Literature DB >> 34001885

Device-independent quantum key distribution with random key basis.

René Schwonnek1, Koon Tong Goh1, Ignatius W Primaatmaja2, Ernest Y-Z Tan3, Ramona Wolf4, Valerio Scarani2,5, Charles C-W Lim6,7.   

Abstract

Device-independent quantum key distribution (DIQKD) is the art of using untrusted devices to distribute secret keys in an insecure network. It thus represents the ultimate form of cryptography, offering not only information-theoretic security against channel attacks, but also against attacks exploiting implementation loopholes. In recent years, much progress has been made towards realising the first DIQKD experiments, but current proposals are just out of reach of today's loophole-free Bell experiments. Here, we significantly narrow the gap between the theory and practice of DIQKD with a simple variant of the original protocol based on the celebrated Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt (CHSH) Bell inequality. By using two randomly chosen key generating bases instead of one, we show that our protocol significantly improves over the original DIQKD protocol, enabling positive keys in the high noise regime for the first time. We also compute the finite-key security of the protocol for general attacks, showing that approximately 108-1010 measurement rounds are needed to achieve positive rates using state-of-the-art experimental parameters. Our proposed DIQKD protocol thus represents a highly promising path towards the first realisation of DIQKD in practice.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34001885     DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-23147-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Commun        ISSN: 2041-1723            Impact factor:   14.919


  24 in total

1.  Proposal for implementing device-independent quantum key distribution based on a heralded qubit amplifier.

Authors:  Nicolas Gisin; Stefano Pironio; Nicolas Sangouard
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2010-08-12       Impact factor: 9.161

2.  Loophole-free Bell inequality violation using electron spins separated by 1.3 kilometres.

Authors:  B Hensen; H Bernien; A E Dréau; A Reiserer; N Kalb; M S Blok; J Ruitenberg; R F L Vermeulen; R N Schouten; C Abellán; W Amaya; V Pruneri; M W Mitchell; M Markham; D J Twitchen; D Elkouss; S Wehner; T H Taminiau; R Hanson
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Strong Loophole-Free Test of Local Realism.

Authors:  Lynden K Shalm; Evan Meyer-Scott; Bradley G Christensen; Peter Bierhorst; Michael A Wayne; Martin J Stevens; Thomas Gerrits; Scott Glancy; Deny R Hamel; Michael S Allman; Kevin J Coakley; Shellee D Dyer; Carson Hodge; Adriana E Lita; Varun B Verma; Camilla Lambrocco; Edward Tortorici; Alan L Migdall; Yanbao Zhang; Daniel R Kumor; William H Farr; Francesco Marsili; Matthew D Shaw; Jeffrey A Stern; Carlos Abellán; Waldimar Amaya; Valerio Pruneri; Thomas Jennewein; Morgan W Mitchell; Paul G Kwiat; Joshua C Bienfang; Richard P Mirin; Emanuel Knill; Sae Woo Nam
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2015-12-16       Impact factor: 9.161

4.  Significant-Loophole-Free Test of Bell's Theorem with Entangled Photons.

Authors:  Marissa Giustina; Marijn A M Versteegh; Sören Wengerowsky; Johannes Handsteiner; Armin Hochrainer; Kevin Phelan; Fabian Steinlechner; Johannes Kofler; Jan-Åke Larsson; Carlos Abellán; Waldimar Amaya; Valerio Pruneri; Morgan W Mitchell; Jörn Beyer; Thomas Gerrits; Adriana E Lita; Lynden K Shalm; Sae Woo Nam; Thomas Scheidl; Rupert Ursin; Bernhard Wittmann; Anton Zeilinger
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2015-12-16       Impact factor: 9.161

5.  No signaling and quantum key distribution.

Authors:  Jonathan Barrett; Lucien Hardy; Adrian Kent
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2005-06-27       Impact factor: 9.161

6.  Device-independent security of quantum cryptography against collective attacks.

Authors:  Antonio Acín; Nicolas Brunner; Nicolas Gisin; Serge Massar; Stefano Pironio; Valerio Scarani
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2007-06-04       Impact factor: 9.161

7.  Event-Ready Bell Test Using Entangled Atoms Simultaneously Closing Detection and Locality Loopholes.

Authors:  Wenjamin Rosenfeld; Daniel Burchardt; Robert Garthoff; Kai Redeker; Norbert Ortegel; Markus Rau; Harald Weinfurter
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2017-07-06       Impact factor: 9.161

8.  Memory attacks on device-independent quantum cryptography.

Authors:  Jonathan Barrett; Roger Colbeck; Adrian Kent
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2013-01-02       Impact factor: 9.161

9.  Classical command of quantum systems.

Authors:  Ben W Reichardt; Falk Unger; Umesh Vazirani
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-04-25       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Certifying the Presence of a Photonic Qubit by Splitting It in Two.

Authors:  Evan Meyer-Scott; Daniel McCloskey; Klaudia Gołos; Jeff Z Salvail; Kent A G Fisher; Deny R Hamel; Adán Cabello; Kevin J Resch; Thomas Jennewein
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 9.161

View more
  4 in total

1.  Experimental quantum key distribution certified by Bell's theorem.

Authors:  D P Nadlinger; P Drmota; B C Nichol; G Araneda; D Main; R Srinivas; D M Lucas; C J Ballance; K Ivanov; E Y-Z Tan; P Sekatski; R L Urbanke; R Renner; N Sangouard; J-D Bancal
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2022-07-27       Impact factor: 69.504

2.  Continuous variable measurement device independent quantum conferencing with postselection.

Authors:  Alasdair I Fletcher; Stefano Pirandola
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-10-15       Impact factor: 4.996

3.  Authentication of variable length messages in quantum key distribution.

Authors:  Khodakhast Bibak; Bruce M Kapron; Venkatesh Srinivasan
Journal:  EPJ Quantum Technol       Date:  2022-02-16       Impact factor: 4.455

4.  Device-Independent Certification of Maximal Randomness from Pure Entangled Two-Qutrit States Using Non-Projective Measurements.

Authors:  Jakub J Borkała; Chellasamy Jebarathinam; Shubhayan Sarkar; Remigiusz Augusiak
Journal:  Entropy (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 2.524

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.