Literature DB >> 34002355

Clinical Pharmacokinetics of Triazoles in Pediatric Patients.

Didi Bury1,2, Wim J E Tissing1,3, Eline W Muilwijk1,4, Tom F W Wolfs5,6, Roger J Brüggemann7,8,9.   

Abstract

Triazoles represent an important class of antifungal drugs in the prophylaxis and treatment of invasive fungal disease in pediatric patients. Understanding the pharmacokinetics of triazoles in children is crucial to providing optimal care for this vulnerable population. While the pharmacokinetics is extensively studied in adult populations, knowledge on pharmacokinetics of triazoles in children is limited. New data are still emerging despite drugs already going off patent. This review aims to provide readers with the most current knowledge on the pharmacokinetics of the triazoles: fluconazole, itraconazole, voriconazole, posaconazole, and isavuconazole. In addition, factors that have to be taken into account to select the optimal dose are summarized and knowledge gaps are identified that require further research. We hope it will provide clinicians guidance to optimally deploy these drugs in the setting of a life-threatening disease in pediatric patients.
© 2021. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34002355      PMCID: PMC8416858          DOI: 10.1007/s40262-021-00994-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet        ISSN: 0312-5963            Impact factor:   5.577


Key Points

Introduction

Immunocompromised pediatric patients are at high risk for invasive fungal disease (IFD). Although advances have been made in the management of IFD, the incidence and mortality rates are still high whereas treatment options remain limited and challenging. Triazoles represent the most important class of antifungal drugs for the prophylaxis and treatment of IFD. Within this class, isavuconazole, itraconazole, posaconazole, and voriconazole are recommended for managing invasive aspergillosis [1] and fluconazole and voriconazole are recommended for managing invasive candidiasis [2, 3]. Understanding the pharmacokinetics (PK) of these triazoles in pediatric patients is crucial to provide the most beneficial treatment. While the PK of triazoles is extensively studied in adult populations, knowledge on the PK of triazoles in pediatric patients is limited. Pediatric dose recommendations of triazoles have either been adjusted several times in the past years (i.e., voriconazole) or have been reported in the literature to a limited extent (i.e., isavuconazole, itraconazole, and posaconazole). This review provides an overview of current knowledge on the PK of the triazoles fluconazole, itraconazole, voriconazole, posaconazole, and isavuconazole in pediatric populations and summarizes factors that have to be taken into account to select the optimal dose.

Search Methodology

Relevant articles that describe the PK of triazoles in pediatric patients were searched until 26 November, 2020 using the databases PubMed and Embase. A detailed description of the literature search strategy is given in the Electronic Supplementary Material. Conference abstracts and unpublished data from conference proceedings were not included in this review. The order of appearance of each triazole in this article is in the order of appearances of market introduction. This emphasizes the need for more prompt action to investigate the PK for the newest released drugs and to learn from pitfalls from the past. After providing a general introduction on pharmacology for all triazoles, a general introduction of each triazole will be given including indications and dose recommendations from the current labels and guidelines. Next, triazole absorption, distribution, metabolism, and elimination characteristics in adults will be described followed by relevant details on pediatric PK for both non-compartmental analyses (NCA) and population PK analyses.

Mechanism of Action: Pharmacology

All triazoles block the conversion of lanosterol to ergosterol through inhibition of the enzyme lanosterol 14α-demethylase (cytochrome P450 [CYP] 51). The depletion of ergosterol and accumulation of its toxic sterol precursors weaken the cell membrane structure and lead to cell membrane dysfunction [4-8]. Next to their fungal pharmacological target, triazoles are substrates and/or inhibitors of the human equivalent CYP enzyme system [4-8]. An overview of the metabolic routes and enzyme affinities of triazoles is provided in Table 1.
Table 1

An overview of the metabolic routes and enzyme inhibition of triazoles

FluconazoleaIsavuconazoleItraconazolePosaconazoleVoriconazole
CYP2C9Moderate inhibitor [4, 82]Substrateb/weak inhibitor [5, 82]
CYP2C19Strong inhibitor [4, 82]Moderate substrate/weak inhibitor [5, 82]
CYP3A4/A5Moderate inhibitor [4, 82]Substrateb/moderate inhibitor [7]Substrateb/strong inhibitor [6, 82]Strong inhibitor [8, 82]Substrateb/strong inhibitor [5, 82]
UGTSubstrateb [7]Substrate/inhibitorb [83]
P-gpMild inhibitor [7]Inhibitorb [6, 82]Substrate/inhibitorb [83]

CYP cytochrome P450, FDA US Food and Drug Administration, P-gp P-glycoprotein, UGT uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase

aRenal excretion

bSubstrate sensitivity/inhibition mentioned in the FDA label and/or FDA drug interaction and labeling list, but the potency of sensitivity/inhibition is not mentioned and therefore not further specified in this table

An overview of the metabolic routes and enzyme inhibition of triazoles CYP cytochrome P450, FDA US Food and Drug Administration, P-gp P-glycoprotein, UGT uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase aRenal excretion bSubstrate sensitivity/inhibition mentioned in the FDA label and/or FDA drug interaction and labeling list, but the potency of sensitivity/inhibition is not mentioned and therefore not further specified in this table

Fluconazole

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of fluconazole in adult patients was received in 1990 and fluconazole is licensed in individual European member states since 1988 [4, 9]. Fluconazole formulations include a solution for intravenous infusion and capsules, tablets, syrup, and powder for suspension for oral administration [9]. Currently, fluconazole is approved in pediatric patients aged 0–17 years for the treatment of mucosal candidiasis, for invasive candidiasis and cryptococcal meningitis, for prophylaxis and treatment of Candida infections in immunocompromised patients, and for prophylaxis (of relapse) and treatment of cryptococcal meningitis in high-risk patients [9, 10]. The fluconazole dosing recommendations in the European and American labels, the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID), and the Infectious Diseases Society of America guidelines are given in Table 2. The recommendations in the labels are different from the international guidelines, but also differ slightly between these international guidelines. Consensus between labels and guidelines is necessary to provide good clinical practice.
Table 2

Fluconazole dose recommendation in European and American labels and international guidelines

Europec [10]FDA [4]ESCMID [2]IDSA [3]
ProphylaxisTreatmentProphylaxisTreatmentProphylaxisTreatmentProphylaxisTreatment
NeonatesPreterm neonates (PNA 0–14 days)3–12 mg/kg every 72 hours
Preterm neonates (PNA > 14 days)3–12 mg/kg every 24 hours
Term neonates (PNA 0–14 days)3–12 mg/kg (maximum 12 mg/kg) every 72 hoursa

(Loading dose 6 mg/kg, on day 1)a

3–12 mg/kg (maximum 12 mg/kg) every 72 hoursa

Term neonates (PNA 15–27 days)3–12 mg/kg (maximum 12 mg/kg) every 48 hoursa

(Loading dose 6 mg/kg, on day 1)a

3–12 mg/kg (maximum 12 mg/kg) every 48 hoursa

Neonates (< 1000 g)3–6 mg/kg twice weeklyb3–6 mg/kg twice weeklyb
Neonates (no PNA or GA reported)

(Loading dose 25 mg/kg)a

12 mg/kg every 24 hoursa

12 mg/kg every 24 hours
Infants/children/adolescentsAge: 28 days to 11 years3–12 mg/kg (maximum 400 mg/day) every 24 hoursa

(Loading dose 6 mg/kg, maximum 400 mg, on day 1)a

3–12 mg/kg (maximum 400 mg) every 24 hoursa

Age: 12–18 years3–12 mg/kg (maximum 400 mg) every 24 hoursa

(Loading dose 6–12 mg/kg, maximum 800 mg, on day 1)a

3–12 mg/kg (maximum 800 mg) every 24 hoursa

Infants (no age range reported)

(Loading dose 25 mg/kg)a

12 mg/kg (maximum 400 mg) every 24 hoursa

Children (no age range reported)6–12 mg/kg every (maximum 600 mg) 24 hoursa

(Loading dose 6–12 mg/kg, maximum 600 mg)a

3–12 mg/kg (maximum 600 mg) every 24 hoursa

8–12 mg/kg (maximum 400 mg) every 24 hours12 mg/kg every 24 hours

ESCMID European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, FDA US Food and Drug Administration, IDSA Infectious Diseases Society of America, GA gestational age, PNA postnatal age

aFluconazole (loading) dose is dependent on type, severity, and localization of the infection

bFluconazole prophylaxis is dependent on risk stratification strategy (incidence rate of Candida infection and neonate risk factors)

cDutch label

Fluconazole dose recommendation in European and American labels and international guidelines (Loading dose 6 mg/kg, on day 1)a 3–12 mg/kg (maximum 12 mg/kg) every 72 hoursa (Loading dose 6 mg/kg, on day 1)a 3–12 mg/kg (maximum 12 mg/kg) every 48 hoursa (Loading dose 25 mg/kg)a 12 mg/kg every 24 hoursa (Loading dose 6 mg/kg, maximum 400 mg, on day 1)a 3–12 mg/kg (maximum 400 mg) every 24 hoursa (Loading dose 6–12 mg/kg, maximum 800 mg, on day 1)a 3–12 mg/kg (maximum 800 mg) every 24 hoursa (Loading dose 25 mg/kg)a 12 mg/kg (maximum 400 mg) every 24 hoursa (Loading dose 6–12 mg/kg, maximum 600 mg)a 3–12 mg/kg (maximum 600 mg) every 24 hoursa ESCMID European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, FDA US Food and Drug Administration, IDSA Infectious Diseases Society of America, GA gestational age, PNA postnatal age aFluconazole (loading) dose is dependent on type, severity, and localization of the infection bFluconazole prophylaxis is dependent on risk stratification strategy (incidence rate of Candida infection and neonate risk factors) cDutch label Fluconazole is characterized by a bioavailability (F) of 90% in adults, which makes intravenous and different oral formulations interchangeable. Absorption of fluconazole is not affected by food intake. The volume of distribution (Vd) of fluconazole is approximately 0.7 L/kg [4]. Fluconazole shows good penetration in a variety of body fluids and tissues, such as cerebrospinal fluid, sputum, saliva, urine, and skin [11]. The affinity of fluconazole for plasma proteins is low (10–12%). Fluconazole is minimally metabolized (∼ 10%) and the route of elimination is primarily (~ 80%) unchanged via renal excretion. Mean clearance (CL) of fluconazole is around 0.0138 L/h/kg in adults [4].

Non-Compartmental Analysis of Fluconazole PK in Pediatric Patients

Six studies described NCA of fluconazole PK in pediatric patients [12-17]. One study was performed in neonates [12] and five studies were performed in infants and children [13-17]. A detailed overview of the dosing regimens and fluconazole pharmacokinetic results is given in Table 3. The neonatal study included 12 premature neonates aged < 24 h after birth receiving fluconazole intravenously in a dose of 6 mg/kg with a dose interval of 72 h [12]. The five studies in preterm and term infants and children included patients with hematological or non-hematological malignancies, congenital disease, neoplastic disease, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), or patients with and without peritoneal dialysis (PD) after open heart surgery with an age range of 2 weeks to 16 years [13-17]. Doses of fluconazole were 2–8 mg/kg per day administered either intravenously or as an oral suspension [13-17].
Table 3

Non-compartmental analyses of fluconazole

PopulationDoseFormulationWeightNSD, FD, or MDPharmacokinetic parametersReferences
CmaxCminTmaxAUCT1/2CLVd
Premature neonates aged < 24 h after birth6 mg/kg IV with a dose interval of 72 hIVNR12FDMean (range)aNRMean (range)NRMean (range)Mean (range)aMean (range)[12]
day 15.5 mg/L (3.7–10.2)2.2 h (0.2–6.6)88.6 h (43.3–187.3)0.011 L/h/kg (0.005–0.017)1.18 L/kg (1.05–1.48)
Cmax
NRMDMean (range)aNRMean (range)NRMean (range)Mean (range)aMean (range)
day 712.8 mg/L (6.0–17.8)1.6 h (0.25–6.3)67.5 h (30.8–130.8)0.020 L/h/kg (0.009–0.045)1.84 L/kg (0.70–5.71)
day 1310.0 mg/L (6.0–14.1)1.6 h (0.25–6.7)55.2 h (31.2–70.7)0.031 L/h/kg (0.016–0.046)2.25 L/kg (1.49–3.68)
Cmax
Premature infants < 3 months of age6 mg/kg dailyIV (N = 2) and PO (N = 6) [suspension]NR6SDMedian (range)aNRNRMedian (range)aNRMedian (range)aNR[13]
9.6 mg/L (6.0–13.5)412 mg*h/L (340–636)0.014 L/h/kg (0.007–0.017)
CmaxAUCinfCL/F
Children with or without PD after open heart surgery aged 2 weeks to 3 years3 mg/kg dailyIVMean (STDV)17MDMean (STDV)Mean (STDV)NRNRMean (STDV)Mean (STDV)aMean (STDV)[14]
4.0 kg (1.1)PD2.13 mg/L (0.99)1.66 mg/L (0.88)72.4 h (9.7)0.018 L/h/kg (0.008)1.39 L/kg (0.22)
Cmax, day 1Ctrough, day 1CLplasma
3.86 mg/L (2.86)2.23 mg/L (1.22)0.014 L/h/kg (0.005)
Cmax, day 2Ctrough, day 2CLpd (24 h peritoneal clearance)
5.32 mg/L (4.06)3.17 mg/L (1.64)
Cmax, day 3Ctrough, day 3
4.60 mg/L (3.43)2.60 mg/L (1.12)
Cmax, day 4Ctrough, day 4
Mean (STDV)MDMean (STDV)Mea n(STDV)NRNRMean (STDV)Mean (STDV)aMean (STDV)
4.4 kg (1.1)Non-PD2.84 mg/L (0.83)2.03 mg/L (1.14)30.9 h (4.0)0.025 L/h/kg (0.043)1.07 L/kg (0.11)
Cmax, day 1Ctrough, day 1CLplasma
5.43 mg/L (2.17)3.06 mg/L (1.32)
Cmax, day 2Ctrough, day 20.014 L/h/kg (0.0032)
6.93 mg/L (3.89)4.00 mg/L (2.35)CLrenal 24 h
Cmax, day 3Ctrough, day 3
6.23 mg/L (1.97)4.15 mg/L (0.95)
Cmax, day 4Ctrough, day 4
Immunocompromised children (congenital disease, HIV, malignant disease or prematurity) aged 0.25 to 16 years2, 3, or 8 mg/kg dailyIV and PONR101cNRMean (STDV)aMean (STDV)NRMean (STDV)[15]
0.25–2 yearsNRNRNRNR21.4 h (4.7)0.95 L/kg (0.15)
2–12 years73.7 mg*h/L (38.6)22.7 h (9.8)0.95 L/kg (0.39)
 ≥ 12 years92.2 mg*h/Lb21.4 h (8.5)0.70 L/kg (0.13)
2 mg/kg IVAUCinf
Mean (STDV)a
0.25–2 yearsNRNRNR56.2 mg*h/L (12.0)
2–12 years103.6 mg*h/L (29.7)
 ≥ 12 years74.2 mg*h/Lb
2 mg/kg POAUCinf
Mean (STDV)a
0.25–2 yearsNRNRNR110.1 mg*h/L (20.2)
2–12 yearsNR
 ≥ 12 yearsNR
3 mg/kg IVAUC0–96
Mean (STDV)a
0.25–2 yearsNRNRNR51.4 mg*h/Lb
2–12 years62.8 mg*h/L (15.8)
 ≥ 12 years52.8 mg*h/Lb
3 mg/kg POAUC0–48
Mean (STDV)a
0.25–2 yearsNRNRNRNR
2–12 years218.2 mg*h/L (77.1)
 ≥ 12 years230.9 mg*h/L (94.2)
8 mg/kg IVAUCinf
Mean (STDV)a
0.25–2 yearsNRNRNRNR
2–12 years354.0 mg*h/L (223.6)
 ≥ 12 years354.4 mg*h/L (127.9)
8 mg/kg POAUCinf
Children with HIV aged 5–13 years2 or 8 mg/kgPO (suspension)NR9SDMedian (range)aNRMedian (range)aMedian (range)aMedian (range)aNRNR[16]
2 mg/kg2.95 mg/L (2.31–4.40)2.0 h (0.5–2.0)48.3 mg*h/L (40.6–58.2)27.1 h (19.8–34.9)
8 mg/kg10.3 mg/L (5.44–12.14)1.0 h (1.0–4.0)205.9 mg*h/L (133.9–241.9)32.1 h (25.6–42.3)
CmaxAUC0–24
2 mg/kgMedian(range)a
97.8 mg*h/L (84.9–135.9)
8 mg/kg413.5 mg*h/L (330.2–684.3)
AUCinf
Children with neoplastic disease aged 5–15 years2, 4, or 8 mg/kg IV daily for 7 daysIVMean (range)24SDMean (SEM)aMean (SEM)aNRMean (SEM)aMean (SEM)Mean (SEM)*Mean (SEM)[17]
35.6 kg (16–60)2 mg/kg3.9 mg/L (0.20)1.7 mg/L (0.09)89 mg*h/L (14)20.3 h (2.7)0.020 L/h/kg (0.0024)0.60 L/kg (0.05)
36.6 kg (25–64)4 mg/kg6.4 mg/L (0.31)2.0 mg/L (0.13)120 mg*h/L (22)15.5 h (1.8)0.037 L/h/kg (0.0048)0.82 L/kg (0.09)
35.5 kg (18–55)8 mg/kg9.5 mg/L (0.14)2.7 mg/L (0.14)186 mg*h/L (16)15.8 h (1.6)0.049 L/h/kg (0.0063)1.06 L/kg (0.08)
CmaxCminAUCinf
Mean (range)17MDMean (SEM)aMean(SEM)aNRMean (SEM)aMean (SEM)Mean (SEM)aMean (SEM)
36.9 kg (16–60)2 mg/kg5.4 mg/L (0.39)2.5 mg/L (0.30)76 mg*h/L (14)20.7 h (2.9)0.027 L/h/kg (0.0046)0.88 L/kg (0.05)
36.8 kg (25–64)4 mg/kg10.5 mg/L (0.69)3.2 mg/L (0.55)110 mg*h/L (24)17.1 h (2.9)0.037 L/h/kg (0.0051)0.93 L/kg (0.11)
38.6 kg (30–55)8 mg/kg14.3 mg/L (0.35)5.5 mg/L (0.29)201 mg*h/L (16)16.9 h (1.8)0.030 L/h/kg (0.0034)0.74 L/kg (0.08)
CmaxCminAUC0–24
NR26OverallNRNRNRNRMean (SEM)Mean (SEM)aMean (SEM)
17.4 h (1.1)0.035 L/h/kg (0.0025)0.86 L/kg (0.4)

AUC area under the curve, CL clearance, C maximal serum concentration, C minimal serum concentration, C trough concentration, F bioavailability, FD first dose, h hours, HIV human immunodeficiency virus infection, IV intravenous, MD multiple dose, N total patients, NR not reported, PD peritoneal dialysis, PO ‘per os’, SD single dose, SEM standard error of the mean, STDV standard deviation, t elimination half-life, T time to reach Cmax, V volume of distribution

aValues recalculated/adjusted from the original paper to create uniformity of units (when individual values were reported, the median was calculated from these values)

bData only available from one patient

cThe study of Brammer et al. pooled data of 113 patients from previous studies. The 12 patients of the study of Saxen et al. were only reported and not analyzed in this pooled study and therefore not mentioned here (N = 101). The study of Lee et al. was also included in this pooled study but the results of the 4-mg/kg regimen are not reported

Non-compartmental analyses of fluconazole AUC area under the curve, CL clearance, C maximal serum concentration, C minimal serum concentration, C trough concentration, F bioavailability, FD first dose, h hours, HIV human immunodeficiency virus infection, IV intravenous, MD multiple dose, N total patients, NR not reported, PD peritoneal dialysis, PO ‘per os’, SD single dose, SEM standard error of the mean, STDV standard deviation, t elimination half-life, T time to reach Cmax, V volume of distribution aValues recalculated/adjusted from the original paper to create uniformity of units (when individual values were reported, the median was calculated from these values) bData only available from one patient cThe study of Brammer et al. pooled data of 113 patients from previous studies. The 12 patients of the study of Saxen et al. were only reported and not analyzed in this pooled study and therefore not mentioned here (N = 101). The study of Lee et al. was also included in this pooled study but the results of the 4-mg/kg regimen are not reported Although three out of these six studies included fluconazole as an oral formulation, none of them described the relative or absolute F of fluconazole [13, 15, 16]. During the first 2 weeks after birth, the Vd of fluconazole in premature neonates almost doubled and CL increased more than two times [12]. After 2 weeks of life, the Vd of premature neonates was found to be higher compared with children [12, 14, 15, 17]. After this period, the Vd decreased [14, 15, 17] and comparable values to adults were reported in children aged ≥ 12 years. [4, 15] These data suggest that premature neonates aged ≥ 2 weeks need adequate loading doses compared to premature neonates straight after birth and that children aged < 12 years need adequate loading doses compared to older children and adults. The higher Vd of fluconazole in premature neonates vs children and adults might be explained by the characteristics of fluconazole and body composition of neonates. Fluconazole is a hydrophilic compound, and neonates tend to have a higher water: fat ratio and as such a higher Vd [18]. The increasing fluconazole CL observed in neonates during the first 2 weeks of life might be explained by the maturation of the kidney function during this period [19]. Clearance of fluconazole in premature neonates seemed to reach the same range as children 2 weeks after birth [14, 17] but was still higher compared with adults [4]. A higher maintenance dose or shorter dosing intervals might be needed in premature neonates, infants, and children compared with adults. Contrary to these studies, one study in premature infants aged < 3 months reported comparable CL to adults, after a single dose of fluconazole [15]. Three studies described exposure of fluconazole after different dosing regimens and found a dose-proportional increase in exposure [15-17]. In patients with PD, no statistical differences in Vd and CL were reported compared to non-PD children with mild renal dysfunction. However, the elimination half-life of fluconazole was significantly longer in PD patients. This points towards the need for a lower maintenance dose or a longer dosing interval in this pediatric PD population [14]. To our knowledge, no other disease variables, such as HIV, have been found to alter the exposure of fluconazole [15-17].

Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Fluconazole in Pediatric Patients

Nine population pharmacokinetic studies were conducted that included either neonatal patients [20, 21], a mixed patient population of neonates and infants [22-27], or children and adolescents aged 3 days to 15.9 years [28]. One of these studies pooled data from three previously reported studies [26]. A detailed overview of the dosing regimens and fluconazole pharmacokinetic results is given in Table 4. The following patient groups were included in these studies: preterm and term patients at risk for IFD, patients with suspected or documented oral or invasive Candida infections, patients supported with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), or immunocompromised hemato-oncology patients. Eight studies described fluconazole PK in a one-compartment model [20-27], of which two studies included first-order absorption in the pharmacokinetic model [20, 21]. One study described fluconazole data best with a two-compartment model and first-order absorption [28]. The pharmacokinetic models and tested covariates are summarized in Table 5.
Table 4

Population pharmacokinetic estimates of fluconazole

PopulationDoseFormulationWeightNSD, FD, or MDPharmacokinetic parametersReferences
AUCT1/2CLV1QV2KaF
Preterm neonates at risk for invasive candidiasis with a median PNA of 3 days3 mg/kg with a dose interval of 72 hIV and PO (orogastric tube)Median (range)75MDNRNR0.0197 × (WT/1.00)0.746 × (eGFR/25.0)0.4631.04 × (WT/1.00)aNRNREstimate (RSE%)Estimate (RSE%)[20]
1.1 kg (0.9–1.3)0.538 1/h (18.5)0.909 (7.03)
Preterm neonates < 750 g with a median PNA of 23 days6 mg/kg twice weeklyIV and PO (suspension)Median (range)c141MDNRNR0.0127 × (SCR/0.8)0.41 × (PMA/28)2.05b1.00bNRNRPoint estimate (SEE)Point estimate (SEE)[21]
0.71 kg0.96 1/h (0.25)1.00 (0.065)
(0.35–2.7)
Preterm and term neonates and infants with suspected or proven candidiasis and a 23- to 40–week gestation and a mean PNA of 13.5 days < 30 weeks CGA: loading dose 25 mg/kg, maintenance dose 12 mg/kgIVMedian (range) c18MDMedian (95% CI)Median (95% CI)Median (95% CI)Median (95% CI)NRNRNRNR[22]
 ≥ 30 weeks CGA: loading dose 25 mg/kg, maintenance dose 20 mg/kg

1.26 kg

(0.750–4.255)

490.9 mg*h/L (406.2–571.9)

AUC0–24, day 1

40.9 h (16.2–78.4)0.015 L/h/kg (0.008–0.039)0.913 L/kg (0.913–0.913)
898.2 mg*h/L (503.4–1445.7)
AUC0–24, SS
Neonates and infants with oral candidiasis or at risk for invasive fungal disease aged between 9 days and 4.4 months3 mg/kgIVMean (SEM)14SDMean (SEM)cMean (STDV)Mean (SEM)cMean (SEM)NRNRNR[27]
4.1 kg (0.2)90.2 mg*h/L (9.0)22.5 h (2.2)0.0378 L/h/kg (0.0036)1.17 L/kg (0.14)
AUCinf
Preterm and term infants at risk for invasive candidiasis with a 23- to 42-week gestation and aged < 120 daysDosing range 3–12 mg/kg/doseIVMedian (range)c55MDNRNR0.015 × (WT/1.00)0.75 × (BGA/26)1.739 × (PNA/2)0.237 × (SCR/1)(−4.896)(CR)d1.024 × (WT/1.00)1NRNRNRNR[23]
1.020 kg
(0.451–7.125)
Hospitalized neonates and infants at risk for invasive fungal disease and a median gestation age of 37 weeks aged < 60 daysLoading dose (25 mg/kg IV), followed by maintenance therapy (12 mg/kg daily)IVNR8MDMedian (IQR)Median (IQR)Median (IQR)cMedian (IQR)cNRNRNRNR[24]
479 mg*h/L (347–496)56 h (26–80)0.016 L/h/kg (0.013–0.021)1.051 L/kg (0.858–1.461)
AUC0–24
Infants supported with ECMO, with a 23- to 41-week gestation and aged < 120 daysIV prophylaxis: 25 mg/kg once a weekIVMedian (IQR)10FDMedian (IQR)Median (IQR)Median (IQR)c,fMedian (IQR)fNRNRNRNR[25]
Followed by IV treatment: 12 mg/kg daily in patients with suspected or known fungal diseaseg3.2 kg (2.6–3.4)

322 mg*h/L (307–343)

AUC0–24

60 h (47–76)0.017 L/h/kg (0.014–0.022)1.5 L/kg (1.3–1.7)
MDMedian (IQR)Median (IQR)Median (IQR)cfMedian (IQR)fNRNRNRNR
352 mg*h/L (344–399)56 h (37–92)0.022 L/h/kg (0.011–0.033)1.9 L/kg (1.4–2.2)
AUC0–24
See references [23-25]. From study [24] only patients with a GA of ≥ 36 weeks were includedSee references [23-25]IVMedian (range)40FD and MDNRNR0.019 × WT × (SCR/0.4)−0.290.93 × WT × 1.4ECMOeNRNRNRNR[26]
3.4 kg (1.9–77)(21 with ECMO)g
Immunocompromised hemato-oncology patients aged 1.8–15.9 yearsSD: 6 mg/kg IVIV and PO (tablets)Mean (STDV)10SD and MDNRMean (STDV)Mean (STDV)cMean (STDV)NRNRMean (STDV)Mean (STDV)[28]
Followed by31.6 kg (25.9)15.63 h (3.21)0.0380 L/h/kg (0.0112)0.562 L/kg (0.106)3.76 1/h (4.88)0.92 (0.09)
MD: 3 mg/kg POVd
Mean (STDV)
0.770 L/kg (0.125)
Vd,SS

AUC area under the curve, CGA corrected gestational age, CI confidence interval, CL clearance, ECMO extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, F bioavailability, FD first dose, h hours, IV intravenous, K rate of oral bioavailability, MD multiple dose, N total patients, NR not reported, PNA postnatal age, PO ‘per os’ (oral administration), Q intercompartmental clearance, RSE relative standard error, SCR serum creatinine, SD single dose, SEE standard error of estimate, t elimination half-life, V1 volume of distribution in the central compartment, V2 volume of distribution of the peripheral compartment, V volume of distribution, V volume of distribution at steady state, WT weight

aFixed or estimated value of exponent used for allometric scaling of volume of distribution was not reported

bUnclear how WT was standardized in this equation

cValues recalculated/adjusted from original paper to create uniformity of units

dWT normalized to 1 kg/week (1 week) and CR (creatinine value) = 1 if SCRT > 1 mg/dL, CR = 0 if SCRT ≤ 1 mg/dL

eECMO = 1 or 0

fOnly one patient received fluconazole treatment

gNumber of ECMO patients reported in this pooled study does not add up with the number of ECMO patients in the individual studies

Table 5

Pharmacokinetic models of fluconazole

PopulationSubjects, NSamples, NProgramCovariates testedCompartmentsPO/IVCovariates in final modelReferences
CLV1QV2T1/2
Preterm neonates at risk for invasive candidiasis with a median PNA of 3 days75303NONMEMWT, HT, eGFR, SCR, GA, PMA, PNA, ALT, AST, BUN1, with first-order absorptionIV and POeGFR with estimated exponent, allometrically scaled WT with estimated exponent. Both normalized to a standard individualAllometrically scaled WT with fixed exponent, normalized to a standard individualNRNRNR[20]
Preterm neonates < 750 g at risk for invasive candidiasis with a median PNA of 23 days141604NONMEMWT, PNA, GA, PMA SCR, ALB, race, ethnicity, intubation status, mode of delivery (Cesarean section or vaginal)1, with first-order absorptionIV and POAllometrically scaled WT with a fixed exponent of 0.75, SCR, PMA (as function of GA and PNA). All normalized to a standard individualAllometrically scaled WT with a fixed exponent of 1 and normalized to a standard individualNRNRNR[21]
Preterm and term neonates and infants with suspected or proven candidiasis and a 23- to 40-week gestation and a mean PNA range 13.5 days1882NONMEMWT, PMA1IVWTaNRNRNRNR[22]
Neonates and infants with oral candidiasis or at risk for invasive fungal disease aged between 9 days and 4.4 months14NRTOPFITAge1IVNRAgeNRNRAge[27]
Preterm and term infants at risk for invasive candidiasis with a 23- to 42-week gestation and aged < 120 days55357NONMEMWT, BGA, PNA, PMA (defined as BGA plus PNA in weeks), and SCR1IVAllometrically scaled WT with a fixed exponent of 0.75, BGA, PNA, and SCR. All normalized to a standard individualAllometrically scaled weight with a fixed exponent of 1 and normalized to a standard individualNRNRNR[23]
Hospitalized neonates and infants at risk for invasive fungal disease and a median gestation age of 37 weeks aged < 60 days857WinNonLinSCR (linear regression analysis)1IVSCRNRNRNRNR[24]
Infants supported with ECMO, with a 23- to 41-week gestation and aged < 120 days10

62 First dose

47 Multiple dose

WinNonLinSCR, ECMO (linear regression analysis)1IVSCRECMONRNRNR[25]
See references [2325]. From study [24] only patients with a GA of ≥ 36 weeks were included40 of which 21 with ECMO360NONMEMWT, ECMO support, volume of blood required to prime the ECMO circuit, ratio of blood prime volume to the estimated native blood volume of the child, hemofiltration, use of CVVHD, SCR, ALB, AST, ALT, PNA, sex, race1IVExponent for creatinine, WTCoefficient for ECMO, WTNRNRNR[26]
Immunocompromised hemato-oncology patients aged 1.8–15.9 years10NRNONMEMAge, WT, HT, BSA, creatinine clearance (linear regression analysis)2, with first-order absorptionIV and POBSAWTbNRNRNR[28]

ALB albumin, ALT alanine aminotransferase, AST aspartate aminotransferase, BGA gestational age at birth, BSA body surface area, BUN blood urea nitrogen level, CL clearance, CVVHD continuous venovenous hemodialysis, ECMO extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, eGFR estimated glomerular filtration rate, GA gestational age, HT height, IV intravenously, MD multiple dose, N total, PMA postmenstrual age, PNA postnatal age, PO ‘per os’, Q intercompartmental clearance, SCR serum creatinine, SD single dose, V1 volume of distribution in the central compartment, V2 volume of distribution in the peripheral compartment, WT weight

aWT is included as covariate on fluconazole CL; however, the covariate equation was not reported

bVdss was best correlated with BSA

Population pharmacokinetic estimates of fluconazole 1.26 kg (0.750–4.255) 490.9 mg*h/L (406.2–571.9) AUC0–24, day 1 322 mg*h/L (307–343) AUC0–24 AUC area under the curve, CGA corrected gestational age, CI confidence interval, CL clearance, ECMO extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, F bioavailability, FD first dose, h hours, IV intravenous, K rate of oral bioavailability, MD multiple dose, N total patients, NR not reported, PNA postnatal age, PO ‘per os’ (oral administration), Q intercompartmental clearance, RSE relative standard error, SCR serum creatinine, SD single dose, SEE standard error of estimate, t elimination half-life, V1 volume of distribution in the central compartment, V2 volume of distribution of the peripheral compartment, V volume of distribution, V volume of distribution at steady state, WT weight aFixed or estimated value of exponent used for allometric scaling of volume of distribution was not reported bUnclear how WT was standardized in this equation cValues recalculated/adjusted from original paper to create uniformity of units dWT normalized to 1 kg/week (1 week) and CR (creatinine value) = 1 if SCRT > 1 mg/dL, CR = 0 if SCRT ≤ 1 mg/dL eECMO = 1 or 0 fOnly one patient received fluconazole treatment gNumber of ECMO patients reported in this pooled study does not add up with the number of ECMO patients in the individual studies Pharmacokinetic models of fluconazole 62 First dose 47 Multiple dose ALB albumin, ALT alanine aminotransferase, AST aspartate aminotransferase, BGA gestational age at birth, BSA body surface area, BUN blood urea nitrogen level, CL clearance, CVVHD continuous venovenous hemodialysis, ECMO extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, eGFR estimated glomerular filtration rate, GA gestational age, HT height, IV intravenously, MD multiple dose, N total, PMA postmenstrual age, PNA postnatal age, PO ‘per os’, Q intercompartmental clearance, SCR serum creatinine, SD single dose, V1 volume of distribution in the central compartment, V2 volume of distribution in the peripheral compartment, WT weight aWT is included as covariate on fluconazole CL; however, the covariate equation was not reported bVdss was best correlated with BSA Overall, population pharmacokinetic studies showed that the relative F from 90.9 to 100% [20, 21, 28] in neonates, infants, and children was excellent, and was comparable to a F of >90% in adults [4]. The rate of oral bioavailability (Ka) was from 0.538 to 3.76 h-1 [20, 21, 28]. It is difficult to compare values of Vd and CL between fluconazole population pharmacokinetic studies directly, as a variety of covariates were included on Vd and CL. Allometrically scaled bodyweight with fixed [20, 21, 23] and/or estimated [20] exponents was added on either Vd [20, 21, 23] and/or CL [20, 21, 23]. Age (inversely related) [27], ECMO [25], a coefficient for ECMO [26] and/or linearly scaled bodyweight [26, 28] were included as covariates on Vd. Covariates as linearly scaled bodyweight [26], body surface area [28], serum creatinine [24, 25], and exponents for estimated glomerular filtration (estimated) [20], serum creatinine [21, 23, 26], postmenstrual age (PMA) as a function of gestational age (GA) and postnatal age (PNA), [21] gestational age at birth (BGA) [23] and/or PNA [23], were included on CL. Serum creatinine was inversely related to CL [21, 23–26]. In one study, it was not clear if postmenstrual age was included as a covariate on fluconazole CL in the final model [22]. Another study reported that bodyweight influenced fluconazole CL but did not report the covariate equation [22]. Three studies used a linear regression analysis to test covariates [24, 25, 28]. One study concluded that fluconazole CL in premature neonates was low at birth and doubled within the first month after birth, but did not report on changes in fluconazole Vd [23]. This conclusion is slightly different from a previous NCA report, which reported a more than two-fold increase in CL during the first 2 weeks of life. Another study included both ECMO and non-ECMO patients and reported a significantly higher Vd but similar CL in pediatric ECMO patients compared with non-ECMO patients [26]. This higher Vd is likely due to the hydrophilic nature of fluconazole and the large circulating volume of ECMO procedures [29]. These population pharmacokinetic results point toward the need for an adequate loading dose of fluconazole in pediatric ECMO patients.

Physiologically Based PK of Fluconazole

Two studies have obtained interesting pharmacokinetic information with physiologically based pharmacokinetic models and assessed fluconazole dosing by predicting either cerebrospinal fluid exposure or the influence of ECMO [30, 31]. Data from plasma samples of 166 infants (< 750 g) with a median PNA of 21 days (range 3–93 days) and cerebrospinal fluid samples of 22 infants with a median PNA of 28 days (range 24–33 days) showed fluconazole exposure in the central nervous system, with a central nervous system-to-plasma ratio of ~ 1 [30]. In the second study, the edema disease state of ECMO patients was added to the model and the authors suggested that edema contributes to lower fluconazole exposure [31]

Summary of Findings and Recommendations

Pharmacokinetic data of fluconazole in neonates and infants are abundant, and pharmacokinetic data of fluconazole in children and adolescents are scarce. Research topics should include the F of all different oral fluconazole formulations and full pharmacokinetic investigations in children and adolescents. Special patient populations such as critically ill pediatric patients with renal impairment or other renal replacement therapy and solid organ transplant recipients should be further investigated. Additionally, the influence of the disease state of patients, such as excess fluid retention, on fluconazole PK might be interesting to further explore. The relative F of fluconazole in pediatric patients is comparable to the F described in adults, which suggests that different formulations of fluconazole are interchangeable in pediatric patients. Most of these studies included the suspension as oral formulation, data on F of other oral formulations are very limited in pediatric patients. Non-compartmental analyses report a higher Vd in preterm neonates compared with children and adults. These results suggest that adequate loading doses are needed. In preterm neonates, the fluconazole CL increases during the first 2 weeks after birth. The CL after 2 weeks of birth is comparable to CL in children but higher as compared to CL in adults. These results imply that higher maintenance doses or shorter dosing intervals are needed in preterm neonates and children. Non-compartmental analyses in pediatric PD patients report a significantly increased elimination half-life for fluconazole and these data suggest a lower maintenance dose or a longer dosing interval in this pediatric population. Population PK studies report that allometrically scaled bodyweight and ECMO are significant covariates on Vd.. As a consequence, pediatric patients receiving ECMO might need higher loading doses. Allometrically scaled bodyweight, serum creatinine (inversely related), and either PMA (as a function of GA and PNA), or GA and PNA are significant covariates on CL. Dose adjustments based on serum creatinine, GA, and PNA might be taken into account to optimize fluconazole use. A standardized method to report both allometric scaling and maturation would be useful to compare pharmacokinetic results from different studies and populations. Dose recommendations for fluconazole are inconsistent between the labels and the ESCMID and Infectious Diseases Society of America guidelines. As outlined previously by others [22], agreement between labels and international guidelines is necessary for clinical practice. Currently, there is no possibility to translate expert consensus from guidelines to an updated product information sheet. A reference in the summary of product characteristics to relevant guidelines would be an option to cover this. However, the legal background to make it possible for authorities and the pharmaceutical industry to request and update their product information will be tremendously challenging.

Itraconazole

Itraconazole was approved for adult patients in 1992 by the FDA [6] and itraconazole has been licensed in individual European member states. The oral capsules and oral solution are widely available in contrast to the intravenous formulations [32]. Itraconazole is not approved in pediatric patients aged < 18 years [6, 33]. However, the pediatric ESCMID-ECMM guideline for invasive aspergillosis and the pediatric ESCMID guideline for invasive candidiasis recommend a dose of 2.5 mg/kg twice daily of the oral solution for the purpose of mold and yeast active prophylaxis in children aged 2–18 years [1, 2]. For treatment of a proven or probable invasive aspergillosis, itraconazole is recommended in a loading dose of 5 mg/kg twice daily of the oral solution on day 1, followed by 2.5 mg/kg twice daily in patients aged 2–18 years [1]. In adults, itraconazole has a variable F with an absolute oral F of the oral solution of 55% [6]. The F of the oral solution is ~ 30% higher compared with the oral capsules [34]. Because of the variable F between formulations, these are not interchangeable. Food intake and pH fluctuation influence the itraconazole uptake, therefore the oral capsules are advised to be administered in a fed state and the oral solution in a fasted state [35]. The Vd of itraconazole is > 700 L [6]. Itraconazole penetrates into a variety of body tissues, including the lung, kidney, liver, bone, stomach, spleen, muscle, keratinous tissue, and skin but does not penetrate well into the cerebrospinal fluid [36-38]. Itraconazole has an active metabolite hydroxy-itraconazole with comparable in vitro activity to the parent compound. Both itraconazole (99.8%) and hydroxy-itraconazole (99.6%) are highly bound to plasma proteins. Itraconazole is mainly metabolized via CYP3A4 (Table 1). Renal elimination of both itraconazole and hydroxy-itraconazole is < 1%. The inactive metabolites of itraconazole are excreted in the urine (35%) and feces (54%). Mean CL of itraconazole in adults is 16.68 L/h [6].

Non-Compartmental Analysis of Itraconazole PK in Pediatric Patients

To our knowledge, there are no NCA reports of itraconazole PK described in neonates. Six studies performed NCA of itraconazole in infants, children, and adolescents aged 0.5–17 years at risk of mucosal fungal infection or IFD. A detailed overview of the dosing regimens and itraconazole pharmacokinetic results is given in Table 6. Patients with hematological and non-hematological malignancies, liver transplantation, respiratory tract infections, HIV, cystic fibrosis (CF), other infections/diseases, or undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) were included in these studies. Itraconazole was administered in different oral and intravenous dosing regimens for prophylaxis and/or treatment. Dosages of itraconazole were from 2.5 to 5 mg/kg once or twice daily, with or without a loading dose of 5 mg/kg twice daily [39-44].
Table 6

Non-compartmental analyses of itraconazole

PopulationDoseFormulationWeightNSD, FD, or MDPharmacokinetic parametersReferences
CmaxCTmaxAUCT1/2CLVd
Children at risk for IFD aged 0.5–17 years2.5 mg/kgIVMean(STDV)33SDITZaNRNRITZaITZITZaITZa[39]
31.1 kg (22.7)Mean (STDV)Mean (STDV)Mean (STDV)Mean (STDV)Mean (STDV)
0.5–2 years0.827 mg/L (0.859)2.121 mg*h/L (1.231)13.3 h (4.15)1.143 L/h/kg (0.513)23.6 L/kg (15.2)
 > 2–6 years1.553 mg/L (0.918)9.510 mg*h/L (11.316)14.0 h (8.05)0.529 L/h/kg (0.611)8.3 L/kg (7.1)
 > 6–12 years0.785 mg/L (0.301)3.765 mg*h/L (1.711)17.2 h (7.94)0.621 L/h/kg (0.340)13.9 L/kg (5.8)
 > 12–16 years0.806 mg/L (0.381)2.669 mg*h/L (1.076)29.0 h (15.6)0.777 L/h/kg (0.455)28.5 L/kg (15.9)
Overall1.015 mg/L (0.692)4.922 mg*h/L (6.784)20.2 h(12.8)0.703 L/h/kg (0.499)18.5 L/kg (14.2)
CmaxAUC0–24
H-ITZaNRNRH-ITZaH-ITZNRNR
Mean (STDV)Mean (STDV)Mean (STDV)
0.5–2 years0.265 mg/L (0.257)4.155 mg*h/L (3.657)16.6 h (3.07)
 > 2–6 years0.299 mg/L (0.162)4.249 mg*h/L (4.103)12.7 h (7.40)
 > 6–12 years0.277 mg/L (0.104)4.166 mg*h/L (2.036)14.3 h (6.76)
 > 12–16 years0.321 mg/L (0.093)3.133 mg*h/L (1.789)12.3 h (8.06)
Overall0.293 mg/L (0.133)3.811 mg*h/L (2.794)13.3 h (7.0)
CmaxAUC0–24
HSCT patients aged 0.9–23 years, for PK part patients aged 9.4–14.8 yearsProphylaxis: 2.5 mg/kg every 12 h for 2 daysProphylaxis: PO (solution)Meanb6MD (after third IV dose)ITZaNRNRITZaITZITZaITZa[40]
29 kgMean (STDV)Mean (STDV)Mean (STDV)Mean (STDV)Mean (STDV)
Followed by treatment with 5 mg/kg every 12 h for 2 days, and a maintenance dose of 5 mg/kg dailyTreatment: IV

4.429 mg/L (1.072)

Cmax,SS

42.837 mg*h/L (24.746)

AUC0–24,SS

39.5 h (33.5)

0.1313 L/h/kg (0.05652)

CLSS

6.959 L/kg (6.897)

VSS

H-ITZaNRH-ITZH-ITZaH-ITZH-ITZaH-ITZa
Mean (STDV)Median(range)Mean (STDV)Mean (STDV)Mean (STDV)Mean (STDV)
3.778 mg/L (0.722)4 h (1.0–7.6)63.094 mg*h/L (19.255)51.0 h(17.9)0.07969 L/h/kg (0.02662)5.659 L/kg (2.341)
Cmax,SSAUC0–24 SSCLSSVSS
CF patients aged < 16 years2.5 mg/kg every 12 h for 14 daysPO (solution)Median(range)5FDITZaNRNRITZaNRNRNR[41]
16.6 kg/m2Day 1Mean (STDV)Mean (STDV)
(15–19.7)0.133 mg/L (0.135)0.433 mg*h/L (0.358)
BMICmaxAUC0–12
H-ITZaNRNRH-ITZaNRNRNR
Mean (STDV)Mean (STDV)
0.230 mg/mL (0.141)1.168 mg*h/L (0.707)
CmaxAUC0–12
MDITZaITZaNRITZaNRNRNR
Day 14Mean (STDV)Mean (STDV)Mean (STDV)
0.404 mg/mL (0.268)0.119 mg/L (0.0834)2.298 mg*h/LL (1.322)
CmaxCminAUC0–12
Mean (STDV)
0.191 mg/L (0.110)
Css,av
H-ITZaH-ITZaNRH-ITZaNRNRNR
Mean (STDV)Mean (STDV)Mean (STDV)
0.550 mg/mL (0.240)0.276 mg/L (0.161)4.792 mg*h/L (2.594)
CmaxCminAUC0–12
Mean (STDV)
0.400 ng/mL (0.216)
Css,av
Infants and children aged 0.5–12 years with hematological malignancy or liver transplantation with mucosal fungal infection or at risk for IFD5 mg/kg of body weight once daily for 2 weeksPO (oral solution)Mean(STDV)26FDITZaNRNRITZaNRNRNR[42]
16.9 kg (1.7)Day 1Mean (STDV)NRMean (STDV)
0.5–2 years0.138 mg/L (0.091)1.340 mg*h/L (0.780)
2–5 years0.314 mg/L (0.105)2.740 mg*h/L (1.080)
5–12 years0.298 mg/L (0.292)2.010 mg*h/L (1.580)
CmaxAUC0–24
H-ITZaNRNRH-ITZaNRNRNR
Mean (STDV)Mean (STDV)
0.5–2 years0.179 mg/L (0.101)2.340 mg*h/L (1.490)
2–5 years0.493 mg/L (0.106)6.730 mg*h/L (1.950)
5–12 years0.447 mg/L (0.365)4.920 mg*h/L (4.390)
CmaxAUC0–24
MDITZaITZaNRITZaITZNRNR
Day 14Mean (STDV)Mean (STDV)Mean (STDV)Mean (STDV)
0.5–2 years0.571 mg/L (0.416)0.159 ng/mL (0.218)6.930 mg*h/L (5.830)47.4 h (55.0)
2–5 years0.534 mg/L (0.431)0.179 ng/mL (0.101)7.330 mg*h/L (5.420)30.6 h (25.3)
5–12 years0.631 mg/L (0.358)0.223 ng/mL (0.145)8.770 mg*h/L (5.050)28.3 h (9.6)
Cmaxpre-dose concentrationAUC0–24T1/2term
H-ITZaH-ITZaH-ITZaH-ITZNRNR
Mean (STDV)Mean (STDV)Mean (STDV)Mean (STDV)
0.5–2 years0.690 mg/L (0.445)0.308 mg/L (0.436)13.200 mg*h/L (11.400)18.0 h (18.1)
2–5 years0.687 mg/L (0.419)0.487 mg/L (0.314)13.400 mg*h/L (9.110)17.1 h (14.5)
5–12 years0.699 mg/L (0.234)0.437 mg/L (0.246)13.450 mg*h/L (7.190)17.9 h (8.7)
Cmaxpre-dose concentrationAUC0–24T1/2term
Cancer patients at risk for IFD aged 2–12 years2.5 mg/kg PO every 12 hPO (oral solution)NR17MDITZaITZaITZITZaNRNRNR[43]
Mean (STDV)Mean (STDV)Mean (STDV)Mean (STDV)
2–5 years0.599 mg/mL (0.231)0.439 mg/L (0.255)13 days (4)16.128 mg*h/L (3.12)
6–12 years1.090 mg/L (0.383)0.674 mg/L (0.285)12 days (6)20.496 mg*h/L (7.25)
Cmax 4 h, day 7Cmin 12 h, day 7TCssAUCmin/d
ITZaITZa
Mean (STDV)Mean (STDV)
2–5 years1.024 mg/L (0.351)0.711 mg/L (0.251)
6–12 years1.524 mg/L (0.770)1.072 mg/L (0.408)
Cmax 4 h, day 15Cmin 12 h, day 15
ITZa
2–5 yearsMean (STDV)
0.877 mg/L (0.248)
6–12 years1.085 mg/L (0.329)
Cssmin
MDH-ITZaH-TZaH-ITZH-ITZaNRNRNR
Mean (STDV)Mean (STDV)Mean (STDV)Mean (STDV)
2–5 years1.008 mg/L (0.341)0.915 mg/L (0.396)14 days (8)28.488 mg*h/L (5.59)
6–12 years1.658 mg/L (0.426)1.427 mg/L (0.449)11 days (5)36.840 mg*h/L (10.1)
Cmax 4 h, day 7Cmin 12 h, day 7TCssAUCmin/d
H-ITZaH-ITZa
2–5 yearsMean (STDV)Mean (STDV)
1.358 mg/L (0.373)1.275 mg/L (0.322)
6–12 years2.180 mg/L (0.753)1.964 mg/L (0.562)
Cmax 4 h, day 15Cmin 12 h, day 7
H-ITZa
2–5 yearsMean(STDV)
1.536 mg/L (0.334)
6–12 years1.919 mg/L (0.535)
Cssmin
HIV-infected patients aged 5–18 years with oropharyngeal candidiasis2.5 mg/kg every 12 or 24 hPO(oral solution)NR26FDITZaNRITZITZaITZITZITZ[44]
Mean (STDV)Mean (STDV)Mean (STDV)Mean (STDV)Mean (STDV)Mean (STDV)
0.420 mg/L (0.06)2.35 h (0.37)3.720 mg*h/L (0.65)25.6 h (5.7)0.660 L/h/kg (0.17)18.90 L/kg (5.3)
CmaxTmaxAUC0–24T1/2Vd,ss
H-ITZaNRH-ITZH-ITZaH-ITZH-ITZNR
Mean (STDV)Mean(STDV)Mean (STDV)Mean (STDV)Mean (STDV)
0.319 mg/L (0.04)7.14 h (1.69)5.240 mg*h/L (0.81)26.8 h (4.0)0.339 L/h/kg (0.05)
CmaxTmaxAUC0–24T1/2
MDITZaITZaITZITZaITZITZITZ
Mean (STDV)Mean (STDV)Mean(STDV)Mean (STDV)Mean (STDV)Mean (STDV)Mean (STDV)
QD0.623 mg/L (0.14)0.192 mg/L (0.06)1.9 h (0.3)7.05 mg*h/L (2.06)58.9 h (13.1)0.601 L/h/kg (0.26)15.52 L/kg (4.47)
CmaxCminAUC0–tauT1/2Vd,ss
7.05 mg*h/L (2.06)
AUC0–24
BIDMean (STDV)Mean (STDV)Mean(STDV)Mean (STDV)Mean (STDV)Mean (STDV)Mean (STDV)
1.340 mg/L (0.22)0.782 mg/L (0.19)1.8 h (0.3)11.52 mg*h/L (2.19)104.2 h (28.3)0.073 L/h/kg (0.029)5.11 L/kg (1.28)
CmaxCminTmaxAUC0–tauT1/2Vd,ss
23.04 mg*h/L (4.39)
AUC0–24
MDH-ITZaH-ITZaH-ITZH-ITZaH-ITZH-ITZNR
Mean (STDV)Mean (STDV)Mean(STDV)Mean (STDV)Mean (STDV)Mean (STDV)
QD0.552 mg/L (0.08)0.383 mg/L (0.10)5.9 h (1.5)11.18 mg*h/L (2.82)55.6 h (21.3)0.160 L/h/kg (0.05)
CmaxCminAUC0–tauT1/2
11.18 mg*h/L (2.82)
AUC0–24
BIDMean (STDV)Mean (STDV)Mean(STDV)Mean (STDV)
1.170 mg/L (0.18)0.997 mg/L (0.15)14.7 h (6.9)Mean (STDV)Mean (STDV)0.047 L/h/kg (0.01)
CmaxCminTmax11.89 mg*h/L (2.06)168.8 h (81.3)
AUC0–tauT1/2
23.75 mg*h/L (4.11)
AUC0–24

AUC area under the curve, AUC AUCmin standardized to a day, BID twice daily, C average serum concentration, CL clearance, C maximum serum concentration, C minimal serum concentration, C average steady-state plasma concentration, F bioavailability, FD first dose, h hours, H-ITZ hydroxy-itraconazole, HIV human immunodeficiency virus, HSCT hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, IFD invasive fungal disease, IQR interquartile range, ITZ itraconazole, IV intravenous, MD multiple dose, N total patients, NR not reported, PO ‘per os’ (oral administration), PK pharmacokinetic, QD once daily, SD single dose, SS steady state, STDV standard deviation, T elimination half-life, T time to reach Css,min, T time to reach Cmax, V volume of distribution

aValues recalculated/adjusted from the original paper to create uniformity of units

bError not mentioned

Non-compartmental analyses of itraconazole 4.429 mg/L (1.072) Cmax,SS 42.837 mg*h/L (24.746) AUC0–24,SS 0.1313 L/h/kg (0.05652) CLSS 6.959 L/kg (6.897) VSS AUC area under the curve, AUC AUCmin standardized to a day, BID twice daily, C average serum concentration, CL clearance, C maximum serum concentration, C minimal serum concentration, C average steady-state plasma concentration, F bioavailability, FD first dose, h hours, H-ITZ hydroxy-itraconazole, HIV human immunodeficiency virus, HSCT hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, IFD invasive fungal disease, IQR interquartile range, ITZ itraconazole, IV intravenous, MD multiple dose, N total patients, NR not reported, PO ‘per os’ (oral administration), PK pharmacokinetic, QD once daily, SD single dose, SS steady state, STDV standard deviation, T elimination half-life, T time to reach Css,min, T time to reach Cmax, V volume of distribution aValues recalculated/adjusted from the original paper to create uniformity of units bError not mentioned In five studies, itraconazole was administered as an oral solution [40-44], of which one study also included the intravenous formulation but the authors did not report the F of itraconazole [40]. Three studies stratified pharmacokinetic results of itraconazole by age [39, 42, 43]. A single dose of 2.5 mg/kg or multiple dosing regimens of 5 mg/kg once daily or 2.5 mg/kg twice daily have been investigated in patients aged 0.5–2 years, 2–5 years, and/or > 5 years [39, 42, 43]. Exposures differ widely between groups and studies. Both CL and Vd appear to change strongly within these groups. Interestingly, administration of a 2.5-mg/kg twice-daily regimen resulted in much higher itraconazole and hydroxy-itraconazole exposures compared with a 5-mg/kg once-daily regimen of itraconazole [42-44]. This is possibly owing to saturable absorption. One study in patients undergoing HSCT reported a considerably higher exposure compared with other studies, which is most likely explained by including a loading dose for itraconazole (5 mg/kg twice daily on day 1, followed by 5 mg/kg once daily) and pharmacokinetic sampling after the third administered dose [40]. Special pediatric populations, such as patients with HIV, showed comparable exposures of itraconazole and hydroxy-itraconazole to other populations, while patients with CF showed a considerably lower exposure after 2.5 mg/kg of itraconazole twice daily compared with other pediatric populations [41, 44]. Higher dosages than 2.5 mg/kg twice daily might be needed in pediatric patients with CF.

Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Itraconazole in Pediatric Patients

Two population pharmacokinetic studies in pediatric patients have been published [39, 45]. A detailed description of the dosing regimens and itraconazole pharmacokinetic results is given in Table 7. The pharmacokinetic models and covariates tested are summarized in Table 8.
Table 7

Population pharmacokinetic estimates of itraconazole

PopulationDoseFormulationWeightNSD, FD, or MDPharmacokinetic parametersReferences
AUCT1/2TlagCLV1Q1V2Q2V3KaF
Children at risk for IFD aged 6 months to 17 years2.5 mg/kgIVMean (STDV)33SDNRNRNRITZa,dITZa,dITZa,dITZa,dITZa,dITZa,dNRNR[39]
31.1 kg (22.7)Estimated valueEstimated valueEstimated valueEstimated valueEstimated valueEstimated value
16.9 L/h63.8 L30.2 L/h134 L9.57 L/h88.1 L
Pediatric patients with CF and BMT patients aged 0.4–18 years (including 5 adults aged 19–30 years)Median (range)PO (capsule/solution)Median (range)49 (including 5 adults)MDNRNRMean (RSE%)ITZbITZbNRNRNRNRMean (RSE%)Mean (RSE%)[45]
5.4 mg/kg (1.5–12.5)29.3 kg19.1 min (3.3)Mean (RSE%)Mean (RSE%)0.09 1/h (21.7)0.55 (12.7)
daily dose(6.8–83.5)35.5 L/h (13.8)627.0 L (27.3)CapsuleFrelativec
Mean (RSE%)
0.96 1/h (67.4)
H-ITZH-ITZNRNRNRNRSolution
Mean (RSE%)Mean (RSE%)
10.6 L/h (14.1)5.29 L (4.1)

AUC area under the curve, BMT bone marrow transplantation, CF cystic fibrosis, CL clearance, F bioavailability, FD first dose, H-ITZ hydroxy-itraconazole, IFD invasive fungal disease, ITZ itraconazole, K rate of oral bioavailability, MD multiple dose, N number of patients, NR not reported, Q1 intercompartmental clearance (compartments 1–2), Q2 intercompartmental clearance (compartments 1–3), RSE relative standard error, SD single dose, STDV standard deviation, T elimination half-life, T lag time, V1 volume of distribution (central compartment 1), V2 volume of distribution (peripheral compartment 2), V3 volume of distribution (peripheral compartment 3)

aValues scaled to a body weight of 30 kg

bValues scaled to a body weight of 70 kg

cRelative bioavailability of capsules compared to solution

dError was not reported

Table 8

Pharmacokinetic models of itraconazole

PopulationSubjects, NSamples, NProgramCovariates testedCompartmentsPO/IVCovariates in final modelReferences
CLV1Q1V2Q2V3FKa
Children at risk for IFD aged 6 months to 16 years33NRNONMEMWT3, with first-order eliminationIVWT normalized to 30 kgWT normalized to 30 kgWT normalized to 30 kgWT normalized to 30 kgWT normalized to 30 kgWT normalized to 30 kgNRNR[39]a
Pediatric patients with CF and BMT aged 0.4–18 years (including 5 adults aged 19–30 years)49 (29 CF of which 5 adults and 20 BMT)227NONMEMTotal WT, lean WT, age, disease, and effect of acidic beverage and food intake, sex, disease category1-compartment with first-order absorption for ITZ and first-order elimination to H-ITZ and a 1-compartment with first-order elimination pathway for H-ITZPO (capsules and solution)

ITZ

Allometrically scaled WT normalized to 70 kgb

ITZ

Allometrically scaled WT normalized to 70 kgb

ITZ

NR

ITZ

NR

ITZ

NR

ITZ

NR

ITZ

NR

ITZ

NR

[45]

H-ITZ

NR

H-ITZ

NR

H-ITZ

NR

H-ITZ

NR

H-ITZ

NR

H-ITZ

NR

H-ITZ

NR

H-ITZ

NR

BMT bone marrow transplantation, CF cystic fibrosis, CL clearance, F bioavailability, H-ITZ hydroxy-itraconazole, IFD invasive fungal disease, ITZ itraconazole, K rate of oral bioavailability, N number of patients, NR not reported, Q1 intercompartmental clearance (compartments 1–2), Q2 intercompartmental clearance (compartments 1–3) ; STDV standard deviation, V1 volume of distribution (central compartment 1), V2 volume of distribution (peripheral compartment 2), V3 volume of distribution (peripheral compartment 3), WT bodyweight

aWT is included as covariate on itraconazole parameters, however the covariate equation was not reported

bValues of exponents used for allometric scaling are not reported

Population pharmacokinetic estimates of itraconazole AUC area under the curve, BMT bone marrow transplantation, CF cystic fibrosis, CL clearance, F bioavailability, FD first dose, H-ITZ hydroxy-itraconazole, IFD invasive fungal disease, ITZ itraconazole, K rate of oral bioavailability, MD multiple dose, N number of patients, NR not reported, Q1 intercompartmental clearance (compartments 1–2), Q2 intercompartmental clearance (compartments 1–3), RSE relative standard error, SD single dose, STDV standard deviation, T elimination half-life, T lag time, V1 volume of distribution (central compartment 1), V2 volume of distribution (peripheral compartment 2), V3 volume of distribution (peripheral compartment 3) aValues scaled to a body weight of 30 kg bValues scaled to a body weight of 70 kg cRelative bioavailability of capsules compared to solution dError was not reported Pharmacokinetic models of itraconazole ITZ Allometrically scaled WT normalized to 70 kgb ITZ Allometrically scaled WT normalized to 70 kgb ITZ NR ITZ NR ITZ NR ITZ NR ITZ NR ITZ NR H-ITZ NR H-ITZ NR H-ITZ NR H-ITZ NR H-ITZ NR H-ITZ NR H-ITZ NR H-ITZ NR BMT bone marrow transplantation, CF cystic fibrosis, CL clearance, F bioavailability, H-ITZ hydroxy-itraconazole, IFD invasive fungal disease, ITZ itraconazole, K rate of oral bioavailability, N number of patients, NR not reported, Q1 intercompartmental clearance (compartments 1–2), Q2 intercompartmental clearance (compartments 1–3) ; STDV standard deviation, V1 volume of distribution (central compartment 1), V2 volume of distribution (peripheral compartment 2), V3 volume of distribution (peripheral compartment 3), WT bodyweight aWT is included as covariate on itraconazole parameters, however the covariate equation was not reported bValues of exponents used for allometric scaling are not reported In 33 patients at risk for IFD aged 0.5–17 years, itraconazole was given intravenously as a single 2.5-mg/kg dose. Underlying diseases included CF, malignancies with febrile neutropenia, respiratory tract infections, or other diseases/infections. A three-compartment model best fitted the data for itraconazole. All parameter estimates were scaled to a total body weight of 30 kg [39], but the covariate equations were not reported. In 49 patients with CF and undergoing bone marrow transplantation aged 0.4–30 years, including five adult patients, a median itraconazole dose of 5.4 mg/kg was given orally as capsules or solution. The vast majority of patients received itraconazole in a once-daily regimen. A one-compartment model was used with delayed absorption and included both itraconazole and hydroxy-itraconazole. The Ka for the solution and capsules was 0.96 h-1 and 0.09 h-1, respectively. The relative F of capsules was 0.55 compared to the solution. Clearance and Vd of itraconazole were allometrically scaled to a total body weight of 70 kg [45]. Values of exponents used for allometric scaling were not reported. Pharmacokinetic studies of itraconazole are limited in pediatric patient populations and are lacking in neonates. Future research should focus on retrieving pharmacokinetic data in these patient populations and should address the F of the different itraconazole formulations. The itraconazole oral solution is the preferred formulation, as the relative F was 45% higher compared with itraconazole capsules. Given the unknown absolute F and the difference in F of the oral formulations, dosing of itraconazole and switching between formulations should be accompanied by therapeutic drug monitoring. Furthermore, a twice-daily itraconazole regimen instead of a once-daily regimen is suggested to optimize itraconazole exposure. Non-compartmental analyses suggest a great extent of variability across different age groups, attributable to both CL and Vd. Differences in studies preclude final conclusions and warrant further investigation. Pediatric patients with CF might need a higher itraconazole dose as a considerably lower exposure is reported compared with patients without CF. Population pharmacokinetic studies included allometrically scaled bodyweight on itraconazole pharmacokinetic parameters. As itraconazole and hydroxy-itraconazole are highly bound to plasma protein, the unbound drug concentrations of itraconazole and hydroxy-itraconazole could be interesting variables for future research specifically in the critically ill population. Research in critically ill populations might be of interest in resource-poor countries where posaconazole and voriconazole may not be available. Itraconazole is not approved for patients aged < 18 years in the labels, but international guidelines provide a dose recommendation for patients aged ≥ 2 years for both prophylaxis and treatment. Agreement between labels and guidelines is important for clinical practice and needs to be established.

Voriconazole

Voriconazole was both European Medicines Agency and FDA approved in 2002 for adult patients and has been available as oral tablets, oral suspension, and powder for concentrate for solution [5, 46]. The current approved indications for both adult and pediatric patients aged ≥ 2 years are treatment of invasive aspergillosis, candidemia in patients without neutropenia, esophageal candidiasis, infections caused by Scedosporium and Fusarium species [5, 46], fluconazole-resistant invasive Candida infections, and prophylaxis of IFD in high-risk allogenic HSCT [46]. The labels, the pediatric ESCMID-ECMM guideline for invasive aspergillosis, and the pediatric ESCMID invasive candidiasis guideline provide dose recommendations for pediatric patients aged ≥ 2 years. For prophylaxis and treatment of both invasive aspergillosis and candidiasis, a loading dose of 9 mg/kg twice daily on day 1, followed by 8 mg/kg twice daily intravenously or 9 mg/kg (maximum 350 mg) twice daily for the oral formulations in pediatric patients aged 2–11 years or aged 12–14 years (< 50 kg) is recommended. A loading dose of 6 mg/kg twice daily on day 1, followed by 4 mg/kg twice daily intravenously or 200 mg twice daily for the oral formulations is recommended in pediatric patients aged 12–14 years (≥ 50 kg) or aged ≥ 14–15 years [1, 2, 5, 46]. In adults, voriconazole is characterized by a F of 96% for both tablets and suspension [5], which makes it possible to switch between the two available formulations. As food intake can reduce voriconazole absorption, both oral formulations are advised to be administered in a fasted state [5, 47]. The Vd of voriconazole is around 4.6 L/kg. [5] The distribution of voriconazole is suggested to be extensive into different body tissues, including the cerebrospinal fluid [48] and aqueous and vitreous parts of the eye [49]. Voriconazole is bound to plasma proteins for around 58% [5]. Voriconazole is characterized by nonlinear pharmacokinetics in adult patients. The main CYP450 enzyme involved in the metabolism of voriconazole is CYP2C19 with also CYP2C9 and CYP3A4 playing a less prominent role (Table 1). Elimination via renal excretion accounts for only 2% in its unchanged form [5, 46].

Non-Compartmental Analysis of Voriconazole PK in Pediatric Patients

There are no NCA of voriconazole PK available in neonates and infants. Five NCA are available in pediatric patients aged 2–17 years. A detailed overview of the dosing regimens and voriconazole pharmacokinetic results is given in Table 9. Patients with hematological and non-hematological malignancies and patients undergoing BMT or HSCT were included in these studies. Voriconazole was administered either orally or in a combined intravenous to oral regimen. The oral voriconazole dose was from 4 to 9 mg/kg (maximum 350 mg) twice daily or was fixed at 200 or 300 mg twice daily. The intravenous voriconazole dose was from 4 to 8 mg/kg twice daily, either with or without a loading dose of 6 to 9 mg/kg twice daily [50-54].
Table 9

Non-compartmental analyses of voriconazole

PopulationDoseFormulationWeightNSD, FD, or MDPharmacokinetic parametersReferences
CmaxCminTmaxAUCT1/2CLVdF
Hemato-oncology or HSCT pediatric patients aged 2 to < 12 years7 mg/kg IV every 12 h for 7 days followed by 200 mg PO every 12 h for 6.5 daysIV and POMedian (range)40FD/MDMedian (range)Median (range)Median (range)Median (range)NRNRNRNR[51]
18.9 kg (10.8–54.5)
Day 1 IV1.99 µg/mL (0.90–6.68)NR2.30 h (0.72–4.08)7.00 µg*h/mL (2.43–36.6)
CmaxAUC0–12
Day 7 IV4.49 µg/mL (1.48–15.4)0.61 µg/mL (0.06–10.9)2.30 h (1.00–4.07)21.8 µg*h/mL (5.02–162)
Cmax SSCmin SSTmax SSAUC0–12SS
Day 7 PO4.11 µg/mL (0.51–18.0)0.49 µg/mL (0.04–128)1.07 h (0.73–8.03)20.1 µg*h/mL (1.70–203)
Cmax SSCmin SSTmax SSAUC012SS
Hemato-oncology pediatric patients aged 2 to < 12 yearsGroup A: 7 mg/kg IV every 12 hIV

Mean (range)

24.2 kg (13–41)

12 (9 in group A and 3 in group B)MDGeometric mean (range)Geometric mean (range)Geometric mean (range)Geometric mean (range)Geometric mean (range)Geometric mean (range)Geometric mean (range)NR[53]
Day 3
Group A11.4 µg/mL (2.9–19.2)

4.1 µg/mL (0.4–8.9)

Cavg

1.1 h (1.0–1.1)49.3 µg*h/mL (4.7–106.6)10.9 h (3.1–29.2)

141.9 mL/h/kg (65.7–1483.1)

CLSS

1852 mL/kg (953–3311)

VSS

AUC0–12
Group B: 6 mg/kg IV every 12 h, followed by a maintenance dose of 5 mg/kg IV every 12 hGroup B5.8 µg/mL (2.4–17.2)

2.2 µg/mL (1.1–3.5)

Cavg

1.0 h (1.0–1.1)26.1 µg*h/mL (12.6–41.5)7.7 h (4.2–14.6)

192.1 mL/h/kg (120.5–396.8)

CLSS

1796 mL/kg (902–2871)

VSS

AUC0–12
Hemato-oncology, BMT and HSCT pediatric patients aged 2 to < 12 yearsCohort 1IV and POMean (range)48Cohort 1 MDGeometric mean (CV%)aNRArithmic mean (CV%)Geometric mean (CV%)aNRNRNRArithmic mean (CV%)[52]
Day 1: 6 mg/kg IV every 12 h; days 2–4: 4 mg/kg IV every 12 h; days 5–8: 6 mg/kg IV every 12 h.; days 9–11: 4 mg/kg PO every 12 h; from day 12: 4 mg/kg PO every 12 h
Cohort 2Cohort 12–5 years3.352 µg/mL (71)
Day 1: 6 mg/kg IV every 12 h; days 2–4: 6 mg/kg IV every 12 h; days 5–8: 8 mg/kg IV every 12 h; days 9–11: 6 mg/kg PO every 12 h; from day 12: 6 mg/kg PO every 12 h24.3 kg (13.0–54.9)4 mg/kg IV4.690 µg/mL (111)1.36 h (15)11.722 µg*h/mL (76)NR
Cohort 26 mg/kg IV0.956 µg/mL (85)1.97 h (0)21.931 µg*h/mL (125)NR
20.8 kg (10.8–37.6)4 mg/kg PO3.067 µg/mL (64)1.50 h (144)

3.788 µg*h/mL (78)

AUCtau

43.6% (88)
6–11 years
4 mg/kg IV4.009 µg/mL (88)1.36 h (16)11.954 µg*h/mL (78)NR
6 mg/kg IV1.555 µg/mL (54)1.97 h (0)24.047 µg*h/mL (129)NR
4 mg/kg PO1.33 h (82)7.346 µg*h/mL (60)90.0% (86)
2–11 yearsAUCtau
4 mg/kg IV3.212 µg/mL (67)
6 mg/kg IV4.353 µg/mL (103)1.36 h (15)11.827 µg*h/mL (75)NR
4 mg/kg PO1.178 µg/mL (70)1.97 h (0)22.914 µg*h/mL (125)NR
1.43 h (122)5.184 µg*h/mL (71)66.0% (97)
AUCtau
Cohort 2 MDGeometric mean (CV%)aNRArithmetic mean (CV%)Geometric mean (CV%)aNRNRNRArithmetic mean (CV%)
2–5 years
6 mg/kg IV4.609 µg/mL (93)1.97 h (0)18.216 µg*h/mL (87)NR
8 mg/kg IV4.804 µg/mL (83)2.63 h (0)25.566 µg*h/mL (81)NR
6 mg/kg PO1.433 µg/mL (66)1.00 h (58)6.959 µg*h/mL (104)63.4% (88)
6–11 yearsAUCtau
6 mg/kg IV3.986 µg/mL (67)
8 mg/kg IV6.924 µg/mL (123)2.17 h (30)16.234 µg*h/mL (60)NR
6 mg/kg PO2.213 µg/mL (49)3.04 h (22)34.681 µg*h/mL (81)NR
2–11 years1.72 h (98)10.076 µg*h/mL (56)66.7% (53)
6 mg/kg IV4.286 µg/mL (85)AUCtau
8 mg/kg IV5.767 µg/mL (121)
6 mg/kg PO1.762 µg/mL (57)2.07 h (22)17.249 µg*h/mL (80)NR
2.84 h (18)29.776 µg*h/mL (82)NR
1.34 h (93)8.373 µg*h/mL (80)65.1% (70)
AUCtau
Immunocompromised hemato-oncology and non-hemato-oncology Japanese pediatric patients aged 2 to < 15 years2–12 years or 12–15 years (< 50 kg): day 1: 9 mg/kg IV every 12 h; days 2–7: 8 mg/kg IV every 12 h; days 8–14: 9 mg/kg PO every 12 h (maximum 350 mg)IV and POMean (range)21MD IVMedian (range)Median (range)Median (range)Median (range)NRNRNRNR
12–5 years (≥ 50 kg):30.4 kg (11.5–55.2)2–11 years

8.21 µg/mL (4.62–12.6)

Cmax,ss

2.89 µg/mL (0.596–9.36)

Cmin,ss

2.96 h (0.950–4.00)

60.2 µg*h/mL (23.0–103)

AUC0–12,ss

[54]
day 1: 6 mg/kg every 12 h IV; days 2–7: 4 mg/kg IV every 12 h; days 8–14: 200 mg PO every 12 h
12–14 years (< 50 kg)7.72 µg/mL (6.24–19.6)4.31 µg/mL (3.09–10.4)4.00 h (2.92–4.20)70.5 µg*h/ml (55.7–177)
Cmax,ssCmin,ssAUC0–12,ss
12–14 years (≥ 50 kg)3.22 µg/mL (2.32–4.12)0.576 µg/mL (0.471–0.680)1.34 h (1.00–1.67)17.6 µg*h/mL (14.2–21.0)
Cmax,ssCmin,ssAUC0–12,ss
All

7.72 µg/mL (2.32–19.6)

Cmax,ss

3.00 µg/mL (0.471–10.4)

Cmin,ss

2.96 h (0.950–4.20)

59.3 µg*h/mL (14.2–177)

AUC0–12,ss

MD POMedian (range)Median (range)Median (range)Median (range)NRNRNRNR
2 to < 12 years

6.70 µg/mL (3.58–18.3)

Cmax,ss

2.06 µg/mL (0.148–12.3)

Cmin,ss

1.09 h (0.917–3.78)

45.6 µg*h/mL (12.4–156)

AUC0–12,ss

12–14 years (< 50 kg)

6.21 µg/mL (6.13–13.0)

Cmax,ss

3.00 µg/mL (1.09–6.59)

Cmin,ss

1.00 h (0.950–2.03)

49.4 µg*h/mL (36.3–117)

AUC0–12,ss

12–14 years (≥ 50 kg)

2.03 µg/mLb

Cmax,ss

0.306 µg/mLb

Cmin,ss

1.00 hb

10.0 µg*h/mLb

AUC0–12,ss

All

6.48 µg/mL (2.03–18.3)

Cmax,ss

2.06 µg/mL (0.148–12.3)

Cmin,ss

1.04 h (0.917–3.78)

45.6 µg*h/mL (10.0–156)

AUC0–12,ss

Hemato-oncology and HSCT adolescents aged 12 to < 17 years6 mg/kg IV every 12 h on day 1 followed by 4 mg/kg IV every 12 h for the next 6 days and were switched to 300 mg PO every 12 hIV and POMedian (range)26FD/MDMedian (range)Median (range)Median (range)Median (range)NRNRNRNR[50]
57.1 kg (30.4–92.2)
Day 1 IV2.36 µg/mL (0.66–4.02)NR1.97 h (1.90–2.08)9.51 µg*h/mL (2.52–21.6)
CmaxTmaxAUC0–12
Day 7 IV3.72 µg/mL (1.171–9.99)1.59 µg/mL (0.08–7.78)1.30 h (1.17–3.95)27.9 µg*h/mL (6.24–95.3)
Cmax,ssCmin,ssTmax,ssAUC0–12,ss
Day 7 PO2.84 µg/mL (0.18–5.88)1.05 µg/mL (0.04–2.84)2.00 h (0.67–8.10)18.7 µg*h/mL (1.17–49.7)
Cmax,ssCmin,ssTmax,ssAUC00–12,ss

AUC area under the curve, BMT bone marrow transplantation, C average plasma concentration, CL clearance, C maximum concentration in blood/plasma, C minimal concentration in blood/plasma, F bioavailability, FD first dose, h hours, HSCT hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, IQR interquartile range, IV intravenous, MD multiple dose, N total patients, NR not reported, PO ‘per os’ (oral administration), SD single dose, SS steady state, T elimination half-life, T ime to reach Cmax, V volume of distribution

aValues recalculated/adjusted from the original paper to create uniformity of units

bValues from 1 patient

Non-compartmental analyses of voriconazole Mean (range) 24.2 kg (13–41) 4.1 µg/mL (0.4–8.9) Cavg 141.9 mL/h/kg (65.7–1483.1) CLSS 1852 mL/kg (953–3311) VSS 2.2 µg/mL (1.1–3.5) Cavg 192.1 mL/h/kg (120.5–396.8) CLSS 1796 mL/kg (902–2871) VSS 3.788 µg*h/mL (78) AUCtau 8.21 µg/mL (4.62–12.6) Cmax,ss 2.89 µg/mL (0.596–9.36) Cmin,ss 60.2 µg*h/mL (23.0–103) AUC0–12,ss 7.72 µg/mL (2.32–19.6) Cmax,ss 3.00 µg/mL (0.471–10.4) Cmin,ss 59.3 µg*h/mL (14.2–177) AUC0–12,ss 6.70 µg/mL (3.58–18.3) Cmax,ss 2.06 µg/mL (0.148–12.3) Cmin,ss 45.6 µg*h/mL (12.4–156) AUC0–12,ss 6.21 µg/mL (6.13–13.0) Cmax,ss 3.00 µg/mL (1.09–6.59) Cmin,ss 49.4 µg*h/mL (36.3–117) AUC0–12,ss 2.03 µg/mLb Cmax,ss 0.306 µg/mLb Cmin,ss 10.0 µg*h/mLb AUC0–12,ss 6.48 µg/mL (2.03–18.3) Cmax,ss 2.06 µg/mL (0.148–12.3) Cmin,ss 45.6 µg*h/mL (10.0–156) AUC0–12,ss AUC area under the curve, BMT bone marrow transplantation, C average plasma concentration, CL clearance, C maximum concentration in blood/plasma, C minimal concentration in blood/plasma, F bioavailability, FD first dose, h hours, HSCT hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, IQR interquartile range, IV intravenous, MD multiple dose, N total patients, NR not reported, PO ‘per os’ (oral administration), SD single dose, SS steady state, T elimination half-life, T ime to reach Cmax, V volume of distribution aValues recalculated/adjusted from the original paper to create uniformity of units bValues from 1 patient Overall, only one study reported the F of voriconazole from 43.6 to 90.0% [52]. This F in pediatric patients was lower compared with the F of 96% seen in adults [5]. In the other studies, a lower F was hypothesized, as lower exposures were reported after oral administration compared with exposures after intravenous administration [50, 51, 54]. Unlike observations in adults where food intake reduces voriconazole absorption [5, 46], it remains unclear if the influence of food intake attributes to the variable F of voriconazole in pediatric patients. The reported lower F and subsequent lower exposure after oral administration imply that there is no bioequivalence between intravenous and oral formulations of voriconazole in pediatric patients. Two studies stratified pharmacokinetic results of voriconazole by age [52, 54]. One of these studies reported an overall comparable exposure of voriconazole in the group aged 2–5 years and aged 6–11 years after administration of 4, 6, or 8 mg/kg of voriconazole in a twice-daily intravenous to oral regimen. This study also reported a ~ 2.5 times increased exposure after increasing voriconazole from 4 to 8 mg/kg, suggesting non-linear PK in these pediatric patients over a dose range of 4–8 mg/kg [52]. The other study administered voriconazole according to the current labels and guidelines. For a detailed description of the dosing strategies, see Table 9. This study reported that patients aged 12–14 years (< 50 kg) had a higher exposure compared with patients aged 2–11 years and that patients aged 12–14 years (≥ 50 kg) had a lower exposure compared with patients aged < 15 years (< 50 kg) [54]. The sample sizes in the different age groups were small and the authors mentioned that the CYP2C19 genotype in their Asian population might also have played a role in the differences in voriconazole PK [54]. Two studies showed an overall higher exposure of voriconazole compared with the other studies [53, 54]. This higher exposure might be explained by the higher dosing regimens used.

Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Voriconazole in Pediatric Patients

There are no population pharmacokinetic analyses of voriconazole available in neonates. One study included infants, but did not describe the pharmacokinetic results for this population separately [55]. In total, nine studies were performed in pediatric patients aged 0.8–21 years [55-63], of which two studies pooled data of three earlier published studies [57, 62] and included data of healthy adult patients [57]. A detailed overview of the dosing regimens and voriconazole pharmacokinetic results is given in Table 10. These studies included immunocompromised patients with hematological or non-hematological diseases, immunodeficiency or autoimmune diseases, liver transplantation, CF, other infections/diseases or undergoing HSCT or BMT [55-63]. Voriconazole was administered either intravenously [55, 61, 63], orally [55], or in a combined intravenous to oral regimen [56–60, 62]. All studies reported PK of voriconazole in a two-compartment model [55-62] and one study included also one compartment for the metabolite of voriconazole [63]. The models included delayed absorption [55, 57, 59] and first-order absorption [55–60, 62] and either linear [61], nonlinear [55, 56, 58, 60, 62], or mixed linear and nonlinear elimination [57, 59]. In one study, voriconazole elimination was included as linear CL but in addition also as non-linear CL to its metabolite [63]. Two other studies included both concentration- and time-dependent voriconazole elimination [57, 59]. The PK models and covariates tested are summarized in Table 11.
Table 10

Population pharmacokinetic estimates of voriconazole

PopulationDoseFormulationWeightNSD, FD, or MDPharmacokinetic parameters
AUCTTlagCLV1
Hemato-oncology patients and patients with other diseases aged 8–15 yearsNRIV and PONR55MDNRNRNRNRWtMedian (95% CI)0.67 L/kg (0.61–0.70)
Immunocompromised children and adolescents aged 2–17 years (also adult data included)

2 to < 12 years IV: day 1: 6 mg/kg every 12 h; days 2–4: 3 mg/kg every 12 h; days 5–8: 4 mg/kg every 12 h

2 to 12 years IV and PO:

day 1: 6 mg/kg IV every 12 h; days 2–4: 4 mg/kg IV every 12 h; days 5–8: 6 mg/kg IV every 12 h; days 9–12: 4 mg/kg PO every 12 h

Or

days 1–4: 6 mg/kg IV every 12 h; days 5–8: 8 mg/kg IV every 12 h; days 9–12: 6 mg/kg PO every 12 h

Or

days 1–7: 7 mg/kg IV every 12 h; days 8–14 200 mg PO every 12 h.

12 to < 17 years IV and PO:

day 1: 6 mg/kg IV every 12 h; days 2–7: 4 mg/kg IV every 12h; days 8–14: 300 mg PO every 12 h

Adults:

day 1: 6 mg/kg IV every 12 h; days 2–7: 4 mg/kg IV every 12 h; days 8–14: 200 mg PO every 12 h

IV and PO (tablet and suspension)

Median (range)

Children:

20.1 kg (10.8–54.9)

Adolescents: 57.1 kg (30.4–92.2)

Adults:

76.0 kg (49.0–97.0)

112 children

26 adolescents

35 adults

MDNR

Value (RSE%)

T50 = 2.41 h (6.6)

0.949 · (1 + ( – 0.874 × (1 − STDY5,adult)))c6.16 × (WT/70)0.7579.0 × WT ⁄ 70
HSCT patients aged 2 to ≤12 years and >12 yearsb

≤ 12 years: 7 mg/kg every 12h IV

> 12 years: 6 mg/kg every 12 h for the

first 24 h, followed by 4 mg/kg every 12 h thereafter

If possible switched to PO with a fixed dose of 200 mg every 12 h for all age groups

IV and PO

Value (range)

≤ 12 years: 27 kg (7–44)

> 12 years: 56 kg (39–85)

23MDNRNRNRNR

Value (RSE%)

228 L/70kg (13.5)

Patients with hematological malignancies or other diseases aged 2 to <12 years

Study A

SD IV: 3 and 4 mg/kg

Study B/C

MD IV: 3, 4, 6, and 8 mg/kg every 12 h (Study B), followed by MD PO 4 and 6 mg/kg every 12 h (study C)

IV and PO (suspension)Median (range) 22.8 kg (10.8–54.9)82MDNRNRNR

Value (RSE%) 0.582 L/h/kg (19)

CL in EMs

Decreased in CL for HEMs/PMs (35.5%)

Value (RSE%)

0.807 L/kg (14)

Immuncompromised Japanese children aged 2 to <15 years

2–12 and 12–15 years (< 50 kg):

day 1: 9 mg/kg IV every 12 h; day 2-7:

8 mg/kg IV every 12h; days 8–14: 9 mg/kg PO every 12 h (maximum 350 mg)

12–5 years (≥50 kg):

day 1; 6 mg/kg every 12h IV; days 2–7: 4 mg/kg IV every 12 h; days 8–14: 200 mg PO every 12 h

IV and PO (suspension)

Median (range)

31.5 kg (11.5–55.2)

21MDNR

Estimate (RSE%)

2.45 h (6.3)

Estimate (RSE%)

0.121 h (2.8)

Alag

CL = 6.02 × (WT/70)0.7575.0 × (WT/70)
Patients with hematological malignancies or other diseases aged 2 to < 12 years (and healthy adults)

Children: mean dose (range) of 5.6 mg/kg

(3.0–8.4)

Adults: mean dose (range) of 2.8 mg/kg

(1.8–4.4)

IV and PO

Mean (range)

Children

22.7 kg (10.8–54)

Adults

75.8 kg (49–97)

141

(85 children and 56 adults)

MDNRNRNRNR

WtMedian (95% CI)

1.20 L/kg

(1.09–1.31)

Vcentral

Immuno-compromised with hematological and non-hematological malignancies, liver transplantation, CF, immunodeficiency or autoimmune disease and oncology patients aged 0.8–20.5 years

Median (range)

IV: 150 mg (55–180), 6.0 mg/kg (3.4–10.5)

PO or nasogastrically:

200 mg (30–600), 5.3 mg/kg (2.0–12.9)

IV and PO

Median (range)

33.3 kg (6.5–102.2)

40

MD < 12 years

≥ 12 years

NRNR

Geometric mean (GRSE%)

4.17 h (13)

4.14 h (11)

Geometric mean (GRSE%)

0.32 L/kg/h (125)

0.20 L/kg/h (170)

Geometric

mean (GRSE%)

0.27 L/kg (188)

0.17 L/kg (188)

Immuno-compromised children aged 2–11 years

SD: 3 or 4 mg/kg

MD: day 1: loading dose of 6 mg/kg every 12 h; days 2–4: 3 mg/kg every 12 h; days 4–8: 4 mg/kg every 12 h

IV

Mean (range)

23.4 kg (12–54)

11 (SD)

28 (MD)

MDNR

Median (5th and 95th percentiles)

7.5h (3.5–21.4)

T1/2

NR

Value(RSE%)e

0.40 L/h/kg (14)

CL in EMs

Decreased CL in HEMs/PMs of 46%.

Value (RSE%)e

0.80 L/kg (20)

Patients undergoing HSCT aged < 2 to 21 yearsIVNR59MDNRNRNR

4.60 × (WT/70)0.75 × [(AgeHill coef)/( AgeHill coef + TMHill coef)]

CLvoriconazole

3.62 × (WT/70)0.75

Apparent CLmetabolite

52.4 × (WT/70)1

A absorption lag time, AUC area under the curve, CF cystic fibrosis, CI confidence interval, CL clearance, CYP cytochrome P450, EMs homozygous extensive CYP2C19 metabolizers, F bioavailability, FD first dose, GRSE geometric relative standard error, h hours, HEMs heterozygous extensive CYP2C19 metabolizers, Hill coef Hill coefficient fixed to 1, HSCT hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, IV intravenous, K rate of oral bioavailability, K rate constant from central to peripheral compartment, K Michaelis–Menten constant, K rate constant from peripheral to central compartment, MD multiple dose, N total patients, NR not reported, PMs poor CYP2C19 metabolizers, PO ‘per os’, Q1 intercompartmental clearance, Q2 intercompartmental clearance, RSE relative standard error, SD single dose, T time at half of the maximum inhibition of Vmax,, T elimination half-life, T lag time, V1 volume of distribution of the central compartment, V2 volume of distribution of the peripheral compartment, V3 volume of distribution of the peripheral compartment, V maximum rate of enzyme activity, V maximum fraction of the Vmax inhibition, WtMedian weighted median

aValues recalculated/adjusted from the original paper to create uniformity of units

bBased on priors

cValues for STDY1,ped; STDY4,adol and STDY5,adult indicate variables of 0 or 1, dependent on the study group

dVmax, inh =100% if CYP2C19 is equal to HEM or PM

eEstimates for a typical model patient, but the typical model patient is not defined

Table 11

Pharmacokinetic models of voriconazole

PopulationSubjects, NSamples, NProgramCovariates testedCompartmentsPO/IVCovariates in final modelReferences
CLV1Q1V2Q2V3KVmaxVmax,inhF
Children and adolescent cancer patients aged 8–15 years55158PmetricsEthnic group, age, sex, WT, hepatic dysfunction2, with first-order absorption and nonlinear eliminationPO and IVNRNRNRNRNRNRNRAllometrically scaled bodyweight with a fixed exponent of 0.75NRNR[56]
Immunocompromised children and adolescents aged 2–17 years112 children2022NONMEMAge, WT, CYP2C19 genotyping status, formulation type (POS/tablet)2, with first-order absorption and mixed linear and nonlinear eliminationPO and IVAllometrically scaled WT with a fixed exponent of 0.75 and normalized to 70 kgAllometrically scaled WT with a fixed exponent of 1 and normalized to 70 kgAllometrically scaled WT with a fixed exponent of 0.75 and normalized to 70 kgAllometrially scaled WT with a fixed exponent of 1 and normalized to 70 kgNRNRNRAllometrically scaled WT with a fixed exponent of 0.75 and normalized to 70 kgCYP2C19 genotyping status was only included in adult patientsNR[57]
26 adolescents554
35 adults760
Immunocompromised children aged 2 to ≤ 12 years and > 12 years23187NONMEMAge, sex, WT, CRP, bilirubin, AST, ALT, GGT, AP, creatinine2, with first-order absorption and nonlinear eliminationPO and IVNRAllometrically scaled WT with a fixed exponent of 1 and normalized to 70 kgAllometrically scaled WT with a fixed exponent of 0.75 and normalized to 70 kgAllometrically scaled WT with a fixed exponent of 1 and normalized to 70 kgNRNRNRAllometrically scaled WT with a fixed exponent of 0.75 and normalized to 70 kgNRNR[58]
Immunocompromised children aged 2 to < 12 years821274NONMEMAge, sex, WT, HT, ethnic origin, serum creatinine, AST, ALT, AP, GGT, ALB,, total bilirubin, total protein levels, CYP2C19, CYP2C9 and CYP3A4 inhibitors, CYP450 inducers, leukemia, BMT, aplastic anemia, lymphoma, or other, CYP2C19 genotype status, presence of mucositis2, with first-order absorption and nonlinear eliminationPO and IVWT, CYP2C19 genotype, ALT(loglinear)WTWTWTNRNRNRNRNRNR[62]
Immunocompromised Japanese children aged 2 to < 15 years21276NONMEMWT, age, sex, CYP2C19 genotyping status, liver function parameters2, with first-order absorption and mixed linear and nonlinear eliminationPO and IVAllometrically scaled WT with a fixed exponent of 0.75 and normalized to 70 kgAllometrically scaled WT with a fixed exponent of 1 and normalized to 70 kgAllometrically scaled WT with a fixed exponent of 0.75 and normalized to 70 kgAllometrically scaled WT with a fixed exponent of 1 and normalized to 70 kgNRNRNRAllometrically scaled WT with a fixed exponent of 0.75 and normalized to 70 kgNRNR[59]
Patients with hematological malignancies or other diseases aged 2 to < 12 years (and healthy adults)141Mean (STDV)PmetricsWT, age, allometric scaling2, with first-order absorption and nonlinear eliminationPO and IVNRAllometrically scaled WT with a fixed exponent of 1NRNRNRNRNRAllometrically scaled WT with a fixed exponent of 0.75NRNR[60]
Children 20.3 (5.4)
Adults 36.5 (22.1)
Immunocompromised children aged 0.8–20.5 years40108NPAGWT, age, sex, creatinine clearance, ALT, AP2, with delayed absorption and nonlinear eliminationPO and IVWT, ageWT, ageWTWT, ageNRNRNRNRNRNR[55]
Immunocompromised children aged 2–11 years35355NONMEMWT, CYP2C19 genotype, ALT, AP2, with linear eliminationIVWT, CYP2C19 genotype, ALT (loglinear) and AP (loglinear)WTWTWTNRNRNRNRNRNR[61]
Patients undergoing HSCT aged < 2 to 21 years591288NONMEMWT, maturation function for voriconazole2-compartments for voriconazole and 1-compartment for its metabolite, with linear voriconazole elimination but also nonlinear voriconazole elimination to its metaboliteAllometrically scaled bodyweight with a fixed exponent of 0.75 and normalized to 70 kg for both voriconazole and metabolite; maturation factor for voriconazoleAllometrically scaled bodyweight with a fixed exponent of 1 and normalized to 70 kgAllometrically scaled bodyweight with a fixed exponent of 0.75 and normalized to 70 kgAllometrically scaled bodyweight with a fixed exponent of 1 and normalized to 70 kgNRNRNRAllometrically scaled bodyweight with a fixed exponent of 0.75 and normalized to 70 kgNRNR[63]

ALB albumin, ALT alanine aminotransferase, AP alkaline phosphatase, AST aspartate aminotransferase, CF cystic fibrosis, CL clearance, CRP C-reactive protein, CYP cytochrome P450, F bioavailability, GGT gamma-glutamyl transferase, HSCT hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, HT height, IV intravenous, K rate constant, MD multiple dose, N total patients or samples, NONMEM nonlinear mixed effect modeling, NPAG non-parametric adaptive grid modeling, NR not reported, PO ‘per os’, POS powder for oral suspension, Q1 intercompartmental clearance, Q2 intercompartmental clearance, SD single dose, V1 volume of distribution of the central compartment, V2 volume of distribution of the peripheral compartment, V3 volume of distribution of the peripheral compartment, V maximum rate of enzyme activity, WT weight

Population pharmacokinetic estimates of voriconazole 2 to < 12 years IV: day 1: 6 mg/kg every 12 h; days 2–4: 3 mg/kg every 12 h; days 5–8: 4 mg/kg every 12 h 2 to 12 years IV and PO: day 1: 6 mg/kg IV every 12 h; days 2–4: 4 mg/kg IV every 12 h; days 5–8: 6 mg/kg IV every 12 h; days 9–12: 4 mg/kg PO every 12 h Or days 1–4: 6 mg/kg IV every 12 h; days 5–8: 8 mg/kg IV every 12 h; days 9–12: 6 mg/kg PO every 12 h Or days 1–7: 7 mg/kg IV every 12 h; days 8–14 200 mg PO every 12 h. 12 to < 17 years IV and PO: day 1: 6 mg/kg IV every 12 h; days 2–7: 4 mg/kg IV every 12h; days 8–14: 300 mg PO every 12 h Adults: day 1: 6 mg/kg IV every 12 h; days 2–7: 4 mg/kg IV every 12 h; days 8–14: 200 mg PO every 12 h Median (range) Children: 20.1 kg (10.8–54.9) Adolescents: 57.1 kg (30.4–92.2) Adults: 76.0 kg (49.0–97.0) 112 children 26 adolescents 35 adults Value (RSE%) T50 = 2.41 h (6.6) ≤ 12 years: 7 mg/kg every 12h IV > 12 years: 6 mg/kg every 12 h for the first 24 h, followed by 4 mg/kg every 12 h thereafter If possible switched to PO with a fixed dose of 200 mg every 12 h for all age groups Value (range) ≤ 12 years: 27 kg (7–44) > 12 years: 56 kg (39–85) Value (RSE%) 228 L/70kg (13.5) Study A SD IV: 3 and 4 mg/kg Study B/C MD IV: 3, 4, 6, and 8 mg/kg every 12 h (Study B), followed by MD PO 4 and 6 mg/kg every 12 h (study C) Value (RSE%) 0.582 L/h/kg (19) CL in EMs Decreased in CL for HEMs/PMs (35.5%) Value (RSE%) 0.807 L/kg (14) 2–12 and 12–15 years (< 50 kg): day 1: 9 mg/kg IV every 12 h; day 2-7: 8 mg/kg IV every 12h; days 8–14: 9 mg/kg PO every 12 h (maximum 350 mg) 12–5 years (≥50 kg): day 1; 6 mg/kg every 12h IV; days 2–7: 4 mg/kg IV every 12 h; days 8–14: 200 mg PO every 12 h Median (range) 31.5 kg (11.5–55.2) Estimate (RSE%) 2.45 h (6.3) Estimate (RSE%) 0.121 h (2.8) Alag Children: mean dose (range) of 5.6 mg/kg (3.0–8.4) Adults: mean dose (range) of 2.8 mg/kg (1.8–4.4) Mean (range) Children 22.7 kg (10.8–54) Adults 75.8 kg (49–97) 141 (85 children and 56 adults) WtMedian (95% CI) 1.20 L/kg (1.09–1.31) Vcentral Median (range) IV: 150 mg (55–180), 6.0 mg/kg (3.4–10.5) PO or nasogastrically: 200 mg (30–600), 5.3 mg/kg (2.0–12.9) Median (range) 33.3 kg (6.5–102.2) MD < 12 years ≥ 12 years Geometric mean (GRSE%) 4.17 h (13) 4.14 h (11) Geometric mean (GRSE%) 0.32 L/kg/h (125) 0.20 L/kg/h (170) Geometric mean (GRSE%) 0.27 L/kg (188) 0.17 L/kg (188) SD: 3 or 4 mg/kg MD: day 1: loading dose of 6 mg/kg every 12 h; days 2–4: 3 mg/kg every 12 h; days 4–8: 4 mg/kg every 12 h Mean (range) 23.4 kg (12–54) 11 (SD) 28 (MD) Median (5th and 95th percentiles) 7.5h (3.5–21.4) T1/2 Value(RSE%)e 0.40 L/h/kg (14) CL in EMs Decreased CL in HEMs/PMs of 46%. Value (RSE%)e 0.80 L/kg (20) 4.60 × (WT/70)0.75 × [(AgeHill coef)/( AgeHill coef + TMHill coef)] CLvoriconazole 3.62 × (WT/70)0.75 Apparent CLmetabolite WtMedian (95% CI) 0.79 1/h (0.58–0.86) Ka Median (range) 0.49 1/h (0.04–0.94) Kcp Median (range) 0.091/ h (0.07–0.28) Kpc WtMedian (95% CI) 0.48 (0.40–0.56) WtMedian (95% CI) 1.24 mg/h/kg0.75 (0.79–.180) WtMedian (95% CI) 5.3 mg/L (2.94–5.98) (1.19 × (1 − 0.615· STDY4,adol) × (1 − STDY5,adult) + 0.0912 × STDY5,adult)c Ka Value (RSE%) 0.585(13) logit(F) 114 × (WT/70)0.75 × (1 + (− 0.382 × STDY1,ped))c Vmax, 1h Concentration and time-dependent Vmax 1.50 + (−0.390 × (AGE < 12))d logit(Vmax,inh) Value (RSE%) 21.9 L/h/70kg (19.7) Value (RSE%) 1430 L/70 kg (22.6) Value (RSE%) 1.19 1/h (-) Ka fixed Value (RSE%) 59.4 % (17.8) Value (RSE%) 51.5 mg/h/70 kg (15) Value (RSE%) 1.15 mg/L (-) Fixed Value (RSE%) 0.609 L/h/kg (13) Value (RSE%) 2.17 L/kg (11) Value (RSE%) 0.849 1/h (40) Ka Value (RSE%) 44.6 % (14) Value (RSE%)a 3.030 mg/L (45) Estimate (RSE%) 1.38 1/h (14) k Estimate (RSE%) 0.597 (13) logit(F) 118 × (WT/70)0.75 Vmax, 1h Concentration and time-dependent Vmax Estimate (RSE%) 2.61 (19) logit(Vmax,inh) Estimate (RSE%)a 0.922 mg/L (30) WtMedian (95% CI) 1.53 1/h (1.14–1.78) Ka 0.40 1/h (0.37–0.43) Kcp 0.15 1/h (0.12–0.17) Kpc WtMedian (95% CI) 0.85 (0.77–0.89) WtMedian (95% CI) 1.82 mg/h/kg0.75 (0.52–3.09) WtMedian (95% CI) 1.54 mg/L (1.06–1.72) Geometric Mean (GRSE%) 0.43 L/kg/h (246) 0.68 L/kg/h (191) Geometric mean (GRSE%) 2.34 L/kg (42) 0.83 L/kg (127) Geometric mean (GRSE%) 0.51 L/h (164) Ka 0.43 L/h (212) Ka Geometric mean (GRSE%) 75% (35) 81% (37) Geometric mean (GRSE%) 5.16 mg/L (9) 7.84 mg/L (5) Value (RSE%)e 0.64 L/h/kg (15) Value (RSE%)e 1.7 L/kg (7.5%) Estimate (RSE%) 1.57 mg/L (34.8) A absorption lag time, AUC area under the curve, CF cystic fibrosis, CI confidence interval, CL clearance, CYP cytochrome P450, EMs homozygous extensive CYP2C19 metabolizers, F bioavailability, FD first dose, GRSE geometric relative standard error, h hours, HEMs heterozygous extensive CYP2C19 metabolizers, Hill coef Hill coefficient fixed to 1, HSCT hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, IV intravenous, K rate of oral bioavailability, K rate constant from central to peripheral compartment, K Michaelis–Menten constant, K rate constant from peripheral to central compartment, MD multiple dose, N total patients, NR not reported, PMs poor CYP2C19 metabolizers, PO ‘per os’, Q1 intercompartmental clearance, Q2 intercompartmental clearance, RSE relative standard error, SD single dose, T time at half of the maximum inhibition of Vmax,, T elimination half-life, T lag time, V1 volume of distribution of the central compartment, V2 volume of distribution of the peripheral compartment, V3 volume of distribution of the peripheral compartment, V maximum rate of enzyme activity, V maximum fraction of the Vmax inhibition, WtMedian weighted median aValues recalculated/adjusted from the original paper to create uniformity of units bBased on priors cValues for STDY1,ped; STDY4,adol and STDY5,adult indicate variables of 0 or 1, dependent on the study group dVmax, inh =100% if CYP2C19 is equal to HEM or PM eEstimates for a typical model patient, but the typical model patient is not defined Pharmacokinetic models of voriconazole ALB albumin, ALT alanine aminotransferase, AP alkaline phosphatase, AST aspartate aminotransferase, CF cystic fibrosis, CL clearance, CRP C-reactive protein, CYP cytochrome P450, F bioavailability, GGT gamma-glutamyl transferase, HSCT hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, HT height, IV intravenous, K rate constant, MD multiple dose, N total patients or samples, NONMEM nonlinear mixed effect modeling, NPAG non-parametric adaptive grid modeling, NR not reported, PO ‘per os’, POS powder for oral suspension, Q1 intercompartmental clearance, Q2 intercompartmental clearance, SD single dose, V1 volume of distribution of the central compartment, V2 volume of distribution of the peripheral compartment, V3 volume of distribution of the peripheral compartment, V maximum rate of enzyme activity, WT weight Seven studies in pediatric patients administered either an oral solution or tablets of voriconazole in which the F was from 44.6 to 85% [55–60, 62]. The F found in these studies was also lower compared with the F of 96% reported in adults [5]. Similar to findings in the NCA, it remains unclear if the influence of food was attributed to this difference. The Ka had a range of 0.43–1.53 h-1 [55–60, 62]. Allometrically scaled bodyweight with fixed exponents [56–60, 63] was added on either CL [57, 59, 63], Vd [57–60, 63], and/or maximum rate of enzyme activity [56–60, 63]. Two studies included patients aged < 2 years [55, 63], of which one study had sufficient information to include a maturation factor to the pharmacokinetic model [63]. Two other studies incorporated the CYP2C19 genotype [61, 62], alanine aminotransferase (ALT) [61, 62], and alkaline phosphatase on CL. In these studies, the CYP2C19 genotype in the combined group of heterozygous extensive/poor CYP2C19 metabolizers [61, 62], ALT [61, 62], and alkaline phosphatase [61] significantly decreased CL, but according to the authors these variables were not predictive for voriconazole CL [61, 62]. Other covariates included linearly scaled weight and age on CL and Vd [55].

Physiologically Based PK of Voriconazole

One physiologically based pharmacokinetic model was developed for voriconazole in children. The physiologically based pharmacokinetic-derived values from the initial oral model showed an overprediction for F, area under the curve (AUC), and maximum serum concentration in children, which decreased substantially after adding intestinal CL to the model. Intestinal first-pass metabolism might explain the lower bioavailability of voriconazole in children compared with adults [64]. The PK of voriconazole in neonates and infants and children aged < 2 years is lacking, and future studies should take these patient populations into account. Future research should further focus on the highly variable F, differences in F between the oral formulations, the linear or non-linear relationship of voriconazole elimination, and PK in critically ill pediatric patients. None of the reports highlight the difference in F of the oral solution and tablets. In contrast to adults, it seems that there is no bioequivalency between oral and intravenous formulations in pediatric patients. It is unclear if the intake of food or gastric-emptying time is (partly) responsible for this variability and/or if the influence of intestinal first-pass metabolism might play a role. These questions need to be further explored. Switching from intravenous voriconazole to oral formulations cannot be done as straightforwardly as in adults but should be accompanied by therapeutic drug monitoring. Noncompartmental analyses report that patients aged < 12 years seem to have a higher CL and Vd compared with patients aged ≥ 12 years and therefore the recommended loading dose and maintenance doses of voriconazole is higher in patients aged 2–11 years compared with those above 12 years. Some population pharmacokinetic studies reported that the CYP2C19 genotype and ALT values were significant covariates on voriconazole CL, but were not predictive for voriconazole CL. Although CYPC19 might be correlated with voriconazole CL, upfront dose adjustments in clinical practice are not yet advised in populations with a low prevalence of homozygous allele variations. Further research is needed to explain the differences of voriconazole PK in pediatric patients, to explore the influence of CYP2C19, and to reflect on the role of ALT as a surrogate marker for liver function. Additionally, other possible elimination routes (i.e., flavin-containing monooxygenase 3 [65]) might be interesting topics to explore.

Posaconazole

In 2005, posaconazole received European Medicines Agency marketing authorization and in 2006 FDA approval for adult patients [8, 66]. The currently available formulations include a concentrate for solution for infusion, an oral suspension, and gastro-resistant tablets [66]. The FDA approved posaconazole in pediatric patients aged > 13 years for prophylaxis and treatment of invasive aspergillosis and invasive candidiasis [8], but in Europe posaconazole is not approved in pediatric patients aged < 18 years [66]. Both the new solid oral tablet and the intravenous solution of posaconazole require a loading dose of double the maintenance dose, whereas this loading dose is not of value for the marketed oral suspension. In the pediatric ESCMID-ECMM guideline for invasive aspergillosis, the recommended dose for posaconazole prophylaxis for patients aged ≥ 13 years is 300 mg once daily of the gastro-resistant tablet or a dose of 200 mg three times daily of the marketed oral suspension. For salvage therapy of a proven/probable invasive aspergillosis for patients aged ≥ 13 years, 300 mg once daily of the gastro-resistant tablet or intravenous formulation or a dose of either 400 mg twice daily or 200 mg four times daily of the marketed oral suspension is recommended [1]. The posaconazole dosing in the setting of prophylaxis for invasive candidiasis is identical to the dosing regimen of the marketed oral suspension for prophylaxis of invasive aspergillosis [2]. All the above-mentioned guidelines recommend using the gastro-resistant tablet over the marketed oral solution because of the anticipated more favorable oral bioavailability of the gastro-resistant tablet. The F of posaconazole is only reported for adult patients receiving the gastro-resistant tablets and is around 54% [8]. As the F of the marketed oral suspension is not available in the public domain, bioequivalence between the formulations cannot be assured. Both the marketed oral suspension and gastro-resistant tablets show saturable absorption, but for the gastro-resistant tablets this was only seen for daily doses above 800 mg of posaconazole [67, 68]. Absorption of the marketed posaconazole suspension is significantly influenced by food intake and administration in a fed state is advised [69]. The gastro-resistant tablets are less prone to food effects [66], but a fed state can still increase the absorption by ∼ 1.5 times [70]. The tablet cannot be broken because of the gastro-resistant coating, which makes it difficult to administer these tablets to patients who are unable to swallow. The mean apparent Vd (Vd/F) of posaconazole is 287 L for the gastro-resistant tablet and the Vd/F is around 1774 L for the marketed oral suspension [8]. Posaconazole penetrates into a variety of tissues, including the lung, heart, kidney, and liver, but penetrates poorly into brain tissue [71] and cerebrospinal fluid [72]. Posaconazole is bound to plasma proteins for > 98% [8]. In contrast to the other azoles, posaconazole is metabolized via uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase enzymes, and particularly uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase 1A4 (Table 1) [73]. About 77% of radioactive-labeled posaconazole was retrieved in the feces of which 66% was the parent compound. The formed metabolites that were excreted in the urine and feces accounted for about 17% of the radioactive-labeled posaconazole [8, 66]. Mean CL is 7.3 L/h [8].

Non-Compartmental Analysis of Posaconazole PK in Pediatric Patients

Currently, there are no NCA studies of posaconazole PK performed in neonates. A detailed overview of the dosing regimens and posaconazole PK results is given in Table 12. Three NCA were performed in immunocompromised patients aged 3 months to < 18 years. [74-76] Patients with hematological and non-hematological malignancies or undergoing HSCT were included in these studies. In two studies, posaconazole was only administered as the marketed oral suspension. The relative F of posaconazole was not determined in these studies [74, 75]. In the other study, posaconazole was administered as a not yet marketed new formulation, a powder for oral suspension (PFS), as well as an intravenous solution [76]. The first NCA investigated posaconazole orally as the marketed suspension at 6 or 9 mg/kg in a two or three times-daily regimen in three different age groups [74]. The second study used the marketed oral posaconazole suspension as 120 mg/m2 based on body surface area (BSA) [75]. In the third study, posaconazole was investigated as either an intravenous solution or as the new oral PFS at 3.5 mg/kg, 4.5 mg/kg, or 6 mg/kg in a twice-daily regimen on day 1, followed by the same dose in a once-daily regimen in two different age groups [76].
Table 12

Non-compartmental analyses of posaconazole

PopulationDoseFormulationWeightNSD, FD, or MDPharmacokinetic parametersReferences
CmaxCTmaxAUCT1/2CLVdF
Pediatric patients with hematological, non-hematological malignancies, or HSCT and neutropenia aged 3 months to < 18 years7 to < 18 years;PO (suspension)Median 29.8 kg136Day 1 FDValueaArithmetic mean (%CV, STDV)Median (minimum–maximum)ValuecNRNRNRNR[74]
6 mg/kg PO every 12 h or3 mo to < 2 years
9 mg/kg PO every 12 h or6 mg/kg BID PO103 ng/mLb68.5 ng/mLb3.38 hb574 ng*h/mL AUC0–12b
6 mg/kg every 8 h PO for 7–28 daysAUCtf
2 to < 7 years
2 to < 7 years;6 mg/kg (BID PO)196 ng/mL (93.9)122 ng/mL (83.1, 101)5.01 h (2.92–11.60)1300 ng*h/mL (91.4) AUC0–12
6 mg/kg every 12 h PO or9 mg/kg (BID PO)175 ng/mL (70.5)112 ng/mL (77.6, 86.9)3.99 h (2.98–11.08)1210 ng*h/mL (76.9) AUC0–12
9 mg/kg every 12 h PO or6 mg/kg (TID PO)109 ng/mL (61.3)68.4 ng/mL (59.2, 40.4)7.95 h (2.98–8.00)544 ng*h/mL (59.6) AUC0–8
6 mg/kg every 12 h PO for 7–28 daysCavgAUCtf
3 months to < 2 years7 to < 18 years
6 mg/kg every 12 h PO or via enteral tube for 7–28 days6 mg/kg (BID PO)156 ng/mL (78.1)107 ng/mL (86.5, 92.5)5.0 h (2.97–12.0)1140 ng*h/mL (93.7) AUC0–12
9 mg/kg (BID PO)162 ng/mL (86.7)113 ng/mL (89.1, 100)3.12 h (2.92–8.00)1270 ng*h/mL (98.1) AUC0–12
6 mg/kg (TID PO)93.2 ng/mL (60.8)57.9 ng/mL (52.2, 30.2)4.88 h (2.92–8.08)424 ng*h/mL (49.5) AUC0–8
CavgAUCtf
Day 7 MDValueaArithmetic mean (%CV, STDV)Median (minimum–maximum)ValuecNRNRNRNR
3 mo to < 2 years
6 mg/kg BID PO520 ng/mb453 ng/mb0.00 hb3590 ng*h/mL AUC0–12b
CavgAUCtf
2 to < 7 years
6 mg/kg BID PO726 ng/mL (125.5)604 ng/mL (129.0, 779)4.13 h (0.0–11.17)6770 ng*h/mL (138.9) AUC0–12
9 mg/kg BID PO581 ng/mL (61.0)485 ng/mL (63.0, 306)3.00 h (0.0–8.08)5350 ng*h/mL (62.0) AUC0–12
6 mg/kg TID PO705 ng/mL (60.9)620 ng/mL (66.2, 411)3.00 h (0.0–5.08)4920 ng*h/mL (67.1) AUC0–8
CavgAUCtf
7 to < 18 years
6 mg/kg BID PO1200 ng/mL (75.5)1050 ng/mL (76.2, 789)4.58 h (0–7.75)11,800 ng*h/mL (75.4) AUC0–12
9 mg/kg BID PO1390 ng/mL (111.4)1240 ng/mL (113.4, 1400)4.03 h (0.0–28.5)13,500 ng*h/mL (115.8) AUC0–12
6 mg/kg TID PO1230 ng/mL (64.2)1150 ng/mL (65.4, 750)2.63 h (0.00–7.62)8310 ng*h/mL (74.9) AUC0–8
CavgAUCtf
Children with a hematological malignancies aged 2–13 years120 mg/m2 every 8 hPO (suspension)Mean (STDV)14MDMean (STDV)aMean (STDV)aNRMean (STDV)aNRMedian (IQR)aNRNR[75]
19.9 kg (6.1)960 ng/mL (630)860 ng/mL (580)20,500 ng*h/mL (14,000)15.9 L/h (9.95–27.86)
CavgAUC0–24CL/F
Hematology and oncology patients with documented or expected neutropenia aged 2–17 years3.5, 4.5, or 6.0 mg/kg IV every 12 h on day 1, followed by 3.5, 4.5, or 6.0 mg/kg (maximum 300 mg) once daily at days 2–10 and were switched to PFS in the same daily dosePO (IV or powder for oral suspension)NR1182–6 years MDGeometric mean (%GCV)Geometric mean (%GCV)Median (minimum–maximum)Geometric mean (%GCV)NRGeometric mean (%GCV)NRNR[76]
3.5 mg/kg (IV)1590 ng/mL (43.1)743 (55.0)1.78 h (1.67–5.53)17,800 ng*h/mL (55.0)3.39 L/h (52.8)
4.5 mg/kg (IV)2320 ng/mL (39.8)1070 (30.0)1.78 h (1.42–5.90)25,600 ng*h/mL (30.0)2.97 L/h (36.2)
6.0 mg/kg (IV)3060 ng/mL (54.1)1300 (48.9)1.75 h (1.57–1.83)31,100 ng*h/mL (48.9)3.27 L/h (49.3)
CavgAUC0–24CL
3.5 mg/kg (PFS)884 ng/mL (44.4)510 (36.0)3.83 h (1.92–4.25)12,200 ng*h/mL (36.0)4.97 L/h (29.1)
4.5 mg/kg (PFS)1550 ng/mL (40.8)901 (64.5)3.82 h (1.88–5.92)21,600 ng*h/mL (64.5)3.49 L/h (59.1)
6.0 mg/kg (PFS)1510 ng/mL (43.4)960 (47.3)4.00 h (2.17–7.92)23,000 ng*h/mL (47.3)4.60 L/h (35.2)
CavgAUC0–24CL/F
7–17 years MDGeometric mean (%GCV)Geometric mean (%GCV)Median (minimum–maximum)Geometric mean (%GCV)NRGeometric mean (%GCV)NRNR
3.5 mg/kg (IV)2450 ng/mL (72.7)1140 ng/mL (49.7)1.77 h (0–3.5)27,300 ng*h/mL (49.7)6.64 L/h (38.6)
4.5 mg/kg (IV)2310 ng/mL (40.3)1240 ng/mL (42.9)1.75 h (1.52–1.80)29,800 ng*h/mL (42.9)6.69 L/h (37.3)
6.0 mg/kg (IV)3340 ng/mL (39.4)1930 ng/mL (41.5)1.77 h (1.33–6.00)44,200 ng*h/mL (41.5)4.76 L/h (55.7)
CavgAUC0–24CL
3.5 mg/kg (PFS)1340 ng/mL (30.8)861 ng/mL (33.8)2.20 h (1.92–6.03)20,700 ng*h/mL (33.8)7.67 L/h (39.9)
4.5 mg/kg (PFS)1670 ng/mL (28.5)1200 ng/mL (33.7)6.14 h (1.98–7.98)28,700 ng*h/mL (33.7)7.84 L/h (49.4)
6.0 mg/kg (PFS)1370 ng/mL (178.5)1040 ng/mL (184.3)2.78 h (0–4.00)25,000 ng*h/mL (184.3)8.39 L/h (190.3)
CavgAUC0–24CL/F

AUC area under the curve, AUC AUC from 0 to final quantifiable sample, BID twice daily, Cavg average serum concentration, CL clearance, C maximum serum concentration in blood, CV coefficient of variation, F bioavailability, FD first dose, GCV geometric coefficient of variation, h hours, HSCT hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, IQR interquartile range, IV intravenous, MD multiple dose, N total patients, NR not reported, PFS powder for suspension, PO ‘per os’ (oral administration), SD single dose, SS steady state, STDV standard deviation, T elimination half-life, TID three times daily, T time to reach Cmax, V volume of distribution

aValues recalculated/adjusted from original paper to create uniformity of units

bValues from one patient

cUnclear whether mean or median values are reported. Type of error was not mentioned

Non-compartmental analyses of posaconazole AUC area under the curve, AUC AUC from 0 to final quantifiable sample, BID twice daily, Cavg average serum concentration, CL clearance, C maximum serum concentration in blood, CV coefficient of variation, F bioavailability, FD first dose, GCV geometric coefficient of variation, h hours, HSCT hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, IQR interquartile range, IV intravenous, MD multiple dose, N total patients, NR not reported, PFS powder for suspension, PO ‘per os’ (oral administration), SD single dose, SS steady state, STDV standard deviation, T elimination half-life, TID three times daily, T time to reach Cmax, V volume of distribution aValues recalculated/adjusted from original paper to create uniformity of units bValues from one patient cUnclear whether mean or median values are reported. Type of error was not mentioned Increasing the daily dose from 6 to 9 mg/kg or increasing the dosing frequency of the marketed suspension from two times daily to three times daily did not increase the exposure of posaconazole. This suggests saturable absorption in pediatric patients, which is also seen in adults. The authors suggested that children aged >7 years showed higher exposures compared with patients aged 2–7 years [74], implying that higher dosages are needed in younger patients to achieve a comparable exposure to older patients. A dosing regimen based on BSA resulted in a comparable mean exposure as children aged 7–17 years on a 6-mg/kg twice-daily regimen [75]. However, data based on BSA were not available for different age groups and exposure in the youngest patients is therefore not exactly known with this approach. Administering posaconazole intravenously or as a PFS in a once-daily regimen (with a loading dose on day 1) resulted in higher exposures compared with the exposures after a twice-daily regimen of the marketed oral suspension in the previously described report [74, 76]. Similarly to this earlier report, posaconazole exposure was lower in younger patients compared with older patients in all dosing groups [74, 76]. Furthermore, the exposure after oral PFS administration was lower compared with intravenously administered posaconazole. As suggested by the authors, there seems to be no bioequivalence between the intravenous and new PFS formulations in pediatric patients [76].

Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Posaconazole in Pediatric Patients

Currently, there are no population pharmacokinetic studies of posaconazole performed in neonates. One population pharmacokinetic model was published in 117 immunocompromised infants, children, and adolescents aged 0.5–18 years. A detailed overview of the dosing regimens and posaconazole pharmacokinetic results is shown in Table 13. Posaconazole was administered as the marketed suspension in the vast majority of these patients, with a mean daily dose of 13.11 mg/kg [77]. A one-compartment model fitted the data best. An overview of the pharmacokinetic model and covariates tested is given in Table 10. Allometrically scaled bodyweight was added on CL and Vd and covariates such as diarrhea and concomitant use of proton pump inhibitors decreased posaconazole bioavailability only after administration of the marketed suspension [77]. The pharmacokinetic models and covariates tested are summarized in Table 14.
Table 13

Population pharmacokinetic estimates of posaconazole

PopulationDoseFormulationWeightNSD, FD or MDPharmacokinetic parametersReferences
AUCT1/2CLV1KaFfDfP
Immunocompromised children aged 5 months to 18 yearsDose (range) 13.11 mg/kg ( 2.67–48.95)PO (tablet and suspension)

Weight (range)

17.8 kg

(6.05–74.8)

117MDNRNR

14.95 × (WT/70)0.75

CL/F

201.7 × (WT/70)1

V/F

Estimate (%RSE)

0.197 1/h FIXED

Ka, suspension

0.588 1/h FIXED

Ka, tablet

NR

Estimate (%RSE)

− 0.33 (28)

Estimate (%RSE)

− 0.42 (14)

[77]

AUC area under the curve, CL clearance, CL/F apparent clearance, F bioavailability, f fractional decrease of the bioavailability in patients with diarrhea (suspension), FD first dose, f fractional decrease of the bioavailability in patients using proton pump inhibitors (suspension), K rate of oral bioavailability, MD multiple dose, N total patients, NR not reported, PO ‘per os’, RSE relative standard error, SD single dose, T elimination half-life, V volume of distribution, V/F apparent volume of distribution

Table 14

Pharmacokinetic models of posaconazole

PopulationSubjects, NSamples, NProgramCovariates testedCompartmentsPO/IVCovariates in final modelReferences
CLVKaF
Immunocompromised children aged 5 months to 18 years117338NONMEM

Diarrhea, treatment/prophylaxis, macrolides, echinocandins, terbinafine, ciclosporin, tacrolimus, mycophenolate, rifamycins, carbamazepine, phenytoin, histamine H2-receptor antagonists, proton pump inhibitors, or valaciclovir on bioavailability

Macrolides, echinocandins, ciclosporin, tacrolimus, mycophenolate, rifampicin, carbamazepine, phenytoin, or valaciclovir on CL

WT, sigmoidal maturation function based on PMA

1POAllometrically scaled WT with a fixed exponent of 0.75 and normalized to 70 kgAllometrically scaled WT with a fixed exponent of 1 and normalized to 70 kgNRDiarrhea, concurrent proton pump inhibitor administration[77]

CL clearance, F bioavailability, IV intravenously, K rate of oral bioavailability, N total, PMA postmenstrual age, PO ‘per os’, V volume of distribution

Population pharmacokinetic estimates of posaconazole Weight (range) 17.8 kg (6.05–74.8) 14.95 × (WT/70)0.75 CL/F 201.7 × (WT/70)1 V/F Estimate (%RSE) 0.197 1/h FIXED Ka, suspension 0.588 1/h FIXED Ka, tablet Estimate (%RSE) − 0.33 (28) Estimate (%RSE) − 0.42 (14) AUC area under the curve, CL clearance, CL/F apparent clearance, F bioavailability, f fractional decrease of the bioavailability in patients with diarrhea (suspension), FD first dose, f fractional decrease of the bioavailability in patients using proton pump inhibitors (suspension), K rate of oral bioavailability, MD multiple dose, N total patients, NR not reported, PO ‘per os’, RSE relative standard error, SD single dose, T elimination half-life, V volume of distribution, V/F apparent volume of distribution Pharmacokinetic models of posaconazole Diarrhea, treatment/prophylaxis, macrolides, echinocandins, terbinafine, ciclosporin, tacrolimus, mycophenolate, rifamycins, carbamazepine, phenytoin, histamine H2-receptor antagonists, proton pump inhibitors, or valaciclovir on bioavailability Macrolides, echinocandins, ciclosporin, tacrolimus, mycophenolate, rifampicin, carbamazepine, phenytoin, or valaciclovir on CL WT, sigmoidal maturation function based on PMA CL clearance, F bioavailability, IV intravenously, K rate of oral bioavailability, N total, PMA postmenstrual age, PO ‘per os’, V volume of distribution The relative Ka of the marketed suspension and tablets was 0.197 h-1 and 0.588 h-1, respectively. The relative F of the marketed suspension and tablets was not described. A decrease of 33% in the relative F of the marketed suspension was seen in patients with diarrhea and a 42% decrease in patients using proton pump inhibitors. As only the oral marketed formulations were used, Vd/F and apparent CL were determined. Allometrically scaled bodyweight normalized to 70 kg was added as covariate on posaconazole Vd/F and apparent CL [77]. Pediatric pharmacokinetic data of posaconazole are very limited, and future research is particularly needed to explain the PK of posaconazole in infants, and to further resolve its PK in children and adolescents. Research topics should include the F of all the oral formulations and the PK in critically ill patients and patients with CF. Furthermore, the drug–drug interaction between posaconazole and CF transmembrane conductance regulator modulators might be an interesting research topic. In adults, the gastro-resistant tablets are the preferred formulation, but there are no pharmacokinetic data of this formulation available in pediatric patients. This oral tablet formulation urgently needs to be studied in children and adolescents to confirm that this is the most appropriate oral pharmaceutical formulation to be used. For patients who are unable to swallow tablets, the new PFS needs to be further explored. Other new child-friendly formulations allowing the administration of smaller dosages might be needed to further expand posaconazole treatment. Although all studies administered posaconazole as an oral formulation, the absolute and/or relative F were not described and need to be explored in pediatric patients. Exposures after administration of the not yet marketed posaconazole PFS were lower compared with intravenous administration, and suggests that there is no bioequivalence between these two formulations. Given the unknown F of the marketed formulations and the non-bioequivalence between intravenous and PFS formulations, dosing of posaconazole and switching between formulations should be accompanied by therapeutic drug monitoring. The majority of available pediatric NCA only administered the suspension of posaconazole as an oral formulation. These data confirm adult observations that the marketed suspension shows saturable absorption. The new posaconazole PFS that is not yet on the market shows higher exposures in a once-daily regimen compared with the twice-daily regimen of the current marketed posaconazole suspension. After administration of both oral and intravenous formulations, posaconazole exposure seems lower in younger patients and higher dosages might be needed to reach the same exposure as older patients. The population PK study included allometrically scaled bodyweight on CL and Vd. Diarrhea and concomitant use of proton pump inhibitors were negatively associated with the relative F of the marketed posaconazole solution. Because of the high protein binding of posaconazole, it might be interesting to explore the influence of its unbound drug concentrations on posaconazole PK.

Isavuconazole

The relatively new triazole isavuconazole is not licensed for pediatric patients. The European Medicines Agency approved isavuconazole for adult patients in 2014 and the FDA approved isavuconazole in 2016 [7, 78]. Available formulations include an oral formulation as hard capsules and an intravenous formulation as powder for concentrate for solution. In adult patients, isavuconazole is indicated for the treatment of invasive aspergillosis. In addition, it is licensed for mucormycosis for patients who have a contraindication or intolerance for amphotericin B [7, 78]. Isavuconazole has not yet been approved for pediatric patients and the international guideline does not provide recommendations for dosing of isavuconazole in pediatric patients [1]. Dose finding trials have been completed or are ongoing, thus more information is expected soon. Isavuconazole is given as a pro-drug isavuconazonium sulfate. The oral F of isavuconazonium sulfate is 98% in adults [7]. After a rapid and complete absorption, isavuconazonium sulfate is quickly and completely cleaved to isavuconazole [7]. Oral and intravenous formulations can be used interchangeably. Food intake or fluctuations in pH do not influence the absorption of isavuconazole [79]. Based mostly on animal research, isavuconazole widely distributes in different tissues, including the liver, lungs, eyes, kidneys, skin, bone, nasal mucosa, and brain [80]. Isavuconazole is bound to plasma proteins for >99% and is metabolized by CYP3A4/A5 and uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase (Table 1) [7]. To our current knowledge, there is only one pediatric study of isavuconazole available in the public domain outside of conference abstracts and case reports. This retrospective study included 29 patients with a hematological malignancy aged 3–18 years. In six patients, an 8-point sample curve was obtained over 12 h. The demographics and dosing regimens are not reported for these six patients separately. The median AUC0–12h (range) in these six patients was 153.16 mg × h/L (86.31–169.45) [81]. Because of the small sample size and missing demographics and dosing information, it is difficult to draw any conclusions from these data. Data on the PK of isavuconazole are urgently needed in pediatric patients including population pediatric PK data. Specifically for pediatric patients, information on F including information on dosing via a nasogastric tube are needed as well as information on bioequivalence after the intake of whole or opened capsules. As isavuconazole is highly protein bound, more research is needed on unbound drug concentrations in, for instance, the critically ill patient populations.

Conclusions

This review shows that the PK of fluconazole is extensively studied in the neonatal population and the PK of voriconazole is extensively studied in children and adolescents. Isavuconazole, itraconazole, and posaconazole are studied to a limited extent. Fluconazole data in children and adolescents are understated, while for other triazoles pharmacokinetic data in neonates and infants urgently need to be studied. Future studies should explore the PK of the newest triazole agents, understanding the F of the available formulations and learning more about interactions with food or administration over a nasogastric tube, the effect of CYP genotypes and other metabolic routes, the influence of other factors such as unbound drug concentrations for highly protein-bound agents, and the development and PK of new oral formulations that can easily be deployed in pediatric patients. In addition, information on the PK of triazoles in critically ill patient populations, the impact of dialysis, ECMO as well as renal or hepatic impairment is lacking in most cases and should warrant further exploration. Better understanding of the PK is necessary for optimal clinical care and remaining knowledge gaps will need to be clarified.
Fluconazole pharmacokinetics is extensively studied in the neonatal population but requires more extensive research in children and adolescents. Voriconazole pharmacokinetics is extensively studied in children and adolescents and could benefit from more information in the critically ill neonatal and pediatric population despite its limited clinical use in these populations.
Isavuconazole, posaconazole, and itraconazole pharmacokinetics are studied to a limited extend in pediatric populations. To our opinion, specifically isavuconazole and posaconazole pharmacokinetics need to be investigated, as these drugs are frequently used in the hemato-oncology setting.
For all triazole agents, there is very limited knowledge on pharmacokinetics in critically ill patients who are likely to have altered pharmacokinetics. In addition, information on the impact of dialysis, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation as well as renal or hepatic impairment is lacking in most cases and should warrant further exploration.
  60 in total

1.  Safety and pharmacokinetics of fluconazole in children with neoplastic diseases.

Authors:  J W Lee; N L Seibel; M Amantea; P Whitcomb; P A Pizzo; T J Walsh
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 4.406

2.  ESCMID-ECMM guideline: diagnosis and management of invasive aspergillosis in neonates and children.

Authors:  A Warris; T Lehrnbecher; E Roilides; E Castagnola; R J M Brüggemann; A H Groll
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2019-05-31       Impact factor: 8.067

3.  Pharmacokinetics of fluconazole in very low birth weight infants during the first two weeks of life.

Authors:  H Saxén; K Hoppu; M Pohjavuori
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 6.875

4.  Pharmacokinetics of fluconazole in children requiring peritoneal dialysis.

Authors:  S F Wong; M P Leung; M Y Chan
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  1997 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.393

Review 5.  Pharmacokinetics and tissue penetration of fluconazole in humans.

Authors:  K W Brammer; P R Farrow; J K Faulkner
Journal:  Rev Infect Dis       Date:  1990 Mar-Apr

6.  Pharmacokinetics of fluconazole in young infants.

Authors:  M C Nahata; K B Tallian; R W Force
Journal:  Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet       Date:  1999 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.441

7.  Pharmacokinetics of fluconazole after oral administration in children with human immunodeficiency virus infection.

Authors:  M C Nahata; M T Brady
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.953

8.  Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Candidiasis: 2016 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

Authors:  Peter G Pappas; Carol A Kauffman; David R Andes; Cornelius J Clancy; Kieren A Marr; Luis Ostrosky-Zeichner; Annette C Reboli; Mindy G Schuster; Jose A Vazquez; Thomas J Walsh; Theoklis E Zaoutis; Jack D Sobel
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2015-12-16       Impact factor: 9.079

9.  Pharmacokinetics of fluconazole in pediatric patients.

Authors:  K W Brammer; P E Coates
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 3.267

10.  ESCMID* guideline for the diagnosis and management of Candida diseases 2012: prevention and management of invasive infections in neonates and children caused by Candida spp.

Authors:  W W Hope; E Castagnola; A H Groll; E Roilides; M Akova; M C Arendrup; S Arikan-Akdagli; M Bassetti; J Bille; O A Cornely; M Cuenca-Estrella; J P Donnelly; J Garbino; R Herbrecht; H E Jensen; B J Kullberg; C Lass-Flörl; O Lortholary; W Meersseman; G Petrikkos; M D Richardson; P E Verweij; C Viscoli; A J Ullmann
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 8.067

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Azole Fungicides and Their Endocrine Disrupting Properties: Perspectives on Sex Hormone-Dependent Reproductive Development.

Authors:  Monica Kam Draskau; Terje Svingen
Journal:  Front Toxicol       Date:  2022-04-28

2.  Necrotizing fasciitis in neonate by Lichtheimia ramosa : A case study.

Authors:  Ashish William; Ravinder Kaur; Deepti Rawat; Neelam S S Kandir; Akanksha Sharma
Journal:  Access Microbiol       Date:  2022-03-09

Review 3.  The Cytokine Release Syndrome and/or the Proinflammatory Cytokines as Underlying Mechanisms of Downregulation of Drug Metabolism and Drug Transport: A Systematic Review of the Clinical Pharmacokinetics of Victim Drugs of this Drug-Disease Interaction Under Different Clinical Conditions.

Authors:  Milo Gatti; Federico Pea
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2022-09-05       Impact factor: 5.577

4.  Influence of Gender, Body Mass Index, and Age on the Pharmacokinetics of Itraconazole in Healthy Subjects: Non-Compartmental Versus Compartmental Analysis.

Authors:  Milijana N Miljković; Nemanja Rančić; Aleksandra Kovačević; Bojana Cikota-Aleksić; Ivan Skadrić; Vesna Jaćević; Momir Mikov; Viktorija Dragojević-Simić
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 5.988

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.