Literature DB >> 34001959

Genetic structure of urban and non-urban populations differs between two common parid species.

Marcin Markowski1, Piotr Minias2, Mirosława Bańbura3, Michał Glądalski4, Adam Kaliński4, Joanna Skwarska4, Jarosław Wawrzyniak4, Piotr Zieliński5, Jerzy Bańbura4.   

Abstract

Landscape conversions induced by human activities can affect dispersal patterns of various bird species and, as a result, affect genetic structure of their populations. Genetic differentiation of bird populations may be enhanced by habitat variation, especially in urban-non-urban systems. The majority of population genetic studies focus on single species, which inflicts limitations for direct comparisons of genetic responses of avian populations to urbanization. Here, we used a set of microsatellite markers to examine genetic diversity, gene flow and population structure in two common parid species, great tits Parus major and blue tits Cyanistes caeruleus occupying three sites in habitats with contrasting urbanization level in central Poland. We found low but significant divergence of urban park population with both suburban and non-urban forest great tit populations, while no differentiation was found between suburban forest and non-urban forest populations. In contrast, no evidence for genetic differentiation was found between blue tit populations from the urban park, suburban forest and non-urban forest sites. We conclude that great tits and blue tits respond to urbanization-related changes in a different way, which may be a result of different rates of migration and/or dispersal, likely higher in blue tits. Some impact may be also induced by interspecific competition. We suggest that changing the focus of urban genetic research from single to multiple species may provide novel insights into how natural populations respond to the processes of urbanization.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34001959     DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-89847-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  26 in total

Review 1.  The estimation of population differentiation with microsatellite markers.

Authors:  François Balloux; Nicolas Lugon-Moulin
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 6.185

2.  Spatial heterogeneity in genetic relatedness among house sparrows along an urban-rural gradient as revealed by individual-based analysis.

Authors:  Carl Vangestel; Joachim Mergeay; Deborah A Dawson; Viki Vandomme; Luc Lens
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 6.185

3.  From patterns to emerging processes in mechanistic urban ecology.

Authors:  Eyal Shochat; Paige S Warren; Stanley H Faeth; Nancy E McIntyre; Diane Hope
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2005-12-19       Impact factor: 17.712

4.  Urbanization without isolation: the absence of genetic structure among cities and forests in the tiny acorn ant Temnothorax nylanderi.

Authors:  A Khimoun; C Doums; M Molet; B Kaufmann; R Peronnet; P A Eyer; S Mona
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2020-01-29       Impact factor: 3.703

5.  Gene flow and genetic drift in urban environments.

Authors:  Lindsay S Miles; L Ruth Rivkin; Marc T J Johnson; Jason Munshi-South; Brian C Verrelli
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2019-09-24       Impact factor: 6.185

6.  A rapid, strong, and convergent genetic response to urban habitat fragmentation in four divergent and widespread vertebrates.

Authors:  Kathleen Semple Delaney; Seth P D Riley; Robert N Fisher
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-09-16       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Independent colonization of multiple urban centres by a formerly forest specialist bird species.

Authors:  Karl L Evans; Kevin J Gaston; Alain C Frantz; Michelle Simeoni; Stuart P Sharp; Andrew McGowan; Deborah A Dawson; Kazimierz Walasz; Jesko Partecke; Terry Burke; Ben J Hatchwell
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-04-01       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Population genomics of the Anthropocene: urbanization is negatively associated with genome-wide variation in white-footed mouse populations.

Authors:  Jason Munshi-South; Christine P Zolnik; Stephen E Harris
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 5.183

9.  Great tits and the city: Distribution of genomic diversity and gene-environment associations along an urbanization gradient.

Authors:  Charles Perrier; Ana Lozano Del Campo; Marta Szulkin; Virginie Demeyrier; Arnaud Gregoire; Anne Charmantier
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 5.183

10.  Effects of low-density urbanization on genetic structure in the Song Sparrow.

Authors:  Valerie N Brewer; Samuel J Lane; Kendra B Sewall; Karen E Mabry
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  1 in total

1.  Genetic structure in neotropical birds with different tolerance to urbanization.

Authors:  Mauricio Rodríguez-Bardía; Eric J Fuchs; Gilbert Barrantes; Ruth Madrigal-Brenes; Luis Sandoval
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-04-11       Impact factor: 4.379

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.