Yu; Ling Ma
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 3.246

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.