BACKGROUND: Candida infections are a leading cause of infectious disease-related death in infants supported with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). The ECMO circuit can alter drug pharmacokinetics; thus, standard fluconazole dosing in children on ECMO may result in suboptimal drug exposure. This study determined the pharmacokinetics of fluconazole in infants on ECMO. METHODS: Infants <120 days of age received either intravenous fluconazole prophylaxis (25 mg/kg once a week) or treatment (12 mg/kg daily) while on ECMO. Paired plasma samples were collected preoxygenator and postoxygenator around doses 1 and 2 to calculate pharmacokinetic indices and describe oxygenator extraction. A 1-compartment model was fit to the data using nonlinear regression. Surrogate pharmacodynamic targets for efficacy were evaluated. RESULTS: Ten infants were enrolled. After dose 1 (n = 9), the median clearance was 17 mL/kg/h, the median volume of distribution was 1.5 L/kg and the median exposure in the first 24 hours (area under the curve from 0 to 24 hours) was 322 h × mg/L. After multiple doses (n = 7), the median clearance was 22 mL/kg/h, the median volume of distribution was 1.9 L/kg and the area under the curve from 0 to 24 hours was 352 h × mg/L. After dose 1, 78% of infants achieved the prophylaxis target, whereas only 11% achieved the therapeutic target. Oxygenator extraction of fluconazole was minimal (-2.0%, standard deviation 15.0), and extraction was not correlated with age of the ECMO circuit (ρ= -0.05). There were no adverse events related to fluconazole. CONCLUSIONS: Infants on ECMO had higher volume of distribution but similar clearance when compared with historical controls not on ECMO. In infants on ECMO, a fluconazole dose of 25 mg/kg weekly provides adequate exposure for prophylaxis against Candida infections. However, higher doses may be needed for treatment.
BACKGROUND:Candida infections are a leading cause of infectious disease-related death in infants supported with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). The ECMO circuit can alter drug pharmacokinetics; thus, standard fluconazole dosing in children on ECMO may result in suboptimal drug exposure. This study determined the pharmacokinetics of fluconazole in infants on ECMO. METHODS:Infants <120 days of age received either intravenous fluconazole prophylaxis (25 mg/kg once a week) or treatment (12 mg/kg daily) while on ECMO. Paired plasma samples were collected preoxygenator and postoxygenator around doses 1 and 2 to calculate pharmacokinetic indices and describe oxygenator extraction. A 1-compartment model was fit to the data using nonlinear regression. Surrogate pharmacodynamic targets for efficacy were evaluated. RESULTS: Ten infants were enrolled. After dose 1 (n = 9), the median clearance was 17 mL/kg/h, the median volume of distribution was 1.5 L/kg and the median exposure in the first 24 hours (area under the curve from 0 to 24 hours) was 322 h × mg/L. After multiple doses (n = 7), the median clearance was 22 mL/kg/h, the median volume of distribution was 1.9 L/kg and the area under the curve from 0 to 24 hours was 352 h × mg/L. After dose 1, 78% of infants achieved the prophylaxis target, whereas only 11% achieved the therapeutic target. Oxygenator extraction of fluconazole was minimal (-2.0%, standard deviation 15.0), and extraction was not correlated with age of the ECMO circuit (ρ= -0.05). There were no adverse events related to fluconazole. CONCLUSIONS:Infants on ECMO had higher volume of distribution but similar clearance when compared with historical controls not on ECMO. In infants on ECMO, a fluconazole dose of 25 mg/kg weekly provides adequate exposure for prophylaxis against Candida infections. However, higher doses may be needed for treatment.
Authors: Nilesh M Mehta; David R Halwick; Brenda L Dodson; John E Thompson; John H Arnold Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2007-04-03 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: David Kaufman; Robert Boyle; Kevin C Hazen; James T Patrie; Melinda Robinson; Leigh B Grossman Journal: J Pediatr Date: 2005-08 Impact factor: 4.406
Authors: E J Anaissie; D P Kontoyiannis; C Huls; S E Vartivarian; C Karl; R A Prince; J Bosso; G P Bodey Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 1995-08 Impact factor: 5.226
Authors: Jo-Anne H van Burik; Voravit Ratanatharathorn; Daniel E Stepan; Carole B Miller; Jeffrey H Lipton; David H Vesole; Nancy Bunin; Donna A Wall; John W Hiemenz; Yoichi Satoi; Jeanette M Lee; Thomas J Walsh Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2004-10-27 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Allan Doctor; Jerry Zimmerman; Michael Agus; Surender Rajasekaran; Juliane Bubeck Wardenburg; James Fortenberry; Anne Zajicek; Emma Mairson; Katri Typpo Journal: Pediatr Crit Care Med Date: 2017-03 Impact factor: 3.624
Authors: Samuel Dubinsky; Kevin Watt; Steven Saleeb; Bilal Ahmed; Caitlin Carter; Cindy H T Yeung; Andrea Edginton Journal: Clin Pharmacokinet Date: 2021-11-30 Impact factor: 6.447
Authors: Julie Autmizguine; Christoph P Hornik; Daniel K Benjamin; Kim L R Brouwer; Susan R Hupp; Michael Cohen-Wolkowiez; Kevin M Watt Journal: Pediatr Infect Dis J Date: 2016-11 Impact factor: 2.129
Authors: Joshua C Euteneuer; Suyog Kamatkar; Tsuyoshi Fukuda; Alexander A Vinks; Henry T Akinbi Journal: J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2018-09-11 Impact factor: 3.126
Authors: Melissa D Johnson; Russell E Lewis; Elizabeth S Dodds Ashley; Luis Ostrosky-Zeichner; Theoklis Zaoutis; George R Thompson; David R Andes; Thomas J Walsh; Peter G Pappas; Oliver A Cornely; John R Perfect; Dimitrios P Kontoyiannis Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2020-08-05 Impact factor: 5.226
Authors: Kevin M Watt; Daniel Gonzalez; Daniel K Benjamin; Kim L R Brouwer; Kelly C Wade; Edmund Capparelli; Jeffrey Barrett; Michael Cohen-Wolkowiez Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2015-04-20 Impact factor: 5.938