Literature DB >> 26503041

Loophole-free Bell inequality violation using electron spins separated by 1.3 kilometres.

B Hensen1,2, H Bernien1,2, A E Dréau1,2, A Reiserer1,2, N Kalb1,2, M S Blok1,2, J Ruitenberg1,2, R F L Vermeulen1,2, R N Schouten1,2, C Abellán3, W Amaya3, V Pruneri3,4, M W Mitchell3,4, M Markham5, D J Twitchen5, D Elkouss1, S Wehner1, T H Taminiau1,2, R Hanson1,2.   

Abstract

More than 50 years ago, John Bell proved that no theory of nature that obeys locality and realism can reproduce all the predictions of quantum theory: in any local-realist theory, the correlations between outcomes of measurements on distant particles satisfy an inequality that can be violated if the particles are entangled. Numerous Bell inequality tests have been reported; however, all experiments reported so far required additional assumptions to obtain a contradiction with local realism, resulting in 'loopholes'. Here we report a Bell experiment that is free of any such additional assumption and thus directly tests the principles underlying Bell's inequality. We use an event-ready scheme that enables the generation of robust entanglement between distant electron spins (estimated state fidelity of 0.92 ± 0.03). Efficient spin read-out avoids the fair-sampling assumption (detection loophole), while the use of fast random-basis selection and spin read-out combined with a spatial separation of 1.3 kilometres ensure the required locality conditions. We performed 245 trials that tested the CHSH-Bell inequality S ≤ 2 and found S = 2.42 ± 0.20 (where S quantifies the correlation between measurement outcomes). A null-hypothesis test yields a probability of at most P = 0.039 that a local-realist model for space-like separated sites could produce data with a violation at least as large as we observe, even when allowing for memory in the devices. Our data hence imply statistically significant rejection of the local-realist null hypothesis. This conclusion may be further consolidated in future experiments; for instance, reaching a value of P = 0.001 would require approximately 700 trials for an observed S = 2.4. With improvements, our experiment could be used for testing less-conventional theories, and for implementing device-independent quantum-secure communication and randomness certification.

Entities:  

Year:  2015        PMID: 26503041     DOI: 10.1038/nature15759

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  19 in total

1.  Robust long-distance entanglement and a loophole-free bell test with ions and photons.

Authors:  Christoph Simon; William T M Irvine
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2003-09-12       Impact factor: 9.161

2.  An elementary quantum network of single atoms in optical cavities.

Authors:  Stephan Ritter; Christian Nölleke; Carolin Hahn; Andreas Reiserer; Andreas Neuzner; Manuel Uphoff; Martin Mücke; Eden Figueroa; Joerg Bochmann; Gerhard Rempe
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-04-11       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Violation of local realism with freedom of choice.

Authors:  Thomas Scheidl; Rupert Ursin; Johannes Kofler; Sven Ramelow; Xiao-Song Ma; Thomas Herbst; Lothar Ratschbacher; Alessandro Fedrizzi; Nathan K Langford; Thomas Jennewein; Anton Zeilinger
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-11-01       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Detection-loophole-free test of quantum nonlocality, and applications.

Authors:  B G Christensen; K T McCusker; J B Altepeter; B Calkins; T Gerrits; A E Lita; A Miller; L K Shalm; Y Zhang; S W Nam; N Brunner; C C W Lim; N Gisin; P G Kwiat
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2013-09-26       Impact factor: 9.161

5.  Bell inequality violation with two remote atomic qubits.

Authors:  D N Matsukevich; P Maunz; D L Moehring; S Olmschenk; C Monroe
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2008-04-18       Impact factor: 9.161

6.  Detector inefficiencies in the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen experiment.

Authors: 
Journal:  Phys Rev D Part Fields       Date:  1987-06-15

7.  Background level and counter efficiencies required for a loophole-free Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen experiment.

Authors: 
Journal:  Phys Rev A       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 3.140

8.  Bell violation using entangled photons without the fair-sampling assumption.

Authors:  Marissa Giustina; Alexandra Mech; Sven Ramelow; Bernhard Wittmann; Johannes Kofler; Jörn Beyer; Adriana Lita; Brice Calkins; Thomas Gerrits; Sae Woo Nam; Rupert Ursin; Anton Zeilinger
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-04-14       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Heralded entanglement between solid-state qubits separated by three metres.

Authors:  H Bernien; B Hensen; W Pfaff; G Koolstra; M S Blok; L Robledo; T H Taminiau; M Markham; D J Twitchen; L Childress; R Hanson
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-04-24       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Random numbers certified by Bell's theorem.

Authors:  S Pironio; A Acín; S Massar; A Boyer de la Giroday; D N Matsukevich; P Maunz; S Olmschenk; D Hayes; L Luo; T A Manning; C Monroe
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-04-15       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  113 in total

1.  Quantum physics: Death by experiment for local realism.

Authors:  Howard Wiseman
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Strong Loophole-Free Test of Local Realism.

Authors:  Lynden K Shalm; Evan Meyer-Scott; Bradley G Christensen; Peter Bierhorst; Michael A Wayne; Martin J Stevens; Thomas Gerrits; Scott Glancy; Deny R Hamel; Michael S Allman; Kevin J Coakley; Shellee D Dyer; Carson Hodge; Adriana E Lita; Varun B Verma; Camilla Lambrocco; Edward Tortorici; Alan L Migdall; Yanbao Zhang; Daniel R Kumor; William H Farr; Francesco Marsili; Matthew D Shaw; Jeffrey A Stern; Carlos Abellán; Waldimar Amaya; Valerio Pruneri; Thomas Jennewein; Morgan W Mitchell; Paul G Kwiat; Joshua C Bienfang; Richard P Mirin; Emanuel Knill; Sae Woo Nam
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2015-12-16       Impact factor: 9.161

3.  Quantum physics: Entanglement beyond identical ions.

Authors:  Tobias Schaetz
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-12-17       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Hybrid quantum logic and a test of Bell's inequality using two different atomic isotopes.

Authors:  C J Ballance; V M Schäfer; J P Home; D J Szwer; S C Webster; D T C Allcock; N M Linke; T P Harty; D P L Aude Craik; D N Stacey; A M Steane; D M Lucas
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-12-17       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Deterministic multi-qubit entanglement in a quantum network.

Authors:  Youpeng Zhong; Hung-Shen Chang; Audrey Bienfait; Étienne Dumur; Ming-Han Chou; Christopher R Conner; Joel Grebel; Rhys G Povey; Haoxiong Yan; David I Schuster; Andrew N Cleland
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2021-02-24       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Quantum network is step towards ultrasecure internet.

Authors:  Davide Castelvecchi
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Certified randomness in quantum physics.

Authors:  Antonio Acín; Lluis Masanes
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Foundations of quantum mechanics and their impact on contemporary society.

Authors:  Gerardo Adesso; Rosario Lo Franco; Valentina Parigi
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2018-07-13       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 9.  From quantum foundations to applications and back.

Authors:  Nicolas Gisin; Florian Fröwis
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2018-07-13       Impact factor: 4.226

10.  The relativistic causality versus no-signaling paradigm for multi-party correlations.

Authors:  Paweł Horodecki; Ravishankar Ramanathan
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-04-12       Impact factor: 14.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.